Often, photographers are driven by the obsessive need to capture the moment, to be productive at all costs. Recently, however, I rewatched a movie that contained a different reflection, one that I would like to share with you today. It is the beauty of choosing not to shoot, to fully immerse oneself in the moment, and rediscover the pure pleasure of observation, which ultimately leads photographers to better photos.

A Reflection Inspired by a Movie Scene
Photographer: “There’s a snow leopard right in this ridge. So, we have to try to be very, very, very, very still. They call the snow leopard the ghost cat. It never lets itself be seen.”
Walter: “Ghost cat?”
Photographer: “Beautiful things don’t ask for attention.”
…
Walter: “When are you gonna take it?”
Photographer: “Sometimes I don’t. If I like a moment… I mean, me, personally… I don’t like to have the distraction of the camera. I just want to stay in it.”
Walter: “Stay in it?”
Photographer: “Yeah, right there. Right here.”
This dialogue is taken from the film “The Secret Life of Walter Mitty,” released in 2013. It is a nice film, even though it is not particularly notable for its photography-related content. It certainly includes some odd details, such as the use of a Nikon F3 with a motor drive mounted on, seemingly, a Nikon AF-S 400mm f/2.8 G, which doesn’t match the camera (and, by the way, certainly couldn’t provide the level of magnification shown in the movie).
But in that scene, in that dialogue, it encapsulates a truly special wisdom I would like to share and comment on with you. Sean O’Connell – the photographer played by a charming Sean Penn – strongly resembles Vincent Munier to me. He is waiting with Walter Mitty on a Himalayan slope. He stands in front of his “holy grail”: the elusive snow leopard. He has the camera ready, the situation is perfect, and the subject is there.
Yet, when asked, “When are you gonna take it?” his response is a philosophical manifesto: “Sometimes I don’t.” In these words, there is no laziness or hesitation, but a conscious and profound choice. A choice that invites us to reflect on our relationship with images, and with the world we aim to portray through our photographs.

The “Ghost Cat” and the Value of Presence
The snow leopard, the “ghost cat,” is the perfect metaphor not only for an elusive subject but for the moment itself: an unrepeatable conjunction of situation, light, emotion, and presence that makes a scene worth living.
In this movie, the photographer Sean tells us that the ultimate goal of his long and arduous journey is not necessarily the photograph, but the encounter. The printed image (and yes, I print my pictures and think of photography as a paper thing) would only be the proof, a testament for others. But the experience belongs solely to the one who lives it.
“Beautiful things don’t ask for attention,” he says. It’s a powerful phrase. Authentic beauty does not pose, does not cry out to be captured. It doesn’t need to; it simply exists.
Instead, our instinct as photographers – almost Pavlovian in the digital age – is to use a device and “capture it,” almost as if to possess it. Yet, paradoxically, in trying to save the moment, we often lose it. We’re busy adjusting exposure, checking focus, thinking about composition, and in doing so, we stop being there, and our attention shifts from the real scene to the one filtered through the viewfinder.

Instead, Sean’s decision to “stay in it” reflects a choice to focus on emotional connection and direct sensory experiences without technological mediation. It involves prioritizing living in the moment over capturing it digitally.
Digital-Social Compulsion and the Loss of Connection
It is all around us: We live in an era of visual gluttony. Everyone films and photographs everything, all the time. The food we eat, the places we visit, the friends we meet. Digital galleries overflow with thousands of images that will rarely be viewed again. Even on the most “photographic” social platforms like Instagram, the most incredible images receive at best only a couple of seconds of attention and maybe thousands of likes, each one based on those 2 seconds. This compulsion to document and share every single moment often stems from a subtle anxiety: the fear of forgetting, the fear that an undocumented experience is an unexperienced one, the fear that without posting it on our favorite social platform, the experience won’t tell our story.
But the opposite is true.
The photographer who loves what they portray should find a primary pleasure in the simple act of looking and enjoying, taking the time to do so. Love for the mountain is not love for photographs of the mountain but for its cold air, its silence, its imposing presence, its stern and wild nature. In this perspective, the camera can become a barrier, a constant filter between us and what we love the most; the “distraction of the camera,” as Sean calls it, is real and transforms us from participants into spectators, from lovers into technicians.
As a very passionate photographer, I’m not saying that Sean is exactly right. After all, he is just a character in a film. And in many ways, all the effort we put into our photography is exactly devoted to capturing those rarefied instants and sensations by using our tools, perhaps in hopes that others will feel something like we did in the field. But I’m pretty sure that maintaining a good connection with our subject is paramount, leading us to better photos, too.

Observing to Understand – Waiting as a Creative Act
I remember photographing a polar bear in the Arctic for the very first time. It was around 3 AM, with the midnight sun. A significant experience I dreamed of for years.
I took thousands of frames, burst after burst, before realizing I was not fully engaging with the moment. The subject was gorgeous, but my pictures weren’t exceptional because I was so focused on the viewfinder that I was unable to pause to observe and understand the scene outside the frame setup. I failed to experience the subtleties of light, the pale blue shades in the ice in the background, and the wind patterns on the ocean water, studded by small pieces of floating ice. I was missing an understanding of the rhythm of the polar bear and its interaction with the environment.
Ultimately, I was missing how and why a polar bear is unique.

It is not solely about those exceptional subjects. Allocating time to establish connections has just as much benefit with the more commonly encountered subjects. It allows you to slow down, experiment, and be unconcerned about the photo – which, perhaps paradoxically, means that better photos will follow.
Generalizing the concept, the optimal image often is not from the photographer’s initial reaction to a scene or their rapid frame bursts. Rather, it is the outcome of a process involving waiting, connecting, understanding the moment, observing the scene, and appreciating it with our naked eyes before and during the shot. These are all steps to creating meaningful pictures.
This approach may seem to be less suited to action photography, but I don’t think it is. Considering which lens to use, how to frame, and identifying the precise moment while observing is a useful exercise in pre-visualization. Even if the peak of the action is brief, it is our observation of the world which enables us to recognize what is about to happen, prepare for it, and photograph it when it arrives.

Conclusion
Sean O’Connell’s lesson from the Himalayan ridge in Walter Mitty is an invitation to rediscover the heart of photography. The act of not using the camera and instead choosing to “stay in it,” in the scene, allows us to return to photographing with a purer gaze, a clearer intention, and a stronger bond with the subject. It reminds us that being a photographer does not just mean knowing how to use a camera and understanding how to construct a photograph. It is knowing how to see – and, even before that, knowing why you love what you see, because a love for your subject is the secret ingredient of any beautiful photo.
Eventually, through observing the world, we’ll achieve better, meaningful images even with fewer photos taken overall.

I hope that this essay has encouraged you to seek a deeper connection with the subjects of your photos, appreciating the experience of engaging with them. Should you have any inquiries or feedback, or wish to share your thoughts on this topic, please feel free to leave a comment in the section below.
The ultimate example of this is a total solar eclipse. While it’s nice to get a snap of totality, 100% of the experience is immersing yourself in the surreal spectacle. Especially since a total solar eclipse cannot be truly captured in an image. Photographed, yes. Truly captured?…not possible. So yeah, soaking in our experiences is the most important thing to do, even as passionate photographers.
Very poignant article, not just for photography but for life.
I love this site just for this kind of article.
Sometimes, I just take binoculars. It makes my bicycle lighter too :D. Great article with thoughtful content Massimo.
I love that scene you describe and the silly movie. Really makes you think about what’s important. Is it a “ghost cat” or a porpose (porpoise)…🤪
AMEN!
I met another photographer at Mesa Verde a number of years ago. I think the photographer had a Nikon Z9 with all kinds of add-ons (an L bracket and some other stuff I could not identify).
We acknowledged each other and then ZZZIIIIPP! I couldn’t count the number of frames just captured. And then back in the car.
My wife and I walked around that location for a while and talked with another family as we enjoyed the amazing landscape. We even talked about what life must have been like back when the ruins were occupied.
We got back in our car and enjoyed a few other Mesa Verde sites where we noticed the other photographer with the “super camera” jump out of the car, ZZIIIIP! and then back in the car.
So much life missed at such an amazing location. I wonder if he ever reviewed all those photos?
Many years ago I was camping in Yellowstone (mid ‘90’s) for three weeks. I was using up the remaining day light sitting at a viewpoint for the lower falls and just enjoying the sounds around me and taking in the view. One vehicle after another pulled up and someone would jump out with an 8mm video camera already up to their eye, pan around, stare at the falls for a moment, narrate a little and then get back in the car and rush to the next spot. What was surprising is how many people did exactly the same thing one after another. I understand wanting to take in as much as you can and being limited on time, but that is doing it wrong.
Same thing now with all the mobile phones- for some it is a reflex to use it all the time in concerts or werever they are. Then send it to all their ‘friends’ ; it is called ‘social- Media.’
Outstanding article Massimo. That scene in Walter Mitty had an impact on me too. On first viewing, my reaction was of disbelief. No way was a photographer going to pass up the shot of a snow leopard!
However the memory of that scene stayed with me. I am one of many who have been guilty of wanting “the shot” each time I went out, and subsequently feeling disappointed I didn’t end up with the “wow” shot to display on social media.
I have since learned to really enjoy my experience in the outdoors, and if I have nothing noteworthy to post, then so be it; I have enjoyed the embrace of nature, the sea, with all my senses.
The key, which you have encapsulated, is slowing down, embracing the environment, being observant, and patience. And then, I may get some good shots. But it doesn’t truly matter, because I enjoyed the experience
Seeing is the fundamental thing. Photography, worthy though it is, is a branch of seeing. One must learn to see before photography makes any sense as an art.
A nicely framed (and expressed) argument. I find it persuasive.