You know the drill. You pick up a magazine or browse a website and flip through the photos. Most you look at for less than a second, but a select few grab your attention and demand a longer look. What’s different about these select photos? What makes some photos great and others mediocre?
I’ve bounced this question off of several distinguished photographers and the answers are always quite similar. They may disagree on some of the ordering, but the list of qualities goes something like this:
- Emotion
- Light
- Composition
- Creativity
- Timing
- Context
- Layers
We’ll break these down in a bit, but first let’s list some things that aren’t important to a photo’s success. These are in no particular order and constitute what I call The Box of Technical BS. Behold the contents of The Box: megapixels, noise, corner performance, RAW headroom, coma, xenon afterglow, diffraction, OLPFs, missing midtones, 14 bit files, MTF charts, dynamic range, monitor calibration, reciprocity failure, 1:1 sharpness, ETTR, chromatic aberration, ART lenses and let’s not forget the aptly named Circle of Confusion. I could go on and on adding to the contents list of the Box of Technical BS, but the one thing all these technical attributes share is that no matter how much you possess of any of these, they won’t increase the emotional impact of a photo one iota. The only technical aspects one really needs a handle on is the exposure triangle and focus and most cameras will do these tasks for you. Which brings us back to the important stuff.
Table of Contents
1) Emotion
Hands down the most important aspect of any photograph is it’s ability to invoke an emotional response. This response is what gets you to look longer at some photos than others, maybe even decide to buy a print and hang that photo on your wall. The response can be anything from happiness to the blues, warmth to chill, serenity to horror. It could inspire curiosity or a call to action. It could simply be a cat video saying “cute” or a food photo that makes your mouth water. If you can pin an adjective/s to a photo other than “boring”, then the photo is succeeding on some level. The stronger the emotions invoked, the more successful the photo and the longer you’ll remember it.
Add clouds to any landscape and pump up the emotional value.
The intensity in this adolescent condor’s eye demands attention.
I’ve got to say this shot is pretty average technically, but because it shows a mom and her chicks, it evokes a response and this shot will sell.
Yes, babies are adorable…
Well maybe not the cutest kid, but did you have a response when you saw this? If so, it worked.
2) Light
The word photography, literally means painting with light. The quality of the light directly impacts the quality of the photograph. There’s soft light, harsh light, warm light, cool light, Rembrandt light, beauty light and so forth. Your camera’s light meter can measure intensity of light, but only you can judge quality of light. There are no equations to evaluate light quality – it’s purely an aesthetic judgement. How does one learn to make this judgement? By studying good photography and painting, watching how movies are lit to invoke emotion, hanging out with photographers and other artists who have an eye for it… Good photographers key into good light. When they see good light, they find a subject to shoot. When they see a good subject, they wait for the good light (or create it themselves with studio lighting, modifiers, etc).
Warm rich light from a low angle – quick find a subject. This Reddish Egret will do nicely.
Got a classic subject you want to shoot, like Sedona’s Cathedral Spires?
Exposure is right on and it’s razor sharp. But because the light sucks it’s boring, boring, boring. But come back for sunset and you get yummy results like this.
Often the good light is very fleeting. Below is the Organ Mountains in New Mexico – a rugged strong landscape. I had my subject, now wait for the light — wait, wait, wait….
Boom. The light only lasted a few seconds.
Here I had very diffuse light from overcast skies – pretty blah unless I find the right subject. In this case this Great Egret made for a splendid high key rendition.
Backlighting can give striking silhouettes…
or fun fringe lighting.
And of course there’s the tried and true north-facing window light – perfect for nude studies like the one below — oops, my bad, this is a family site. Trust me, the shots are awesome. As a consolation here’s a window-lit still life.
3) Composition
Composition is the arrangement of subjects within a photo. A good composition gets the viewer’s eye to travel throughout a photo. A weak composition leads the eye to one spot where it subsequently gets stuck. There are scads of articles and books written about composition and the various “rules” and concepts are beyond the scope of this article. The point I want to make is that a photo with strong composition combined with good light has more emotional impact than one of the same subject with lousy composition and/or poor light.
Here we have a nice shot of an eagle – it’s properly exposed and focused, very sharp at 1:1, and terrifically boring. (So boring I didn’t bother to clone out that sensor dust.) It’s just another bird on a stick shot – nothing original or compelling about it.
Here’s the same eagle on the same tree but with a composition that complements the shot. The eyes are invited to wander back and forth on the sweeping branch and as the eagle tears off a chunk of fish, his stooped shoulders add a complementary curve to the composition.
Which would you rather look at? Oh by the way, the first shot was taken with an $18,000 lens, the second with a $1000 lens – toss those in The Box.
4) Creativity
Creativity is all about seeing a subject in a way others don’t. It’s about being original. Photographers whose work stands out does so because it’s original. With the most creative ones you can tell who shot the photo without reading the byline, because their style is so unique. Avedon and Salgado come to mind.
Other than the model’s stunning good looks (the baby gator that is), there’s not a whole lot going for this shot.
Here we’re getting a bit more creative, framing through the jaws of a dinosaur. A smidge of creativity makes this a lot more fun to look at than the first shot. How about a bucket of creativity?
Selfie, meet Bizarre Atmospheric Phenomena. Bizarre Atmospheric Phenomena, meet Selfie. The subject of this is a tad ambiguous until you realized that is a human figure, in this case the photographer, casting his shadow into a fogbow in the rainforest (technically this is called a Glory [the circle rainbow] and Brocken Spectre [my shadow]).
Some scenes you just don’t want to put yourself into.
Here’s a nice captive adult gator all plumped up on the turkey dogs the tourists at Gatorland toss him (and maybe an egret or two). Now for a more creative look at an egret with one of Gatorland’s finest.
5) Timing
Capturing the peak of action or human emotion or even just waiting for some clouds to move into position can make or break a photo. After all a photograph is a minuscule slice of time captured and preserved for the ages. Not all slices of time are as visually compelling as others.
A second before these ducks were calmly loafing in the water. Now they explode.
The peak of action is one thing, but sometimes more powerful is the moment of emotional dread immediately preceding the peak. Hard to look at this and not be relieved that you aren’t in that raft going through Lava Falls.
6) Context
Context is fundamental in storytelling – showing the subject relating to other subjects (animate or inanimate) or the environment gives the viewer more to chew on than just a straight portrait.
Two Laughing Gulls smooching prior to getting their groove on.
Then there’s the classic little subject in the large landscape.
Here the vastness of the landscape gives a sense of isolation to the subject which can invoke feelings of isolation, loneliness, independence or even confidence depending on how one looks at it. Great Blue Heron on Florida’s Gulf Coast.
Let’s go with another tiny figure in big landscape shot.
Here the tiny figure puts the surrounding landscape into perspective creating a sense of vastness we don’t get if we clone out the person as below.
Here we still have a nice landscape but the sense of scale has diminished, giving a more abstract feel to the scene.
7) Layers
Layering in a photo is a broad and somewhat ambiguous concept. Different photographers define it differently. Here’s my take. A photo with layers does more than one thing at a time, giving the viewer more to muse over. Layers can be visual elements, the obvious example being a strong foreground with a strong background.
Here’s classic near/far layering, with the well-traveled guitar case in the foreground, the guitar-toting rock star (John Stirratt of Wilco) strolling out into the desert in the mid-ground and lastly the sandstone buttes in the background.
More near to far with the rock formations in Antelope Canyon. In this case the layering is more subtle as there is a steady progression from near to far. Nevertheless there are several more definitive points that establish foreground, mid-ground and background layers.
Did you really think I’d forget a bird photo?
Note that single layer photos can succeed just fine if the subject is strong enough.
Here’s the same cormorant we saw before, but this time its gesturing (in this case yawning – when will that photographer stop shooting?) carries the photo.
Layers can also be story telling layers – where two or more elements of the photo inspire the viewer to consider multiple story lines.
Here we return to Antelope Canyon and the same vantage point the black and white study was done from. Only now we’re not just looking at visual layers but the added story-telling layer of the crazy crowds is included – yes this is what to expect if you visit Antelope Canyon, though you might not see the trendy wedding photo shoot going on.
These are the more obvious examples but there can be layers of meaning or feeling and on and on – basically anything that causes the viewer to come up with multiple interpretations of what’s going on.
8) Wrapping up
When you view a good photo you get lost in the subject, the story and the feelings evoked. You don’t wonder about the metadata. Let’s revisit the opening shot of the condor landing at sunset.
Here we have exquisite light, strong composition and spot on timing. The foreground and background layering puts this incredibly rare bird into context within the beautiful landscape it lives in. All this adds up to emotional punch and a winning shot.
What makes a photograph work is what makes any piece of art work, whether photo, painting, sculpture or other. Shooting with a Leica or Hasselblad won’t make your photos better. Shooting with feeling will. To take your photography to a higher level, think outside The Box.
“Hands down the most important aspect of any photograph is it’s ability to invoke an emotional response.”
Much like one of the more important aspects of a writer is his/her ability to use language properly…
OR to proofread before publishing…
Maybe a bit of editing is in order … I’ll come back later and see if you’re a “publish it and forget it” type of author…
I might make it down past the first paragraph next time around…
(sigh)
Until that time. . .
Bull pucky: “Hands down the most important aspect of any photograph is it’s [sic] ability to invoke an emotional response.”
This tripe dumbs down photography and the natural response to it.
This dumbing-down reflects the popular and hackneyed outlook of photographers who earn money from doing photography. They appeal to the lowest common denominator in society to induce sale of their product. Every normal human has emotions. This approach sums up in this utterance: “Getting the money shot.” Such forced effort presupposes moneymaking as the prime object of doing photography.
On the other hand, the natural response to a photograph involves the visual sense apart from emotion or feeling or even words. A photograph speaks with a visual voice. Hence, foremost, a viewer of a photograph will give attention to it for its visual qualities or its graphical presentation. Conscious awareness follows this initial response.
So, afterward, yes, the viewer may (and only may) experience an emotion or a feeling or a general sensation arising from the content of the photograph. The viewer may experience just a visual pleasure in relation to the photograph.
By insisting that a photograph to succeed must first evoke emotion, the author fosters a distortion of photography. In actuality, photography functions as a medium of human expression firstly appealing via the visual sense.
John,
I find myself reading this very old thread after enjoying cruising through a generous number of examples of your exquisite view of the world. I was guided here from a thread on supertopo which described a soul at the top of Its game in the physical world. Maybe ‘view of the world’ isn’t entirely accurate, but it’s easy to recognize you as an artist of life. It’s rare to find an individual graced with the uncanny vision and technical skill to express the beauty to be found in so many areas of this ironic life—the visual world, the world of movement, as well as the ability to perceive with humor the brutal reality of a seemingly senseless life among those who are blind to what is plainly evident to oneself.
Those are high attainments. At the same time, you recognize the painful emptiness within such talent. Being surrounded by a world which doesn’t share your ability to see, makes the emptiness that much more palpable. But being the artist-of-life you are, you negotiate this challenge with humble and graceful skill, as well. From my perspective, that’s a soul ‘at the top of their game in the physical world’, and that position can only reveal deeper emptiness since the physical world is a horribly cruel illusion, and the soul, lurking silently under the immense load of this illusion is yearning for a truth that doesn’t exist within this world.
Nurture that yearning, John. Hold it dear. It’s the closest thing you possess to eventually transcending the lower worlds and discovering what IS real. Maybe not in this lifetime, but some exquisite moment, true Grace will ignite that latent fire within with a truth beyond current reckoning, and you’ll be on your way—home.
Good work, John! Thanks for sharing of your Self so gracefully. One day, you WILL enjoy the fruits of having done so, and the physical world will gratefully fade away into the nothingness it is, as you ascend into beauty unimaginable at this time. And this will happen while living in a physical form. Something to anticipate.
P.S. I especially appreciate the hysterical honesty of your shot within a shot in Antelope Canyon. I used to spend countless days and nights alone there (upper and lower) without seeing another soul, hanging out and photographing in 4×5 color. Ironically, it was after leaving one such session, that I was graced to come upon my favorite photograph while wandering the empty and featureless expanse of the Navajo hinterlands. It’s called Beauty Walks a Razor’s Edge. We’ll never ‘make it ours’, but someday we become it.
Great article. Very educational. A necessary counter to the technically obsessed articles that dominate the Internet. And I like your dry wit and humour too. Thanks
I would only add one thing to your excellent article. Get out there and shoot, the best learning tool is suffering failure and success on a consistent basis.
Great article and great pictures. I’ve told myself that I don’t get to upgrade my gear until I start taking wow worthy pictures regularly. Thanks for helping me figure out what elements make a picture wow worthy!
This article opened my mind. I will think of it each time I pick up my camera. I stumbled upon it while surfing and am sooo glad I did. I understand the watermarks and signatures but that has nothing to do with the article as far as I’m concerned. The comparisons John made were very instructive. Thank you much John. Now I need to digest the photos on your website. I have learned much. Just for that, today is a good day.
Great article & points. Great pix as well. Thanks John, 1 of 25,000! P.S. Don’t like watermarks or signatures btw
“John “Verm” Sherman is one of only 25,000 wildlife and nature photographers based out of Flagstaff, Arizona.” – LMAO
Great article and shots!
The message of this blog post is important – emotion trumps technology. However, the author undercuts the message by branding every image with an intrusive watermark. The personal advertising / defensiveness implied in watermarking distracts from and ultimately corrodes all of those images’ emotive potential.
Watermarks imply fearfulness – of theft, or anonymity, or perhaps other things. They don’t display confidence. And especially if they’re poorly designed, they degrade the image even further by calling attention to themselves, at the cost of the image’s emotion.
I hope the author takes a note from the other excellent contributors to this blog (including Nassim) who don’t feel the need to watermark everything and who instead let their pictures speak for themselves.
Hi Chuck,
I really don’t like the watermarks myself, but they are a reaction, admittedly defensive, to having several of my shots taken from the pages of Photography Life and reproduced without permission. As so much business/advertising is done on the internet these days, the old argument that the file is too low res to be worth stealing doesn’t apply when you are posting 2048 pixel wide images. At lower resolution, e.g. Instagram’s ~1000 pixel maximum, I feel less paranoid and if you want to see my images without watermarks you can go to Vermphoto on Instagram. How’s that for self-advertising? In the end though, the only thing worse than having your images stolen off the web is posting images so poor nobody wants to steal them :)
The watermarks violate one of the prime concerns in photography: avoiding distractions from the main subject.
Well put.