What is Field Curvature?

Field Curvature, also known as “curvature of field” or “Petzval field curvature”, is a common optical problem that causes a flat object to appear sharp only in a certain part(s) of the frame, instead of being uniformly sharp across the frame. This happens due to the curved nature of optical elements, which project the image in a curved manner, rather than flat. And since all digital camera sensors are flat, they cannot capture the entire image in perfect focus, as shown in the below illustration:

Field Curvature

In a simple field curvature scenario like above, the light rays are perfectly focused in the center of the frame, at Image Plane A (where the sensor is). Since the image is curved, sharpness starts to drop as you move away from the center, resulting in less resolution in the mid-frame and much less resolution in the corners. The circular “dome-like” image in three dimensional form is shown to the right of the illustration. If the corner of the image is brought into focus, which would move the image plane closer (Image Plane B), the corners would appear sharp, while mid-frame would stay less sharp and the center would appear the softest. The effect of field curvature can be very pronounced, especially with older lenses.

Like other optical aberrations, field curvature is not limited to photographic lenses – it can be seen in microscopes, telescopes and other optical instruments. While it was possible to bend the image plane with film cameras and compensate for field curvature, it is no longer possible to do that on flat digital image sensors. On top of that, with increased sensor resolution on recent digital cameras, the effect of field curvature is even more relevant and evident today.

Wavy Field Curvature

Unfortunately, field curvature is not limited to the “simple” type illustrated above. Most modern lenses incorporate many different optical elements inside lenses, with some optical elements that are specifically placed to reduce the effect of field curvature. As a result, field curvature can appear in different forms, often with “wavy” curvature, as shown below:

Wavy Field Curvature

Lenses with wavy field curvature can show sharp center and corner performance, but soft mid-frame performance. If you look at the above illustration, you will see that the shape of the curved image starts out touching Image Plane A in the center, where it is perfectly in focus. Then the image curves in the mid-frame and comes back again in the corners. Hence, if you focus in the center, both the center and the corners would appear sharp, but the mid-frame would appear softer in comparison. If you focused in the mid-frame, which is where the Image Plane B is, the mid-frame would appear sharp, while both the center and the corners would appear softer. This sort of field curvature is a very common occurrence in modern lenses, even professional lenses worth thousands of dollars (see more on this below).

Also, field curvature behavior can vary by distance. Some lenses look good at short range with practically no visible curvature, while exhibiting a rather strong level of field curvature at infinity. The effect of field curvature varies by lens design. Short range lenses (ultra wide, wide and normal) below 50mm typically suffer from curvature problems the most. Telephoto lenses, on the other hand, often have very little or no visible field curvature.

How to find out if a lens has Field Curvature

You might be wondering if the lens(es) you use have field curvature. Before you start your search, you should know that every single lens has field curvature – some stronger than others. While modern optical designs take field curvature into consideration and have specific elements within the optical design to reduce it, most lenses still suffer from it. In fact, even many expensive professional lenses from well-known brands (Nikon, Canon, Zeiss, Leica, etc) have very pronounced field curvature.

The easiest way to find out if a lens suffers from field curvature is to look at its MTF data provided by the manufacturer. For example, take a look at the following MTF chart from Nikon 28mm f/1.8G:

Nikon 28mm f/1.8G MTF

Note how the lines curve – they start out high, then curve down in the middle, then curve up again, then curve down toward the extreme far. This is a classic example of a “wavy” field curvature, where the center is sharp, the mid-frame is softer, the corners are sharp again and then the extreme corners are soft. I saw exactly the same thing when testing the lens, as evidenced from my Nikon 28mm f/1.8G Review and here are some 100% crops to illustrate the point:

Nikon 28mm f/1.8 Field Curvature Sample @ f/1.8

Wide open at f/1.8, the lens suffers from visible field curvature. The center appears sharp, while the mid-frame is much softer in comparison, with corners being better than the mid-frame (if I focused in the mid-frame, both the center and the corner would appear soft). It is a strange thing to see, but this is not the only lens that suffers from such curvature – other Nikon lenses, even the much more expensive Nikon 24-70mm f/2.8G have a similar problem.

How to Reduce Field Curvature

Like other optical aberrations such as Chromatic Aberration, the best way to reduce field curvature is to stop down the lens. If a lens has small to moderate amount of field curvature, stopping down a little will significantly reduce it. But if a lens suffers from heavy field curvature, then you might have to stop down to f/8 or f/11 to reduce it. Sometimes even stopping down to the smallest aperture (at which point diffraction kicks in) does not fully eliminate it.

In the case of the above-mentioned Nikon 28mm f/1.8G, here is what happens at f/8:

Nikon 28mm f/1.8 Field Curvature Sample @ f/8.0

As you can see, both center and mid-frame appear much sharper, but the mid-frame is still a little weaker in comparison (which is normal).

Unfortunately, it is impossible to fix field curvature in post-production software such as Photoshop and Lightroom.

Lens Performance Evaluation

It is a well known fact that lenses perform the best in the center of the frame and their image quality can deteriorate toward the edges. In fact, optical performance of lenses is often assessed by the uniformity of sharpness across the frame, so it is a fairly common practice for lens reviewers to demonstrate center and corner performance using various test charts. The problem with most such assessments, however, is that they do not take field curvature into consideration, often arriving at wrong conclusions. When it comes to testing lenses, there are typically two methods. The first method involves focusing in the center of the frame and then looking at both the center and the corner when evaluating sharpness. The second method is to focus in the center and then focus in the corner separately to assess each separately. Some will acquire focus in the center, mid-frame and corner separately. Both methods can potentially lead to different results and conclusions. The first method would show terrible performance on any part of the image frame that is subject to heavy field curvature, while the second method would show what a lens can potentially resolve in individual parts of the frame, but not the image as a whole.

When testing lenses, our team at Photography Life always uses the first method, which is to acquire focus once in the center and then assess the performance throughout the frame. We believe that this method is the only proper way to assess lens performance, because it takes the effect of field curvature into account. If a lens suffers from heavy field curvature, the numbers for corner and potentially mid-frame will be significantly lower. If we were to focus on each section of the frame separately, it would hide the effect of field curvature, which we believe is a serious optical issue to disregard. In addition, when working on the field, one would rarely acquire focus in the extreme part of the frame, separately from the center. Most autofocus systems are designed to be close the the center of the frame.

The only potential problem with our lab assessments is the fact that some lenses show pronounced field curvature at close distances, but have almost none at infinity (important to know for landscape photographers). We are certainly aware of this particular dilemma and we are working on adding additional test results to provide field curvature data for both close focus and infinity. Hence, providing test data only for close distances, or only for subjects at infinity does not provide enough information to fully evaluate the effect of field curvature.

To read more about other optical problems, check out some of the articles we published before:
What is Chromatic Aberration?
What is Spherical Aberration?
What is Focus Shift?


  1. January 19, 2013 at 12:41 am

    Great article Nasim :)

    I think we can also see this in zooms in simmering heat where Mirages occur like in deserts e.g. (lenses have really hard time to focus and the subject appears dull)

    Or there was a Canon kit zoom 28-90 or 85 (came with EOS 300 in 2000) that would be the best example ,I’ve never seen a worse lens in my life :) ,If only I had a Canon digital body the lens is still lying in box.

    First time I heard this from my Dad who returned a 4×5 Schneider lens that it was too faulty and a field camera could not take better pics.The other sample was OK ,so I guess maybe it can be from sample to sample too ?

    In layman terms can we say it “dull distorted glass effect” ?


  2. 2) Mark Allen
    January 19, 2013 at 6:04 am

    Interesting read Nasim, I cant say I ever pixel peep in the corners, and I think I have a long way to go in my photography before worrying about corner sharpness too much. Its good to learn though and I enjoy your writing style, its easy to read whilst not avoiding technical details.

    Many thanks, and good to see you are posting again!

  3. 3) Anthony Ruggeri
    January 19, 2013 at 6:23 am

    Thanks for this article — field curvature is probably my #1 concern with lenses because I am usually shooting landscapes where corner-to-corner clarity is important and because there is no easy way around it. When I originally got my D800E I was very much looking forward to using the 24 PC-E on it, but I rented the lens for some testing and found some very clear and dramatic field curvature (in fact, using that lens at full tilt makes the actual curvature very easy to see).

    Focus bracketing helps, but I always prefer one image and at most a few for either focus stacking or dynamic range.

    I’m finding your site to be one of the best when it comes to reviews, and I’m glad you give this issue the attention that it deserves.

  4. 4) HomoSapiensWannaBe
    January 19, 2013 at 8:12 am

    Lenses have personalities, huh?

    This article confirms the usefulness of live-view where the focus point can be put anywhere in the frame. This is perhaps the only way to assure that subjects away from the center are rendered in the sharpest focus with any lens, no matter the degree or type of field curvature. Along with this is the need to consider where the sharpest focus points within the field curvature of a lens occur within the depth of field at the aperature the image is taken.

    Thankfully we can easily review this, especially on EVF cameras, but even with the rear LCD using loupe viewing tools such as Hoodman, etc.. The subject of a future article perhaps?

    Nasim, I recall you wrote an article about how to focus off-center subjects? Perhaps you could link to it at the end of this article for those that didn’t read it?

  5. 5) Sid
    January 19, 2013 at 10:18 pm

    Thanks for this write up Nasim. I had noticed the effects of field of curvature on my 18-55 kit lens long back but I dint know the reason behind this optical issue.

  6. 6) Alex
    January 20, 2013 at 12:42 am

    Nasim, thanks for informative article.

    But, man, you shall add axis labels to the chart! This is elementary school basics.

    • 6.1) mark
      January 22, 2013 at 4:34 pm

      Would help beginners to understand MTF charts. However, as I proposed further down, an own article about “how to read MTF-charts” would probably even more useful.

    • January 25, 2013 at 4:31 pm

      Alex, I apologize for assuming that our readers know how to read Nikon MTF charts :) I will post an article on reading MTF charts later this week!

  7. 7) gregorylent
    January 21, 2013 at 3:59 am

    why i love photographylife.com … see above

  8. 8) Vikas
    January 22, 2013 at 3:54 am

    Great article!!

    Wouldn’t this render the subject noticeably out-of-focus when shooting using Focus and Recompose technique?

  9. 9) mark
    January 22, 2013 at 4:30 pm

    Hi Nasim

    Thanks for the explanation, but I have a question: Could you write a beginners guide article about how to read MTF charts? I was searching the internet, but found nowhere an explanation which I understood.


    • 9.1) mark
      January 22, 2013 at 4:45 pm

      P.S. I mean even with labeled axis (on other internet pages) I do not fully understand the principle of the chart. Just an example: Why do 100 lines/mm relate to “resolving power” and 30 lines/mm for “contrast transmiting ability”. Thats not transparent. You have a gift to explain things in an easy understandable way, most probably you could explain MTF charts much better to beginners than wikipedia.com or punitsinha.com

    • January 25, 2013 at 4:32 pm

      Mark, great idea – I am working on an article on how to read MTF charts!

      • 9.2.1) mark
        January 25, 2013 at 5:39 pm

        That’s great. I’m looking forward to it! :)

        • Profile photo of Nasim Mansurov Nasim Mansurov
          April 25, 2013 at 2:29 pm

          LOL, just realized that it only took me 3 months to finally do it :D

  10. 10) faz
    January 27, 2013 at 11:23 pm

    Great Article, So can I conclude that there is no permanent fix for Field Curvature?? if a brand new lens is having this issue, it should be replaced by the manufacture? Would this issue occur later after couple of months or years?

    • 10.1) mark
      January 29, 2013 at 6:02 pm

      Quote Nasim Mansurov: “Before you start your search, you should know that every single lens has field curvature…”

      Its a physical characteristic/property which is never perfect.

  11. March 11, 2013 at 7:58 am

    Hello Nasim,
    I had a question related to the above if you could kindly clarify.
    What happens when you use a non-center focus point particularly one that is in an area affected by the field curvature; would the camera put the focus at focus plan A or B (reference to the images above)..
    I’ve made some observations using my 28mm f1.8G on the D3 and came here to better understand whats happening:
    – Focusing with centre point is usually very accurate from f1.8
    – Off center focus points (extreme right and extreme left) will cause back focus (more so above 1.8, i.e. not so severe at f1.8!)
    – Focusing with the center point and recomposing seems to produce better results than using any of the right or left focus points..

  12. 12) D&A
    August 18, 2013 at 10:47 pm

    Hi Nasim,

    My being familiar with optics and field curvature, I have an unusual situation. I have a wide angle rangefinder lens that exhibits extreme field curvature, being most prominent at longer subject distances although it can be detected at almost any distance. The lens is set up to backfocus so that if the center of the frame’s subject is focused on, it will be in well in front of the zone of focus (due to backfocusing) but the sides and edges of the frame due to the extreme field curvature are placed perfectly in the depth of field and are razor sharp. I suspect if the backfocus is corrected enabling the center part of the frame to rest within the depth of field, the outer zones of the frame due to field curvature will be well in front of the zone of focus and be severely soft. Any thoughts?

  13. 13) Ralph
    November 28, 2013 at 8:12 am

    Hi Nasim,

    Great article, as usual!

    Is there any more significance that “wavy” field curvature is more pronounced at 30l/mm, rather than at 10l/mm?



  14. 14) David Eichler
    July 3, 2014 at 12:59 pm

    Are you sure that the MTF curve is conclusive with regard to field curvature? It seems to me that the MTF info does not differentiate between lower resolution due to variations in focus across the field and sheer variations in the resolving ability of the lens itself; and stopping down tends to mitigate these variations with most lens designs.

  15. 15) terry lau
    July 23, 2015 at 1:27 pm

    A question that bother me is whether shorter flange distance such as Sony’s E mount mirrorless cameras will result in more field curvative issues that require a higher lens design skills and if result will be improved using A mount lens via adapter .
    I note that it seems harder to get evenly sharp images across the frame with E mount cameras and that even expensive lens suffer from quality issues .
    Answers much appreciated


Comment Policy: Although our team at Photography Life encourages all readers to actively participate in discussions, we reserve the right to delete / modify any content that does not comply with our Code of Conduct, or do not meet the high editorial standards of the published material.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <i> <s>