Although I have already done a focal length comparison from 12mm to 500mm focal length before, I decided to do it once again for telephoto lenses. I receive quite a few emails from our readers, asking about telephoto lenses and focal lengths, specifically whether a focal length of a lens is going to be sufficient for bird and wildlife photography. The below images should give you a pretty good idea about field of view when using particular focal lengths, from 70mm all the way to 1200mm:
The above images are not cropped in post-production and represent equivalent focal lengths relative to 35mm. The longest field of view of the 1200mm shot was captured with the Nikon 200-400mm f/4.0 + TC-20E III TC @ 400mm (800mm effective) on a DX body, which is equivalent to 1200mm. The shortest focal length was captured with the Nikon 70-200mm f/2.8G VR II at 70mm.
Wow, thanks! Just the info I was looking for. Can you explain what you mean by 800mm effective with a 200-400mm lens? How do you get a 1200 mm focal length with a 200-400mm lens? Thanks! I will definitely buy my telephoto lens by clicking on the B&H link on your website!
great comparison. i’ve been a fan for reading reviews on your website regularly.
you can get 800mm effective from a 200-400mm lens by using TC-20E III just like nasim wrote before. TC-20E is a 2 times teleconverter combine with 400mm focal length it becomes 800mm and when 800mm lens mounted at DX cameras (crop factor 1.5x body, series other than D700, D800, D3, D3x, D3s, D4) then it becomes 1.5 x 800mm = 1200mm lens.
Thanks Raymond. I understand the teleconverter, Nasim was saying 400 mm is 800 mm effective. What I don’t understand is why this is 1200 mm equivalent… What is the mechanism? Is it that those cameras are at normal lens at 50mm rather than 35 mm?
The smaller DX APSC-sized Sensor in the camera used here needs to be multiplied by a factor of x1.5 to get to a Full-Frame sensor equivalent.
The 800mm maximum focal length (achieved by having that 2x TC) is then multiplied by 1.5, giving the 1200mm FF equivalent.
If a camera with an even smaller Micro 4/3 Sensor was used, the equipment Full Frame focal lengths are Doubled- as the crop-factor is x2 with this system- not x1.5 as with APSC sensor
Dear Sir or Ma’am,
We get your information from the internet. It is honor for me to have this opportunity to introduce my products, company and myself.
I am a salesman from Changchun Richen Optronics Co., Ltd.. My name is Mike who comes from Changchun city Jilin province China.
1. All kind of wide angle lens and telephoto lens with different size.
2. Large-scale focal variation monitoring lens.
3. Fisheye lens.
4. Broadcast lens
5. macro, connecting circle。
Minimum order quality: 100 pieces
Port: Dalian by ocean or Changchun by air
Packing detail: carton PVC gift box or white box
Delivery time: 20-40 days
Payment terms: TT or Weston Union
Brand Name: RICHARM or OEM
Changchun Richen Optronics Co., Ltd. is a professional enterprise, which located in Chinese optical base-Changchun City. It is mainly engaged in manufacturing and marketing of optical lens, since established in 2000, it has been a professional manufacturing with large scale producing ability.
At present, we mainly export to Europe, America and Japan etc.
Close enough, thank you!
Wat was the distance between you and the birds? (preferably in meters- I’m a Metric Man :-) )
Wouter, you are most welcome!
Unfortunately, the subject distance information is not available in EXIF… I can only give you a rough estimate – I would say around 15 meters from me to the birds.
KUSO Exif Viewer (free) can usually tell you the distance in meters for a raw file. The field is FocusDistance and is in meters. I have found KUSO and FxIF, a plugin for FireFox, to be invaluable. :-)
Aaron, an EXIF viewer can only show the info if it is available :) The distance information is typically reported by a lens and if you are shooting with teleconverters and shooting over a certain distance, the information can fail to come through. If that happens, the camera will show a really large number or “unknown” for distance.
Haha, I didn’t consider that the teleconverters might mess with that. I figured the camera would factor it in with the newer electronic ones and D/G lenses, but I guess not huh?