In advance of the Photography Life’s full review on the Sigma Sport 150-600mm f/5-6.3 DG OS HSM/S superzoom, I thought readers may like to see a few sample images along with some initial thoughts about shooting with this lens hand-held. Before getting into this brief article I’d like to extend a big ‘thank you’ to Photography Life reader Michael Wroblewski, who very generously let me borrow his copy of the Sigma 150-600mm Sport lens so I could do some shooting at Bird Kingdom in Niagara Falls, Ontario.
I should point out that Michael suggested that I shoot with a monopod or tripod with this lens. Since I never normally shoot in that manner I ignored his advice and I chose to take all of my shots for this article hand-held. I’m likely one of the most ‘tripod-allergic’ members of the Photography Life team so taking this approach made the most sense to me. This, of course, puts a different slant on the article, but since many photographers prefer to shoot hand-held most of the time I thought this perspective may be important to a number of Photography Life readers.
As soon as you pick up the Sigma Sport 150-600 lens you immediately get a feeling of high quality and durability. This lens is beefy, weighing in at 6.3 lbs. (2.86 Kg), about 2 lbs. (almost 1 Kg) more than the Tamron 150-600 VC, Sigma 150-500 OS, Nikon 80-400 VR and other similar zoom lenses. This weight difference is very noticeable when shooting hand-held with this lens.
The zoom action is very smooth and all of the controls feel solid and tight. It is very apparent that Sigma was intent on producing a high caliber lens when they designed the 150-600 Sport. The construction seems top notch.
After spending a few hours shooting hand-held non-stop with the Sigma 150-600 Sport it’s my view that the majority of potential buyers of this lens would likely use it with a monopod or tripod most of the time. Hand-holding is possible, but unless you are used to shooting with a large, heavy lens most people would not find it comfortable to shoot with the Sigma 150-600 Sport hand-held for much more than 30-60 minutes at a time. You will definitely need to rest the lens against the crook of your elbow during lulls in the action.
I often shoot my Tamron 150-600 VC hand-held for stretches of 4-5 hours and I’d estimate that the Sigma would lead to the same level of fatigue in about half the time. The weight of the Sigma is such that I had to adjust my hand-holding technique and shooting style. I needed to bring my elbow further across my body and anchor it firmly into my mid-section as well as change my wrist angle in order to better support the added weight of the Sigma. I also found that I had to bring my shoulders forward and almost hunch around the lens to get a comfortable position to aid in weight distribution.
Normally when I find a subject for an image I focus on it by half-depressing the shutter and hold my lens steady, waiting for the exact moment to capture my shot. With my Tamron 150-600 VC I sometimes wait up to 20-30 seconds in this position before taking a single image.
With the Sigma I found this was harder to do because of the added weight and within 5-10 seconds I could feel my steadiness begin to waiver, so I needed to change my shooting style. Rather than wait for the precise moment to shoot, I decided to fire off a series of quick, individual shots shortly after the lens acquired initial focus. The Sigma 150-600 Sport reacquires focus very quickly between shots and I got good results with this approach.
The Sigma 150-600 Sport’s image stabilization seems to work quite well. If you look at the EXIF data you’ll see that I got some useable images at quite slow shutter speeds, some under 1/30th with the lens fully extended.
Auto focusing with my Nikon D800 was fast and accurate. In lower light situations focusing took a bit longer but it was still acceptable. My brother-in-law shot with the Sigma 150-600 Sport for a while with his Nikon D7000 and he did not experience any AF issues at all.
My impression is that the Sigma 150-600 Sport is sharper wide open at 600m than is the Tamron 150-600 VC. This is to be expected given that the Sigma Sport is considerably more money, costing about 85% more than the Tamron. Nasim will likely be doing some formal sharpness testing, so readers looking for statistical assessments of this lens versus competitive products will need to wait until the full Photography Life review is completed.
I must admit that I didn’t enjoy shooting with the Sigma 150-600 Sport on the first day out with it. I found that it was initially very uncomfortable and awkward to hand-hold. This was my fault for not realizing that I needed to change my approach. After I adjusted my hand-holding technique I found my results improved and the shooting experience was much more enjoyable.
Overall, I thought the Sigma was a high quality lens with a very solid and secure feel. Shooting hand-held is possible but it does require good technique and you may need to adjust your usual approach to compensate for the additional weight. I imagine the majority of photographers who buy this lens will use a monopod or tripod with it most of the time, and only shoot hand-held with it periodically, and for limited time durations.
I’m sure the rest of the team at Photography Life will do an excellent job with their full review of the Sigma 150-600 Sport, as well as with the Sigma 150-600 Contemporary version. Since I’m starting a review of the Nikon 1 V3 I won’t have the time to make any additional contributions towards the review of the two Sigma 150-600 mm zoom lenses.
Confession Time…
While I think the Sigma 150-600 Sport is sharper than my Tamron 150-600mm when shot wide open at maximum focal length, I’m not sure how many photographers will notice the difference once they process their RAW files. So, just for fun I inserted an image taken with my Tamron 150-600mm VC in this article. The image was taken at the same venue and on the same day as the Sigma images. You may be able to spot it right away…
Technical Note: All images were shot hand-held with a Nikon D800. RAW files were processed through DxO OpticsPro 10 with a DNG file then exported into CS6 and Nik Suite for additional adjustments as needed.
Article and all images are Copyright Thomas Stirr. All rights reserved. No use, duplication or adaptation is allowed without written permission.
Disappointed you didn’t test the Sigma 160-600 Contemporary hand held. It would have been a much more helpful comparison – apples to apples.
Hi Colin,
At the time that his review was done I did not have access to the Sigma 150-600 Contemporary. It has been almost 5 years since I’ve owned full frame camera gear. All of my work since July 2015 has been with smaller sensor cameras.
Tom
How far away were most of the birds that you shot.
Hi Mike,
It has been three years or so since I wrote this article, perhaps longer, so my memory has faded with regards to the exact shooting parameters. I would guess between 20 and 40 feet.
Tom
Comprei uma sigma sport 150-600 recentemente e a qualidade me surpreendeu,como toda lente pouco luminosa a sigma também tem suas limitações,quando usada o máximo do zoom ela apresenta ruído aceitável é uma pequena distorção,porem se usarmos ate 400 ou 500MM as imagens apresentam uma qualidade boa,de modo geral mesmo usando 600MM ela produz boas imagens,contando que não use ISO acima de 100,com certeza isso e um obstáculo quando se fotografa pássaros na sobra ou na copa das árvores,porem nesses ambientes convém usar menos zoom é assim aumentar o ISO em 2 ou 3 pontos pra obter uma imagem mais iluminada e não perder qualidade.
Peso da objetiva: ela pesa aproximadamente 2 quilos e novecentas gramas,as vezes cansa o braço um pouco,mas prefiro fotografar sem trie porque ganho mobilidade.
Estabilizador de imagens: o estabilizador apresenta uma qualidade razoável, o bom mesmo e fotografar com velocidade alta,isso evita a perda de imagens,é muito difícil conseguir fotos boas usando velocidade abaixo de 1/80s,certamente quando fotografamos com velocidades superiores a 200 ou 250 as chances de obter uma imagem mais nítidas são bem maiores.
Resumo geral: estou satisfeito com minha objetiva,um excelente custo beneficio pra que não tem 60 ou 80 mil pra comprar uma Canon ou nikon de 600 ou 800MM
Aproveito e convido vocês para conhecer o yfotos,um site totalmente brasileiro onde todos podem compartilhar suas imagens ou usar qualquer uma livremente sem pagar nada,acesse:www.yfotos.com
yfotos.com/animais
Olá Joel,
obrigado por compartilhar sua experiência com o programa Sigma 150-600. É bom ouvir que você tem sido feliz com o desempenho da objectiva.
Tom
What if I wanted to use this lens with a Tripod on a A6500, could anyone recoomend a tripod below $200? Carbon Fibre? Am I dreaming or is it doable for this price range?
Hi Matt,
I think it would be difficult to find something sturdy enough in that price range. Plus, you would likely need a quality gimbal head to get good motion for birds in flight etc. You’re probably looking at about $400-$500 for the gimbal head alone. I would imagine a good quality tripod would be at least $350 to $500, perhaps more. I mainly only use tripods for my video business and haven’t needed to buy one for quite a while so perhaps some readers can provide additional input.
Tom
Thanks for this great article! I’m a diehard handholder too, rarely using a tripod. 98% of my pics on my website are handheld:
1-4u-computer-graphics.com/mosko…graphy.htm
The featured pic on my website could not be gotten on tripod as they flew front, side, behind and other side before landing.
So all the tripod users with their “big” lenses were stuck watching this action.
I have the Nikon D500 w/battery grip and Sigma Pro 150-600mm on order.
Just sold the Nikon D7200 w/Sigma C 150-600mm to get the above outfit.
Can’t wait to try this out…
Nature, birding & wildlife photography is a extreme passion of mine.
Thanks for the positive comment Jack – I’m glad you enjoyed the article? Thanks too, for sharing some of your experiences!
Tom
Hi Tom,
I am planning to buy Sigma 150-600mm Sport & NIKON D500. Many are telling the lens is heavy but I love the build/quality of the images produced.
Can you please elaborate on your shooting technique ? Any image of preferably holding this lens.
I was a 100 % hand holding Tamron 150-600mm guy. Even I hate Tripods / Monopods.
Thanks
Rajesh
Hi Rajesh,
When I owned a Tamron 150-600mm I was also a 100% hand-held shooter. The Sigma Sport 150-600mm is a very nice lens but it is quite heavy to hand-hold for extended periods. I wrote an article about hand-holding larger lenses and specifically what I did to adjust my technique when using the Sigma Sport. Here is a link: tomstirrphotography.com/tips-…-hand-held
Tom
Wonderful images. I totally love this lens.
I have also published some images from sports edition with my Nikon D750 on my blog. check this
www.ultrawidelife.com/sampl…ikon-d750/
Excellent images, Tom. Can you use a picture to demonstrate how to hold a heavy lens like Sigma 150-600 Sport? Thank you in advance.
David
Hi David,
I’m glad you enjoyed the images! Here is a link to an article that I wrote about shooting with large telephoto lenses…it includes images showing holding positions: tomstirrphotography.com/tips-…-hand-held
Tom
Tom
much obliged for the link
All pics are wonderful and perfect
Mind if I send you few of my shots taken with D7100 + Tamron 150-600mm for your critical comments……That will sure help me to improve further.
Where should I load the pics?
I guess camera setting was on Shutter priority…
what if I do practice on Manual mode?
Thanks
Babar
Hi Babar,
If you go to my blog you’ll find my contact info…we can then chat further.
Tom
Tom thanks for the rely
Mind if you please let me know the Link showing the pic taken with Tamron 150-600mm
and I hope the distance is also mentioned along with other data
thanks
Hi Babar,
Here are five links to articles with birds-in-flight taken with the Tamron and a Nikon D800:
tomstirrphotography.com/egret…on-150-600
tomstirrphotography.com/brown…150-600-vc
tomstirrphotography.com/photo…150-600-vc
tomstirrphotography.com/birds…0-600mm-vc
tomstirrphotography.com/photo…0-600mm-vc
Unfortunately I never include distance to subject, but I rarely crop my photos and if I do only marginally, so this should give you a good sense of the quality you can achieve shooting at a distance.
Tom