The Sony FE 20mm f/1.8 G is an $898 wide-angle, wide-aperture prime lens for Sony full-frame cameras. As you’ll see throughout this review, this small and somewhat unassuming lens has extraordinary performance, making it a top choice for landscape, Milky Way, and other wide-angle photography. Is the Sony FE 20mm f/1.8 G right for you? Read on to find out!
Table of Contents
About This Review
Some photographers might be surprised to see Photography Life reviewing a Sony lens in as much detail as we are below, including full lab tests. We’ve mostly been known as a Nikon website since our founder Nasim Mansurov is a long-time Nikon shooter. To date, we’ve reviewed 90 Nikon lenses and only 5 from Sony (with no lab tests of any Sony lenses until now).
This disparity was mainly due to a lack of time – we’ve focused most of our resources on reviewing the gear that we’re most familiar with, which has largely been Nikon so far. However, at a personal level, I’ve been using Sony cameras off and on for a couple of years now, as well as Canon cameras, to supplement my usual Nikon kit. It has long been on my to-do list to give this equipment proper reviews. And now that Photography Life has expanded our number of staff and freelance writers, I finally have the time and resources to do so.
If you have doubts that a Nikon-heavy website like ours could review a Sony lens fairly, look no further than this review, where the Sony FE 20mm f/1.8 G breaks new ground and sits at the upper echelon of all the lenses we’ve reviewed. All image quality tests that we run in the lab (including sharpness testing) are fully comparable across brands, and the Sony FE 20mm f/1.8 G scores extremely high in almost every way.
It took a lot of time and effort to set up our lens testing lab to review Sony and Canon equipment properly so that the numbers can be compared across brands. Many Photography Life readers will have noticed our slow pace of lens reviews over the last few months while I worked on this project. I want to thank you for staying loyal and supporting Photography Life during that time anyway – you won’t be let down by what comes next! For the rest of this year and into 2024, Photography Life will be publishing lens reviews at a rapid pace: at least one review per week, published each Tuesday with full lab data for every lens. Not only will our rate of Nikon lens reviews be higher than ever, but we’ll also be reviewing Sony and Canon lenses with our famously thorough level of detail.
With that, let me share my experiences from the Sony FE 20mm f/1.8 G.
Sony FE 20mm f/1.8 G Specifications
- Mount Type: Sony E Mount
- Focal Length: 20mm prime
- Angle of View (APS-C): 70°
- Angle of View (Full Frame): 94°
- Maximum Aperture: f/1.8
- Minimum Aperture: f/22
- Aperture Blades: 9, rounded
- Filter Size: 67mm
- Lens Elements: 14
- Lens Groups: 12
- Special Elements: 2 advanced aspherical, 3 extra-low dispersion elements
- Anti-Reflection Coatings: Nano AR coating
- Fluorine Coated Front Element: Yes
- Image Stabilization: No
- Internal Focusing: Yes
- Control Rings: Focus and aperture rings
- Function Button: Yes
- Focus Motor: Dual XD linear motors
- Minimum Focus Distance: 18 cm (7.1 inches)
- Maximum Magnification: 0.22× (1:4.5)
- Mount Material: Metal
- Weather/Dust Sealing: Yes
- Dimensions (Length × Diameter): 85 × 74 mm (3.3 × 2.9 inches)
- Weight: 373 g (0.82 lbs)
- MSRP: $898 (check current price)
For a lens that’s part of Sony’s “G” line rather than their “GM” line, these are surprisingly high-end specs! The complex lens design, fluorine-coated front element, custom function button, and dedicated aperture ring are all good signs. Aside from the lack of an XA element, there’s little here to signify that it’s not a GM lens.
Probably the most exciting specification, however, is the Sony FE 20mm f/1.8 G’s weight. At just 373 grams (0.82 pounds), this is a very light and portable lens. The 67mm filter size is also smaller than expected. For comparison, Nikon’s Z 20mm f/1.8 S weighs 505 grams (1.11 lbs) and takes 77mm filters.
Build Quality and Handling
The Sony FE 20mm f/1.8 G has a high-quality plastic construction with a metal lens mount. For saving weight and absorbing bumps, I personally prefer this type of lens design more than all-metal lenses, although I know that’s a touchy subject. The focus ring on the Sony 20mm f/1.8 G is rubberized, while the aperture ring is not.
On the left-hand side of the lens, you’ll find the AF-MF switch and a custom function button (called the Focus Hold Button in Sony’s parlance). This button can be assigned to a wide variety of tasks, not just holding focus – anything from changing white balance to modifying your flash settings.
On the right-hand side of the lens is another switch, this one to click or de-click the aperture ring. Videographers will likely leave this set to OFF, while still photographers will probably be split. I personally like the clicked ring because the aperture is less likely to change by accident, so I left it ON.
The rest of the build quality and handling features are good, too. I like the fluorine-coated front element to keep the front element clean more easily, and the dust and moisture resistant construction is ideal for a travel/landscape lens like this. There are no external moving components as the lens is focused, adding to the weather-resistant design.
As with most Sony lenses with a linear focus motor, the focusing group of the Sony FE 20mm f/1.8 G is not held in place mechanically and can move slightly when the lens is not receiving power. This isn’t a malfunction, but even so, it can be slightly disconcerting to feel the lens elements shift when the camera’s off and you move the FE 20mm f/1.8 G around.
Sony FE 20mm f/1.8 G Focus Performance
The Sony FE 20mm f/1.8 G autofocuses quickly and almost silently, with very impressive accuracy. The accuracy is exceptionally high even in a lab environment which magnifies small focusing errors.
Because of the f/1.8 maximum aperture, the Sony FE 20mm f/1.8 G focuses in very dark conditions without any issue. Compared to something like a 16-35mm f/4, for example, the Sony 20mm f/1.8 can focus in conditions that are about one fifth as bright.
The close-focusing capabilities of the Sony FE 20mm f/1.8 G are reasonably good, too, with a maximum magnification of 0.22× (1:4.5) and a minimum focusing distance of 18 cm / 7.1 inches. It’s not a macro lens, but it will let you get some reasonable close-up photos if you find a small subject that benefits from an ultra-wide perspective.
There is, however, one issue worth noting with the Sony FE 20mm f/1.8 G’s focusing performance: a high level of focus breathing. You can see it in the image below, which is a composite of close focus and infinity focus.
For videographers, this could pose a problem if you plan to rack focus extensively with the FE 20mm f/1.8 G. Most of Sony’s newer cameras have a focus breathing compensation setting for videography, which fixes the problem but crops your footage from the lens, giving you closer to a 22.5mm perspective rather than 20mm. Here’s the same shot in video form:
Distortion
The Sony FE 20mm f/1.8 G has low levels of distortion – specifically, 0.54% pincushion distortion as measured in the lab. However, the wavy mustache shape of this lens’s distortion can make it stand out a bit more than 0.54% would imply.
Even so, it’s low enough that you won’t need to correct distortion in most photos from this lens, with the exception of some architectural photography. If you do need to correct the distortion, Adobe Lightroom and most other post-processing software has a built-in profile for the Sony FE 20mm f/1.8 G that removes distortion almost entirely.
Vignetting
The Sony FE 20mm f/1.8 G has moderately high levels of vignetting, which is unsurprising for an ultra-wide f/1.8 lens. The vignetting is higher at infinity focus, and it never really goes away even at the narrowest apertures.
By comparison, here’s the chart from Nikon’s similar mirrorless lens, the Z 20mm f/1.8 S:
You can see that both lenses have a fairly high level of vignetting, with the Sony performing a bit better at close-focus distances and the Nikon performing a bit better at infinity focus.
Here’s how this vignetting looks in practice on a uniform subject at both f/1.8 and f/16, infinity focus:
Lateral Chromatic Aberration
There is negligible amount of chromatic aberration on the Sony FE 20mm f/1.8 at every aperture.
Anything under about one pixel is almost impossible to notice in real-world images, even with chromatic aberration corrections turned off. The Sony FE 20mm f/1.8 G never even gets above 0.60 pixels. In short, you will rarely if ever see any lateral chromatic aberration on this lens, no matter how high-contrast the subject.
Sharpness
The Sony FE 20mm f/1.8 G is one of the sharpest lenses we’ve ever tested:
I couldn’t believe my eyes at the f/1.8 central sharpness numbers! It’s higher than any other f/1.8 lens we’ve measured at Photography Life before. Indeed, the center at f/1.8 is far sharper than most lenses ever get, regardless of aperture.
Technically, the peak sharpness of this lens occurs at f/2.8 in the center. There, it reaches numbers that are the second highest of any lens we’ve ever tested, only behind the F-mount Nikon 28mm f/1.4E. (That lens has held our record for years with a score of 4162 LW/PH in our Imatest MTF50 tests – though the difference between that and the FE 20mm f/1.8 G’s performance is negligible in practice.)
Finally, the Sony FE 20mm f/1.8 G has no focus shift issues, as well as minimal levels of field curvature. With this performance, it cements itself as the sharpest ultra-wide lens that we have ever tested at Photography Life.
Sharpness Comparisons
1. Sony FE 20mm f/1.8 G vs Sony FE 16-35mm f/2.8 GM
How does the Sony 20mm f/1.8 G perform compared to a high-end zoom like the $1900 Sony FE 16-35mm f/2.8 GM? Although this lens has recently been replaced by a GM II version, it’s still a staple of many professional photographers’ bags and a good point of comparison. However, as you can see below, it doesn’t rise to the remarkable level of the Sony FE 20mm f/1.8 G.
(When looking at the charts below, make sure to compare the same apertures against one another below for a true apples-to-apples comparison.)
The Sony FE 16-35mm f/2.8 GM puts up a good fight for a zoom, but it was never going to be a fair comparison – a high-end prime will almost always beat a high-end zoom in sharpness, and this is no exception. At almost every aperture and portion of the frame, the FE 20mm f/1.8 G is clearly ahead.
2. Sony FE 20mm f/1.8 G vs Nikon Z 20mm f/1.8 S
When we tested the Nikon Z 20mm f/1.8 S a few years ago, I didn’t think that another 20mm f/1.8 would be able to surpass it in sharpness for a very long time. But it seems that my prediction was hasty. While the Nikon Z 20mm f/1.8 S is still an incredible performer – and anyone complaining about blurry photos with that lens needs to get their eyes checked – the Sony FE 20mm f/1.8 G manages to take things even further. See for yourself:
Both of these results are very impressive, but the Sony FE 20mm f/1.8 G has the edge. In particular, the differences from f/1.8 through f/2.8 in the center are especially striking. However, even in the corners, sharpness is either comparable or slightly in the Sony’s favor at every aperture.
Considering that the Sony FE 20mm f/1.8 G is $150 less expensive than the Nikon Z 20mm f/1.8 S, as well as smaller and lighter, Sony’s optical engineers have pulled off something amazing. The Nikon Z 20mm f/1.8 S already blew me away, and the Sony FE 20mm f/1.8 G is somehow even sharper.
3. Sony FE 20mm f/1.8 G vs Sony FE 24mm f/1.4 GM
Another top-quality, wide-angle Sony prime is the $1400 Sony FE 24mm f/1.4 GM (see my extensive review of the Sony FE 24mm f/1.4 GM). Although this lens occupies a slightly different niche because of its longer focal length and wider maximum aperture, the two lenses are similar enough that I wanted to test them side-by-side. Here’s what I found:
Yes indeed – the Sony FE 20mm f/1.8 G is sharper than the venerable Sony FE 24mm f/1.4 GM almost everywhere you look. The only place where the 24mm f/1.4 has a clear advantage (aside from the ability to shoot f/1.4!) is corner performance specifically at f/2. Otherwise, the two lenses are either tied, or the FE 20mm f/1.8 G is ahead.
Granted, the whole selling point of the Sony FE 24mm f/1.4 GM is the maximum aperture of f/1.4, so it still makes sense if you need that capability. Other photographers, including me, love the 24mm focal length and might choose it instead for that reason. But if sharpness is your goal, the Sony 20mm f/1.8 is the wide-angle lens to beat.
Coma
Related to sharpness is coma, a lens aberration that can make dots of light in the corner of a photo look like smears.
Coma isn’t usually visible in everyday photography, but for something like Milky Way photography, it can be a major factor. A 20mm f/1.8 lens has an excellent focal length and maximum aperture for Milky Way photography, and I couldn’t wait to put the Sony FE 20mm f/1.8 G’s coma performance to the test.
First, here’s the full image:
Next are crops at both f/1.8 and f/2.8. The images shown below are tiny 1.5 megapixel excerpts from the Sony a7R V’s 61-megapixel sensor. No noise reduction or upsampling has been applied. These crops are taken from the top-right corner of the image in order to exaggerate coma as much as possible. Click to see full size:
This is excellent performance with hardly any coma at f/1.8 and none at f/2.8! If you had hoped to use the Sony FE 20mm f/1.8 G for Milky Way photography, have no fear. It was built for this kind of thing.
Here’s how two alternative lenses perform – the Sony FE 16-35mm f/2.8 GM (shown at 20mm) and Sony FE 24mm f/1.4 GM (shown at f/1.8 and f/2.8). I took these photos within minutes of each other from the same tripod position in order to make them as comparable as possible.
In short, the 20mm f/1.8 G is the best of the three. It beats the 24mm f/1.4 GM slightly at both f/1.8 and f/2.8, while both prime lenses handily beat the Sony 16-35mm f/2.8 GM zoom in terms of coma. Even the zoom lens isn’t bad, though – I’ve seen much worse than that before.
Bokeh
Bokeh is another word for the qualities of the background blur in a photo. Blurry out-of-focus backgrounds with round, uniform highlights are usually considered favorable.
Although a 20mm lens isn’t a typical choice if you want blurry backgrounds, the f/1.8 maximum aperture and reasonably good close-focus capabilities of the Sony FE 20mm f/1.8 G mean that it’s at least a possibility. So, I wanted to put this lens’s bokeh to the test.
Bokeh is always subjective, but personally, I find the background blur of the Sony 20mm f/1.8 G to be surprisingly good. Out-of-focus highlights are rendered soft and round, making for unobtrusive backgrounds. So, feel free to embrace this lens for ultra-wide close-up photography. The bokeh is really quite pleasant.
Sunstars and Flare
A wide-angle lens like the Sony FE 20mm f/1.8 G is commonly used in situations where the sun or other bright points of light are in your photo, like street lamps at night. For that reason, I was eager to test the lens’s performance in terms of sunstars and flare.
As you can see below, you’ll get pretty distinct 18-point stars with the Sony FE 20mm f/1.8 G when the sun is partly covered. There’s also minimal flare in such photos:
In more demanding scenes, however, the story is different. The flare is pretty well-controlled at wider and medium apertures, even when the bare sun is in the frame. But at narrow apertures like f/11 and f/16, you’ll get some really distinct flare with this lens.
Granted, almost all lenses will experience flare when the bare sun is in the frame like this – but it’s still on the high side with the Sony FE 20mm f/1.8 G, especially at narrower apertures.
Summary and Recommendations
The Sony FE 20mm f/1.8 G sets new records for the performance of an ultra-wide lens. Its sharpness, distortion, coma, and chromatic aberration performances are all best-in-class, not to mention that it’s well-built and very portable.
In terms of value, the Sony FE 20mm f/1.8 G’s $900 price tag isn’t low enough that most photographers can buy it on a whim, but it’s still a great price for what you get. By comparison, the Nikon Z 20mm f/1.8 S is $1050, and most ultra-wide f/2.8 zooms are significantly more expensive than that. The only similar third-party lens that I’d consider is the Sigma 20mm f/1.4 Art, which also costs $900 but offers a brighter maximum aperture.
Here’s how I’d sum up the pros and cons of the Sony FE 20mm f/1.8 G.
Pros:
- Best-in-class optical performance in almost every regard, including groundbreaking sharpness
- Remarkably accurate autofocus and good low-light focusing capabilities
- Excellent build quality with tight tolerances and useful handling features
- Small and light – surprisingly so, considering the performance
- Great value at $900
Cons:
- High levels of focus breathing, worth noting for videographers
- Significant vignetting at infinity focus (and still noticeable at narrow apertures)
- Flare is on the high side at narrow apertures
If this pro/con comparison looks lopsided, that’s because it is! There aren’t any major flaws with the Sony FE 20mm f/1.8 G – certainly nothing that would make me recommend against buying this lens. Even the three cons above are things that most users will be able to work around. Frankly, it’s rare to see a lens this impressive.
So, who should get the Sony FE 20mm f/1.8 G? It’s a great landscape, Milky Way, and architectural photography lens, as well as an excellent choice for travel photography because of the small size and weight. Any Sony photographer who needs a wide-angle lens should give this one a serious look. Performance-wise, it’s excellent. The only real question is if a 20mm prime is right for you in the first place. Some photographers will find a zoom to be better for their needs, while others will prefer a prime lens of a different focal length. Don’t buy a lens just because of how sharp it is! I’ve made that mistake before, and I almost always end up selling the lens in question.
However, if you can use a 20mm f/1.8 lens, and you’re a Sony photographer… all I can say is that you’ll be amazed by this one. It is simply one of the best ultra-wide lenses ever made.
Support Photography Life
I hope that you found this review of the Sony FE 20mm f/1.8 G to be useful! You can thank Photography Life for this review by using our affiliate links below when purchasing camera equipment, whether it’s the Sony FE 20mm f/1.8 G or any other gear.
- Sony FE 20mm f/1.8 G at B&H – Current Price and Sales
- Sony FE 20mm f/1.8 G at Adorama – Current Price and Sales
- Sony FE 20mm f/1.8 G at Amazon – Current Price and Sales
- Used/Worldwide: See eBay Prices
Photography Life gets a small percentage of each purchase made through the links above, even if you buy something other than the Sony FE 20mm f/1.8 G, without costing you anything extra.
More Sony FE 20mm f/1.8 G Image Samples
Images and text copyright © Spencer Cox, all rights reserved. Copying or reproduction is not permitted without written permission from the author.
Sony FE 20mm f/1.8 G
- Build Quality and Handling
- Size and Weight
- Sharpness Performance
- Other Image Quality
- Value
Photography Life Overall Rating
Thoughts on the Sony 20mm vs Zeiss Batis 18mm?
Size, weight, aperture all favor Sony.
Zeiss has T*, Zeiss look, and build quality.
I know less about optical performance one vs the other (excepting max aperture of course).
As soon as I test the Batis 18mm, I’ll publish a review of it too! I haven’t had a chance yet, but I should later this year.
Thank you for the excellent review, Spencer! I’m really glad to hear Photography Life will be reviewing more lenses, as I always appreciate PL’s thorough reviews – in particular the lab tests.
Please would Photography Life consider reviewing the Nikon Z-mount DX lenses, as well as their full-frame ones? Sadly not everyone can afford full-frame (I use a Nikon Z50), and so I would really appreciate it if you were able to review Nikon’s Z DX lenses, please – and possibly even Sigma’s Z DX primes?
Those are all on the list! Although I can’t promise how soon it’ll be – probably sometime next year. I’m reviewing one lens per week right now, but some others are my priority at the moment.
Sony has used digital technologies competently. They implemented the technology of focus respiration compensation by cropping part of the frame and recalculating pixels.
I have seen reviews in which, when compared head-on, Sony’s new objects gave a smaller viewing angle.
The only thing I understood is that this technology only works with native glasses. For the old manufacturers of optics, they closed it, as well as imposed restrictions on the maximum frame rate.
Nikon with its Z 20 mm 1.8S acted more honestly and achieved a reduction in focus breathing due to the lens itself.
Sony’s solution made it easier to sharpen the image. And thereby make it easier, cheaper and more compact.
There are always tradeoffs. Digital compensation for focus breathing works well, if you don’t mind the slightly cropped frame. Vignetting and focus breathing were two compromises that Sony made in order to design the 20mm f/1.8 as small as possible while retaining its excellent sharpness.
Hi Spencer – thanks for the review. Interesting. Did you do the MTF measurements on a Sony body or via adapter on Nikon. If the former, could this skew the resolution numbers (one way or the other) and make a direct comparison difficult?
Great question. This will be a pretty long answer, but I’d like to be complete!
We tried a lot of things in the lab to get the MTF numbers to be comparable. An adapter was out of the question because adapting mirrorless lenses cross-brand has significant image quality penalties in the corners. (Plus there is no Canon RF to Nikon Z adapter, so we couldn’t go through with our goal of also reviewing Canon lenses.)
I quickly realized that we needed to test mirrorless lenses on camera bodies of their own brand. We chose similar resolution cameras to keep differences to a minimum and retain compatibility with all of our old lens reviews – that was the Nikon Z7, Canon EOS R5, and Sony a7R III.
However, the differences were still not zero. The Canon R5 has a weak anti-aliasing filter while the other two cameras don’t, for instance. To get fully comparable results, we did extensive lab testing of the same lenses on all three cameras (including DSLR lenses to avoid the adapter unsharpness issue). Then we calculated a conversion factor that would allow us to translate a given MTF result across cameras.
No method is perfect, but this one gives extremely comparable numbers across brands. It means that the MTF numbers in all of our upcoming Canon and Sony reviews will be on a level playing field with our existing Nikon reviews.
More info: photographylife.com/our-c…e-to-nikon
Thank you! Interesting. I had not seen the article, so this is great. Appreciate the effort! All we need now is for you to measure a very poor lens to confirm that the lower end of that regression is accurate as well. ;-)
You also answered another question – regarding corner performance of “off-brand” lenses. I have been considering the Sony 14/1.8 to use it on a Z7/Z8 for astro landscapes, but the edges/corners may not hold up, so maybe not the best idea.
Glad it could be useful! With a really terrible lens, any cross-brand differences between cameras are irrelevant, since the lens would be too blurry to benefit from being on a slightly higher-resolving camera. Technically our conversion factor still applies, but if the lens is that blurry, it would make less than a 1% difference to the final numbers.
Any mirrorless lens, especially wide-angles, I would strongly recommend against adapting across brands if sharpness is your main goal (especially corner sharpness at wide apertures like for the Milky Way). The axis of incoming light in the corners is just too steep. However, one option in your case could be the Sigma 14mm f/1.8 Art, since it’s a DSLR lens. Adapting it with the FTZ adapter should work without issue.
Thanks! I agree. The Sigma is an interesting option, though so heavy (and with the FTZ, also bulky) that it makes me wonder if I wouldn’t just rather expose for twice as long with the 14-24/2.8 Z I already have. The Sony’s combination of size, weight, aperture, and quality appears to be unmatched.
hi Spencer since you know both Sony and Nikon’s 20mm f/1.8 lenses, i would like to ask you which one has better corners and if the nikkor has more coma…
Also is it possible to use the Sony lens on a Nikon body without too much hassle..
I’m interested in this too. My reading of the review of the two lenses is that the Sony is more compact and a better performer. I am almost tempted to try the Megadap ETZ 21 Pro adapter. Spencer, a test of this adapter with this lens would be very interesting.
Hi David, I would strongly recommend against using adapters to put a Sony lens on a Nikon camera if you are interested in maximum performance. Corner sharpness takes a significant hit when you do so. (Central sharpness stays similar, so if that’s your goal, go for it.) This is based on some of the many lab tests I ran when figuring out how to get comparable MTF numbers across brands.
Thank you.
Hi Pieter, the corners are extremely similar on both lenses, less than a 10% difference even at the most, which is roughly the threshold of what’s visible in practice. That said, that sub-10% difference generally does favor the Sony.
As for coma, the two lenses are the same. The Nikon 20mm f/1.8 has an extremely similar coma pattern where it is very low at f/1.8 and almost nonexistent as you stop down.
I very much recommend against using the Sony lens on a Nikon body if you’re asking about critical corner sharpness. Based on my tests, you’ll lose a meaningful amount of corner and midframe performance when adapting mirrorless lenses across brands.
My copy of lens experience lot of coma in the corners, when I use it for Milky Way. It is very strange as I have seen images, which are so good…
The only three possibilities are that the corners were out of focus when you took those photos, you were mistaking long exposure motion blur for coma, or your copy of the lens is decentered.
I hate to put it like that – I know those aren’t three very pleasant options. But coma isn’t particularly subjective. You should be able to get results that match the crops in this article (taken at 8 seconds of exposure to freeze movement for this comparison, and triple checked for pinpoint focus). If not, it is most likely a decentering issue.
Definitely a cool lens and one I’m excited to add to the kit. Great example photos!
Thank you, Alex! I think you’ll like it a lot.
Spencer – Something I didn’t understand were your comments on “focus breathing” … Could you elaborate a little, please.
Sure thing, this is when a lens changes focal length as it’s focused at different distances. It’s usually a bigger problem for videography than for still photography, since this effect can be distracting when you rack focus during a video clip. In still photography, focus breathing mainly comes into play when focus stacking, since it causes your composition to shift slightly during the stack.
The Sony FE 20mm f/1.8 G has relatively high levels of focus breathing, so the difference in focal length is pretty substantial between the close focus and far focus distances. If you watch the video clip that I filmed, you’ll get a sense of how significant the difference is. I’ve seen worse, but I’ve also seen better!
QUOTE Breathing (lens), Wikipedia
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/…ing_(lens)
A lens with a constant focal length will exhibit narrowing of the angle of view at closer focus, and conversely, maintaining a constant angle of view requires precise reduction of focal length as focus is decreased,[1] which some (often higher quality) lenses are designed to do.[2] Lens breathing does not prevent one from racking focus or following focus with this lens, but it lessens the desirability of any type of focus adjustment, since it noticeably changes the composition of the shot.[3]
References
1. Rowlands, D. Andrew (2018). “Equivalence theory for cross-format photographic image quality comparisons”
Optical Engineering. 57 (11): 1
DOI: 10.1117/1.OE.57.11.110801
…
2. What Makes Cinema Lenses So Special!? | DEEP DIVE on Arri Signature Primes. February 2020. Archived from the original on 2021-12-21.
3. “SAMPLE – LENS BREATHING”. hdslr35 on Youtube. Archived from the original on 2021-12-21. Retrieved 13 June 2014.
END OF QUOTE
Reference 1 is an excellent paper; it’s open access and downloadable. The relevant section is:
8 Appendix B: Focus Breathing
The performance for the price of this lens is crazy. Nice review and great shots. Way to go on expanding to Sony and Canon lenses!
Thanks! One review per week is going to be the challenging and exciting part now that the groundwork is finished.
Spencer, thank you for this remarkable review. Sony’s distinction of “G” vs “GM” is more related to price than to performance.
Wish I needed this lens, but I have the Zeiss Loxia 21 which is some ways I prefer, such as having precise mechanical MF and straight aperture blades for clean aperture stars at medium apertures. But the Loxia is not fully weather sealed.
Think of reviewing the 4/16-35 PZ G and the 4/70-200 Macro G. This is my current travel kit (and when anticipating astro I add either the Loxia 21 or the Laowa f2 15mm Zero-D).
Yeah, I think the Loxia 21mm is a fair alternative!
And absolutely, both of those lenses are on my list. I’m starting off reviewing wide-angle lenses and working my way up, for the most part. But I already have a lot of samples from the 70-200mm f/4, so it may sneak ahead a few spots in the list.
Spencer, FYI here are four with the 70-200 macro. The Sept 12 image of the Kilauea eruption was cropped from a 61mp sensor image in order to shoot at f/4. The macro of dogwood berries and the two of the solar eclipse were taken at 280mm using the Sony TC14 1.4x teleconverter. I’m very impressed with this lens. Copy and paste this link to my Google Photos album into your browser. It won’t open directly from this comment blog.
photos.app.goo.gl/5fgq79yNGsBs2kAC9
Ooh, those are nice. Thanks for sharing.