The Sony 16-35mm f/2.8 GM has very few weak points. It’s sharp, well-built, and optically strong in other ways – in particular, the impressive flare performance and low distortion are unusual for an ultra-wide zoom.
Sony evidently saw some places where they could still improve the 16-35mm f/2.8 GM, since they launched a GM II version of the lens in mid-2023. The newer lens shaves off some weight, adds an aperture ring, and improves the close focusing distance. Whether it’s sharper or not remains to be seen – we’ll test that next month. But given the price difference ($1900 vs $2300, and a greater difference on the used market), the original GM version of the 16-35mm f/2.8 will remain a good choice for a lot of Sony photographers.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/21b9e/21b9e83c6664b9de0a770c3a4d0026de7fb3ffa1" alt="Sony GM 16-35mm f2.8 Sample Landscape"
Here’s how I’d sum up the pros and cons.
Pros:
- Best-in-class flare and distortion performance
- Strong sharpness throughout the zoom and aperture range
- Very fast autofocus with good low-light focusing capabilities
- Excellent build quality with good weather sealing
- Advanced handling features befitting a professional lens
- Less expensive than most professional f/2.8 zooms
Cons:
- Noticeable field curvature at the longer focal lengths
- An extending barrel when zooming is not ideal for working in harsh conditions
There are other potential cons if you’re being picky – the pedestrian vignetting and chromatic aberration levels, for example – but this is a very good lens overall. The current price of $1900 isn’t cheap, but it’s less expensive than Canon’s and Nikon’s similar lenses, and it’s $400 less than the cost of the GM II version of the lens.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/055a2/055a2d6f64d7d77d1cb62f7da61c3a3b8bd188af" alt="Sony-16-35mm-f2.8-GM-Sample-00016"
That said, if you’re after maximum performance rather than “just” great performance, you may want to consider one of Sony’s prime lenses instead. The FE 20mm f/1.8 G and the FE 24mm f/1.4 GM both out-perform the 16-35mm f/2.8 GM in sharpness and (to a lesser extent) other aspects of image quality. If you don’t need the flexibility of a zoom or the ability to reach 16mm, those lenses could be better choices than this one – they’re lighter, less expensive, and better optically.
Still, most of us are willing to trade some niche image quality gains for the huge flexibility of a zoom. If that’s true of you, you can’t go wrong with the Sony 16-35mm f/2.8 GM.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d354c/d354c27312102672f25643e4d9732a9f1f065cce" alt="Sony-16-35mm-f2.8-GM-Sample-00009"
I hope that you found this review of the Sony FE 16-35mm f/2.8 GM to be helpful in making your decision! If you want to purchase the lens, you can thank us for the work that went into this review by using the affiliate links below:
- Sony 16-35mm f/2.8 GM at B&H – Current Price and Sales
- Sony 16-35mm f/2.8 GM at Adorama
- Sony 16-35mm f/2.8 GM at Amazon
- Used/International at eBay – Check prices
Photography Life gets a small percentage of each purchase made through the links above, even if you buy something other than the Sony 16-35mm f/2.8 GM, without costing you anything extra. Thank you for supporting our lens testing efforts!
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f54c1/f54c131ada4a226765d9f0972d59d051047bd4a8" alt="Sony-16-35mm-f2.8-GM-Sample-00005"
Images and text copyright © Spencer Cox, all rights reserved. Copying or reproduction is not permitted without written permission from the author.
Sony FE 16-35mm f/2.8 GM
- Build Quality and Handling
- Size and Weight
- Sharpness Performance
- Other Image Quality
- Value
Photography Life Overall Rating
Table of Contents