I used to have a wooden tripod. It was not as bad as it sounds — other photographers were always fascinated by the design, and it was sturdier than you might expect. Unfortunately, despite weighing 4.2 pounds, it had a maximum height of just three feet. Plus, it was bulky. I brought this tripod along on a hiking trip, thinking that these problems wouldn’t be too bad. I was wrong. It was too big to sit well on my backpack, and its weight started to bother me on long hikes. I researched my other options, and carbon fiber tripods began to come up in my searches. I wanted the best possible weight-to-stability ratio, so I knew that I needed to save some money.
Through the course of my research, the tripod brand Really Right Stuff (RRS) began to emerge as the one of the “best” tripod manufacturers. I already had the BH-40 ballhead, which I was quite happy with, so I began to save up. I ultimately ordered the Really Right Stuff TQC-14, a top-of-the line travel tripod.
Table of Contents
- Weight (with center column): 2.7 pounds, 1.2 kilograms
- Weight (center column removed): 2.5 pounds, 1.1 kilograms
- Maximum height (with center column): 59 inches, 1.5 meters
- Maximum height (no center column): 48 inches, 1.2 meters
- Lowest height (with center column): 14.3 inches, 36 centimeters
- Lowest height (no center column): 3.3 inches, 8 centimeters
- Length folded: 17.7 inches, 45 centimeters
- Weight Capacity: RRS claims that it can support 25 pounds (11.3 kg), but I’m sure that it could hold ten times that without slipping. I hung from it for a few seconds, and it didn’t move. These numbers are arbitrary anyway.
- Recommended lenses: According to RRS, you can use this tripod with up to a 500mm f/4 lens, but it’s better for 300mm f/4 lenses, 70-200mm f/2.8 lenses, and smaller.
- Leg angles: 25, 55, and 85 degrees.
- Top tube diameter: 1.13 inches (28.7mm)
- Bottom tube diameter: 0.65 inches (16.5mm)
- Price: $850 new, and almost impossible to find anywhere used.
2) Why This One?
As you can see, the TQC-14 has some pretty impressive specifications. Given its small folded length and light weight, it can hold more weight than you would expect. Since I tend to use my tripod after a long hike, I want the best stability possible at the lowest total weight.
My wooden tripod (the Berlebach 703 Report) weighed me down to the point that I refused to carry it on hikes more than a few miles long. It wasn’t a bad tripod, and, for $250, I would be surprised if there is a sturdier one. But, at 4.2 pounds (plus a one-pound tripod head), it was past the threshold of comfort for hiking long distances. Not to mention that it took up a tremendous amount of space for its short maximum length of just 39 inches. All of this is without bringing up its cumbersome locking knobs and thin feet, which made it irritating to use. These issues led me to go without a tripod during what turned out to be one of the best hikes I have ever taken.
Not wanting to get caught up in the same mess in the future, I knew I needed to replace my tripod. So, why would I go for such an expensive tripod? Would a cheaper one not be able to provide the same benefits, but still leave me money for other equipment?
Truthfully, a cheaper tripod would probably give me sharp shots in many situations. Especially if it weren’t windy, or if I didn’t extend the tripod completely, or if I weren’t shooting from the ocean. Then I realized that, with the lenses I use, the biggest detriment to the image quality of my prints is camera shake. I needed the sturdiest tripod possible, so that I could print a photo 24×36 inches even if the tripod was in a stream at the time of exposure. The reputation of Really Right Stuff is unmatched, which made my decision easier.
I need a sturdy tripod for my prints, and a four-pound tripod is too heavy for some of the hikes that I do. As such, I believe that my decision for the RRS TQC-14 was well-justified. I believe that it is possible to get sturdier tripods if you use telephotos constantly, and you can get lighter tripods for bare-bones heights. To some extent, if you don’t have to carry your tripod far, there are better options available. But I don’t believe that there is any better hiking tripod on the market than the TQC-14.
I decided on Really Right Stuff as a brand before I chose the specific tripod that I wanted from their lineup. Initially, I had my mind on the TVC-24, a slightly larger model. It weighs 3.2 pounds (no center column) and has thicker leg sections that add stability. After spending a lot of time with the TQC-14, I have come to the conclusion that I would have been equally happy with the TVC-24. I would choose between the two based upon the head that you are using — if you have a lightweight ballhead (like the RRS BH-30), I would recommend the lighter TQC-14. If you have a larger ballhead, you would probably prefer the heavier tripod. (Note that I actually use the BH-40 on my TQC-14, so these are just generalizations.)
I have found a few details about the tripod that are worth keeping in mind while you use one. Personally, never having used twist locks before, I found them fantastic. I found it tough to remember which way to turn the locks initially, but it’s now second nature. Also, I can say confidently that, when both are at three feet tall, the TQC-14 is comparable in stability to my old Berlebach, despite being much smaller. The TQC-14 tripod is a bit more prone to vibration at its maximum height, but at this point it is about a foot taller anyway.
When all the leg sections of the TQC-14 are retracted, I don’t think that it is possible to get a sturdier tripod. This remains true when I have extended one of the three leg sections. Even with my longest lens (105mm) at maximum magnification in live view, I can flick the leg of the tripod without the image on screen moving for more than a fraction of a second. With all the leg sections extended, it takes about 1.5 seconds for the image to settle. Not really something to worry about.
Another important thing to mention is the center column, which comes with the tripod. I am generally against center columns, but this one made me reconsider — at 0.2 pounds, its weight is all but negligible, and it is supposed to be sturdy enough to use without much vibration. Still, I eventually decided to remove the center column. Why?
I find that, especially on hills, center columns restrict my ability to lower the camera how I want. As the specifications show, the center column makes it impossible to lower the camera below 14.3 inches, which is actually taller than my miniature tripod’s tallest height. I tend to use a low angle more than a high angle, so I decided that I would rather give up a foot of maximum height in exchange for the ability to go about a foot lower when I need to do so. Truthfully, I haven’t encountered a situation that made me regret my decision.
To remove the center column, follow the instructions that come with the tripod. Even with these instructions, it took me a while to get the tripod back together after I removed the center column. Not a huge deal, and I’d imagine that it’s possible to get quicker with practice, but don’t count on being able to take the column on and off quickly in the field.
On that same note, I didn’t do any practical testing with the quick column, but I believe that it lives up to its reputation of being completely usable if it’s not too windy. It’s not necessary for my uses, but I can see how it would be a useful feature for other people.
Besides its stability, I think that my favorite feature of the TQC-14 is its twist-lock system. On every other tripod I have ever used, I have found the leg locks frustrating or hard to use. With the TQC-14, I can twist all the leg sections at the same time, and it only takes about a quarter turn to unlock all the legs. Plus, like the rest of the tripod, the twist-locks are extremely well-made.
Another, more subtle feature of the TQC-14 is also nice: when the legs fold back up, they don’t hit each other. Instead, the legs come to a stop at exactly a 90 degree angle, about a centimeter before they touch the others. This is nice because it lets you close the tripod without worrying that two of the legs will crush your fingers when you close them.
If you ever take your tripod into wet, muddy, or sandy areas, you will appreciate how easy it is to clean. To take apart a section, you just unscrew the twist-locks a few turns, and then the leg slides out completely. Rinse it with water and a towel, and re-apply grease if you wiped off some. It goes back together exactly the same way. For a traveling photographer, it could not be easier to maintain this tripod. RRS has a guide online to make it easier, which is also nice.
Like most high-end tripods, the TQC-14 allows you to switch out the tripod’s feet without resorting to power tools. I bought the spike feet from RRS, which makes it easier to secure the tripod in sand or mud.
One of my favorite features of the TQC-14 is how easy it is to position its legs at different angles. Most tripods have awkwardly small buttons that you have to push and hold, which is fairly slow to use. The TQC-14, though, has a large metal slider (almost like a switch) that you pull from the top of the legs. Once you pull the slider out, you can position the leg at any of the three angles (25, 55, and 85 degrees). The slider snaps back into place with a light tap, locking the legs again.
Lastly, I applaud Really Right Stuff for including a thread-locking product with the tripod, along with the hex keys that tighten the tripod’s various joints. It goes to show that RRS cares that the customer can maintain the tripod’s condition, something that most tripod companies don’t bother to consider. This focus on the customer is one of the main reasons that I chose RRS over another high-end brand of tripods.
There are two minor problems with this tripod, from my experience. Actually, they are more like suggestions for the TQC-14 Mark II than actual issues.
First, I wish that the butterfly knob (the one-inch piece of aluminum between the tripod head and the legs) could be removable along with the center column. This would make the tripod a bit shorter for those of us trying to save as much space as possible. Also, this knob can hit the lever on Really Right Stuff’s BH-40 ballhead (only the older version of the head, though).
Second, I wish that the second angle on the tripod were 45 degrees instead of 55 degrees. The other two angle settings (25 and 85 degrees) are fine, but the 55 degree setting is just wide enough that it has a bit of bounce if a strong force (or a heavy lens) is applied to the top. Plus, 45 degrees is theoretically the most stable angle for a brace, although this is probably insignificant. Granted, I have no idea what design considerations went into the TQC-14, so perhaps it is impossible to design the tripod to work at 45 degrees anyway.
The TQC-14 is extremely stable for its weight, but it isn’t always the perfect platform. If it is extremely windy, or if you are photographing from a stream, there may be slight blur in telephoto images. This improves vastly with fewer leg sections extended, though. Here is how I use my TQC-14:
- With my 105mm telephoto, I am wary of extending the tripod to its maximum height in anything more than a light wind. I try not to extend that section at all, actually. Luckily, there are very few situations that necessitate using a telephoto at a four-foot height rather than a three-foot height. When I use the tripod in heavy wind or a stream, I try not to extend either of the bottom two sections.
- With my 50mm lens, I tend to avoid extending the bottom section if it is very windy. I have never seen any vibration once I collapse the bottom section, no matter how windy.
- With my 24mm lens, I have never seen any blur under any conditions. If it is super windy, or if I am in a strong stream, I may collapse the bottom section just for peace of mind.
I have not tested any of RRS’s heavier tripods, so it is possible that they would be better in these situations. Still, the TQC-14 is fantastic, even with a telephoto — if it’s super windy, I just know that I have to lower the tripod.
If you are considering a different RRS tripod, such as the TVC-24, it all comes down to how much you shoot with the tripod at its full height. If a tripod’s stability is based on its weight-to-height ratio, the TVC-24 is about as stable at full height as the TQC-14 is with its bottom section retracted. (With the 3.2 pound TVC-24, the ratio is one pound per fifteen inches at four feet tall. With the 2.5 pound TQC-14, that ratio is one pound per fifteen inches at three feet tall.)
Is this difference worth 3/4 pound to you? For those of you who don’t hike much, the answer is probably yes. If you do hike a lot, the weight difference may be significant. Do you hike with your camera more, or do you shoot more in windy conditions? You can’t go wrong with either the TQC-14 or the TVC-24, but each has its strengths.
I believe that the RRS TQC-14 is the traveling photographer’s dream tripod. At this weight and height, I cannot see how there could be a more stable tripod on the market, and I know that there isn’t one that is more well-built.
Really Right Stuff is one of the few companies which I would always recommend buying new equipment, as opposed to searching for something on the used market. Their customer service is amazing, of course, but I also have heard that they silently improve the design of their tripods over time. If you want to know that you have the most current version, buying direct is a must. Plus, no one sells these tripods on the used market in the first place.
The TQC-14 is light enough that it’s easy to carry all day, and it’s so well-constructed that I actually enjoy carrying it. If I always have a tripod with me, that could be the difference between ISO 100 and ISO 800, or f/11 and f/4. Either way, for landscape images especially, carrying a tripod makes it possible to print images at a far higher quality than you otherwise could.
As the photos from this article demonstrate, I have brought the TQC-14 places where I would not bring anything larger. I carried it around in a bag during my trip to New York City, and I ultimately took photos that would have been impossible otherwise. If you hike long distances with your equipment and you don’t use a massive telephoto lens, there is perhaps no better tripod in the world.
You can purchase the TQC-14 from our trusted partner B&H Photo Video.
- Build Quality
- Size and Weight
- Ease of Use
- Speed and Performance
Photography Life Overall Rating
I own a TVC 34L since 2014 and the question for me is does it really worth the money? After six years of use in different weather conditions (I live in Canada and winter is very rough here), I can say that it is no doubt a good tripod, but that it is way too expensive and waaaaaayyyy overrated as being the ultimate tripod. If I had to buy again, I will never. Over my six years of ownership, I had a chance to try other brands, especially a Sirui carbon fiber (w-2204) that I borrowed from a friend.
So, for a full day, I had a chance to compare my RRS with the Sirui in 4 conditions of lighting: sun, golden hour, blue hour and full darkness. The test I made was to take the 3 same photos with the same camera and the same lens, under these four conditions with each tripod. A total of 24 photos, as 2 sets of 12. Back home, I looked on the computer at each photos at different magnification, pixel peeping as much as I could and I was not able to see any difference that would justify the difference of price between the two tripods.
That test has convinced me that I paid way too much for my tripod and that I had been too much influenced by the unjustified hype surrounding this brand.
Also, when I purchased the TVC34L through the RRS Web site, they sent me a used tripod. I know it thanks to the blue oil you are instructed to put in the legs joint. Mine had dried Vibra-Tite in there, so it was obviously not a brand new tripod that I nevertheless paid full price. RRS never agreed to offer a discount when I realized their scheme.
So all things considered, I cannot warn your readers enough to look at other brands before they fall under the craze surrounding this overpriced product.
Hi Jeff, Let me know if you want to sell the tripod :). I am on Fred Miranda forums looking for one
I performed an informal test using a laser pointer mounted onto the hot shoe of several camera setups (wide angle and telephoto lenses) of varying weight and calibrated vibration (weight on a pendulum) to test several tripods, including Slik, Feisol CT3442, Gitzo and Really Right Stuff. The RRS tripods tested with much lower vibration and faster dampening. I think it’s partially due to the more rigid tubes RRS uses, but also the rigidity and tighter manufacturing tolerances of their design (leg locks and spider) that contributes to the lower vibration and faster dampening. Thom Hogan has a good article on choosing tripods and saving yourself money in the long term. www.bythom.com/support.htm
I remember several years ago RRS sent me a more controlled study using an accelerometer to measure vibration. I’m an engineer, so that technical study finally convinced me to buy an RRS tripod. I have never looked back. I’ve shot in a variety of inclement weather conditions, from rain to extreme cold and the RRS tripods smooth controls, design (radius of corners) ease of handling give me lots more confidence than the other tripods I’ve owned. The Gitzo 1227 MK2 Mountaineer that I owned was only 1/3 lb lighter than my TVC-24L but it couldn’t handle nearly the weight that the TVC-24L can, plus the TVC-24L can extend a foot higher than the Gitzo 1227, without center column extended (the TVC-24L does not have a center column) and yet can get down to 3.4″ from the ground, while the Gitzo can only get down to 13″ from the ground.
After our last two week trip to the UK with lots of hiking and walking around the various cities, I found the combination of the TVC-24L and Arca Swiss Cube a little too bulky and heavy for international travel at almost 5.5lbs and 27″ in length. The RRS TQC-14 and Acratech Ultimate is 1.7lbs lighter and 4.7″ shorter. That might not seem all that much, but the TQC-14 can fit into international carry-on easily and 1.7lbs is considerably lighter. You’ll notice the difference when carrying it all day.
Hope you guys find that helpful.
I have the RRS BH-40 (with the new logo). I have spoken with RRS Customer service and they said that the base of the BH40 does not sit properly on the tripod because of the butterfly knob for the quick column. But in your photo, it doesn’t look like there’s a problem. I could certainly get the TFC version but I like the option of being able to raise the column if I ever need the extra height.
I now have the new BH-40 as well, and it seems to be exactly the same size as the old one. The older version still had a decent bit of room before it hit the butterfly clamp, too — it wasn’t particularly close. However, I no longer have the TQC-14, so I cannot test and tell you with certainty.
Sorry for the slow response. Just saw your comment earlier today.
Curious to know what you changed it out for!
One model heavier, the TVC-24!
I have two questions on the Feisol tripod model CT-3372LV RAPID
1- Do you know the canadian distributor ? , Please add your comments
2- Comment this model from Feisol
Sorry I forgot to add the name of the distributor, It is ”Vancouver Photo Network Webstore”
Really Right Stuff certainly make great products and that is reflected in their prices. As to the article the points you made about the twist locks & tools could equally be said about Gitzo tripods as they provide allen keys and online help. My head of choice is the Arca-Swiss Z1 (I also have the RRS BH-55) this is in my opinion the Rolls-Royce of ball heads however the BH-55 is built like a tank but with great finesse and I love the adaptor plate options RRS has they are far better than Arca-Swiss.
My tripods include the RRS TVC-24 and I agree with your comments about it its a superb product. I also have the Gitzo GT2540LLVL levelling tripod it to is a great product and fast for levelling as the name implies, moral of both is you get what you pay for.
Thank you for sharing your perspective! I just got back from Iceland, and I carried the TVC-24 the entire time (swapped out my TQC-14 because of the insane winds in Iceland). I shot about 3500 frames from my TVC-24, and I could not be happier. At one point, the wind was about 30mph during the most beautiful hour of lighting that I have ever seen. With a cheaper tripod, I don’t think that the results would be printable (as it is, that photo is one of my all-time favorites).
Thanks for your review. Your input was the one review that threw me over the top in making my decision. I put a Acrutech GPS ballhead on them and I could not be happier. The TQC-14 is engineered to be stable at the weight and height that they are, no more, no less! Shooting from different heights is just not me and these legs at a shorter level are extremely stable. This product is really outstanding and I look forward to hauling them over hills and valleys and through airports. They just work! Pricy, yes, and one can not go to a store nearby and handle a set but, when you call the staff tells you that if they don’t meet your needs just send them back. Problem is once you have them in you hands you will not let go.
I am glad to hear about your positive experiences! Sorry that I am late to reply… somehow I missed your comment.
I have tried a couple other tripods since I wrote the review, and nothing has the same stability/weight ratio as the TQC-14. Including a $400 carbon fiber tripod that I tried recently, which weighed more and was far less stable.
Hello Spencer, could you name this $400 tripod please? I am looking for travel tripod and want to avoid mistake. RRS is too expensive in my country, so TQC-14 is unfortunately not an option right now, but cheaper brands are.
Sorry I’m responding a bit late — comments from this article aren’t showing up in my inbox.
It’s the Oben CC-2461. However, the Oben BE-126T head is wonderful, and I highly recommend it if you need a less-expensive head. (It’s not as good as a $300 RRS model, but it is in the same ballpark.)
Spencer, you mentioned the problem of working with a tripod in windy conditions. I assume the RRS like other top tripods has a center column hook for adding weight for stability (e.g., your backpack). That can considerably improve stability and reduce anxiety about equipment damage in adverse conditions.
The TQC-14 does have a hook, and I do hang my bag from it sometimes. The issue with it (and all tripod hooks) is that, although hanging a weight makes the tripod less likely to fall over, it does almost nothing to dampen small vibrations. Still, it is a useful feature to have if you are worried the tripod will fall.
For $47, I am sure that the Dolica is quite a good tripod. However, for many photographers, there is of course a reason to go for bigger and/or stronger tripods, and in many cases it can be more important than a lens. I delayed buying a D800e for several months in favor of using this tripod with the D7000, and I am happy with the decision.
I have owned several tripods at different prices, and I would be shocked if any $47 tripod+ballhead combo would be able to hold a heavy setup (say, a full-frame camera + 70-200mm zoom) at full height without vibration, especially in the wind or water. Still, if you use it in good conditions, I’m sure it is a far cry better than nothing.
I agree that it is great that so much equipment is selling for low prices, and it allows people like me (a student photographer on a student budget) to buy great gear for far less than it would have cost a few years ago. I would love to try the Dolica, since I am sure it is a great budget option.
Thank you for sharing your experiences!
I agree some people need bigger, heavier, and thus more sturdy tripods. You will not fool physics, you always need more mass for more stability (mass is even more crucial for wind or water conditions you mentioned…). However, I dared to compare your tripod vs. mine, both of which are not to support heavy setup you described but still provide good results and most importantly are lightweight and convenient for travel. I believe real life results of both tripods would be close, curious to see a comparison like this… By the way, I envy your ‘student’ budget. Where I come from, to have gear like that you need to be a well paid professional.Thanks for replying.
I also would like to compare the two if I get the chance, and I would probably be pleasantly surprised by the Dolica.
My equipment probably makes it seem like my budget is larger than it really is : ). In truth, I waited about a year to afford this tripod. I am lucky enough that I make some money from print sales, and aside from that I just save everything I can and wait.
I am glad that you and the other Mateo both like the Dolica. I do actually use the setup I described (albeit with the 105mm macro rather than a 70-200mm), and I can assure you that, even in heavy wind, there is absolutely no vibration visible in final photos from the TQC-14. Further, when I lock the ballhead I use (the BH-40), the image doesn’t slip at all. I also have a $100 Giottos ballhead, which slips considerably with this lens. This is what makes the RRS worth the money to many people.
That said, if the Dolica is good for you, that’s fantastic. Not everyone needs a $1000 tripod in the same way that not everybody needs a $1000 lens. It all depends upon how you use your equipment.
Keep up with the good work Spencer! I wish you all the best and lots of life-changing travels, constantly new perspectives to be discovered in your photographs.
Stick to your guns. I love saving money, but its not possible (yet) to get a good cheap travel tripod. They don’t exist. I have an older Gitzo Traveler and never regretted the expense. This RRS is even better. Your photos and back will appreciate it everyday.
I got one of those $40 Dolica tripods a few years ago. It’s actually very nice for the money and it works fairly well for a small point and shoot camera, but no way would it work for a DSLR.
It appears that there are two comments already by you (or two users with the same name), so I am not quite sure what you are talking about…
There are two Mateos apparently. My comment finally appeared, thank you.
Spencer, good review, but I think when you’re doing a product review of something like a tripod it would be really helpful if there were more pictures of the actual product. For example, when you’re talking about the twist locks, providing a nice photo of the twist locks would be helpful. Or when you were talking about the butterfly lock. Or maybe some pictures of the tripod in its various states of extension with a person standing next to it for scale or showing the actual tripod in use in various scenarios so the readers can see how it performs in action. Things like that to help illustrate the features of the product you are reviewing better. Something to consider for the future or for amending this article.