Photography Life

PL provides various digital photography news, reviews, articles, tips, tutorials and guides to photographers of all levels

  • Reviews
  • Learn
  • About Us
  • Forum
  • Search
Home → Reviews → Cameras and Lenses → Nikon Z 28-75mm f/2.8 Review

Nikon Z 28-75mm f/2.8

By Spencer Cox 40 Comments
Last Updated On December 17, 2022

«»

Table of Contents

  • Specifications and Build Quality
  • Optical Features
  • Sharpness Comparisons
  • Verdict
  • More Sample Images
  • Reader Comments
Disclosures, Terms and Conditions and Support Options
guest

guest

40 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Marc Petzold
Marc Petzold
January 8, 2023 11:54 am

I don’t understand that (it was being known since the 1st rumors) Nikon licensed another Tamron Zoom design, but only the way old G1, and this lens here costs more, than the later, much sharper, better Tamron 28-75/2.8 G2 for Sony E-Mount, into a Nikon disguise…

Perhaps, Nikon doesn’t want anything “value” which could come close to their mighty 24-70/2.9 Z, which sells for a premium, of course. No offense.

-1
Reply
Marc Petzold
Marc Petzold
Reply to  Marc Petzold
January 8, 2023 11:55 am

Sorry typo, of course i meant the Nikon Nikkor 24-70/F2.8 Z-Mount, not F2.9 ;)

0
Reply
Mark Laidlaw
Mark Laidlaw
December 24, 2022 4:06 pm

I think I fall into the category of “Real-World Photographer”. I shoot about 2 jobs/week, usually on location, photography is definitely not a hobby.

Main body is a Z9, with 2 Z6’s as backups or when I’m running multiple sets. Usually I shoot prime lenses because we’re shooting tabletop stuff, and I’ve got plenty of time to consider composition.

I own this lens, instead of the 24-70 f/4. I almost bought the 24-70 f/2.8S, but I can’t stand the ergonomics of it. The 24-70’s narrow zoom ring on the Z9 makes it uncomfortable to zoom in and out, and near impossible with one flick of the fingers without twisting your elbow. Although the optics aren’t anywhere near as good, the weight and shape of the 28-75 simply make it easier to use when you’re constantly zooming in and out.

My results match yours though. Good in the center, not great in the periphery unless stopped down.
In the places where I’d use a 24-70 2.8, it’s fine. Not amazing, but not terrible. Would I use it for critical studio work, absolutely not. But for a general 2.8 zoom when shooting lifestyle work, it’s actually just fine, plus it feels better in the hands when you’re in the trenches and have to act fast.

0
Reply
Spencer Cox
Spencer Cox
Author
Reply to  Mark Laidlaw
January 4, 2023 6:52 pm

That’s a very “real-world photographer” thing of you to do, Mark – choosing equipment based on ergonomics and speed of use, rather than utmost corner sharpness at f/2.8 :)

0
Reply
Christian
Christian
December 23, 2022 12:50 am

Great and detailed review as always! Keep up the good work. I am considering getting this lens for travel photography and general walk around lens. I am a photographer and use have z6 and z6ii along with 14-30s, 20s, 35s, 50s lenses and 105 1.4e So basically all my pro needs are covered with the above lenses. The z6 is also astromodified, but its usable for daytime images as well. Sometimes I wish myself I had a light walk around lens for travel. But it’s not an easy choice.
1. 28-75
2. 24-200
3. z30+18-140
4. z30+16-50 + 50-250

The 4 options are about the same price with the winter deals. Or option 5. get nothing and use my 35 for travel.

0
Reply
Spencer Cox
Spencer Cox
Author
Reply to  Christian
December 23, 2022 12:03 pm

It sounds to me like you have the wide apertures covered with your prime lenses, so I don’t think the 28-75mm f/2.8 is the way to go for you. I think the 24-200mm (probably also carrying the 35mm or 50mm prime along) would make a more natural travel kit and extend your existing capabilities.

The Z30 + 18-140mm would also be a good alternative if you want something smaller and lighter. I don’t think I’d go with the Z30 + two lens kit unless you want much more reach on the long end. 140mm is already a lot on a DX camera.

0
Reply
Andrew Llewellyn
Andrew Llewellyn
December 19, 2022 1:17 pm

Very measured review, and, very accurate, as I did buy this lens on offer. I also have the Z 24-120 f4 which gives me options. In the studio the f4 is heavier and sometimes hesitates to focus in low contrast light. The 28-75 f2.8 focuses better in low contrast situations and is lighter in weight. I am using it to shoot fashion and beauty and in most situations is sharp enough, as I am only using the central area, and sometimes you actually don’t want pin sharp for creative reasons

0
Reply
Spencer Cox
Spencer Cox
Author
Reply to  Andrew Llewellyn
December 19, 2022 5:56 pm

Thank you, Andrew! It sounds like you have good experience with both of them.

And even at its worst, we’re hardly dealing with a Lensbaby-type lens — it takes a lot of magnification in post-processing to see the weaker areas of the 28-75mm.

0
Reply
Alex
Alex
December 18, 2022 12:04 pm

Hi Spencer, thank you for the review! It would be great if you included some portraits as well. Do you think this lens can be used for close-ups or full-body portraits? Will the blur match or come close to the 50mm F2 lens blur when used at 75mm F2.8 ?

0
Reply
Spencer Cox
Spencer Cox
Author
Reply to  Alex
December 18, 2022 12:15 pm

It would make a good portrait option at 75mm and f/2.8. The amount of background blur will be similar to the 50mm f/2 at that focal length / aperture. Although the 85mm f/1.8 S would be the best of the three options if you’re a dedicated portrait photographer.

As for close-ups, the 28-75mm f/2.8 does well with a 1:3 magnification. For something like flower photography, it would probably be enough. Otherwise the 50mm f/2 would be the better option.

1
Reply
Alex
Alex
Reply to  Spencer Cox
December 19, 2022 11:40 pm

Thank you Spencer!

0
Reply
Robert John
Robert John
December 18, 2022 7:30 am

Nothing here to get excited about. I’ve been told off before, but I do regard this as Nikon messing about when they could be developing a Z mount D500 and, say, a 10-20. Even Canon have managed the R7 (although without a decent lens).
Aps-c is such a good camera format in terms of ergonomics and value for money, especially for wildlife. Over at Mirrorless Comparisons they are big fans of the 300/f4 with TCs on a Z mount.

0
Reply
Spencer Cox
Spencer Cox
Author
Reply to  Robert John
December 18, 2022 12:12 pm

I hope that they do make a D500-type camera for the Z system before long. The Canon EOS R7 looks good, maybe Nikon will decide to create a competitor.

0
Reply
Marc Petzold
Marc Petzold
Reply to  Spencer Cox
January 8, 2023 11:56 am

A Nikon Z-500 APS-C/DX would being extraordinary. Especially because of the x1.52 cropfactor technically, for the birders, -wildlife shooters. So better Nikon should bring out a Z-500, instead of a Z-70….

0
Reply
Andrew
Andrew
December 17, 2022 10:45 pm

Thanks for the review. Ultimately it is a more affordable offering than the 24-70 f2.8 with a little less quality.

Personally I would have liked to see something more innovative like a 35-85 f2.8 or even f2 lens for portraiture. Now that would make a new lens interesting beyond simply price.

1
Reply
Spencer Cox
Spencer Cox
Author
Reply to  Andrew
December 18, 2022 12:11 pm

Sure thing, Andrew! I agree, it would be nice to see Nikon branch out a bit now that they’ve filled in most of the common types of lenses.

0
Reply
Filip
Filip
December 17, 2022 5:14 pm

Please fix the vignetting comment – it says it’s worst at 24mm, but that’s outside the focal range.

0
Reply
Spencer Cox
Spencer Cox
Author
Reply to  Filip
December 17, 2022 5:56 pm

Good catch, thank you, Filip. Consider it fixed!

0
Reply
Patrick Smith
Patrick Smith
December 17, 2022 2:21 pm

Looks like a nice copy of the Tamron, nothing too exciting. The biggest issue with this lens is it’s competition. The F-mount 24-70mm f/2.8E VR adapts well via FTZ, especially on the Z9! It’s around $1000-$1300 USD in mint condition and it’s a better lens in every way. It’s autofocus is faster, it’s aperture is not only f/2.8…but it’s true to its value. I bet this 28-70mm is more like an f/3.5 T-stop wise…meaning I think it’s light transmission is nowhere near as bright as the F-mount. The next issue is the amazing 24-70mm f/2.8 S, which you can sometimes find used for a good price. I know someone who got one for $1250 and it was like brand new in the box and had the USA warranty card still in the box. So I’m just not sure how many people will ever buy this lens. Don’t get me wrong, I’m not saying it looks like a bad lens, I just wouldn’t pay $1000+ for this, no way. Too many amazing lenses in that price range.

0
Reply
Spencer Cox
Spencer Cox
Author
Reply to  Patrick Smith
December 17, 2022 5:58 pm

I’ll check on the T-stop possibility later tonight and compare it to other f/2.8 lenses that I have on hand. In any case, you’re right about the good range of options from the used market. Midrange zooms are a pretty saturated part of Nikon’s lineup, especially once you start considering DSLR glass.

0
Reply
Adam
Adam
Reply to  Patrick Smith
December 18, 2022 1:56 am

I owned f mount 24-70 2.8 and tamron f mount 24-70 g2. Yes, both of them are “better” lenses. But they are much heavier and bigger. As n wedding/event photographer I can’t stress how big difference does this make. Operating camera body, with flash and mid range zoom 2.8 lens for many hours, using only one hand is finally possible. Can’t wait for 70-180 and for sure I am buying 17-28 on spring. Currently I use Tamron 15-30.

0
Reply
Mr. Parasini
Mr. Parasini
December 17, 2022 2:12 pm

Another great review and beautiful photos, Spencer! This lens is a solid performer and a nice option in a N lineup. My 2 cents: it’s still too pricey for such a boring focal lengths and f-stop combo. And one more thing: almost any lens is good when stopped down to f 11 – f 16.

0
Reply
Spencer Cox
Spencer Cox
Author
Reply to  Mr. Parasini
December 17, 2022 3:04 pm

I’m glad you liked the review and the photos! It’s true, at f/11 or f/16, most differences vanish no matter what lens you’re using. That’s largely why I picked the 24-200mm f/4-6.3 for my personal landscape photography.

3
Reply

Learn

  • Beginner Photography
  • Landscape Photography
  • Wildlife Photography
  • Portraiture
  • Post-Processing
  • Advanced Tutorials

Reviews

  • Camera Reviews
  • Lens Reviews
  • Other Gear Reviews
  • Best Cameras and Lenses

Photography Tutorials

Photography Basics
Landscape Photography
Wildlife Photography
Macro Photography
Composition & Creativity
Black & White Photography
Night Sky Photography
Portrait Photography
Street Photography
Photography Videos

Unique Gift Ideas

Best Gifts for Photographers

Subscribe via Email

If you like our content, you can subscribe to our newsletter to receive weekly email updates using the link below:

Subscribe to our newsletter

Site Menu

  • About Us
  • Beginner Photography
  • Lens Database
  • Lens Index
  • Photo Spots
  • Search
  • Forum

Reviews

  • Reviews Archive
  • Camera Reviews
  • Lens Reviews
  • Other Gear Reviews

More

  • Contact Us
  • Subscribe
  • Workshops
  • Support Us
  • Submit Content

Copyright © 2023 · Photography Life

You are going to send email to

Move Comment