Photography Life

PL provides various digital photography news, reviews, articles, tips, tutorials and guides to photographers of all levels

  • Lens Reviews
  • Camera Reviews
  • Tutorials
  • Compare Cameras
  • Forum
    • Sign Up
    • Login
  • About
  • Search
Home โ†’ Reviews โ†’ Cameras and Lenses โ†’ Nikon Z 26mm f/2.8 Review

Nikon Z 26mm f/2.8 Review

By Spencer Cox 47 Comments
Last Updated On January 26, 2024

«»

Nikon Z 26mm f/2.8 vs Nikon Z 28mm f/2.8

I’ve already mentioned the Nikon Z 28mm f/2.8 several times in this review, and that’s because it’s impossible to escape their similarities. Both lenses have a similar design philosophy – small and light! – with the same maximum aperture and nearly the same focal length. How do their optics compare, though? Here’s what I measured in the lab, with the 26mm followed by the 28mm:

Nikon-Z-26mm-f2.8-MTF-Performance

Nikon Z 28mm f2.8 MTF Performance

It’s an interesting comparison. At f/2.8, the winner is the Nikon Z 26mm f/2.8, which has a much sharper center, slightly sharper midframes, and very comparable corner performance. As you stop down, however, the Nikon Z 26mm f/2.8 barely improves, while the Nikon Z 28mm f/2.8 gets much sharper. Corner performance in particular is far higher on the Nikon Z 28mm f/2.8 at f/4 and beyond. (Midframe performance on the 28mm f/2.8 doesn’t measure very high due to wavy field curvature.)

If you tend to shoot at f/2.8 most of the time, the Nikon Z 26mm f/2.8 takes the win, thanks to its high central sharpness. Otherwise, this comparison isn’t much of a contest – the Nikon Z 28mm f/2.8 is the sharper lens overall.

Nikon Z 26mm f/2.8 vs Nikon Z 24mm f/1.8 S

How does the Nikon Z 26mm f/2.8 compare to a high-end Nikon Z prime like the 24mm f/1.8 S? It’s probably no surprise that the S-line lens wins. But by how much? Here are the Imatest graphs, starting with the 26mm f/2.8 again:

Nikon-Z-26mm-f2.8-MTF-Performance

Nikon Z 24mm f/1.8 S MTF Performance

That’s not a close contest. The Nikon Z 24mm f/1.8 S simply blows away the Nikon Z 26mm f/2.8 in the shared aperture range, especially in the corners. Even at f/11 and f/16 (where most lenses perform very similarly) the corners of the Nikon Z 24mm f/1.8 S are a good bit sharper. Now you see what you’re giving up with a lens that prioritizes portability over all other considerations.

Just for fun, next let’s do a comparison of the Nikon Z 26mm f/2.8 against one of the most popular Nikon Z zooms, the 24-120mm f/4 S.

Nikon Z 26mm f/2.8 vs Nikon 24-120mm f/4 S

I don’t think that very many people will be trying to decide between these two lenses directly, but this section should still be a good reference. If you already have the Nikon Z 24-120mm f/4 S (or the similarly sharp Nikon Z 24-70mm f/4 S), now you’ll know how Nikon’s lightest Z lens compares.

Nikon-Z-26mm-f2.8-MTF-Performance

Nikon Z 24-120mm f4 S MTF Performance 24mm

Prime lenses usually beat zooms in terms of sharpness, but not this time. The Nikon Z 26mm f/2.8 is one of the weaker prime lenses I’ve tested, and the Nikon Z 24-120mm f/4 S is a great zoom lens. At f/4 and f/5.6 in particular, it’s really no contest – the 24-120mm f/4 S is a cut above. The two lenses get closer in performance at the narrower apertures, but even at f/16, the corner performance of the 24-120mm f/4 is stronger.

Our Thoughts

Spencer: Based on what we found on the previous page of the review, I can’t say I’m surprised by the results here.

Nasim: As a lens reviewer, I don’t give the 26mm f/2.8 high marks for sharpness. I will say, it could always be worse, and I’ve tested worse lenses before – just not Nikon Z glass.

Spencer: One point in defense of the Nikon Z 26mm f/2.8 is the good central performance at every aperture, including f/2.8. Doesn’t that matter more than corner performance to a lot of photographers?

Nasim: Yes, just because you and I tend to stare at corners when we review lenses, does not make it a popular hobby. Although, it might be popular among some of the people reading this :)

Spencer: But to the broader point, I doubt that most photographers would prefer a weaker lens if given the choice. The Z 28mm f/2.8 is a better performer, it’s less expensive, and it’s almost as light. I think it has more appeal overall.

The next page of this review sums up everything and explains the pros and cons of the Nikon Z 26mm f/2.8. So, click the menu below to go to “Verdict”:

Table of Contents

  • Specifications and Construction
  • Optical Features
  • Sharpness Comparisons
  • Verdict
  • More Sample Images
  • Reader Comments
«»
Looking for even more exclusive content?

On Photography Life, you already get world-class articles with no advertising every day for free. As a Member, you'll get even more:

Silver ($5/mo)
  • Exclusive articles
  • Monthly Q&A chat
  • Early lens test results
  • "Creative Landscape Photography" eBook
Gold ($12/mo)
  • All that, PLUS:
  • Online workshops
  • Monthly photo critiques
  • Vote on our next lens reviews
 
Click Here to Join Today
 
Disclosures, Terms and Conditions and Support Options

Learn

  • Beginner Photography
  • Landscape Photography
  • Wildlife Photography
  • Portraiture
  • Post-Processing
  • Advanced Tutorials
Photography Life on Patreon

Reviews

  • Camera Reviews
  • Lens Reviews
  • Other Gear Reviews
  • Best Cameras and Lenses

Photography Tutorials

Photography Basics
Landscape Photography
Wildlife Photography
Macro Photography
Composition & Creativity
Black & White Photography
Night Sky Photography
Portrait Photography
Street Photography
Photography Videos

Unique Gift Ideas

Best Gifts for Photographers

Site Menu

  • About Us
  • Beginner Photography
  • Lens Database
  • Lens Index
  • Photo Spots
  • Search
  • Forum

Reviews

  • Reviews Archive
  • Camera Reviews
  • Lens Reviews
  • Other Gear Reviews

More

  • Contact Us
  • Workshops
  • Support Us
  • Submit Content

Copyright © 2025 ยท Photography Life

You are going to send email to

Move Comment