Photography Life

PL provides various digital photography news, reviews, articles, tips, tutorials and guides to photographers of all levels

  • Lens Reviews
  • Camera Reviews
  • Tutorials
  • Compare Cameras
  • Forum
    • Sign Up
    • Login
  • About
  • Search
Home → Reviews → Cameras and Lenses → Nikon Z 24-70mm f/2.8 S Review

Nikon Z 24-70mm f/2.8 S Review

By Nasim Mansurov 22 Comments
Last Updated On March 6, 2024

«»

Table of Contents

  • Introduction & Build Quality
  • Optical Performance
  • Lens Comparisons
  • Verdict
  • More Image Samples
  • Reader Comments
Looking for even more exclusive content?

On Photography Life, you already get world-class articles with no advertising every day for free. As a Member, you'll get even more:

Silver ($5/mo)
  • Exclusive articles
  • Monthly Q&A chat
  • Early lens test results
  • "Creative Landscape Photography" eBook
Gold ($12/mo)
  • All that, PLUS:
  • Online workshops
  • Monthly photo critiques
  • Vote on our next lens reviews
 
Click Here to Join Today
 
Disclosures, Terms and Conditions and Support Options
guest

guest

22 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Jurry de Vries
Jurry de Vries
July 6, 2024 4:49 am

Dear Spencer,

Thanks for a solid review and comparison. I recently exchanged the Z 24-70 f/4 for the f/2.8 for multiple reasons: 1) I use it often in low-light conditions, and the 2.8 is simply stronger at that than the 4.
Secondly, I like the feel and weight better. I initially used the 24-70 f/4 on the Z6 II body, which was a nice combination. But now that I am using the Z8, this 2.8 feels better balanced with the camera.
Built quality: it feels (and probably ois) stronger

2
Reply
andy
andy
March 5, 2024 11:51 am

“You won’t be able to meaningfully beat this lens in sharpness unless you use a prime lens.” of course if 24-70G nicely removed from the comparison.

The sharpness comparison is not consistent. It doesn’t make any sense comparing different lenes results made on the sensors with different resolution 36Mpix G, E vs 45Mpix for Z.
If you would take Nikkor E or G lens install it via FTZ adapter on Z7 and read results from imatest then it would be real lens comparison, but it seems it’s not in your interest.

-4
Reply
Spencer Cox
Spencer Cox
Admin
Reply to  andy
March 6, 2024 6:22 am

All right, I added the 24-70mm f/2.8G to the comparison. I’m not sure what you were expecting for a lens from 2007, but it’s a little below average in sharpness among the lenses tested here.

By the way, none of the lenses in this review were tested on a 36 MP sensor, I don’t know what gave you that impression. We tested all the lenses in this review on Nikon’s 45 megapixel sensor, and all the sharpness results are 100% consistent and comparable. What you describe as a “real lens comparison” is precisely how we do things. We test F-Mount lenses either on the Z7 via the FTZ adapter, or on the D850, which gives the same Imatest results.

2
Reply
andy
andy
Reply to  Spencer Cox
March 6, 2024 3:29 pm

I clearly remember an answer from Nasim on one of the reader’s comment he left in one of the F-mount lenses review. There was info that you (photographylife.com) used D810 with imatest. Unfortunately I don’t remember in which specific lens review I saw that comment. It’s so many of them here and it was quite long time ago.
If this not true, I take my words back and asking for apology.
I would advise you to write an article about methodology and equipment you use to test lenses (old, new lenses, different systems, etc). It will clarify all these type of questions, and uncertainties.

-2
Reply
Spencer Cox
Spencer Cox
Admin
Reply to  andy
March 6, 2024 4:27 pm

Sure thing Andy, you’re probably remembering right. Before the D850 came out, we tested everything on the D810. After that, Nasim retested a bunch of lenses on the D850 (and now Z7) so that all of our reviews would be comparable again. There are still a small number of old lenses that we never retested on the 45MP sensor – in those lens reviews, the charts look totally different. All the lenses shown in this review were tested on the 45MP sensor, though.

I’ll work on an article that talks about our methodology, but the basic situation is that every full-frame lens tested on Photography Life is comparable to one another, including across brands. The rare exceptions are those older lenses with different looking test charts.

1
Reply
Mark
Mark
March 5, 2024 7:52 am

Can I please ask about the numerical figures given for sharpness. Is there an article that explains what these mean? Can you compare the numbers on this site between manufacturers or sensor sizes? For example, could you directly compare results for Nikon FF with Fujifilm APS-C lenses? Or is it more subtle than that? Thank you.

0
Reply
Spencer Cox
Spencer Cox
Admin
Reply to  Mark
March 6, 2024 6:13 am

Hi Mark, the numbers in our tests are measured line widths per picture height. It’s a measure that changes with camera sensor size, so you can’t really compare the full-frame values against APS-C values, although you could multiply the APS-C numbers by 1.5 to get approximately what the lens “would” be on a full-frame sensor with the same pixel density.

As for comparing cross brand, we put a lot of effort into making sure that all full-frame test results are fully comparable across brands. Our Nikon, Canon, and Sony lens reviews can be compared without issue. Here’s the article explaining more about what these numbers mean and how we ensured they would be comparable across brands: photographylife.com/our-c…e-to-nikon

1
Reply
Mark
Mark
Reply to  Spencer Cox
March 7, 2024 3:06 am

That’s really helpful, thank you very much Spencer. I really enjoy reading the website and viewing the beautiful photographs. I’m considering a switch from my d750 to a fuji system to save weight and bulk, so interested to understand exactly where I may be compromising, hence my question. Much appreciated.

0
Reply
Per Erik Langaanes
Per Erik Langaanes
March 2, 2024 9:12 am

You let out the 24-70/2.8G in the comparition. For me it is the lens to have espescially for family pictures. It is sharper in the center than the 24-70/2.8Z at 70mm, and the bokeh is better in my opinion than the other zoom lenses through the hole zoom range. Though it has some weak sides, it is a keeper for me.

-2
Reply
Spencer Cox
Spencer Cox
Admin
Reply to  Per Erik Langaanes
March 6, 2024 6:22 am

I just added it to the comparison!

1
Reply
Ashi
Ashi
March 1, 2024 11:49 pm

Great comparison! I love the Z24-120. incredible sharpness for this zoom range.

3
Reply
Spencer Cox
Spencer Cox
Admin
Reply to  Ashi
March 6, 2024 6:22 am

Not sure why you’re getting downvoted, the Z 24-120mm f/4 is a great lens throughout the zoom range.

4
Reply
Laurence Goode
Laurence Goode
November 22, 2023 9:30 am

What’s amazing about your lens review is how accurate to my ( & others ) experience it is. Perhaps the most accurate and precise review I have ever seen.

My experience, as stated is as yours. However, the flaws of the lens you discuss do rise to the level of deal breaker. I have generally stopped using the lens for many things. For regardless of how good it’s better features are, they do not outweigh the negatives.

First problem for me, and for my clients whom also saw and rejected this too, is the heinous distortion at 24mm. It always looks bad. Could almost ( well maybe not ) live with this. Secondly, the long end the performance fall off includes many hazy images under many light sources. Definite lack of contrast, image cohesion, and what looks like a soft, faded, mushy image. Slight, but definitely noticeable. And an absolute deal breaker.

Next, there is often a very slight blue violet cast, very slight, but irritating none the less under several lighting circumstances.

Finally, a complaint that could be leveled at all Z and latter F mount lenses, is complex sombrero or wave distortion running through the image. Am told by scientists that this is due to the way modern lenses are made. In this particular case, noticeable at all focal lengths.

I would dump the lens, except – for me – I bought it specifically only for use at 35mm-50mm, to eliminate carrying around two lenses under combat like conditions, and in that range, it is very good. I would say it excels there, with positives outweighing the negatives. The lack of bulk on the street makes the lens extremely valuable for me. Just was hoping good at all lengths. Eh, what can you do.

In fact, was asked to photograph the combat at a major manufacture’s Black Friday sale tomorrow, where I will be hit, knocked around, perhaps beaten on, etc. And for this purpose, the lens is spectacular.

I don’t feel this lens is up to most tasks, but if you have a very specific, admittedly narrow needs, l like mine are for me, than perhaps something like this is a must.

-8
Reply
Greg Proops
Greg Proops
Reply to  Laurence Goode
February 5, 2024 5:27 am

Blah blah blah

4
Reply
Pete A
Pete A
Reply to  Laurence Goode
March 2, 2024 4:03 am

What on earth are you omitting from your photography workflow such that you produce images having “heinous distortion at 24mm” and “often a very slight blue violet cast, very slight, but irritating none the less under several lighting circumstances” (rhetorical question).

Many thanks for providing entertainment 🤣

6
Reply
Manuel
Manuel
Reply to  Laurence Goode
March 5, 2024 1:44 am

I use the Sony GM 24-70 F2.8 II with my Z8 via an adapter ring and I sold my Nikon S 24-70 F2.8.
The reason is simple: it is really better in all areas and especially more homogeneous in terms of sharpness and for lightness too. For the moment I’m keeping both systems and when Nikon releases a new S 24-70 F2.8, if it is as good and compact as the Sony, I will buy it without hesitation.

2
Reply
Jerry Garbin
Jerry Garbin
Reply to  Laurence Goode
November 23, 2024 7:14 pm

What on earth did I just read? You’re either a troll or so incompetent with a camera that you can’t get a flagship lens from one of the top lens makers in the world take a good photo.

Also… you’re not in combat like situations–there’s no way a major manufacturer would want photos of the “combat” at a Black Friday sale.

0
Reply
Ashish
Ashish
June 23, 2023 10:46 pm

How does this lens compare to Sony 24-70 2.8 GM II?

1
Reply
Sam
Sam
Reply to  Ashish
March 1, 2024 5:03 pm

Certainly no contest in terms of weight – the Sony is much lighter according to specifications. I am curious about performance. I have had this lens for 3+ years now, and perhaps it is time Nikon came up with an improved version, especially with reduced weight like Sony did in going from their GMI to GMII.

0
Reply
Kurt Mann
Kurt Mann
Reply to  Sam
August 11, 2024 7:37 am

This is maybe the only lens in the trinity that can be improved (besides weight reduction, which is always a plus), but it’s still a great lens. They have a few other lenses to produce before they start the reruns! If I had a say in it, which I certainly do not.

0
Reply
Katerina
Katerina
April 26, 2023 12:02 am

Excellent review as always! Stunning images too. Thank you

2
Reply
Nasim Mansurov
Nasim Mansurov
Author
Reply to  Katerina
April 26, 2023 12:09 am

Thank you Katerina! We were lucky to visit some beautiful places around the world with this lens. Looking back, this is a great lens indeed.

4
Reply

Learn

  • Beginner Photography
  • Landscape Photography
  • Wildlife Photography
  • Portraiture
  • Post-Processing
  • Advanced Tutorials
Photography Life on Patreon

Reviews

  • Camera Reviews
  • Lens Reviews
  • Other Gear Reviews
  • Best Cameras and Lenses

Photography Tutorials

Photography Basics
Landscape Photography
Wildlife Photography
Macro Photography
Composition & Creativity
Black & White Photography
Night Sky Photography
Portrait Photography
Street Photography
Photography Videos

Unique Gift Ideas

Best Gifts for Photographers

Subscribe via Email

If you like our content, you can subscribe to our newsletter to receive weekly email updates using the link below:

Subscribe to our newsletter

Site Menu

  • About Us
  • Beginner Photography
  • Lens Database
  • Lens Index
  • Photo Spots
  • Search
  • Forum

Reviews

  • Reviews Archive
  • Camera Reviews
  • Lens Reviews
  • Other Gear Reviews

More

  • Contact Us
  • Subscribe
  • Workshops
  • Support Us
  • Submit Content

Copyright © 2025 · Photography Life

You are going to send email to

Move Comment