Midrange zooms are probably the most popular go-to lenses today. It’s a constant pattern: I pass a photographer out in nature, glance at their camera, and inevitably see something like an 18-55mm or 24-105mm mounted to their camera. Sure, everyone talks about their “nifty fifty,” but what most people use the most is a midrange zoom.
Partly, that’s because midrange zooms ship with a lot of cameras by default. But it’s also because these are very useful lenses. You can photograph almost any everyday subject, from landscapes to portraits, if your lens covers both wide angles and moderate telephotos.
In the world of midrange zooms, a few stand out. For example, the high-end 24-70mm f/2.8 lenses from most companies have remarkable performance. The Canon 28-70mm f/2 can replace a bag full of primes in one swoop. The Sigma 24-105mm f/4 Art has an unusually good price-to-performance ratio. And so on.
Does the Nikon Z 24-120mm f/4 S join that esteemed company? I think it does. The lens’s sharpness is very impressive and consistent across its focal lengths, and it’s even good at close-up photography compared to almost every zoom. It has unmatched versatility.
That said, it could be better in terms of vignetting, chromatic aberration, and distortion – all of which are correctable in post-processing, but not without introducing minor artifacts. The bokeh also leaves something to be desired.
Here’s how I would sum up the pros and cons:
Pros
- Great, consistent sharpness at all focal lengths and apertures
- Relatively lightweight without sacrificing build quality
- Fast, accurate, quiet autofocus
- Good flare and sunstar performance
- Very good close focusing capabilities with 1:2.6 maximum magnification
- Reasonable price of $1100 for the performance
Cons
- Heavy distortion, especially at 24mm
- Relatively busy bokeh
- Middling chromatic aberration and vignetting performance
- Dual telescoping barrel construction, which is more prone to damage over time
- No vibration reduction
All told, I think the pros of the Z 24-120mm f/4 S easily outweigh the cons. It’s a very good lens overall. Still, it’s not the lens for everyone. As one obvious example, since the lens doesn’t have vibration reduction, I’m hesitant to recommend it for Nikon Z DX users whose cameras lack in-body image stabilization (like the Nikon Z30, Z50, and Zfc).
Likewise, Nikon has no shortage of alternative lenses for photographers seeking a midrange zoom. The Z 24-70mm f/4 S, for example, may look meager by comparison – but pair it with the Nikon Z 14-30mm f/4 S and Tamron 70-300mm f/4.5-6.3, and you’ll have a lightweight, versatile kit that doesn’t skip any important focal lengths. As much as I like the 24-120mm f/4 S, it’s at least worth considering the other options since there are so many.
Aside from that, a lot of Nikon Z users are sticklers for maximizing detail and resolution. The 24-120mm f/4 S has great, consistent sharpness, although dedicated pixel-peepers may prefer a prime lens. You could also out-resolve it somewhat with the Nikon Z 24-70mm f/2.8 S if you don’t mind the added weight and expense. When you’re choosing your lenses, everything is a balance.
Still, the Nikon Z 24-120mm f/4 S navigates those balances quite well – and that’s its biggest strength. There are lighter lenses, sharper lenses, less expensive lenses, and longer zoom lenses. But almost nothing on the market performs as well on all those points at once as the 24-120mm f/4 S. To me, it is arguably Nikon’s best-ever midrange zoom, and only the Z 24-70mm f/2.8 gives it a run for its money, depending on your priorities.
That’s why I see myself recommending the Nikon Z 24-120mm f/4 S to a lot of photographers in the coming years. Despite an abundance of midrange zooms for Nikon Z, this is the best “default” choice that almost anyone would be happy with.
Does that make it the right lens for you? It depends on your situation, so I’ll put it this way: To improve upon the 24-120mm f/4 S in any particular area, you need to compromise somewhere. Want a lighter lens? Be ready to compromise on performance, reach, or both. Want a sharper lens? You’ll need to go with a prime, or alternatively a heavy, expensive zoom that maxes out at 70mm. And so on. Hence why I say the Nikon Z 24-120mm f/4 S is so well-balanced.
Whether this review has convinced you to get the 24-120mm f/4 S or pick something else, I hope at least that it helped you narrow things down. You can always ask me in the comment section on the final page of this review if you have specific questions about your situation, and I’ll do my best to answer.
Where to Buy
The Nikon Z 24-120mm f/4 S was out of stock for a few months when it was first released, but the availability has stabilized over time. At the time I’m publishing this review, it’s possible to find the lens available in stock for $1100, including from B&H:
The lens is also available at Amazon, Adorama, and of course eBay, among others:
As always, you can thank Photography Life for the work that went into this review by buying your photography equipment through the links above – it gives us a 1-3% commission without costing you anything extra. Quite a bit of time goes into these reviews, including approximately 2-3 hours of lab testing for each focal length shown in our sharpness tests. (For the 24-120mm f/4 S, that was six different focal lengths.) We always appreciate your support, which helps us keep testing lenses like this.
The next page of this review has some additional sample photos from the Nikon Z 24-120mm f/4 S under a variety of photographic situations. So, click the menu below to go to the next page, “More Sample Images.”
Nikon Z 24-120mm f/4 S
- Optical Performance
- Features
- Build Quality
- Focus Speed and Accuracy
- Handling
- Size and Weight
- Value
Photography Life Overall Rating
Table of Contents