Photography Life

PL provides various digital photography news, reviews, articles, tips, tutorials and guides to photographers of all levels

  • Reviews
  • Learn
  • About Us
  • Forum
  • Search
Home → Reviews → Cameras and Lenses → Nikon Z 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 VR S Review

Nikon Z 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 VR S

By Spencer Cox 119 Comments
Last Updated On March 25, 2023

«»
Disclosures, Terms and Conditions and Support Options
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

guest

119 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
ilanifer
ilanifer
May 29, 2023 12:29 am

Hi, I consider replacing my 500mm PF with this lens. Is it a good move or is the 500 PF better anyway?
As a wildlife photographer I suppose I will be using the lens mostly at 400 mm – it’s weakest range and I’d probably use a 1.4 teleconverter all the time.. is it for me ?

0
Reply
Spencer Cox
Spencer Cox
Author
Reply to  ilanifer
June 1, 2023 2:44 am

It sounds like for your needs, you should just go with the Z 400mm f/4.5 instead. You get 2/3 stop more light, and it pairs better with the Z teleconverters compared to the 100-400mm. (The 100-400mm is already at f/8 with the 1.4x TC, which is not a great maximum aperture for any low-light or even medium-light wildlife photography.)

Between the 400mm f/4.5 versus the F-mount 500mm f/5.6, it’s pretty much a tossup. I would normally suggest the 400mm f/4.5 because it’s such a strong performer at 400mm. But if you’re not exaggerating and you always/nearly always plan to use the 1.4x TC, you could just as well go with the 500mm f/5.6.

All of this assumes that you mainly plan to use the lens at its longest focal length while also using the teleconverter. If you need the 100-399mm range, you know which lens is better :)

1
Reply
ilanifer
ilanifer
Reply to  Spencer Cox
June 3, 2023 4:55 am

Thank you !!! You have touched all the points of concern and clarified them.
I’ll stick to my 500 PF and if an opportunity will come , I’ll take it. No need to rush.
Thanks.

0
Reply
Jerry Z.
Jerry Z.
May 23, 2023 11:17 am

In your opinion how does this with the TCs stack up against older lenses like the Sigma 150-600 Contemporary (NOT Sport), especially on the long end? I know they’re made with two very different goals in mind – the Sigma is meant as a budget model and there are also sacrifices to be made when making a superzoom – but with the dropoff in quality presented by the TCs I would guess they might end up having similar levels of image quality around the 600 mark. Comparing the MTF data suggests similar quality but given that they were tested years apart and with different cameras I’m not reading too much into it.

The easier answer here would be to wait for the Z 200-600 to come out but who knows if Nikon will actually release that this year like their roadmap has suggested…

0
Reply
Spencer Cox
Spencer Cox
Author
Reply to  Jerry Z.
June 1, 2023 2:47 am

Having not tested the Sigma 150-600mm in the lab myself, all I can give you are my impressions based on our review from years ago. I expect that the Z 100-400mm + 1.4x TC will perform about the same as the Sigma 150-600mm in terms of sharpness at the long end. However, the Sigma has the advantage of maximum aperture, being an f/6.3 on the long end (2/3 stop brighter than the 100-400mm + 1.4x TC on the long end).

Either way, the 200-600mm should be coming out relatively soon – should be this year. I recommend waiting if performance at 600mm is important to you.

0
Reply
Richard Wanbon
Richard Wanbon
April 18, 2023 2:01 am

I absolutely love this lens! For travel, I leave the 70-200 behind and love how this lens gives me macro, the full focal range and a comparable to the 200-500 all in one. The cost was a gulp but it’s quickly become one of my favourite lenses. While I thought most of its usage would be for those landscape peeks and the occasional macro, it does really well with candid portraits too with nice bokeh. Paired with an UWA and a normal zoom, that’s a reasonable travel kit for the versatility it provides.

0
Reply
Spencer Cox
Spencer Cox
Author
Reply to  Richard Wanbon
June 1, 2023 2:48 am

It’s an awesome lens – very versatile, like you say. Landscapes, macro, portraiture, and of course wildlife photography. It does pretty much everything well.

0
Reply
Richard Rosen
Richard Rosen
March 31, 2023 3:34 pm

Thank you for the review on this very important Nikon Z class telephoto zoom. My own observation confirms most of your findings. I am very pleased with its performance between 300 and 400mm, but less so at the 100-200 marks. While weighing in at about 3 lbs, this lens is a lightweight compared to my predecessor, the Sigma 120-300 f2.8 Sport. I know I gained focal length, and weight, but had to give up aperture. Using the Z 100-400, with the 1.4x tc may degrade image sharpness slightly…but its not perceptible.
The Z 70-200 and the Z 100-400 compliment each other well.

0
Reply
Spencer Cox
Spencer Cox
Author
Reply to  Richard Rosen
March 31, 2023 3:40 pm

Glad you enjoyed the review! I was a bit the other way, where the wider performance struck me as better than the telephoto performance – but the 100-400mm is so sharp overall that the differences don’t matter much. In any case, anything will look a bit worse than the Z 70-200mm in that range of focal lengths, even most primes! They do complement each other well.

0
Reply
Richard Rosen
Richard Rosen
Reply to  Spencer Cox
March 31, 2023 5:17 pm

Sharpness is not the issue with me. I think you agreed with another commenter that contrast was an issue. Fortunately, I also own the Z 70 – 200, that covers the areas in question.

0
Reply
Spencer Cox
Spencer Cox
Author
Reply to  Richard Rosen
March 31, 2023 5:19 pm

The contrast of the 100-400mm is quite good – I just was unsurprised to hear the commenter say that the 400mm f/4.5 was better side-by-side in that respect.

1
Reply
Cal Jackson
Cal Jackson
March 29, 2023 8:31 am

How would you compare the Nikon z 100-400 to the Sigma 100-400?

0
Reply
Spencer Cox
Spencer Cox
Author
Reply to  Cal Jackson
March 31, 2023 3:38 pm

I’m afraid I haven’t tried the Sigma 100-400mm yet. It’s one of several on my list.

0
Reply
Jeff
Jeff
March 27, 2023 6:43 pm

Overall I’m interested in the lens but I keep thinking about the 200-600 lens that might get released sometime this century.

0
Reply
Spencer Cox
Spencer Cox
Author
Reply to  Jeff
March 29, 2023 12:21 am

Nikon’s roadmap supposedly covers “through 2023,” so I have to think that lens will be among the next few to be announced. But it’s also been years at this point with no new signs…

1
Reply
Hayden
Hayden
March 26, 2023 12:25 am

How did you find lens Contrast at 400mm? Just watched Chris Frosts review of this Lens on Youtube and he compared the lens to the 400mm 4.5vr and it was a night and day difference in favor of the prime.

1
Reply
Spencer Cox
Spencer Cox
Author
Reply to  Hayden
March 29, 2023 12:19 am

It’s worse than at the wider focal lengths, but still within “good” or “great” territory. However, the 400mm f/4.5 is best-in-class based on everything I’ve seen, so it would make sense that Chris saw a clear difference side by side.

2
Reply
Jason Frels
Jason Frels
March 25, 2023 3:04 pm

I did a comparison with and without the 2.0x teleconverter with some birds in my front yard. Both were very sharp, even when cropping in close to the bird’s beak and eyes. You do lose 2 stops of light with the teleconverter though and need good light. The focus is more hunty with the teleconverter

This is a link to the 2711 x 1807 crop of a shot without the teleconverter. Nikon Z7ii, Z 100-400 f/4.5-5.6 VR S, 400mm, f/7.1, 1/800s, ISO125, hand-held
comment image

This is a link to the 2710 x 1807 crop of a shot with the 2.0x teleconverter. Nikon Z7ii, Z 100-400 f/4.5-5.6 VR S, TC-2.0x, 800mm, f/11, 1/800s, ISO640, tripod
comment image

I didn’t apply any sharpening.

3
Reply
Spencer Cox
Spencer Cox
Author
Reply to  Jason Frels
March 25, 2023 3:14 pm

Beautiful photos, Jason! And thanks for the details about how you took them.

0
Reply
Robert John
Robert John
March 25, 2023 12:11 pm

Depending on your style of photography I could see the 70-200/2.8 and 2.0 TC being the better bet for 1) f2.8 and 2) greater sharpness at the short end.
But perhaps the response to that is that the 100-400 plus a 85/f1.8 is the real winner (bearing in mind the TC isn’t cheap).
Nice to see the improvement over the 80-400G. I sold that and kept my 70-200/f4 and 300/f4D in preference and never regretted it.

0
Reply
Spencer Cox
Spencer Cox
Author
Reply to  Robert John
March 25, 2023 3:29 pm

It’s a dilemma, and the 70-200mm f/2.8 takes teleconverters pretty well, even though the 100-400mm still beats it over 200mm. At the end of the day, I’m glad we have a few options.

1
Reply
bg5931
bg5931
March 25, 2023 10:12 am

Spencer – on the lens review overview page (photographylife.com/lens-reviews), this review is listed under NiSi, not Nikon Z. Just FYI. ;)

0
Reply
Spencer Cox
Spencer Cox
Author
Reply to  bg5931
March 25, 2023 10:20 am

Did I accidentally click the wrong category, or does NiSi secretly make this lens? The world may never know…

(Good catch – fixed :)

2
Reply

Learn

  • Beginner Photography
  • Landscape Photography
  • Wildlife Photography
  • Portraiture
  • Post-Processing
  • Advanced Tutorials

Reviews

  • Camera Reviews
  • Lens Reviews
  • Other Gear Reviews
  • Best Cameras and Lenses

Photography Tutorials

Photography Basics
Landscape Photography
Wildlife Photography
Macro Photography
Composition & Creativity
Black & White Photography
Night Sky Photography
Portrait Photography
Street Photography
Photography Videos

Unique Gift Ideas

Best Gifts for Photographers

Subscribe via Email

If you like our content, you can subscribe to our newsletter to receive weekly email updates using the link below:

Subscribe to our newsletter

Site Menu

  • About Us
  • Beginner Photography
  • Lens Database
  • Lens Index
  • Photo Spots
  • Search
  • Forum

Reviews

  • Reviews Archive
  • Camera Reviews
  • Lens Reviews
  • Other Gear Reviews

More

  • Contact Us
  • Subscribe
  • Workshops
  • Support Us
  • Submit Content

Copyright © 2023 · Photography Life

You are going to send email to

Move Comment