We never tested the 80-400mm G on a 45 megapixel sensor. You can see our review of the 80-400mm G, although the test results were from a 36 megapixel sensor instead and a different test chart. One day I’d like to go back and test the 80-400mm G on a comparable sensor, but it’s not my top priority at the moment. photographylife.com/revie…400mm-vr/3
Raymond MEISTER
July 9, 2024 5:32 am
Raymond MEISTER 4 July 2024 16h15 I currently own the Z8 + Z24-120 S. I am very happy about it. I would like to complete my equipment with a zoom TV. I like the Z100-400 S very much. I tried it and I get the quality of my 24-120. It would also be an excellent complement. My hesitation comes from the weight and the clutter especially for travel. I’m afraid I won’t take it often. I do reportage photography, landscape photography and sometimes animal photography and a bit of sport. I recently tried the new Z28-400. It is practical and versatile but does not have the quality of 24-120 and 100-400. Especially from 165 where it opens only at f8. In addition it is a bit redundant with my 24-120, which can become in DX a 36-180. I am rather an amateur photographer a little experienced. Thanks for your advice.
Raymond MEISTER
July 4, 2024 4:15 pm
Je possède actuellement le Z8 + le Z24-120 S. J’en suis très content. J’aimerais compléter mon équipement avec un télé zoom. Le Z100-400 S me séduit beaucoup. Je l’ai essayé et je retrouve la qualité de mon 24-120. Ce serait également un excellent complément. Mon hésitation vient du poids et de l’encombrement surtout pour les voyages. Je crains de ne pas l’emporter souvent. Je pratique la photo de reportage, de paysage et occasionnellement de l’animalier et un peu de sport. J’ai essayé récemment le nouveau Z28-400. Il est pratique et polyvalent mais n’a pas la qualité du 24-120 et du 100-400. Surtout à partir de 165 où il n’ouvre qu’à f8. En plus il fait un peu double emploi avec mon 24-120, qui peut devenir en DX un 36-180. Je suis plutôt un photographe amateur un peu expérimenté. Merci de vos conseils.
Gary Swergold
May 11, 2024 8:51 am
Here is a point not covered in the review. Sharpness (and F stop) definitely suffer using this lens with the 1.4TC. But, the lens sharpness declines between 300mm and 400mm. I’ve used the 100-400mm with the 1.4TC and find that sharpness is better if I only zoom to about the 350mm mark. That gives a sharper image at close to 500mm.
QUOTE Our Verdict: The Nikon Z 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 VR S … Cons: • Bokeh quality and sharpness drop meaningfully with the teleconverters, especially the 2.0x TC.
I’d love to see an updated comparison with the Nikon Z 180-600 and the Tamron 150-500 now available. Those are two compelling options at much lower price points.
Peter
December 24, 2023 11:47 am
So, I own the Z 70-200 f2,8 and the Z 100-400 f4,5-5,6 with the Nikon Z f and Z fc instead of the tc‘s and I feel very fine with that option. However, I really would like a test review, taking this combination into account. From my amateur- perspective, the Z fc makes much more sense, than a tc.
Robert John
November 8, 2023 4:55 pm
Interesting. By comparison, my 70-300E and 500/5.6, used, cost me £2,600. That’s quite a bit cheaper than the 100-400 bearing in mind that with a 35mm camera, 400mm doesn’t cut it for wildlife (it’s much smaller in the U.K.) so it really needs a £500 TC. And if one has a mid-range z-mount, it’s only 10mp in dx mode (and Nikon doesn’t make a decent aps-c z-mount camera, nor does it look like it will). I don’t fancy 560mm at f8. The only z-mount that would make sense is a 33mp £2,500 (max) Z6iii. That could take a 24-70/120/200, 70-180/f2.8 and 400/f4.5 and 1.4TC, and give 14mp in dx mode. Looks good. But it’s a whopping £8,200. That’s why I can’t pay attention to Z8/9s. Add in the cost of lenses and it heads north at quite a lick. Over at Sony, they’ve got Samyang making some great budget lenses (like the 135/f1.8) …
Jean-Daniel Pellet
September 19, 2023 2:38 pm
I’m kind of puzzled by the stars in you overall rating chart… :-)
Strange! Thank you for letting me know. I just fixed it.
Troy Phillips
September 13, 2023 12:37 am
What an amazing lens , sharp super zoom with fast autofocus. It’s light and small I believe for what it is . I have just recently purchased the Nikkor Z 24-120 f/4 S and am really liking it . My plan is to have a Nikon Trio of the Nikon Z 14-24 f/2.8 S , 24-120 I have and this 100-400 S lens . I have so many primes from the F mount days and the Nikkor Z 85 f/1.8S . If Nikon makes a 28mm f/1.2 I’d get that . With the new Nikon Z mount I’m enjoying adapting glass . I’ve been buying m Mount Voigtlander stuff . Then I get the Fotodiox E to Z electronic adapter and it’s working great. Loving my Nikon Z9 for manual focus glass also . All my old Nikon manual focus glass going back to 1960 works great adapted . The Z system manors it super easy to get accurate focus . Love this system and so much looking forward to getting this Nikon Z 100-400 f/4.5-5.6 lens .
the obvious lens to compare this to is the 80-400mm G. Why did you leave that out?
We never tested the 80-400mm G on a 45 megapixel sensor. You can see our review of the 80-400mm G, although the test results were from a 36 megapixel sensor instead and a different test chart. One day I’d like to go back and test the 80-400mm G on a comparable sensor, but it’s not my top priority at the moment. photographylife.com/revie…400mm-vr/3
Raymond MEISTER
4 July 2024 16h15
I currently own the Z8 + Z24-120 S. I am very happy about it. I would like to complete my equipment with a zoom TV. I like the Z100-400 S very much. I tried it and I get the quality of my 24-120. It would also be an excellent complement. My hesitation comes from the weight and the clutter especially for travel. I’m afraid I won’t take it often. I do reportage photography, landscape photography and sometimes animal photography and a bit of sport. I recently tried the new Z28-400. It is practical and versatile but does not have the quality of 24-120 and 100-400. Especially from 165 where it opens only at f8. In addition it is a bit redundant with my 24-120, which can become in DX a 36-180. I am rather an amateur photographer a little experienced.
Thanks for your advice.
Je possède actuellement le Z8 + le Z24-120 S. J’en suis très content. J’aimerais compléter mon équipement avec un télé zoom. Le Z100-400 S me séduit beaucoup. Je l’ai essayé et je retrouve la qualité de mon 24-120. Ce serait également un excellent complément. Mon hésitation vient du poids et de l’encombrement surtout pour les voyages. Je crains de ne pas l’emporter souvent. Je pratique la photo de reportage, de paysage et occasionnellement de l’animalier et un peu de sport. J’ai essayé récemment le nouveau Z28-400. Il est pratique et polyvalent mais n’a pas la qualité du 24-120 et du 100-400. Surtout à partir de 165 où il n’ouvre qu’à f8. En plus il fait un peu double emploi avec mon 24-120, qui peut devenir en DX un 36-180. Je suis plutôt un photographe amateur un peu expérimenté.
Merci de vos conseils.
Here is a point not covered in the review. Sharpness (and F stop) definitely suffer using this lens with the 1.4TC. But, the lens sharpness declines between 300mm and 400mm. I’ve used the 100-400mm with the 1.4TC and find that sharpness is better if I only zoom to about the 350mm mark. That gives a sharper image at close to 500mm.
QUOTE
Our Verdict: The Nikon Z 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 VR S
…
Cons:
• Bokeh quality and sharpness drop meaningfully with the teleconverters, especially the 2.0x TC.
photographylife.com/revie…5-6-vr-s/4
I read that the teleconvertors available we not compatable with the z 100-400nm.
You read wrong and wrote poorly.
I’d love to see an updated comparison with the Nikon Z 180-600 and the Tamron 150-500 now available. Those are two compelling options at much lower price points.
So, I own the Z 70-200 f2,8 and the Z 100-400 f4,5-5,6 with the Nikon Z f and Z fc instead of the tc‘s and I feel very fine with that option. However, I really would like a test review, taking this combination into account. From my amateur- perspective, the Z fc makes much more sense, than a tc.
Interesting.
By comparison, my 70-300E and 500/5.6, used, cost me £2,600. That’s quite a bit cheaper than the 100-400 bearing in mind that with a 35mm camera, 400mm doesn’t cut it for wildlife (it’s much smaller in the U.K.) so it really needs a £500 TC. And if one has a mid-range z-mount, it’s only 10mp in dx mode (and Nikon doesn’t make a decent aps-c z-mount camera, nor does it look like it will). I don’t fancy 560mm at f8.
The only z-mount that would make sense is a 33mp £2,500 (max) Z6iii. That could take a 24-70/120/200, 70-180/f2.8 and 400/f4.5 and 1.4TC, and give 14mp in dx mode. Looks good. But it’s a whopping £8,200.
That’s why I can’t pay attention to Z8/9s. Add in the cost of lenses and it heads north at quite a lick.
Over at Sony, they’ve got Samyang making some great budget lenses (like the 135/f1.8) …
I’m kind of puzzled by the stars in you overall rating chart… :-)
Strange! Thank you for letting me know. I just fixed it.
What an amazing lens , sharp super zoom with fast autofocus. It’s light and small I believe for what it is .
I have just recently purchased the Nikkor Z 24-120 f/4 S and am really liking it .
My plan is to have a Nikon Trio of the Nikon Z 14-24 f/2.8 S , 24-120 I have and this 100-400 S lens . I have so many primes from the F mount days and the Nikkor Z 85 f/1.8S . If Nikon makes a 28mm f/1.2 I’d get that .
With the new Nikon Z mount I’m enjoying adapting glass . I’ve been buying m Mount Voigtlander stuff . Then I get the Fotodiox E to Z electronic adapter and it’s working great. Loving my Nikon Z9 for manual focus glass also . All my old Nikon manual focus glass going back to 1960 works great adapted . The Z system manors it super easy to get accurate focus .
Love this system and so much looking forward to getting this Nikon Z 100-400 f/4.5-5.6 lens .