Photography Life

PL provides various digital photography news, reviews, articles, tips, tutorials and guides to photographers of all levels

  • Lens Reviews
  • Camera Reviews
  • Tutorials
  • Compare Cameras
  • Forum
    • Sign Up
    • Login
  • About
  • Search
Home → Reviews → Cameras and Lenses → Nikon Z 1.4x and 2.0x Teleconverters Review

Nikon Z 1.4x and 2.0x Teleconverters Review

By Spencer Cox 70 Comments
Last Updated On September 19, 2024

«»

Cropping – much like using a teleconverter – exaggerates issues like lens aberrations, diffraction, and noise. Unlike a teleconverter, it also reduces your photo’s total pixels. Whether you crop or use a teleconverter, you’re making some compromises, but which one gives you better results?

If you’re starting with a high-resolution camera like one of Nikon’s 45-megapixel bodies, it’s reasonable to wonder if the teleconverter is even necessary. And with a bad teleconverter, it would definitely be better just to crop! How do the two Nikon Z TCs hold up? Below are my high-resolution crops to help determine the answer.

Shooting Notes: All of the photos below were .NEF files taken with the 45-megapixel Nikon Z7, then converted to JPEG upon export from Adobe Lightroom. Crops are taken from the center of the frame. Lightroom’s default import sharpening was applied, but no noise reduction was applied to any of the photos. In order to display images of the same size, I upsampled the lower-resolution photos upon export from Lightroom. Every photo was taken with the Nikon Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S zoomed into 200mm. 

Test #1: Bright Light Simulation

For the first of two tests, I’m simulating a bright environment – even something like landscape photography – where ISO and aperture values are held constant. In all three photos below, I used an aperture of f/5.6 and the base ISO of 64.

In order, the photos below are: 200mm, 280mm, 400mm. (In other words: no TC, 1.4x TC, 2.0x TC.) Click to see full size and switch between the three photos more easily:

Nikon Z without TC 200mm f5.6 ISO 64
No teleconverter: 200mm, f/5.6, ISO 64
Nikon Z 1.4x TC 280mm f5.6 ISO 64
Z TC-1.4x teleconverter: 280mm, f/5.6, ISO 64
Nikon Z 2.0x TC 400mm f5.6 ISO 64
Z TC-1.4x teleconverter: 400mm, f/5.6, ISO 64

This goes to show that teleconverters still beat cropping! The least detailed crop above is the photo without the teleconverter, while the most detailed is the photo with the 2.0x TC. That said, the difference between the 1.4x and 2.0x TC photos is relatively small. More fine detail is visible in the 2.0x TC image if you look closely, but it’s not as dramatic as the 200mm vs 280mm difference.

Test #2: Low Light Simulation

Now I’d like to simulate a more common situation in wildlife photography, where you’re fighting to capture as much light as possible. In this case, I’ve set the lens to its maximum aperture value each time, and I used a higher ISO (ISO 800, 1600, and 3200 respectively). The order of the photos is the same: bare lens, 1.4x TC, 2.0x TC.

No Teleconverter 200mm f2.8 ISO 800
No teleconverter: 200mm, f/2.8, ISO 800
Nikon Z 1.4x TC 280mm f4 ISO 1600
Z TC-1.4x teleconverter:  280mm, f/4, ISO 1600
Nikon Z 2.0x TC 400mm f5.6 ISO 3200
Z TC-2.0x teleconverter: 400mm, f/5.6, ISO 3200

The story is the same this time – the teleconverters both beat the bare lens, and the 2.0x teleconverter captures more subject detail than the 1.4x teleconverter. To my eye, the benefit of the 2.0x TC is greater this time, probably because the 1.4x TC didn’t have the luxury of stopping down to f/5.6. In any case, I was glad to see these results – it means that the teleconverters exist for a good reason!

On the next page of this review, I’ll dive into the question of sample variation with the Nikon Z teleconverters. So, click the menu below to go to the next page, Sample Variation.

Table of Contents

  • Specifications & Build Quality
  • Optical Features
  • Compared to Cropping
  • Sample Variation
  • Verdict
  • Reader Comments
«»
Looking for even more exclusive content?

On Photography Life, you already get world-class articles with no advertising every day for free. As a Member, you'll get even more:

Silver ($5/mo)
  • Exclusive articles
  • Monthly Q&A chat
  • Early lens test results
  • "Creative Landscape Photography" eBook
Gold ($12/mo)
  • All that, PLUS:
  • Online workshops
  • Monthly photo critiques
  • Vote on our next lens reviews
 
Click Here to Join Today
 
Disclosures, Terms and Conditions and Support Options

Learn

  • Beginner Photography
  • Landscape Photography
  • Wildlife Photography
  • Portraiture
  • Post-Processing
  • Advanced Tutorials
Photography Life on Patreon

Reviews

  • Camera Reviews
  • Lens Reviews
  • Other Gear Reviews
  • Best Cameras and Lenses

Photography Tutorials

Photography Basics
Landscape Photography
Wildlife Photography
Macro Photography
Composition & Creativity
Black & White Photography
Night Sky Photography
Portrait Photography
Street Photography
Photography Videos

Unique Gift Ideas

Best Gifts for Photographers

Subscribe via Email

If you like our content, you can subscribe to our newsletter to receive weekly email updates using the link below:

Subscribe to our newsletter

Site Menu

  • About Us
  • Beginner Photography
  • Lens Database
  • Lens Index
  • Photo Spots
  • Search
  • Forum

Reviews

  • Reviews Archive
  • Camera Reviews
  • Lens Reviews
  • Other Gear Reviews

More

  • Contact Us
  • Subscribe
  • Workshops
  • Support Us
  • Submit Content

Copyright © 2025 · Photography Life

You are going to send email to

Move Comment