I came across this review late, but a lot of valuable information. The only frustrating thing about this camera is taking a picture when there is something closer to you. The focus grabs it immediately. Now I use my body as part of the focus process and move back, get closer, etc. Other than that I am very happy with the camera.
Geoffrey
September 27, 2024 4:15 am
very nice review, funny and informative. thanks a lot.
Shashank
April 25, 2023 7:31 am
I really enjoyed this review even after owning this camera since Jan 2018. I bought it for its zoom abilities to be honest.
Bernard Fisher
November 7, 2021 8:35 pm
I have a P900 and becoming used to it. I cannot find how to do a time lapse of a garden being overrun with bamboo which grows a couple of feet per day. Can you please give me any clues as to whether the P900 can be set up for this. I have tried all settings. thanks
Kevin
February 5, 2021 7:54 am
I just ordered the P950 and am looking forward to trying it out for the very reasons you talk about here. I bought it primarily as an aid to identifying birds in the field, to take an image home of what I’ve seen.
Love the Grand Canyon pics!
gfmucci
December 1, 2020 4:56 pm
Have you looked at the newer 950? It added RAW and improved the viewer resolution. But have they speeded up the focus and cache issues you mentioned? Are the improvements worth the extra $200 -$300?
Thomas F Moffatt
April 4, 2020 11:59 am
Five years after the camera was reviewed in this column, I must say that some have made this camera “sing”. In the Canadian province where I live, one wild bird photographer has taken absolutely amazing and sharp “portraits” of species, especially forest songbirds and shorebirds. They really are incredible, like bird portraits if they were taken by Karsh. Timing may be nearly everything in this case, but the P900 certainly held up its end of the equation. I have been totally blown away with her images. (I use a Nikon D7200 with 300 pf lens and 1.4x nikon extender. She does much better than I do).
Moirangthem Somorendro
December 27, 2019 7:02 pm
I have the camera. One thing you professionally narrates and which leaves me envious of your know how is picture taken at so and so “mm”. By any chance can you share how it’s done. Thanks.
The focal length used should be stored in the jpg file – you just need software to read it. The free Irfanview photo viewer/editor will do this, as will many other programs.
Richard Angeloni
June 11, 2019 3:53 pm
I just picked up the P900 since it was on sale and it looks like a fun camera to use (I enjoy bird photography and zoom photography in general). One thing I noticed when using it on a tripod is the difficulty keeping it steady, which is certainly expected at 2000mm since the camera’s zoom telescopes so much. I think Nikon messed up by placing the hole for the tripod off a bit on the side (not in the center) on a weaker part of the camera. To compensate, I bought a lens tripod collar mount ring to hopefully add some stability and keep the tripod under the center of the camera. Still it’s a fun camera to use, and I think anyone who knows how to use a camera can get good results.
Lawrence Lievense
September 9, 2018 10:04 pm
The D900 is my ‘family/vacation/tourist camera. It’s when I leave my Canon 5dMk III and IV home and have used the Nikon D900 for four weeks in China (7,000 photos), a Belize diving trip (2k shots), a Bahamas sailing trip (1250k) and Florida 3 week diving/touristing trip. the ufALL shots were VERY well done and easily documented the fun of our vacations. Of course it’s not aDSLR and comparisons to my pro rigs are plain stupid and mis-focused. Who needs RAW when the average viewing time of a vacation shot is about 3.5 seconds and no big blowup or post-production work is expected? Get over yourselves folks and compare apples to apples. The stupidly name “prosumers” cameras have a place in the real world and should ONLY be compared to their intended use.
I came across this review late, but a lot of valuable information. The only frustrating thing about this camera is taking a picture when there is something closer to you. The focus grabs it immediately. Now I use my body as part of the focus process and move back, get closer, etc. Other than that I am very happy with the camera.
very nice review, funny and informative. thanks a lot.
I really enjoyed this review even after owning this camera since Jan 2018. I bought it for its zoom abilities to be honest.
I have a P900 and becoming used to it. I cannot find how to do a time lapse of a garden being overrun with bamboo which grows a couple of feet per day. Can you please give me any clues as to whether the P900 can be set up for this. I have tried all settings. thanks
I just ordered the P950 and am looking forward to trying it out for the very reasons you talk about here. I bought it primarily as an aid to identifying birds in the field, to take an image home of what I’ve seen.
Love the Grand Canyon pics!
Have you looked at the newer 950? It added RAW and improved the viewer resolution. But have they speeded up the focus and cache issues you mentioned? Are the improvements worth the extra $200 -$300?
Five years after the camera was reviewed in this column, I must say that some have made this camera “sing”. In the Canadian province where I live, one wild bird photographer has taken absolutely amazing and sharp “portraits” of species, especially forest songbirds and shorebirds. They really are incredible, like bird portraits if they were taken by Karsh. Timing may be nearly everything in this case, but the P900 certainly held up its end of the equation. I have been totally blown away with her images. (I use a Nikon D7200 with 300 pf lens and 1.4x nikon extender. She does much better than I do).
I have the camera. One thing you professionally narrates and which leaves me envious of your know how is picture taken at so and so “mm”. By any chance can you share how it’s done. Thanks.
The focal length used should be stored in the jpg file – you just need software to read it. The free Irfanview photo viewer/editor will do this, as will many other programs.
I just picked up the P900 since it was on sale and it looks like a fun camera to use (I enjoy bird photography and zoom photography in general). One thing I noticed when using it on a tripod is the difficulty keeping it steady, which is certainly expected at 2000mm since the camera’s zoom telescopes so much. I think Nikon messed up by placing the hole for the tripod off a bit on the side (not in the center) on a weaker part of the camera. To compensate, I bought a lens tripod collar mount ring to hopefully add some stability and keep the tripod under the center of the camera. Still it’s a fun camera to use, and I think anyone who knows how to use a camera can get good results.
The D900 is my ‘family/vacation/tourist camera. It’s when I leave my Canon 5dMk III and IV home and have used the Nikon D900 for four weeks in China (7,000 photos), a Belize diving trip (2k shots), a Bahamas sailing trip (1250k) and Florida 3 week diving/touristing trip. the ufALL shots were VERY well done and easily documented the fun of our vacations. Of course it’s not aDSLR and comparisons to my pro rigs are plain stupid and mis-focused. Who needs RAW when the average viewing time of a vacation shot is about 3.5 seconds and no big blowup or post-production work is expected? Get over yourselves folks and compare apples to apples. The stupidly name “prosumers” cameras have a place in the real world and should ONLY be compared to their intended use.