Photography Life

PL provides various digital photography news, reviews, articles, tips, tutorials and guides to photographers of all levels

  • Reviews
  • Learn
  • About Us
  • Forum
  • Search
Home → Reviews → Cameras and Lenses

Nikon Coolpix P900

When crazy zoom meets affordable price...

By John Sherman 111 Comments
Last Updated On February 11, 2020

«»

The Nikon Coolpix P900 is an ultimate camera for anyone wanting to get closer to their subject. With its insane zoom range of 24-2000mm and 7 fps shooting speed, it is a versatile choice for many types of photography, including wildlife. Let’s take a look at this camera in more detail.

When I offered to review the Nikon Coolpix P900 for Photography Life, I told Nasim I felt like a comedian rooting for Sarah Palin to become president so he’d have four more years of material. C’mon, 24-2000mm zoom combined with a 1:2.3” sensor? The comedic potential seemed endless. But what if it didn’t suck?

Nikon P900

A box arrived for me with a Nikon D7200 and P900 in it for review. I went straight for the P900. I’ve got a serious case of telephoto-eyetis and I wanted to see just what this baby could do. I’d never shot with a superzoom point-and-shoot (AKA bridge camera) before and didn’t have any photogeek friends who owned one. To me such a camera was only seen around the necks of tourists at the Grand Canyon. So there was just one thing to do – I grabbed the P900 and headed to the Great Ditch.

Verm-sunset-couple-P900-1188
COOLPIX P900 @ 10.7mm, ISO 100, 1/320, f/3.5

Before we jump into the canyon, let’s check out some of the more pertinent and/or compelling features of the P900:

  • 83x zoom range 4.3-357mm f/2.8-6.5 lens – a 24-2000mm equivalent. Add digital zoom on top of that and you can get 8000mm equivalent.
  • 7 fps burst rate at full resolution, 60 fps and 120 fps burst rates at lower resolution
  • Pre-shooting cache – records images before you fully depress the shutter release
  • 16 MP Sensor
  • Focus Peaking
  • 3” LCD tilt/flip monitor
  • Electronic View Finder with eye control
  • 5-stop Vibration Reduction
  • Macro focusing to 1cm
  • 18 scene modes including timelapse, bird-watching, easy panorama and moon shot
  • and of course wi-fi, GPS, full HD and all that stuff

Lens Performance

Let’s get right into the juicy stuff and check out the zoom range and lens performance. Where else can you get a single lens that can go from this…

Verm-35mm-venus-belt-P900-1239
COOLPIX P900 @ 5.9mm, ISO 100, 1/40, f/3.2

…to this:

Verm-watchtower-vultures-P900-1201
COOLPIX P900 @ 170mm, ISO 200, 1/500, f/5.6

Those are both handheld shots from the same spot and that’s not even the full zoom range. The first is 35mm equivalent and the second is 950mm equivalent (the P900 crop factor is 5.6). This was the view from Navajo Point toward Desert View and The Watchtower. To get an idea of the full zoom range let’s double the distance and go to Lipan Point, 1.8 miles from the Watchtower and slap the P900 on a tripod, set the self-timer to lessen camera shake and take some test shots.

Verm-24mm-P900-0273
24mm equivalent. COOLPIX P900 @ 4.3mm, ISO 100, 1/1600, f/2.8
Verm-55mm-P900-0271
55mm equivalent. COOLPIX P900 @ 9.8mm, ISO 100, 1/2000, f/3.5
Verm-124mm-P900-0269
124mm equivalent. COOLPIX P900 @ 22.3mm, ISO 100, 1/1600, f/4.0
Verm-260mm-P900-0267
260mm equivalent. COOLPIX P900 @ 46.4mm, ISO 100, 1/1600, f/4.5
Verm-500mm-P900-0266
500mm equivalent. COOLPIX P900 @ 89.2mm, ISO 100, 1/1000, f/5.0
Verm-850mm-P900-0264
850mm equivalent. COOLPIX P900 @ 152mm, ISO 100, 1/800, f/5.6
Verm-2000mm-P900-0263
2000mm equivalent. COOLPIX P900 @ 357mm, ISO 100, 1/640, f/6.5
Verm-4000mm-P900-0259
4000mm equivalent. COOLPIX P900 @ 714mm, ISO 100, 1/1000, f/6.5

The shots from 24mm to 2000mm equivalent are with the optical zoom. The shot at 4000mm equivalent is with the camera’s digital zoom enabled. Crazy, huh?

At 24-35mm, the corners are definitely soft, but by 55mm this improves a lot and is pretty much gone by 200mm. 500mm looks best to my eye for corner to corner sharpness. By 850mm the corners are softening a tad again, but most shots at this length or longer will likely be wildlife or another subject that likely doesn’t demand or benefit from sharp corners. At 2000mm things get a little soft overall, but bear in mind that we’re talking 2000mm here and shooting through 1.8 miles of atmosphere in a dusty part of the country. Once we go to digital zoom, softness drops a bunch, but even so from two miles away I can tell who’s texting, who’s shooting camera phone pics, who’s got the DSLR, and oooh, I hope that dog’s tail is always up like that.

Overall, the lens from wide to fully optically zoomed is way better than I expected for a lens with such design demands. Any distortion is well corrected (likely with a lot of help from the software). Also bear in mind that any comments as to sharpness are from me resorting to Dummyvision (viewing at 1:1 with my reading glasses on). If I view these at web resolution, they all look pretty decent except for the digitally zoomed 4000mm one. But don’t take my word for it, check out the MTF chart:

Verm-MTF-P900-0210
COOLPIX P900 @ 14.3mm, ISO 100, 1/320, f/3.5

Whoops those aren’t the MTF curves, this is actually a rock abstract and judging by the sharpness I’m guessing the MTF chart looks quite a bit better.

Here’s some more at the long end – these are cropped to keep the subject the same size in final output. The 2000mm shot is cropped to about 35% of the original, the 4000mm one is about 70% of the original file, so this final view is equivalent to 6000mm. I did some sharpening and touch-up on these to see how good I could make them look in final output.

Verm-2000mm-osprey-P900-1920
2000mm equivalent (6000mm as cropped). COOLPIX P900 @ 357mm, ISO 400, 1/800, f/6.5
Verm-4000mm-osprey-P900-1925
4000mm equivalent (6000mm as cropped). COOLPIX P900 @ 714mm, ISO 320, 1/800, f/6.5

Definitely some noise/pixelation and fine detail could be better resolved, but overall not bad for a $599 camera and certainly good enough for one’s Facebook page. Before all us D810 owners start freaking out, here is the same bird, same final size, shot with the D810 with Nikkor 800mm f/5.6E VR and 1.4x teleconverter cropped and even upsampled a bit to get the same final subject size.

Verm-cropped osprey-1.4x800-D810-7706
NIKON D810 + 800mm f/5.6 @ 1150mm, ISO 500, 1/1250, f/10.0

We Win! We Win! We Win! The D810 absolutely clobbered the P900. I’m so delighted and relieved that I spent the extra $21,000.

All supertelephoto lenses, even those costing five figures, have issues when it comes to camera shake, heat shimmers and other atmospheric disturbances.

Verm-coyote-P900-1686
COOLPIX P900 @ 499.8mm, ISO 400, 1/800, f/6.5

The softness of this coyote shot is not due to optical imperfection of even digital zooming (this is at 2800mm equivalent) but to late morning heat shimmers.

What about depth of field? The tiny sensor equates to greater depth of field at any given viewing angle.

Verm-DOF-P900-0295
COOLPIX P900 @ 4.3mm, ISO 100, 1/100, f/8.0

At 24mm equivalent and f/8 you get everything from inches away to infinity in focus. However at f/8 sharpness is dropping off, likely due to diffraction. However, this is hard to see without Dummyvision.

Verm-f4.5-P900-3567
COOLPIX P900 @ 26.8mm, ISO 100, 1/800, f/4.5

Here’s an example at f/4.5 and 100% – looks nice and crisp.

Verm-f8-P900-3569
COOLPIX P900 @ 26.8mm, ISO 100, 1/320, f/8.0

Here’s the same lichen at f/8 and 100% – pretty good but not as crisp as the f/4.5 version. I would only shoot the P900 at f/8 if I absolutely needed the depth of field like in the rock slab shot above. Greater depth of field equates to more forgiveness in focusing. The flip side is if you want that super-narrow depth of field look (completely blurred out background) like this…

Verm-Avocet-Gilbert-7630
NIKON D600 + 500mm f/4 @ 700mm, ISO 800, 1/500, f/7.1

You need to shoot with a DSLR, preferably full frame like the D600 used for this Avocet shot. You won’t get it with the P900 or any other 1:2.3” sensor camera.

Zooming is power-only and takes 4 seconds to get from 24-2000mm. If you shoot more at one end of the range or another, you can set the start-up zoom position to whatever length you want and when you turn the camera on it will start zooming to that focal length.

The most glaring flaw with this lens is how much flare it suffers from because there is no lens hood and the front element is not recessed.

Verm-lens-flare-P900-0101
COOLPIX P900 @ 6.2mm, ISO 100, 1/320, f/3.2

I needed to block the sun from the lens with my hand – I ended up doing this a lot.

Verm-no-lens-flare-P900-0102
COOLPIX P900 @ 6.2mm, ISO 100, 1/250, f/3.2
Verm-hex-flare-P900-1150
COOLPIX P900 @ 4.3mm, ISO 100, 1/800, f/8.0

Put the sun in the frame and I got more flare hexes than vultures in my shot. The hexes indicate Nikon used a six-blade diaphragm.

Nikon claims a 5-stop vibration reduction. Not sure about the numbers, but it worked good for me. A tripod worked even better and if you want to utilize the long end of the zoom range (and of course shoot in low light) I recommend one.

When put in close-up mode, Nikon claims the lens will focus to within 1 cm of the subject. However I actually shot Washington’s portrait on a dollar bill with the lens holding the bill flat against a window and it was in focus from about 1.5mm distance (but edges horridly soft).

Verm-GW-P900-3644
COOLPIX P900 @ 5.4mm, ISO 110, 1/30, f/3.2

Besides how easy it would be to bump your subject and/or scratch your lens, being this close can cause the camera shadow to partially block your subject and even make a ring light give a bright donut pattern. I’ve been disappointed with soft macro performance in other point-and-shoots, but when I backed up a little, the P900 did admirably. I really like this next shot.

Verm-NGS-check-P900-2084
COOLPIX P900 @ 15.2mm, ISO 100, 1/800, f/4.0

There’s a bit of softening up and left of the “N” in National Geographic and obvious barrel distortion, but otherwise things look pretty crisp. You can even clearly make out the “void” pantograph, designed to prevent counterfeiters from photoduplicating such checks. So the macro mode won’t pay back for itself that way, but for flowers or bugs where corner sharpness and distortion don’t mean much, it should be fine.

Verm-caterpiller-P900-3482
COOLPIX P900 @ 17mm, ISO 100, 1/320, f/4.0

This caterpillar looks very sharp. Even cropped at about 50%. But with the inherent great depth of field of the P900 there’s a bit of distraction in the background.

Here’s another caterpillar. Viewed full frame:

Verm-1-1-caterpiller-P900-3485
COOLPIX P900 @ 17mm, ISO 100, 1/500, f/4.0

And at 100%:

Verm-1-1-caterpiller-P900-3485-2
COOLPIX P900 @ 17mm, ISO 100, 1/500, f/4.0

I’m impressed by the sharpness.

Verm-macro-w-BG-P900-3508
COOLPIX P900 @ 18.7mm, ISO 100, 1/800, f/4.0

Here we see an example of using the greater depth of field to include some background for context.

Verm-Globemallow-P900-3522
COOLPIX P900 @ 12.5mm, ISO 100, 1/1250, f/3.5

Here I wanted a simpler background so I used the sky.

Verm-thistle-P900-3539
COOLPIX P900 @ 15.2mm, ISO 400, 1/1000, f/8.0

And here I used the black side of my collapsible reflector as my background.

Verm-dead-pp-P900-3546
COOLPIX P900 @ 5.9mm, ISO 400, 1/800, f/6.3

This is about 3”x4” worth of dead prickly pear. At f/6.3 the corners show just a smidge of softness.

Table of Contents

  • Overview and Lens Performance
  • Frame Rates, Shooting Speed and Focusing
  • Sensor Performance
  • Camera Modes
  • Ergonomics and Other Notes
  • Summary
  • Reader Comments
«»

Related Articles

  • Nikon D3100 vs Nikon D5100
    Nikon D3100 vs D5100
  • D700 at Weddings
    Is Nikon D700 Obsolete?
  • Nikon D7000
    Nikon D7000 vs D300s
  • Fujifilm X-T2
    Last Camera Syndrome
  • Screenshot 2019-02-04 13.28.45
    Nikon Lens-Only Discounts on 13 Lenses
  • Nikon GP-1
    Nikon GP-1 Review
Disclosures, Terms and Conditions and Support Options
Filed Under: Cameras and Lenses Tagged With: Camera Reviews, Nikon P900, Nikon Reviews, Super Telephoto Lens, Superzoom

About John Sherman

John “Verm” Sherman is one of only 25,000 wildlife and nature photographers based out of Flagstaff, Arizona. In 2012 he was awarded Flagstaff Photography Center’s Emerging Artist of the Year award. He has since submerged into internet notoriety but comes up occasionally to contribute to Arizona Highways Magazine.

Learn

  • Beginner Photography
  • Landscape Photography
  • Wildlife Photography
  • Portraiture
  • Post-Processing
  • Advanced Tutorials

Reviews

  • Camera Reviews
  • Lens Reviews
  • Other Gear Reviews
  • Best Cameras and Lenses

Photography Tutorials

Photography Basics
Landscape Photography
Wildlife Photography
Macro Photography
Composition & Creativity
Black & White Photography
Night Sky Photography
Portrait Photography
Street Photography
Photography Videos

Unique Gift Ideas

Best Gifts for Photographers

Subscribe via Email

If you like our content, you can subscribe to our newsletter to receive weekly email updates using the link below:

Subscribe to our newsletter

Site Menu

  • About Us
  • Beginner Photography
  • Lens Database
  • Lens Index
  • Photo Spots
  • Search
  • Forum

Reviews

  • Reviews Archive
  • Camera Reviews
  • Lens Reviews
  • Other Gear Reviews

More

  • Contact Us
  • Subscribe
  • Workshops
  • Support Us
  • Submit Content

Copyright © 2023 · Photography Life

You are going to send email to

Move Comment