I had a chance to use the Leica M7 TTL .72 rangefinder film camera together with the Leica 35mm f/2.0 Summicron M Aspherical lens for about a month and shot with this gear in different conditions and shoots. Prior to the M7, I never shot with any Leica gear but heard so much about them from other photographers and industry peers. So I decided to give Leica a try and see how it would fit my film photography needs. Below is a summary of my findings with the camera.
I was so excited when the Leica M7 came in the mail. I put up a post on Instagram and Facebook with an image of the camera and most of my friends commented that they were jealous. I noticed that people regard Leica very highly. So, I was excited to see what all the hype was about.
My initial opinion right out of the box was that this camera felt good in my hands. It felt solid, but not too heavy (and not too light either). I loved the size. I am so tired of lugging my heavy 5D Mark III or Contax 645 around. The Leica is the perfect sized camera, in my opinion. It’s very discrete, which is a good thing when trying to capture photojournalistic moments at a wedding or for street photography.
The camera strap was easy to attach and feels very secure. The batteries were easy to insert and came with clear instructions. It was a breeze to attach the 35mm lens to the Leica body.
I had a feeling I was going to love this camera!
Leica M7 TTL .72 Specifications
- Type: 35mm Interchangeable-lens rangefinder camera
- Lens Mount: Leica M bayonet
- Focus Modes: Manual only
- Exposure Modes: Manual & Aperture-priority
- Exposure Metering: TTL selective centerweighted
- Metering Range: EV -2 to EV +20 with f/1.0 lens at ISO 100
- ISO Range: 6-6400 (DX coding with ISO from 25-5000)
- Shutter Speed: 1/1000th/second – 1 Second + Bulb
- PC Terminal: Yes
- Flash Mounting: Hot shoe – X-sync at up to 1/50th sec with TTL (up to 1/1000 with a Metz flash and SCA 3502 adapter.
- Film Transport: Manual with lever
- Viewfinder Magnification: 0.72x
- Diopter Correction: Available optionally from -3 to +3
- Self Timer: No
- Remote Control: Possible with optional standard mechanical cable release.
- Multiple Exposure: No
- Power Source: Two 3V 2L76 (DL 1/3N) lithium batteries
- Dimensions: 5.4 x 3.1 x 1.5″ (138.0 x 79.5 x 38mm) WxHxD
- Weight: 1.23 lbs (610g)
Leica 35mm f/2.0 Summicron M Aspherical Specifications
- Filter Size: 39mm
- f/Stop Range: 2.0-16
- Minimum Focus Distance: 2.3′
- Angle of View: 64 Degrees
- Groups/Elements: 5/7
- Length: 1.4″
- Maximum Diameter: 2.0″
- Weight: 9 oz (255 g)
The Leica requires two tiny non-rechargeable button batteries (3V Lithium) which are quite long-lasting. It will also work at two shutter speeds, 1/60th and 1/125th, without a battery. I like that feature!
Loading film proved to be more challenging than I had thought. I have been shooting film on a daily basis for the past 2.5 years. I feel fairly confident about using film cameras, but this camera proved to be much more difficult than I expected.
The manual showed how to load film (this was my first time using this specific type of film camera), but I still had to Google and search for a how-to video for instructions. I watched it several times and loaded my film. It seemed to be loaded correctly and I started to shoot.
Using the Camera
What I love and hate about this camera is how manual the settings are. The knobs on the camera are simple and there’s not too many of them. One thing I do not like about modern digital cameras is how many features are offered. I think camera companies have made their cameras more complex then they need to be. I am happiest with the simplest of cameras because I believe simplicity is elegant and allows the user to focus more on image capture instead of fiddling with settings. That was what I loved about the Leica when I first used it.
However, this camera is so manual with its settings that there is a larger chance for user error. The user manually loads the film, sets the counter to zero, manually focuses the camera, manually cranks the camera, and then manually winds the films. Normally I like this sort of thing… but I ran into lots of trouble!
When I first started shooting it, I noticed that this camera is very quiet (again, another plus in my book!), but part of me was wondering if I loaded the film correctly and if I was actually capturing images with every click of the shutter. However, I kept on shooting.
My first roll of film was Kodak Portra 400 35 mm film. It has 36 exposures. I got to 36 exposures, and then the film kept going. It got up to past 38 so I decided to try to wind the roll.
I switched the camera to the mode that enables winding the film and started the turn the crank. I winded for quite some time, never really felt any pressure, and couldn’t tell if it was done or not. I know that I am supposed to feel tension when the film is done winding, so I had a feeling something was wrong. I asked a Leica expert and he said that based on what I told him, I will likely have a blank roll.
I opened the back of my camera, and my film was completely winded (despite the fact that I never felt the pressure of it winding). I shipped the film off to my favorite lab, Photo Impact Imaging in Hollywood, and sure enough, it was blank.
Upon farther searching on Facebook film forums, I am not the only one that has ended up with a blank roll—it happens quite frequently to new Leica users.
I loaded another roll and was extra careful about this one. I loaded a roll of Kodak Tri-X 400 35 mm film. I shot it rather quickly around my home, as I was eager to see what sorts of results it would yield.
I shipped it off to my lab, and it worked! I lost a few exposures at the beginning of the roll, as I was testing to make sure the roll was advancing by keeping the back off the camera for my first few exposures. I ended up with 22 frames from a 24 exposure roll of film.
The next roll was Fuji 400h 35 mm film. It felt like it was loaded incorrectly, so I pulled the film out, cut down the roll of film, and reinserted it. Then, I could see that it was feeding correctly when I reinserted it.
However, the counter was not going back to zero as it should. It usually takes just a couple of clicks to bring the counter to zero. This time it took me 7-8 clicks to bring the counter back to one. Not sure what was going on there. But I finished the roll and it was exposed correctly.
Then I loaded my 4th roll of film and this time the film would not advance. It was stuck, even when I checked the battery and my settings. So I let it sit a few days, tried it again, and it seemed to work.
When the roll was finished I started to wind the film as normal. This time I felt lots of pressure and the roll couldn’t seem to finish winding correctly. So, I opened the back of the camera and saw that the film was jammed.
I gave my lab this roll of film that wasn’t completely winded and had a dented, broken, bent and ruined strip of film hanging off the end of it.
Luckily for me, the film that was inside the camera did work! I lost about 6 frames because of the jam.
My Frustrations with the Leica
At this point, I was getting pretty tired of this camera, because it has mostly just given me troubles. Troubles loading, troubles winding, and troubles with the image counter.
I have found this camera to be the least intuitive camera I have ever used (which is difficult considering its knobs are so simple). Even my 5D Mark III, which is full of more features than I ever need in life, is more intuitive.
I am sure that the majority of my problems were caused by user error – however, I was being careful each time I used the camera, I read the manual in its entirety, I Googled YouTube videos to make sure I was doing it correctly, and I posted on forums when I ran into trouble. From what I have read in the comments of other Leica users, the chance of user error is very high.
The other thing to know about Leica is that it has rangefinder focusing. I have a Polaroid 180 camera that I posted about here, that has rangefinder focusing. You can reference that post for more info on rangefinder focusing.
I have come to the conclusion that I do not like rangefinder focusing, nor will I buy any camera in the future with it.
While I know some photographers are quite quick at it and love it, I am so very slow at it, despite my best efforts to practice. There is no way I could use this camera at a wedding or anything fast-moving. I photographed mostly scenery (so inanimate objects), and even with that, I had to spend a lot of time making sure the image was in focus. I still ended up with quite a few out of focus frames.
Also, what you see in the viewfinder is not exactly what you are going to get – so sometimes precise framing is impossible. I much prefer the viewfinder that shows me exactly how my crop will be when I click the shutter.
One thing that I did like with this camera was the in-camera meter. I left the settings on aperture priority for the meting and every frame was exposed correctly (well at least my lab told me that when they scanned my film). I am used to hauling around a handheld light meter when photographing on film, and it was a welcome change to leave it at home! However, I noticed the shadows were blocking in more than I prefer in many of my shots.
Leica 35mm f/2.0 Summicron M Aspherical Lens
While I liked the focal length of the Leica 35mm f/2.0 lens and the size/weight of it, overall I wasn’t a huge fan. As I describe below, I was underwhelmed with the images that it produced.
The lens comes with a lens hood/flare shield that attaches to the front of the lens. It popped off unintentionally more times than I could count. Every time I took off the lens cap, the lens hood snapped off as well. That part of the lens felt badly designed to me.
Also, it is worth noting that you must make sure the lens cap is off when shooting because the camera is a rangefinder. This means that even if the lens cap is on when you look through the viewfinder, it appears like the lens cap is off. You could accidentally shoot an all-black roll by leaving the cap off (however, this was NOT the cause of my blank roll!).
While I got some “good” images back, overall I did not love them. When I shoot film on my Contax 645 (my go-to film camera – it is a medium format camera with a larger negative, so I know I am not comparing apples to apples here), I am in love with my images. I know the Leica and the Contax are very different cameras, but I did not like the images that came back from the Leica. Some of them were OK, but for an $8000 camera and lens combo, I was expecting more.
Overall, they just look OK to me.
All images below were taken on the Leica and the film scans straight from my lab unless otherwise specified. No editing in Photoshop or Lightroom has been done to these images.
Above: The photo on the left was taken on the Leica, the photo on the right taken with my Contax 645. They were scanned by the same person and shot on the same film stocks (Fuji 400H). I do not like the tones of the Leica and the shadows are darker than I prefer. I like the image to the right better.
Above: This comparison is the most similar. The photo on the left was taken on the Leica, the photo on the right taken with my Contax 645. Again, I prefer the Contax 645. Obviously, they are very different cameras, but it is interesting to compare.
Above: Not particularly happy with any of these three above photos, all taken with the Leica M7. The image on the left has some strange lines happening in the sky. The image in the middle has dark shadows and odd tones. And image to the right has intense chromatic aberrations.
I would not recommend this camera. It gave me tons of problems and after loading 4 rolls of film (my plan was to shoot 5 rolls), I was done. One of them was blank, 1 got jammed, one I had to reload because it wasn’t advancing properly, and just one roll worked as expected.
It is a very expensive camera, and in my opinion, the images that I was able to produce from the Leica were not of high enough quality to warrant the price.
While I had heard lots of hype on how amazing the Leica film rangefinders are, upon further inspection, I have found quite a few people in the online film community equally as frustrated. Many have stated they have buyer’s remorse. I know there are some good deals out there on used Leicas, so I recommend trying an older, used model before spending the big bucks on a new one.
The Leica M7 and the 35mm f/2 lens are simply not the right camera set up for me!
- Build Quality
- Focus Speed and Accuracy
- Image Quality
- Size and Weight
- Metering and Exposure
- Packaging and Manual
- Ease of Use
Photography Life Overall Rating
Die selben Erfahrungen habe ich auch gemacht. Zwar bin ich froh, das die Deutschen wenigstens noch eine Kamera herstellen aber dieser schwere Klotz ist eher zur Angabe geeignet. Meine M 7 habe ich wieder verkauft, so ein häßliches, umständliches Ding.
Thanks for sharing such informative content. I would like to tell you about my blog Best Mirrorless Camera Under $1000
So good to see an honest critical review not one of those pandering to the company that lent them a camera. I totally agree with your review. I had two m3s, two M6s as well as an M240 (soap slab like heavy camera which was atrocious to use) and multiple Summilux and Summicron lenses. Whilst I never had film jamming problems the whole hype re quality is overdone. The lenses tried on the m240 the lenses did not perform well at all. Nowadays the tech and optics of modern lenses and cameras have made the Leica something of an anachronism . It is a luxury item that is not better than its competitors — akin to a nylon Louis Vitton bag …bit of an item to hang around your neck when you are on Instagram …all about marketing. I am sure this will upset all those Leica lovers but I will remind them that I used Leica for over 40 years in tandem with Canon, Nikon, Mamiya and Rolleiflex systems. Look at how good the little Fujix100s are and how easily they outdo the much more expensive Leica digitals out now.
btw I should let you know that with the M6 if you leave the lens cap on the meter arrows will both flash to let you know you have the cap on – I would assume the M7 had the same feature?
You sound to me like a Kodak Brownie fan. Tsk.
Frankly, this is more of a review of you than it is about the M7.
the beach model shot on the right image is minimum one stop more exposed than the left image. overexposed I’d reckon..
Nazim, I was hoping you had more Leica reviews, or at least L-mount reviews. When I searched the site, I happened upon this review. As Wilbur mentions, Leica’s tend to polarize the crowd. I have shot a lot of systems. Each has it’s pro’s and con’s. In fairness to the reviewer, I decided to learn more about her. I found an interesting quote, “My first few rolls on the Contax were terrible as well. It’s not just about finding the right light, setting the right exposure, and composing the right shot.” I wonder if such a scathing review would have been the result of her first four rolls with the Contax. The author specifically chose the Contax because “I decided on the Contax 645 and a Zeiss 80 2.0 lens – everyone I knew shooting film raved about it, the colors, the lens, and the ease of use.”
My concern is that Laura basically criticized the 35mm camera because it was “unintuitive” and difficult to use when she admits in her own commentary that she prefers cameras that are easy to use and that it took her a few rolls to learn how to use the camera that was the easiest to use.
I find the credibility of the review lacking.. not because of my experience with the camera (though I have owned Leica’s), but because it seems the capabilities and preferences of the reviewer are out of synch with the product that was being reviewed. Back to Wilbur’s example… Would you ask someone to review a Bugatti when they prefer to drive a simpler vehicle? And would you find the review credible when they drove the Bugatti for the same amount of time as they did to learn how to drive the simple vehicle? I would not find their review of the Bugatti very credible.
My ask is that reviewers be competent with the products and families of products they are reviewing, or declare their lack of familiarity and expectations at the onset.
Somewhat ridiculous review by someone who cannot figure out how to load a Leica. If you cant do this simple operation, why not just use your phone camera?
Loading film is super easy as long as you load with the bottom ‘up’. Keep the flap on the back closed. Just remove the bottom plate, stretch the film across, feed in pick up spool(simple ), viola … loaded. I load it in the dark if needed but no reason to overthink.
Nazim, I must write that I have not been as entertained, pained, and generally entertained by a Comments Section in years. (Tho I rarely have the time and inclination to read ALL the comments when there are so many. But, I had some airport downtime and nothing else to do.) This old blog post (that I never saw until now) and the ensuing comments clearly reveal several things: film still has a following and, a blog about a Leica M product never fails to produce seething emotions one way or the other! I suppose this is why so many opera companies stage the same operas in their houses (albeit with different interpretations) year in and year out: they can always be assured of great attendance. This principle, I see, operates in the world of Blogs, too!
I no longer post replies to those who say Leica’s are over-priced crap. But, I will say that I never hear people saying these kinds of things about Ferraris, Bugatti Veyrons, etc. All vehicles will get there but some will do it in a different style – even if they cost many times more than the family Chevy or Ford. Last year I visited Wetzlar and was looking at the factory production of some of the glass lenses. An employee was coating the rim of a lens element with an anti-reflective black ‘paint’. She used a brush and an ‘ink’ pot. The Japanese visiting tourist standing next to me suddenly exclaimed, “Ah…. I see there is much handwork here. Not automated. No robot assembly.” This is key to understanding part of the cost of a Leica lens and camera: real people earning real, western society, industrial-level wages. Another part is economy-of-scale. Leica is not churning out zillions of anything. Small batch production is always going to cost more. So… when folks complain that Leica’s cost too much, I want to ask them do they, “enjoy working for free?” And then say, “please just enjoy the camera system of your choice and don’t let the fact you (perhaps) cannot easily afford a Leica system make you berate something you have never used – unless you practice some consistency and throw complaints at that guy driving the Ferrari!”
Oh, great site Nasim. Keep up the great work!
Laura: As you obviously love photography and are willing to experiment and write about your experiences, please give another Leica a test drive… a digital M240 or M10, for example, or a film M6. And, importantly, find a ‘mentor’ in the Leica M world to show you the ropes (not always easy here in northern NM, for instance, but always a good start to learning anything new.)