Photography Life

PL provides various digital photography news, reviews, articles, tips, tutorials and guides to photographers of all levels

  • Lens Reviews
  • Camera Reviews
  • Tutorials
  • Compare Cameras
  • Forum
    • Sign Up
    • Login
  • About
  • Search
Home → Reviews → Cameras and Lenses → Hasselblad 907X and CFV 100C Camera Review

Hasselblad 907X and CFV 100C Camera Review

By Spencer Cox 28 Comments
Last Updated On May 5, 2024

«»

Table of Contents

  • Introduction & Features
  • Handling and Build Quality
  • Image Quality
  • Verdict
  • Reader Comments
Looking for even more exclusive content?

On Photography Life, you already get world-class articles with no advertising every day for free. As a Member, you'll get even more:

Silver ($5/mo)
  • Exclusive articles
  • Monthly Q&A chat
  • Early lens test results
  • "Creative Landscape Photography" eBook
Gold ($12/mo)
  • All that, PLUS:
  • Online workshops
  • Monthly photo critiques
  • Vote on our next lens reviews
 
Click Here to Join Today
 
Disclosures, Terms and Conditions and Support Options
guest

guest

28 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Jay
Jay
May 4, 2024 7:25 pm

Great review – thoughtful and informed by real-world use. Thanks! A few thoughts…

1. Your links on where to buy did not include links for the XCD V lenses – and for good reason as they are near impossible to buy – and/or have ridiculous wait lists. TBH, it was a major knock-out for me. I wanted to buy into this system with these newer lenses but I eventually gave up.

2. Re your gloves and touchscreen comment, have you tried “thumbless gloves” or “touchscreeen gloves”? If not, search Amazon for these terms and you will see a range of options for both.

3. You could put “No video (your opinion may vary)” under both pro and con maybe?

Beautiful photography, excellent review.

Thanks.

0
Reply
Spencer Cox
Spencer Cox
Author
Reply to  Jay
May 5, 2024 5:03 pm

Thanks, Jay! Yes, it works well with fingerless gloves and touchscreen gloves, which is fine in moderately cold environments. Here in Colorado, I do a lot of landscape photography in temperatures where warmer gloves are necessary. All depends on the photographer’s situation.

0
Reply
Luc Mary-Rabine
Luc Mary-Rabine
May 3, 2024 11:46 am

I use both the X2D and the 907 X CFV 50. The 907 X is a joy to use with its retro feeling but most of the time I use the CFV on my 903 SWC, along with the A12 film back. To obviate the lack of stabilization, I use the hand grip, very convenient if you do not carry a tripod. You should add that by a very sunny day, the screen of the CFV may be useless. Thanks for this excellent review.

0
Reply
Spencer Cox
Spencer Cox
Author
Reply to  Luc Mary-Rabine
May 3, 2024 5:12 pm

I’m glad you liked the review, thanks, Luc! Good point, the screen is definitely not that bright. I kept it set to full brightness, and I still sometimes had to shade it from the sun to see my composition properly.

0
Reply
Javi
Javi
May 2, 2024 1:28 pm

I find it very strange that the DxO laboratory has not done any analysis of this sensor after two years, or why are they hiding it?

0
Reply
Spencer Cox
Spencer Cox
Author
Reply to  Javi
May 2, 2024 8:09 pm

Who knows. But I wouldn’t guess that it’s because they’re deliberately trying to hide something. Not much to hide anyway – it’s a medium format sensor that performs well, as expected.

2
Reply
fiatlux
fiatlux
May 2, 2024 11:27 am

Interesting review of a unique camera (and great photos by the way). Slap an XCD 21 or 28mm on it and you have a kind of digital SWC! Kudos to Hasselblad/DJI for offering such an option on an already niche market.

A few comments though (from someone who uses an X1D):

1 – The XCD lens range is relatively limited and pretty expensive (outside of the two ‘P’ lenses) compared to Fuji GF lenses. Evaluate your needs carefully before committing to the system!
2 – HC/HCD lenses are only fully functional on XCD cameras if they are of the very latest design (manufactured after 2014 or so). These can be updated to FW 18 to offer AF with the XH adapter and converter. Since the H system was introduced in 2002, many (most) of the lenses on the used market are older, cannot be updated to FW 18 and will therefore only work in manual focus.
3 – On the plus side, quite a few lenses designed for 24×36, especially long ones, actually cover 33×44, and you will even be able to maintain AF with Canon EF lenses and Techart’s TCX-01 (which is still hit-and-miss in terms of compatibility). But as with any adapted lens outside of the HC/HCD ones, you are stuck to the electronic shutter which, with the very slow readout time of the sensor, is indeed problematic when shooting handheld or any moving subject.

2
Reply
Spencer Cox
Spencer Cox
Author
Reply to  fiatlux
May 2, 2024 11:36 am

Thanks, and I’m glad you liked the photos! That’s a useful perspective. I’ll add a mention in the review of which HC/HCD lenses can be used with autofocus.

0
Reply
John Motzi
John Motzi
May 2, 2024 11:20 am

I was a little surprised that one supposedly cannot use the leaf shutter of V lenses when using the 907X “camera”. The 50C back & 100C back are shown to be used with leaf shutters when V lenses are mounted on 500 series cameras, and leaf shutters on view camera lenses (via PC Cable connection) when used with an Alpa system. Not sure why that would not also be the case when using the V lenses dumb adapted on the 907X.

0
Reply
Spencer Cox
Spencer Cox
Author
Reply to  John Motzi
May 2, 2024 11:33 am

I don’t have V lenses to test with it, so I was just quoting Hasselblad’s page on the XV Adapter, but that does seem to be the situation. This thread is the closest I could find to a discussion about potential workarounds, and it doesn’t really come to a practical answer: www.hasselbladdigitalforum.com/index…pic=8738.0

1
Reply
fiatlux
fiatlux
Reply to  John Motzi
May 2, 2024 11:40 am

When you use the digital back on a V Hasselblad camera, it is the camera that mechanically cocks and triggers the leaf shutter in the lens. When you use the dumb XV adapter, there is no such mechanical link and the camera has to rely on its electronic shutter. Same limitation with adapted X-Pan lenses (which also have leaf shutters).
I guess engineering an adapter capable of mechanically cocking and releasing the lens leaf shutter would be pretty complex.
Somewhat easier would be an adapter for Mamiya 6 or 7 lenses that had electronically-controlled leaf shutters, but I am not betting on anyone coming up with such thing, unfortunately. 😢

4
Reply
Roar Velle
Roar Velle
May 2, 2024 7:50 am

Phase one has beautiful cameras. Why not look at these? I think the difference to full frame would be greater, and use in the field better.

0
Reply
Jason Polak
Jason Polak
Admin
Reply to  Roar Velle
May 2, 2024 8:19 am

Now I am expecting a phase one under the tree next Christmas :)

0
Reply
Spencer Cox
Spencer Cox
Author
Reply to  Roar Velle
May 2, 2024 10:58 am

I’d definitely be willing to test it. There are a lot of Phase One cameras that range from a couple thousand dollars on the used market to $50,000+ for the newest generation with the most resolution. The 100 MP Trichromatic back is the one that interests me the most – would love to use that on a technical camera – but talk about expensive.

1
Reply
Roar Velle
Roar Velle
Reply to  Spencer Cox
May 5, 2024 4:05 pm

Or the xt system out in the field!

0
Reply
fiatlux
fiatlux
Reply to  Roar Velle
May 2, 2024 11:51 am

The Phase One XC camera shares a somewhat similar philosophy but, once you factor in the price of a digital back, is quite a bit more expensive.
This being said, if I were to use a digital back on a larger MF (or even LF) camera, I think I would prefer a used Phase One IQ1 100 back than this “cropped MF” CFV 100C.

1
Reply
Spencer Cox
Spencer Cox
Author
Reply to  fiatlux
May 2, 2024 12:00 pm

If you’re open to buying used (I certainly am), the used digital back market these days is ridiculous. Including pretty high-resolution “uncropped” medium format sensors selling for less than some full-frame cameras.

0
Reply
Elaine Lansdown
Elaine Lansdown
May 2, 2024 6:41 am

The thing that impressed me the most about this camera system was the stunning color profile of the sensor. The pictures you took are beautiful and special. I’ve never seen another camera system achieve the same results. I guess there is a good reason why this camera costs what it does.

0
Reply
Spencer Cox
Spencer Cox
Author
Reply to  Elaine Lansdown
May 2, 2024 10:51 am

Very kind of you to say that about my photos, thank you, Elaine. This camera is definitely out of my budget, but I still consider the price to be reasonable for the niche it offers.

0
Reply
Jason Polak
Jason Polak
Admin
May 2, 2024 5:19 am

Awesome review, and fascinating even for someone who many never use such a system. The sensor performance is impressive. Seems like a perfect camera for tripod usage and large printing without the weight!

0
Reply
Spencer Cox
Spencer Cox
Author
Reply to  Jason Polak
May 2, 2024 10:45 am

Thanks, Jason! I agree, it’s great within that specialization. Not a generalist camera by any means, but there are already a million generalist cameras for photographers who need them.

0
Reply
bg5931
bg5931
May 2, 2024 1:33 am

I guess I am among those 20% who might be within the target audience for this camera. But unless I win the lottery, it is not going to happen (and even if I did win the lottery, I might buy a 400/2.8 TC instead :D ). Nevertheless, I thought this review was an interesting read. Always good to know what else is out there.

And: Hope you were somewhere safe when shooting those buffalo at 70 mm equivalent!

0
Reply
Spencer Cox
Spencer Cox
Author
Reply to  bg5931
May 2, 2024 1:39 am

Thanks! I was in my car the whole time – actually in a traffic jam caused by the bison. Nowhere to go even if I wanted to! A surprisingly common occurrence in Yellowstone.

2
Reply
Sam
Sam
May 2, 2024 1:15 am

Does the system support astrophotography? Are there fast wide angle lenses that do not weigh a ton?

0
Reply
Spencer Cox
Spencer Cox
Author
Reply to  Sam
May 2, 2024 1:44 am

With this ISO performance, it would be a strong potential choice for astrophotography. Focusing on the stars is a little tricky because, in my opinion, the live view’s maximum magnification is not as high as I would like. The 38mm f/2.5 that I used in this review would not be a bad Milky Way lens if you don’t mind the 30mm equivalent focal length, and there are various other lens options as well.

I’ll write more on the subject soon, so keep an eye out before making a decision on buying into this system for astrophotography.

1
Reply

Learn

  • Beginner Photography
  • Landscape Photography
  • Wildlife Photography
  • Portraiture
  • Post-Processing
  • Advanced Tutorials
Photography Life on Patreon

Reviews

  • Camera Reviews
  • Lens Reviews
  • Other Gear Reviews
  • Best Cameras and Lenses

Photography Tutorials

Photography Basics
Landscape Photography
Wildlife Photography
Macro Photography
Composition & Creativity
Black & White Photography
Night Sky Photography
Portrait Photography
Street Photography
Photography Videos

Unique Gift Ideas

Best Gifts for Photographers

Subscribe via Email

If you like our content, you can subscribe to our newsletter to receive weekly email updates using the link below:

Subscribe to our newsletter

Site Menu

  • About Us
  • Beginner Photography
  • Lens Database
  • Lens Index
  • Photo Spots
  • Search
  • Forum

Reviews

  • Reviews Archive
  • Camera Reviews
  • Lens Reviews
  • Other Gear Reviews

More

  • Contact Us
  • Subscribe
  • Workshops
  • Support Us
  • Submit Content

Copyright © 2025 · Photography Life

You are going to send email to

Move Comment