Photography Life

PL provides various digital photography news, reviews, articles, tips, tutorials and guides to photographers of all levels

  • Lens Reviews
  • Camera Reviews
  • Tutorials
  • Compare Cameras
  • Forum
    • Sign Up
    • Login
  • About
  • Search
Home → Reviews → Software

DxO DeepPrime XD Tested – An Evolution of Noise Reduction

By Libor Vaicenbacher 17 Comments
Last Updated On January 4, 2023

Artificial intelligence, or rather machine learning, is now a permanent part of many photo editing programs. I recently tested one such machine learning program for noise reduction and sharpness, called DxO PureRaw 2. In the meantime, however, the French company DxO reworked their de-noising module called DeepPRIME (which is part of PureRaw 2) and introduced a new version called DeepPRIME XD.

The suffix XD stands for “extra detail.” This gives us a hint of what to expect from the new algorithm. But how does it perform? That’s what I wanted to cover in today’s quick review.

Robin_DeepPrime XD
NIKON D500 + 500mm f/5.6 @ 500mm, ISO 5000, 1/400, f/5.6

To start, I should say that I was hoping to see DeepPRIME XD integrated into DxO PureRaw 2 via an update. In fact, PureRaw 2 has become almost an integral part of my editing workflow. Unfortunately, it didn’t happen. So maybe in PureRaw 3? In any case, for now, it’s only found in DxO PhotoLab 6.

As such, DxO PhotoLab 6 has taken up temporary residence in my computer. Only time will tell if it will stay there permanently. I have left all its editing and cataloguing features aside and focused my attention solely on DeepPRIME XD.

Table of Contents

  • Processing Speed
  • Noise Reduction Quality
  • Preservation of Details
  • Color Preservation
  • Summary

Processing Speed

I selected a set of eleven photographs for editing, taken mostly with Nikon D500 and Nikon D750 cameras. The lenses used were a Nikon 400mm f/2.8 G or a Nikon 200-500 f/5.6 zoom lens. I mention this fact because both the camera and the lens must be in the program’s database in order to use its full potential. That’s why I didn’t include the Nikon Z9 with the new telephoto lenses in the test. While the Nikon Z9 is familiar to DxO, the Nikon 400 f/4.5 and 400 f/2.8 TC S lenses were not yet in the database at the time of my testing.

I processed the entire series of photos twice to minimize any possible error. The resulting processing times were different for each method, and not by a small amount. DxO PhotoLab 6 processed the photos the fastest, at 1 min. 12sec., when I set the older DeepPRIME algorithm. The same algorithm, but in DxO PureRaw 2, completed the job in 1 min. 52 sec. And finally, my computer’s processor had the most work to do with the new DeepPRIME XD. It took a long 3 min. 56 sec. – so, the new XD algorithm is hardly fast.

But what matters the most is image quality. Does it fare better there?

Noise Reduction Quality

DxO claims that the standard DeepPRIME algorithm should reduce the noise level by 2 stops, while DeepPRIME XD will show a difference of 2.5 stops or more. These are marketing numbers, of course, but they at least show that DxO considers the XD version of the algorithm to be superior.

How does this difference be reflected in the photos themselves? In my opinion, the difference is noticeable immediately, if you zoom in enough.

Take a look at the 100% crops below. DeepPRIME XD (the image on the right) clearly has the edge over the older algorithm on the left.

Great Tit_PureRaw2Great Tit_DP XD

What ISO did I use for this photo? A whopping ISO 20,000! I don’t shoot at ISO 20,000 every day, but I can imagine situations where it comes in handy, especially in dense forests.

Although the DeepPRIME XD algorithm looks cleaner and less “blocky” at first glance, note that it also created some artifacts under the bird’s beak and behind its head. The older DeepPRIME algorithm may not look as clean, but the artifacts are not as obvious in the image.

Preservation of Details

The usual choice in noise reduction is pretty simple: Either you get a photo with minimal noise and minimal detail, or more detail but more noise. If you want both, you typically need to use masks and apply noise reduction only where it’s the most needed, like out-of-focus regions.

Artificial intelligence algorithms have improved this tradeoff, but it’s still an unavoidable part of photography. This is where I was most curious to see how DeepPRIME XD would compare to the previous version.

The original DxO DeepPRIME is on the left, and DxO DeepPRIME XD is on the right:

Bicolored Antbird_DeepPrimeBicolored Antbird_DeepPrime XD

When I compare the results, I’m not disappointed. You can see that the edge sharpness has increased slightly in the XD version, and the amount of noise in the out-of-focus background has decreased. Unlike the prior test, this is definitely a win for the newer algorithm.

Here’s another example below. Check out the crest of the Andean Cock-of-the-rock. I think the difference is really visible. (As before, the older algorithm is on the left, and the newer XD is on the right.)

Cock-of-the-rock DeepPrimeCock-of-the-rock DeepPrime XD

Color Preservation

This is where things get a little complicated. I exported the photos from DxO PhotoLab 6 and DxO PureRaw 2 by converting to a DNG file. With most photos, this caused no issues, but the Andean Cock-of-the-rock was a different case. Its deep orange color is a tough test for cameras and editing programs alike.

For point of reference, here’s how the orange color should look, as shown prior to exporting the image:

Export dialog Deep Prime XD

But here’s how it actually looked upon export to a DNG:

cock-of-the-rock_Color shift
Compare the color shift with the correctly converted crops above; NIKON D500 + 400mm f/2.8 @ 400mm, ISO 4500, 1/320, f/3.2

It almost looks pink, like a tamer version of a flamingo! At first I thought this was a problem with the XD algorithm, but upon exporting it with the original DeepPRIME algorithm as well, the problem persisted.

Only when I exported as a TIFF file instead of DNG did the color look normal again. I don’t know why that is exactly, but it was something I wanted to note in case you are noticing similar issues with the colors in your DNG files.

Summary

DxO has taken a step forward with its new way of pre-editing RAW files. DeepPRIME XDdelivers what its name promises. It actually manages to extract a slightly higher level of detail from files shot at high ISO than its predecessor DeepPRIME.

However, there are a few minor issues. The first problem I’ve encountered is that at very high ISOs, the new algorithm can create artifacts in areas that are out of focus. The second finding is color shift when converting to DNG, although this isn’t necessarily worse than with the previous DeepPRIME algorithm.

Summing up all the positives and negatives of the new DeepPRIME XD, the positive feelings prevail for me. If you frequently shoot at high ISOs and routinely face heavy noise, getting some software with the XD noise reduction algorithm could be useful for your work.

That said, at the moment, it’s only in the DxO PhotoLab 6 Elite software, which is fairly expensive at €219 (note that the cheaper ESSENTIAL Edition does not include the DeepPRIME XD). I hope that DxO adds this feature to their PureRaw software or PhotoLab Essential, because although it’s a useful improvement, it may not be worth the price if you wouldn’t use the other features of PhotoLab Elite.

Looking for even more exclusive content?

On Photography Life, you already get world-class articles with no advertising every day for free. As a Member, you'll get even more:

Silver ($5/mo)
  • Exclusive articles
  • Monthly Q&A chat
  • Early lens test results
  • "Creative Landscape Photography" eBook
Gold ($12/mo)
  • All that, PLUS:
  • Online workshops
  • Monthly photo critiques
  • Vote on our next lens reviews
 
Click Here to Join Today
 

Related Articles

  • DxO_PureRaw_18
    DxO PureRaw Tested: A Noise Whisperer?
  • Fully Recovered Image from RAW
    Long Exposure Noise Reduction Explained
  • Uncropped Drone Photo with Minimal Noise Reduction
    Color Noise Reduction Isn’t a Free Ride
  • Flying Duck
    Photo Noise Reduction Tutorial
  • Verm-color-noise-nr0-Salton-Sea-4437-2
    How to Avoid and Reduce Noise
  • Canon EOS R6 Review
    Canon EOS R6 Video Review
Disclosures, Terms and Conditions and Support Options
Filed Under: Software Tagged With: DxO, High ISO, Noise, Noise Reduction, Software, Software Reviews

About Libor Vaicenbacher

Libor works as a biology teacher, guide, photographer and photography course lecturer. His passion is birds. As an ornithologist, Libor has studied the avian diversity of the South American Andes. He fell in love with this part of the world and since then he likes to return there with his camera to popularize its nature with his photographs, talks and articles. You can see more of Libor's work on his Instagram page.

guest

guest

17 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Richard Handler
Richard Handler
November 18, 2022 10:07 pm

Libor, can you comment on the blue hue Deep Prime imparts to the black/white/yellow songbird?

(If you did not have the control image on the left half I’d have thought this blue tint was from diffraction of sunlight by structures within the feathers.)

0
Reply
Libor Vaicenbacher
Libor Vaicenbacher
Author
Reply to  Richard Handler
November 21, 2022 2:35 am

Hi Richard, thanks for the question. The blue hue has three causes. The first is that Great Tit’s photo was taken in deep shadow. Almost in the dark. That’s why the colours are rather cold. The other cause are microscopic structures on the surface of the feathers that absorb some wavelengths and reflect others (in this case blue). And the last cause is the most trivial, color profiles. DxO PureRaw produces DNG files that both Capture 1 and Photoshop read correctly without having to touch the color profiles. However, PhotoLab 6 needs to be tweaked (see my reply below) to make the colors match the original.

0
Reply
Julian Dunster
Julian Dunster
November 18, 2022 6:13 pm

I think the slow speeds are a reflection of your computer. I have deep prime XD and for a z9 NEF file it is scarcely 2 seconds to process – almost fast enough to not see it happen. I also have Topaz DeNoise and there are times when I feel that does a better job with just a small of sharpening added to the brew.

0
Reply
Libor Vaicenbacher
Libor Vaicenbacher
Author
Reply to  Julian Dunster
November 21, 2022 2:23 am

The times I give are valid only for the computer I used and the sample of photos I tested. Differences in processing times should be seen as relative rather than absolute.

1
Reply
Marcin
Marcin
November 18, 2022 7:07 am

Libor

Nice comparison. As a long time DxO Photolab (and DxO Optics Pro prior to that) user, I have some remarks for you:

1. DeepPrime and DeepPrime XD benefit extremely from a GPU in one’s computer. Please check your preferences if you have that set up properly – you will see a really huge decrease in computing times!

2. DxO Photolab 6 has introduced a wide gamut colour space which was previously not supported by the DxO Photolab 5. This has created multiple issues with strange colour casts for some users.

3. Generally, colour management was somewhat lacking in DxO Photolab (no problem for me, since I base on sRGB) and during export proper colour profiles were either not attached or not properly indicated in the file’s metadata. When you cross this point with te previous one, you may end up in colour shifts in DNG files whereas the TIFF files were OK. Also, please take into consideration that DNG files exported from DxO Photolab are linear DNGs.

3
Reply
Libor Vaicenbacher
Libor Vaicenbacher
Author
Reply to  Marcin
November 21, 2022 1:55 am

Thank you Marcin for your useful comment. As for the speed, it will always be lower with the new DeepPrime XD than with DeepPrime. So more than absolute values, readers might be interested in relative values. Each computer handles the task differently in terms of speed, but the relative difference in times should be similar.

The matter of colour profiles is indeed somewhat confusing. Perhaps more than inconsistent colors, there is the problem of inconsistent color profile management. First of all it is essential to set the correct color profile in the “Color rendering” in DxO. But then it is also necessary to select the correct profile when importing the DNG file into the editor. In Photoshop, I achieved the most correct color rendering when I selected “camera neutral”.

0
Reply
Pieter Kers
Pieter Kers
November 18, 2022 3:56 am

Preserving color is, besides the grain, a real problem with high ISO.
On a Nikon d850 i find the color acceptable up to 6400 asa without using DXO.
Does DXO extend the ISO-range in terms of color?

0
Reply
Libor Vaicenbacher
Libor Vaicenbacher
Author
Reply to  Pieter Kers
November 21, 2022 2:09 am

Hi Pieter, you are right that at higher ISOs there is a problem with the colours. But this is not just a matter of the file taken, but also the subject itself. Where there is no light, there are no colours. But to your question. I wouldn’t say that DxO improves colors at higher sensitivities in any significant way (if at all). Of course you can tweak them further with additional adjustments. In any case, I wouldn’t be afraid to go higher than ISO 6400 with DxO. Of course in cases where it makes sense.

0
Reply
Pieter Kers
Pieter Kers
Reply to  Libor Vaicenbacher
March 23, 2023 5:06 am

I just tried deeprime XD (DXO pure raw 3) and on my computer it takes almost 1 minute for each 45MP file !( without XD it was 10 sec)
at ASA’s above 6400 The XD version starts to get better than the non XD. You can use 512.000 ASA ! wow! Artefacts- al over the place, but a usuable file without grain and strong but not perfect colors. Compare that with the normal developed LR version and it is night and day… well done DXO ! you have made my camera far better in the dark, more than hardware could do.

0
Reply
Libor Vaicenbacher
Libor Vaicenbacher
Reply to  Pieter Kers
March 23, 2023 5:56 am

Unfortunately, Pieter, this is a result that matches mine. I’m about to reinstall my PC, so I’ll put DxO PureRaw 3 on it and test the speed again. Fortunately, I don’t edit a lot of photos, so it’s not such a problem for me. I’ll just have a whole lunch instead of coffee while I’m editing in DxO. By the way, I was also wondering if an investment of around 100 usd would end up being more useful than buying a new camera for thousands of usd. What if you combine a top-of-the-range camera with top-of-the-range software? That’s one hell of a ride.

0
Reply
Cees
Cees
November 18, 2022 1:14 am

I tested DXO DeepPrime as well and I agree for noise reduction it is really good and makes older and M4/3 cameras more usefull. I compared with the other AI noise reduction software that is on the market and found it to be superior. There is only a color problem if you send the file back to LR as dng (only optical corrections and NR) but only if you use their new working color space (wich has became useless for me). Using the classic working colorspace the problem does not occur. It is only a pity that the dng file becomes much bigger than the original raw file.

0
Reply
Pieter Kers
Pieter Kers
Reply to  Cees
November 18, 2022 3:53 am

can you explain what colorspace you mean- adobe color profile?

0
Reply
Cees
Cees
Reply to  Pieter Kers
November 18, 2022 7:40 am

No, this is a new, what DXO calls a new extended working space. What it exactly means I do not yet know but in the program you can choose between the new and the classic working space. As long as I choose classic I do not have problems with the colors.

0
Reply
Marcin
Marcin
Reply to  Pieter Kers
November 18, 2022 9:22 am

No, DxO has implemented some proprietary colourspace. In the DxO forum you can find charts comparing the new wide gamut space to ProPhoto RGB etc.

0
Reply
Mark B
Mark B
Reply to  Cees
November 18, 2022 10:45 am

Which programs did you compare to? I’ve been using Topaz Denoise.

0
Reply
Cees
Cees
Reply to  Mark B
November 18, 2022 11:14 am

I tried and compared Topaz and On1 NoNoise with DXO.

0
Reply
Libor Vaicenbacher
Libor Vaicenbacher
Author
Reply to  Cees
November 21, 2022 2:19 am

Yes, the colour profiles need some experimentation. For Nikon files, a usable approach is to open the photo in Nikon NX Studio, which displays the colors correctly. Then open Adobe Camera Raw (or another editor) and there, by selecting the appropriate profile, try to find a match between the two views of the same file. You then save that profile as the default for that particular camera.

0
Reply

Learn

  • Beginner Photography
  • Landscape Photography
  • Wildlife Photography
  • Portraiture
  • Post-Processing
  • Advanced Tutorials
Photography Life on Patreon

Reviews

  • Camera Reviews
  • Lens Reviews
  • Other Gear Reviews
  • Best Cameras and Lenses

Photography Tutorials

Photography Basics
Landscape Photography
Wildlife Photography
Macro Photography
Composition & Creativity
Black & White Photography
Night Sky Photography
Portrait Photography
Street Photography
Photography Videos

Unique Gift Ideas

Best Gifts for Photographers

Subscribe via Email

If you like our content, you can subscribe to our newsletter to receive weekly email updates using the link below:

Subscribe to our newsletter

Site Menu

  • About Us
  • Beginner Photography
  • Lens Database
  • Lens Index
  • Photo Spots
  • Search
  • Forum

Reviews

  • Reviews Archive
  • Camera Reviews
  • Lens Reviews
  • Other Gear Reviews

More

  • Contact Us
  • Subscribe
  • Workshops
  • Support Us
  • Submit Content

Copyright © 2025 · Photography Life

You are going to send email to

Move Comment