Photography Life

PL provides various digital photography news, reviews, articles, tips, tutorials and guides to photographers of all levels

  • Reviews
  • Learn
  • About Us
  • Forum
  • Search
Home → Reviews → Cameras and Lenses → Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM Review

Canon RF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM

By Dvir Barkay 21 Comments
Last Updated On July 2, 2020

«»
Disclosures, Terms and Conditions and Support Options
guest

guest

21 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Hugh Vail
Hugh Vail
January 3, 2021 4:13 pm

I am a novice to the full frame mirrorless world. I love my Canon RP with the 24-105 RF L lens. It is heavy but takes beautiful pictures and is very flexible. I love it.

1
Reply
Marc
Marc
January 18, 2020 9:47 am

Hm, if a mediocre bokeh is 4 out of 5 stars I would like to know what a bad bokeh rating is, and how reliable the star ratings of this website are.

Vignetting you say “much better than the Nikon Z 24-70mm f/4 S” but the numbers you present us are equal if not worse than the numbers in the review of the Nikkor lens, on this website. If the f stop numbers are correct does that mean that the corner _area_ which is affected is much smaller (“much better”) with the Canon lens compared to the Nikkor lens? At least it is not clear to me what you mean.

Apart from this I like your review, thanks.
Regards.

0
Reply
PPK
PPK
October 26, 2019 5:46 am

I just purchased the RP and 24-105. Been a Nikon user since 1989. Nikon’s last few years of product have been weak – my 300 pf was never any sharper than an old 70-300 VR… The canon menus are sweet! The 24-105 is light without being cheap. I had some good nikkors over the years – 35-70 f2 is what this new canon lens reminds me of… Go Canon!

0
Reply
Joachim
Joachim
March 22, 2019 6:31 pm

Dvir, thanks for the review. I’m curious: why did you look into nearly all kinds of optical features and left out or forgot the various distortions? It’s only a question, no complaint.

0
Reply
Dvir Barkay
Dvir Barkay
Author
Reply to  Joachim
March 22, 2019 8:21 pm

Joachim, to test distortion and to be exact about it takes measurement tools that are beyond my means. As with the resolution tests, we will update this review in the future with Imatest results including distortion values when Canon releases a higher megapixel body. What I can tell you is that the RF 24-105 is relatively well controlled for distortion for a lens of this type and better than the Sony FE 24-105 and Nikon 24-70/4. At 24mm, there is noticeable though not atypical levels of barrel distortion. The other focal lengths feature pretty good control of distortion and are quite easily corrected. Overall, I would rate the performance as quite good when it comes to the lens’s handling of distortion (again, based on the eye test and not on exact measurements which will come in the future).

0
Reply
Enrique Balarillo
Enrique Balarillo
March 22, 2019 1:06 pm

Thank you for the nice review.

0
Reply
Dvir Barkay
Dvir Barkay
Author
Reply to  Enrique Balarillo
March 22, 2019 8:22 pm

You are welcome Enrique!

0
Reply
Daniel
Daniel
March 22, 2019 9:40 am

Control ring fellas! With that and it’s IS and tack sharp image quality if you could take one lens on a trip this is it. It’s a phenomenal lens!

2
Reply
Orlando
Orlando
March 22, 2019 7:50 am

How does it compare to the Nikon Z 24-70/4S?

0
Reply
Richard
Richard
Reply to  Orlando
March 23, 2019 6:45 pm

This.

Great efforts by apparently both Canon and Nikon in their mid-zoom f4, how does the 24-105f4 compare to the Nikon 24-70f4?

0
Reply
Spencer Cox
Spencer Cox
Admin
Reply to  Richard
March 23, 2019 9:33 pm

Having used both – the Nikon is way smaller and lighter. The specs don’t tell the full story, but side by side, it’s just significantly more compact. In sharpness, both of these are next-level lenses. The Nikon is a hair sharper in the corners at f/4 from 24-50mm. At 70mm, performance is dead even to my eyes. Beyond 70mm, the Canon wins :)

2
Reply
Richard Vernon
Richard Vernon
Reply to  Spencer Cox
March 24, 2019 1:57 am

Thanks Spencer! I have the Nikon and have been blown away by it – to the extent that I’m leaving some primes at home and am able to walkaround at night with an f4 kit lens shooting handheld at 1/15 and 1/20 at the 70mm end, and get really useable shots. Great for photographers everywhere that the Canon and Nikon offerings are so strong.

0
Reply
Giovanni
Giovanni
March 22, 2019 5:16 am

“The rotating zoom and focus rings both feel very smooth, while offering the right amount of resistance so that nothing feels loose. ”

I own this lens and I find the zoom ring a lot less smooth than the EF 28-70 L F2.8 first series I own. Yet at the canon shop they told me they are all like this…

0
Reply
Ertan
Ertan
March 22, 2019 4:34 am

Actually IS performance of the lens on EOS R is very impressive. Success rate at 1/2 seconds at 105mm is very high and I don’t have the most solid hands. Definitely better than my previous A7III and 24-70mm GM. I will compare with my EM1 II and 12-100mm f4 pro lens tonight and see if it can compete.

0
Reply
Maarten
Maarten
March 22, 2019 3:58 am

“mediocre bokeh compared to some of its peers” and stil 4 ⭐️?

0
Reply
Ertan
Ertan
Reply to  Maarten
March 22, 2019 4:31 am

You want 2 stars? There are other factors which impact useability and quality of a lens. To mw this is a solid 4 star zoom lens (one of the good ones in the market).

0
Reply
Joachim
Joachim
Reply to  Ertan
March 22, 2019 11:39 am

Maarten was referring specifically to the bokeh rating, I think, and I also would not rate it’s bokeh 4★. And still, I envy Canon shooters for this very round and well performing standard zoom, while Nikon falls 35 mm shorter and comes with massive distortions both at wide and tele end. At the moment it’s useless at 70 mm as soon as straight lines should remain straight and as long as I have no dedicated lens profile in Capture One – this kind of cushion distortion C1 cannot correct.

0
Reply
Ertan
Ertan
Reply to  Joachim
March 22, 2019 12:09 pm

Then I misunderstood his comment, if that’s what he meant.

0
Reply
tamthebam
tamthebam
Reply to  Joachim
March 22, 2019 3:27 pm

The Nikon lens is extremely sharp lens when used as designed with the applied lens profile. This is common practice on many/most mirrorless lenses from Sony, Olympus , Panasonic etc . It is a design choice to allow software to correct what it can easily do in exchange for a sharper lens. Even high end lenses in each system take advantage of this. Just in case you think that Canon is not party to this kind of thing take a look at the uncorrected vignette numbers for the RF 24-105 and 50mm F/1.2. In theory if not necessarily in practice :-) utilising software to correct vignette or apply a lens profile gives the ability to produce sharper lenses that provide better results than their DSLR counterparts

Here is an example showing that the RF 50L vignettes more at F/16 than the Sigma 50mm F/1.4 ART does at F/2
www.the-digital-picture.com/Revie…#038;API=7

0
Reply
Joachim
Joachim
Reply to  tamthebam
March 22, 2019 6:23 pm

I don’t care about vignetting, I do care about distortion because here the picture has to be geometrically altered which costs resolution, no matter how sophisticated you believe the software handles it. And I hate to be forced to use this stupid Nikon raw converter, so don’t even think to mention LR. ;) The RF 50L is btw. a f/1.2, not f/4, but feel free to continue comparing bananas with elephants.

Oh, and you’re just guessing that high end lenses take advantage of software manipulation or care to prove that? “Sharper lenses thanks to software” – well, we all can dream, can’t we.

0
Reply
paradiddlesixix
paradiddlesixix
Reply to  Joachim
January 26, 2020 10:36 am

i dont think that hes claiming that there is a software applied to make the lenses sharper. i believe he means that lens design is a game of tradeoffs. a company can use software to help in some areas and focus on things that cant be fixed in software. its much harder and more complicated to design a lens that is super sharp, no distortion or vignetting than it is to build a super sharp lens with a limited amount of distortion, that can easily be fixed in software.

2
Reply

Learn

  • Beginner Photography
  • Landscape Photography
  • Wildlife Photography
  • Portraiture
  • Post-Processing
  • Advanced Tutorials

Reviews

  • Camera Reviews
  • Lens Reviews
  • Other Gear Reviews
  • Best Cameras and Lenses

Photography Tutorials

Photography Basics
Landscape Photography
Wildlife Photography
Macro Photography
Composition & Creativity
Black & White Photography
Night Sky Photography
Portrait Photography
Street Photography
Photography Videos

Unique Gift Ideas

Best Gifts for Photographers

Subscribe via Email

If you like our content, you can subscribe to our newsletter to receive weekly email updates using the link below:

Subscribe to our newsletter

Site Menu

  • About Us
  • Beginner Photography
  • Lens Database
  • Lens Index
  • Photo Spots
  • Search
  • Forum

Reviews

  • Reviews Archive
  • Camera Reviews
  • Lens Reviews
  • Other Gear Reviews

More

  • Contact Us
  • Subscribe
  • Workshops
  • Support Us
  • Submit Content

Copyright © 2023 · Photography Life

You are going to send email to

Move Comment