Arca-Swiss C1 Cube Review

In this review, I will talk about my experience and impressions with using perhaps the finest tripod head I have seen to date, the Arca-Swiss C1 Cube. Targeted specifically at macro, architecture and landscape photographers that need ultra high precision, with the ability to handle large and heavy cameras, the “Cube” is a very specialized, high-end tool. It has been on the market for a few years and went through several changes. The version I tested is the most current model and this particular review is for the Flip-Lock quick release type head – the one that had the most problems (more on this below). As of today, Arca-Swiss manufactures two types of the Cube: one with the the “Flip-Lock” clamp and one with a “Classic” screw-knob clamp, both of which are capable of securely attaching Arca-Swiss compatible plates, rails and other accessories.

Arca-Swiss C1 Cube

NIKON D800E + 55mm f/1.4 @ 55mm, ISO 400, 1/50, f/16.0

For the past few months, I have been on a long quest to find the perfect tool for my lens testing lab. After building a custom rig with sliding rails for focus bracketing and test chart alignment needs, I realized that I needed a very precise setup that would allow me to tilt the whole rig without having to constantly fiddle with making adjustments. I love my Really Right Stuff BH-55 ballhead, but for my particular situation, I found it to be a nuisance to use when small adjustments are needed. After reading good things about the Manfrotto 405 Pro geared head, I bought it and tried it out, only to discover that it had a little bit of “play” that was unacceptable for my lens testing needs. I then understood that my only option was to go premium and buy something that would give me fine precision and stability. In a short period of time, I discovered that there are very few options available on the market when shopping for geared heads. Aside from the Arca-Swiss C1 Cube, the Photo Clam Multiflex (which is basically a Korean copy of the Cube) and the Linhof 3D Micro, there is literally nothing else available. I could not obtain the Photo Clam Multiflex, but I was able to get a hold of the Linhof 3D Micro and Arca-Swiss C1 Cube. Both turned out to be very fine heads, but as I pointed out in my review, the Linhof 3D Micro disappointed me in a couple of areas like build quality and limitations, which made the C1 Cube stand out.

Let’s take a look at the Arca-Swiss C1 Cube in more detail.

1) Specifications

Here is a quick rundown of the specifications:

Maximum Camera Supported: Large format up to 8×10
Load Capacity: N/A
Dimensions: 110 x 84 x 84mm (without knobs, approx 110 x 110 x 110mm with knobs)
Quick Release: Yes
Quick Release Type: Arca-Swiss
Lock-Type: Flip-Lock
Level: Yes
Tension Control: Yes
Tilting/Leveling Rotation: 30 degrees
Panning Rotation: 360 degrees
Tripod Mount Thread Size: 3/8″-16
Weight: 1032g

Interestingly, Arca-Swiss does not specify anywhere what the maximum load capacity is. Some websites list a load capacity of 100 kg, which is insane! I am sure the Cube can take a lot of load – more than you would probably ever need, but the 100 kg claim sounds a little over the top. I have tried out my Nikon 200-400mm f/4G VR on it (coupled with the Nikon D800E) and I did not see any issues with stability / handling, even at extreme angles.

2) Build Quality and Packaging

As expected from Arca-Swiss products, the build quality of the C1 Cube is top notch. I have owned a number of Arca-Swiss products in the past, including the popular Monoball Z1 head (which I still use after 6 years) and I can certainly vouch for the quality of their products – simply outstanding. To appreciate how well the C1 Cube is made, just compare it to anything else on the market and you will quickly realize that the C1 almost belongs to a different class of its own. The finish is smooth and polished all around, with no sharp corners or edges. Each knob is made consistently, with securely attached rubber grips for enhanced handling. To me, the Arca-Swiss C1 Cube can be best described as work of art and engineering excellence. Just by holding and feeling it in your hands, you could tell that it probably took a team of incredibly talented individuals to craft such a fine tool.

The only thing Arca-Swiss often cheap-outs on is the manual – my C1 Cube came with literally two pages of paper manual stapled together and folded. Along with a warranty card and a small red notice that warns about use of third party non-compatible plates, everything was put in a Ziploc bag. Arca-Swiss could have designed a better manual with some marketing material and illustrations to make it a little more appealing. At the same time, I do not particularly care for packaging and product manuals, as long as the product itself is solid, which it certainly is!

3) Operation and Adjustments

Operating the Cube is certainly easier than it might appear when looking at the product image. There are four knobs that control tilt and leveling movements (two per axis). The knobs are interconnected on each side, so you could use one or both for adjustments. Knob rotation is very smooth, but it does not mean that the head is loose in any way – there is a bit of tension on the knobs to allow for finer adjustments. And if you want to go slower, there are two tension control dials on each axis that can be moved from minus (-) to plus (+) in order to tighten the movements even more:

Arca-Swiss C1 Cube Tension Dial

NIKON D800E @ 55mm, ISO 400, 1/50, f/16.0

If you keep the dial on the minus (-) side, the head loosens up and if you move it towards the plus (+), the knob gets harder to turn. If you apply some force on the dial and move it as far to the plus (+) sign as possible, the knobs get extremely hard to move.

There is one additional knob on the bottom of the Cube that allows opening it up to use in vertical mode, which is great – it makes the Cube much more versatile when compared to the Linhof 3D Micro. Another huge plus to the Cube is the fact that it rotates up to 30% on each axis, which is far more than what the Linhof 3D Micro can accomplish (limited to just 12 degrees each way). Take a look at the below image that clearly demonstrates how much more the Arca-Swiss C1 Cube can tilt in comparison:

Linhof 3D Micro vs Arca-Swiss C1 Cube

NIKON D800E + 55mm f/1.4 @ 55mm, ISO 400, 1/50, f/16.0

In addition, the Cube does not require making a lot of turns on the knobs to move it. Adjustments can be done much faster when compared to the Linhof 3D Micro, which is good when needing to make bigger tilt changes – you won’t get as frustrated. Similar to the Linhof 3D Micro, there are two bubble levels for each side. I compared the bubble levels to the ones that sit on my macro rails and they appeared to be accurate.

There are two panning bases for capturing panoramas: one on the base for panning the whole head and one right under the clamp. So it is definitely a “panorama-friendly” head.

When working with the head, I had four important requirements:

  1. Allow for precise adjustments for both tilting and panning
  2. Handle heavy loads on either side of the head when tilted, since I use a specialized macro rail setup and can potentially move the camera side to side or front to back
  3. Have zero “play”, no matter how much it is tilted or panned
  4. Allow for secure locking/tightening to prevent potential tilting/panning

I am happy to say that the Cube met all of my requirements. After I locked my rails on the head, I tried to move the setup in different directions – there was no play whatsoever. And once I tightened everything up (including the top and bottom panning bases), the rails would not move at all, even after applying some force. In comparison, I could not get Linhof 3D Micro to tighten fully no matter how much force I applied when tightening the panning base.

4) Flip-Lock Clamp

The original version of the Arca-Swiss C1 Cube was shipped with a flip-lock clamp that was heavily criticized by many. First of all, it did not properly fit many plates and rails made by US manufacturers like RRS and Kirk – unlocking the flip-lock could fully detach the plate (imagine dropping camera gear as a result). Second, the flip-lock was too small and rather painful to use, especially with gloves. And lastly, the base of the clamp was rather small for the size of the Cube.

Arca-Swiss has made improvements to the flip-lock clamp and I am happy to say that the important problems have been addressed. First of all, the flip-lock clamp that came with my Cube fit all of my plates perfectly. I have tried RRS, Kirk, Hejnar Photo and other third party plates / rails and all of them securely fit the clamp. When the clamp was in fully open position, I could drop any of the plates that I have (not fully straight, needed a little bit of a side angle to drop). Bringing the flip-lock to the half position already tightened the plates pretty well and pushing it all the way to the closed position fully locked the plates in, dead on. I am not sure if Arca-Swiss has been making slight changes in locking size for the US market, but that’s how my sample was. The flip-lock is still somewhat painful to use though. It took me a little to figure out how to unlock the flip-lock – you have to push the small silver pin outwards and then it unlocks. Once it is in the half open position at 90 degrees, you then have to push the small silver screw inside towards you, which then allows to fully open the lock. If you have thick gloves, it would be very difficult to unlock it, so I am definitely not a big fan of this design. Take a look at how the flip-lock design works:

Arca-Swiss C1 Flip-Lock Operation

That’s why I have never been a fan of flip-lock quick release clamps!

The base of the clamp is still rather small, so I would love to be able to swap it out to a better clamp from RRS or Hejnar Photo. The bad news is, due to the number of repairs Arca-Swiss USA had to perform on these heads (due to wrong screw sizes that damaged the threads), the clamp is no longer easily detachable – Arca-Swiss now glues the clamp to the head. The good news is, Arca-Swiss finally realized that people might not like their flip-lock clamp design, so they are now offering heads with a classic screw-knob clamp. While I initially thought that I could get used to the flip-lock version of the head, I realized that it was just not for me, so I returned this one and ordered the screw-knob version instead. I don’t think I will be attempting to replace the screw-knob clamp with a third party clamp – too risky to potentially damage the Cube.

5) Weight and Size

At over a kilo of weight, the Cube weighs approximately the same as my full-size RRS BH-55 ballhead with a panning clamp. If you take into account all the knobs, it is also similar in width and height. It is a solid chunk of metal, although Arca-Swiss did a good job with minimizing its weight by shaving off some parts of the Cube, particularly along the axes and the base. When compared to the Linhof 3D Micro (as seen in the comparison image below), it is wider, a little taller and heavier.

6) Arca-Swiss C1 Cube vs Linhof 3D Micro

When compared to its direct competitor, the Linhof 3D Micro, the Cube has a few major advantages:

  1. The Linhof 3D Micro only allows up to 12 degrees of tilting and lateral leveling, while the C1 Cube is much more flexible and versatile, allowing for up to 30 degrees movement.
  2. Build quality of the C1 Cube is superior, with smooth finish and no cheap rubber parts.
  3. The Linhof 3D Micro requires a special “angled device” adapter plate in order to switch to vertical mode. The C1 Cube, on the other hand, has a base that can be unlocked, allowing the head to be tilted to vertical position.
  4. The Arca-Swiss C1 Cube has a tension adjustment dial (+ and -) on both axes, while the Linhof 3D Micro does not.
  5. The Linhof 3D Micro is much slower than the C1 Cube, because it requires 1 full 360 degree turn to move by 1 degree. The C1 Cube moves to about 8 degrees with a similar 360 degree turn.
  6. The Arca-Swiss C1 Cube is significantly cheaper in the US compared to the Linhof 3D Micro ($1,572 vs $2,160), a difference of almost $600.

Here is a side by side comparison between the two:

Arca-Swiss C1 Cube vs Linhof 3D Micro

NIKON D800E + 55mm f/1.4 @ 55mm, ISO 400, 1/50, f/16.0

7) Summary

Without a doubt, the Arca-Swiss C1 Cube is the finest tripod head I have used to date. When you factor in its features, ultra-high precision design and versatility, it is an engineering marvel and a work of art. For a number of years I have been wanting to try out the Cube, but I struggled to justify its high price and simply did not understand how it could be better than a solid ballhead. But after spending many hours in a lab testing lenses, I realized that a ballhead simply did not cut it for making fine adjustments, so I started looking at different solutions. After testing out several products, including the Manfrotto 405 Pro Geared Head and the Linhof 3D Micro, I realized that the Arca-Swiss C1 Cube stands above its competition and represents exactly the head that I have been looking for. Having spent over $10K on gear, charts and software for testing lenses, I am sure the Cube will be another good investment that will serve me well for years to come. It definitely deserves all the praises that it has been getting for years from working professionals and I am happy to join this list.

7) Where to Buy

The Arca-Swiss C1 Cube can be purchased from our partner, B&H Photo Video for $1,572. The Flip-Lock version of the head is also available for $1,699 (as of 03/07/2014).

Arca-Swiss C1 Cube
  • Features
  • Build Quality
  • Handling
  • Value
  • Size and Weight
  • Packaging and Manual
  • Ease of Use
  • Stability

Photography Life Overall Rating



  1. 1) Arnel Gonce
    March 9, 2014 at 8:02 pm

    Hi Nasim,
    I noticed you said you made an exchange. I have been looking at this off and on for about a year and a half. The price has come down, I’m happy to see, but for a long time they would not accept returns if you were unhappy with it. I just want to clarify that you can indeed make a return with this?

    • March 10, 2014 at 1:35 pm

      Arnel, if you buy from a reliable seller like B&H or Adorama, you will have no problems with returns! I got mine through B&H and they were happy to accept the return and ship me the other version.

  2. 2) Blake
    March 10, 2014 at 3:21 pm

    Nasim, you mentioned having experience with both the Z1 & bh-55 and was curious as to which one you prefer as I am currently debating between the two. Thanks!

    • March 10, 2014 at 5:07 pm

      Blake, as much as I love my Z1, nothing compares to the BH-55 – yes, it is that good!

  3. 3) Blake
    March 24, 2014 at 9:19 pm

    Nasim, I finally pulled the trigger and ordered the Really Right Stuff BH-55 and it should arrive this Wednesday!

    • March 27, 2014 at 10:31 am

      Blake, you won’t regret your purchasing decision – the BH-55 is my most favorite ballhead!

  4. 4) Rory
    March 28, 2014 at 7:37 am

    An excellent article Nasim! I did not know very much about the cube and found your description very easy to understand.

    If you really want a challenge, you should test all the various gimbal heads on the market now! I recently decided to update my aging original Wimberley, which still works great but is on the heavy side. I was amazed at how many alternatives there are now.

    Thanks very much for your efforts. Photography Life is a pretty classy operation.


  5. 5) Leonor
    August 30, 2014 at 8:58 am

    Nassim, very interesting reviews, thanks. I do macro photo and would like to know if you could do very fine focus bracketing with the Cube. I’m looking for a head or tool that would allow me to do fine focusing instead of using my hands to move the focusing ring. It is very hard to get in focus images when doing 4X or 5X magnification and touching the ring. I appreciate your comments. Thanks

  6. 6) Shane
    January 12, 2015 at 2:44 am

    30%? Oh, you mean 30°. ;)

  7. 7) Jo Jundt
    January 17, 2015 at 4:15 am

    My geared head “career” started with Manfrotto 410, then 405, currently I reached Arca-“Swiss” level and went d4. It’s amazing, how tiny yet much more accurate a d4 compared to Manfrotto 405 is. I don’t think I carry on with that career, meaning: a cube d1 shall return my list of desirable items after I went medium format.

    I put “Swiss” into quotation marks since I searched long time to get an address of them in Switzerland. The company moved to South france. Actually I don’t think there’s a lot of Swiss work in this head – no offense meant. I’m just not a big fan of advertising with wrong labels and justifying high prices by “Swiss Made” – Arca is not allowed to label their products officially with that signet

    However, if the quality is fine, I don’t complain about names. The troubles you had with the flip lock design I only can confirm, plus add some things I never had with my currently quick release system Manfrotto 410 PL. While I basically find Arca system plates less chunky and disturbing when handholding the camera, it’s difficult to find a quick release base suitable for one hand action at any angle. With Manfrotto system, I hold the camera, click it in and tighten it afterwards. After clicking, it won’t be lost. The plates look cheap, are cheap – but reliable and there’s only one manufacturer. For Arca-system I found a couple of plates that don’t find in the flip lock clamp, most of them being to small.

    With the flip lock, inserting the camera doesn’t do anything secure – I need a second hand to activate that lever. That’s the main reason I’m hesitating to go fully Arca. Oh, and the d4 flip lock came unglued, so I changed it to a modified Manfrotto PL410 and it works fine. And looks cheap, ouch. Perfectly machined parts at d4 and above the raw suface of mold magnesium. the whole thing looks so out of proportion…

    In your 405 report you mentioned the need of a screwdriver – a coin will serve as well ;)

    And the play you mentioned I could not find on mine. But that’s a matter how strong the springs are tightened pressing the worm against the gear wheel ( ) Have you tried to turn the quick release knobs against the opposite direction? Their springs are responsible for the play. Oh yes, and the Manfrotto bubbles are kind of a lotto. I guess if you find one pointing right, they offer you a free tripod… I compared a couple of them, all were just cosmetics and looking good on a tripod head.

  8. 8) Bartosz
    March 5, 2015 at 8:41 am

    Hi Nassim,
    Thanks for this article.
    In your review of the Manfrotto 405 you also mentioned you would check the ARCA Swiss D4. Did you have the chance to do so? I’m still hesitating between the cube and the d4. I’m mostly in architecture photography using a dslr.


Comment Policy: Although our team at Photography Life encourages all readers to actively participate in discussions, we reserve the right to delete / modify any content that does not comply with our Code of Conduct, or do not meet the high editorial standards of the published material.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *