The other day, I tried to list everything that contributes to a good photo. What are the crucial ingredients? High on the list were two things: thinking actively about composition in the field, and deliberate and careful post-processing. But what sustains the activity of going and taking those photos in the first place? What provides that crucial energy?
Such a question delves into the philosophical and leaves behind technique. When other photographers talk about their technical methods, they are often useful but none too surprising. What drives a person to take photos, however, can be far more perplexing. Technique may be how to do something, but it doesn’t explain the why.

So, why? Maybe I cannot speak to the answer for everyone, but I can at least think about why I do photography myself. Could it be the social aspect of sharing photos, some chance for recognition? Or the thrill of the hunt in bird photography? These have some bearing, perhaps, but for me the greatest source of sustenance is a sense of emptiness.
The notion of emptiness I’m referring to is what the Zen Buddhist teacher Shunryu Suzuki called a direct experience of reality, which is a little different than the word emptiness in common English parlance. Emptiness as I use it refers much more to a lack of idea of self, where you are one with an activity without ego.
This search for emptiness is a quest for ephemeral worlds. Yesterday, against the dry wild grasses waving in the wind, I saw the pale moon rise, gaining strength in the darkening sky. An entire world in an instant. Capturing that world is emptiness of the self, because you can be in that world without preconception. I am sure that is why, for me, photography is so peaceful.

What makes a good photo? When I look back at my favourites, I could tell you what distinguishes them from all the others. Composition? Light? Those are important, but they’re not what I had in mind. Rather, my favourites were ones where I had that direct experience of becoming the world in the viewfinder, of pressing the shutter, and only after having the realization of, “oh yes, I am here”. The melting of the self into a single transient moment is what makes a good photo.
That’s not to say that I have a recipe or a knack for taking good photos. I often take shots I prefer to delete, even when I’ve enjoyed the moment of the photo. Others are experiments, or just plain mysteries of the process. Maybe I tried to find emptiness, but something got in the way, leaving me with only a faint sense of an existence dissolving into nothingness. But a genuine resonance with the scene means good composition and good lighting because it is our own way of communicating intimately with the world, and receiving something good in return.

Methods and photographic technique are important. But after learning, practicing… why do I go out again and again? I just want to see those worlds again, plain, without any judgment or evaluation. It’s a simple love of nature, and a desire to connect with it in some way. We come from the universe, and that is what ultimately supports us, even if we sometimes hide it under the opaque veil of our own mental noise.
What makes a good wildlife photographer? A craving for solitude comes to mind. But one cannot always have solitude in a literal sense. Maybe a serene scene can be interrupted by a helicopter overhead, or a dog barking in the distance. But even if the literal solitude is interrupted, one can still seek for those ephemeral worlds that provide an instant of solitude, something to hold onto as a reminder of our primordial beginnings.

I think all human beings have the instinct to seek out this solitude as an echo of the void from which we came, though it’s not always clear how to find it. With photography, we convert the chaos of memory cards and cameras and the noise of the darkest shadows into a single photograph. Sometimes, we find what we are looking for, and that is the magic of the photo.
Some months ago, I lay on the grass in Brazil and found through the viewfinder a Southern Lapwing. I had a moment of finding the emptiness within the world of the Lapwing, and it became my favourite shot of this species. In a world where little seems to make sense, a Lapwing on the grass makes the most sense of all. When you find an intimate moment with a bird or a mountain or a forest, the life of what is in front of you becomes your life for just one instant.

All of this might sound mystical, but I believe that if it seems so, it is only because we have been saturated with mechanical rationality. Outside in the wild, amongst the trees and smell of vegetation and singing birds, it makes perfect sense.
In one respect, that is why I find AI so abhorrent in art. Beyond its immediate dangers, AI also is the next level of a process whose overarching philosophy places no emphasis on the personal discovery of worlds. Instead, there is just the glorifying of a final product so that it can act as a fertilizer for the growth of a soulless system.
These days, times may seem more uncertain than ever. However, in the surrounding chaos, we can always find new reasons to take a photograph. Perhaps it’s a new camera or lens, or a week’s vacation to the tropics. But I beyond that, if we want to continually have the opportunity for exploration through photography, we must return to being surrounded by raw existence. And once there, we must hope that we can once more stumble onto emptiness in one of those ephemeral worlds, before it disappears in the blink of an eye.
I agree with your statement on AI. It almost makes things too easy in post processing. With that in mind, I have used AI to make tolerable an absolute mess of a shot, that I know I will never get a second chance to get again………
I get your viewpoint. However, I do think there is also something magical about allowing the chance of missing a shot to remain that chance, and letting “fate” decide which photos you’ll get (or not), up to and including the shutter press :)
I absolutely love your photo of the moon. You got the grass way more out of focus than I’m used to against a very crisp moon. So it gives it a real painterly feel, quite different from other photos I’ve seen!
I think I relate to your “emptiness” and perhaps I would use the word awe and being in the moment. When I’m really into photography even the cold doesn’t seem so cold.
Thank you, John. I really appreciate the feedback! The moon was an experiment and I’m happy you like it!
Yes, I think awe is also a good way to describe it too!
For me it’s the dopamine hit that I get when I succeed in getting results I’m pleased with. It’s rare; if it was easy, it wouldn’t be so rewarding when it works.
I’ve often asked myself whether I’d still do wildlife photography even if it were easy. But I don’t think it’s possible for it to be easy. Of course, in the traditional sense, if animals were more cooperative, it would be “easier” – yet, all that other stuff, composition, trying to find a way of seeing, editing, is still quite difficult so I think it can never really be easy!
Great article, as ever, Jason. That is what I, too, seek. I am reminded of the time soon after my husband’s death. I disappeared into a local forest and saw a fungi specimen worth devoting my photographic attention to. I lay on the forest floor and set up my gear for focus stacking. I had only popped into the forest briefly )I thought), but when I looked at my watch, I had been there nearly three hours. I had been totally lost in the world of a tiny specimen not much bigger than 2 cms tall. I felt a total sense of relief, and a uniting with the universe that was very healing. I the self had been subsumed into the world of the universe. I had been emptied and disappeared into something much huger and greater than my tiny being, yet it was something of which I was a part.
Here in Australia during Covid, we were banned from National Parks. I knew this would cause massive repercussions with regard to mental health, and I was right. We need access to the sublimity of nature (to the sense of eternal, infinite and universal that nature provides) in order to retain our mental well being.
Thanks for a thoughtfully expressed article.
Thank you for the comment and sharing your experience, Louise. You are so right that we need access to nature, and being restricted from it is not a good thing at all.
Whenever I am out shooting, there is a primary objective and then there is what actually happens. For example, when I am at the beach looking for birds, lighthouses and land/water scapes, I am also looking at the paterns left in the sand by past waves. some of these patterns are ephemeral lawsting until the next wave while others may be laft from past storms or yesterdays waves. Thank you for calling out the possibilities.
That’s a good way of approaching it, Joe. I like the idea of being aware of what’s happening even if you have a primary objective as you say!
A great article Jason! I completely agree. I like to go out in nature where you can quietly do your thing for macro and landscape and sometimes also for animals and or birds. Your photos are beautiful, especially those of the moon and the Lapwing. Congratulations for this beautiful work.
Thank you very much for the comment, Danny! I appreciate it. And being in a place of quiet is one of the best reasons for doing wildlife photography!
Hi Jason, for you is emptiness, for me is beauty.
Being around taking photos is the constant research for beauty. Not beauty in itself – the standard meaning that we all give to this word – but something that you’ll recognize immediately when you see it. Also a theoretically ugly bug has beauty.
Most probably I do not like the world I see around and I use these photos as bookmarks for something different, that remind me that there is more than dry reality. Just to remind me that below this superficial world (we’ve never been so superificial in our history) there’s something more.
Or, at least, something that seen months or years after, is capable to resurface the sensations I had when I was looking through the viewfinder.
And yes – that’s why AI will fail. They’ll do a lot of money in commercial photography for sure, but they’ll never replace photography.
Excellent post – I rarely read something like this on photo blogs or similar.
Thanks, Mauro! Yes, the search for beauty and to find new ways of seeing it is one of the great benefits of beauty. I agree with you also that a “theoretically ugly bug has beauty”, though I have a hard time finding any wild animals ugly! I think they’re all pretty :)
I loved this. All of it. And I’m not even a Photographer! ( ..yet. I want to be, but lack the equipment presently. Its a long and boring story..). But the way you describe being in Nature and immersing yourself – or dissolving yourself- in the moment really resonates. (Your points regarding AI, likewise). Really love the photos- especially the third one. Beautiful, elegant, simplicity. Cheers!
That is very kind of you to say, Bee! I really appreciate the comment. If you don’t have the right equipment yet, start with a phone if you have one. It wouldn’t necessarily work for things like birds but you can still photograph nature up close like some landscapes and plants.