Sometimes you get to choose your holiday destination, sometimes circumstances choose it for you. I’ve had quite a lot of the latter over the years. Whenever my wife (a university professor) has a conference or research trip somewhere interesting, she tries to keep my wanderlust satisfied by tagging a holiday onto it. This was the case for our second trip to Chile a few weeks ago, though with the added bonus of visiting Argentina as part of the trip. I’m usually happy to revisit scenic places, since you’ve then got a more idea of which places are interesting, and what places you could shoot better.
And on this occasion the primary camera had changed to the Nikon D850, with my D800 now officially the second body. Having said that, I was delighted with the results produced last time, and I was more than happy to share the results with fellow Photography Life readers in this article.
Although the D850 was nominally ‘first’ camera, I tended to just grab whichever body had the appropriate lens on it. The only time I would specifically reach for the D850 was when I wanted to try focus-stacking (you’ll have to wait until another time to see the results!). The experience of the previous trip helped my selection of lenses. My choice was Sigma 14mm f/1.8 Art (the Nikon 16-35mm f/4G VR I used last time just wasn’t wide enough), Sigma 24-35mm f/2 Art (last time the Nikon 24-70mm f/2.8 was rarely used between 35 and 70mm), Sigma 50mm Art, and Nikon 70-200mm f/2.8G VR II – since I knew we’d be doing a brief rainforest tour. I also used my wife’s Panasonic LX100 for the occasional shot. The rest of the gear was my trusty Benro tripod with RRS BH55 head, and a pair of Solmeta GPS units (a Geotagger Pro, which has a very useful remote trigger, but lousy connector which keeps falling out, and a GMAX which has a much better connector, but no remote – unless you count the smartphone app, which I never got to work).
Enough nerdy stuff, on with the photos! We visited a couple of the same towns and locations in the Atacama and Andes as our previous visit, but made a real effort to see new places as well. From Copiapo, up into the Andes, for this:
And this:
(And a quick dose of altitude sickness, having spent the night around 13,000ft – the Solmeta GMAX also records altitude!) We needn’t have worried about repeating ourselves. The salars (salt lakes) which we visited last time had changed. I’m guessing that each Spring when the snow melts, the water gathers (and dissolves salt?) in different places.
The Andes are more craggy and more obviously mountain-like in other areas, but what was striking here were the amazing colours (in the crystal-clear dry mountain air), and the soft contours. This often made it difficult to tell on the camera screen whether they were in focus or not! I wasn’t too worried since I’d had the same experience last time, but it wasn’t until I got home and transferred everything to the computer that I could be certain the cameras hadn’t let me down.
My wife commented that some of these shots looked ‘overdone’ in the editing, so I went back in CNX2 and turned off my ‘tweaks’ – but no, I was being pretty faithful to what was there. I also thought that some shots looked more like paintings, but again, with all the edits turned off, they still looked like paintings. That’s the Andes for you!
From our next stop, San Pedro de Atacama, we ventured further afield – a long drive to Salar de Talar (aka Salar de Aguas Calientas), not far from the border with Argentina, which proved to be spectacularly beautiful:
I thought I would miss not having a polarizer on the Sigma 14mm (please, please Fotodiox? My 145mm filters are sitting here, waiting…), but the contrast of this lens is so good, the shots were fine without (and no time wasted trying to even out the blue sky!). Once again, the mountains ranged from proudly volcanic, to the carefully polished and dusted with colour:
Laguna Chaxa in the Salar de Atacama had also reshaped and recoloured since our previous visit:
The next stage of our holiday was across the border into Argentina. After being suitably fortified by a day touring wineries, our next step was an overnight stay in the rainforest of the El Rey National Park. I wasn’t expecting too much photographically. Previous (limited) experience of rainforests has taught me that you often hear far more than you see. Still, I captured these guys fighting at our campsite:
And these guys & gals enjoying their own meal:
After the greenery of the rainforest, back to the scrubby altitude of the Andes, but from the Argentine side. Our base was Purmamarca, nestled against a rainbow of hills and rocks:
From here we drove up to over 4200m (13,500ft):
And then down to the spectacular Salinas Grandes. I’ve had a yearning (which landscape photographer hasn’t?) to see the amazing Salar di Uyuni in Bolivia, but have been put off by the difficulty of getting there, the problems of personal safety in that country, and the myriad stories of dishonest/unreliable guides. My hope was that if Salinas Grandes was as stunning as images on the web suggested, my lust for large, gleaming white salt flats would be sated. Luckily, Salinas Grandes delivered:
As a farewell to the region, we drove down the Quebrada de Humahuaca, in a rush to get to the airport, but making time for a couple of shots on the way:
I realize we’ve only seen one part of Chile, and a tiny corner of Argentina – a good excuse to head back soon.
Final thoughts on gear: I could have left the Sigma 50mm at home and saved the weight. For the few occasions I needed between 35 and 50mm, I could shoot at 35mm and crop.
The LX100 is a great little camera, but you have to get exposure perfect when you shoot. Once you open the shots in an editor, you realize you have pretty much zero room for manouvre. There has to be some penalty for using such a small sensor.
My Vanguard backpack turned out to be not the best choice for this trip. Maybe if we’d been doing more hiking, a backpack would have made more sense. For schlepping around airports, where I had other things over my shoulders, I ended up having to carry it, which was back-breaking (no-one said those Sigma lenses were light!). Far more sensible would have been a suitcase-style pack, with wheels and extending handle – say hello to my birthday present, a Lowepro RL150!
If you’re interested in seeing more of my images, see my Flickr gallery.
Great article, Alan!! Yes, the frontier between Argentina and Chile is very long, and for sure quite hard to do all the Andes region in one single trip. And great pics!!!
Next time I suggest you to follow the National Route 40 (RN40) from Argentina. It is a route that travels all along the Andes, from the northen dry mountains all the way down till Usuahia. Things in betwen: The Aconcagua mountain, the Perito Moreno glaciar, the peaks Torres del Paine, few volcanos, Nahuel Huapi Lake and the point in which Pacific Oceans meets Atlantic ocean, just to name a few
Hi Nasim. Great pictures, as always you shot, but as a Chilean I consider that far south Chile is much more interesting, even though is clear your wife needs to get there. Our Chilean Patagonia with Torres del Paine National Park is a place that you may consider to visit next time you come. Sorry for my terrible English. Best regards.
Sorry, I should say “Alan” :-(
Thanks Walter. We are saving up very hard! Torres del Paine, with maybe a little side-trip to Antarctica!
Great shots and a lot of useful tips! Colors, textures and details are terrific. Thank you for sharing Alan. Greetings from Chile.
Great series Alan. I was interested in your comment about toggling your edits off in CNX2 to check the unedited colour. I’m also a CNX2 holdout and continue to use it to process my D4 files and my D810 files (after converting them with raw2nef). Have you found a way to process your D850 files with CNX2 or were you just referring to your D800 images?
I did process everything in CNX2, but the D850 images were a real pain. I opened them in NX-D, then saved them as 16 bit TIFF. The TIFFs were then processed in CNX2. I did find I had to be careful with exposure alterations. Even though everything was theoretically 16 bit until the final save, changes in the blue sky produced ‘banding’ very quickly – more like you were dealing with an 8 bit file (it’s slightly visible in some of the images posted here) – any comments or suggestions from more experienced readers more than welcome!
The D800 files of course produced no such problems in CNX2.
raw2nef sadly doesn’t seem to be an option. CNX2 looks at the camera model (which raw2nef alters, as you know), but also the image size. With the D810, the images are the same size as the D800, so that isn’t an issue, but the 45MP of the D850 wouldn’t be recognised as a Nikon RAW image. Maybe if you resized them down to 36MP first, but then that would kind of defeat the object of buying a D850…
The best alternative seems to be DXO Photolab, which uses NIK ideas and some of the same GUI. I will have to take the plunge soon!
PS The CNX2 and NX-D are on different PCs, since I’ve heard they argue with each other if you try and install them both on one machine…
You can run them on the same machine if you run CNX2 version 2.4.6. The last version of CNX2 does not play nicely with NX-D.
Thanks for your reply. I’ve also used NXD to do the conversion to 16bit tifs but It’s a bit lumpy so, so far I’m happy that I can still process the converted D810 files in NX2. I’ll check out PhotoLab. Much appreciated.
Cheers
‘Lumpy’ is a very good description!
I asked Nikon Canada that question before installing NXD on my Windows machine. They said no conflicts having both programs on the same computer and it works fine. I haven’t had any issues.
Great article, great photos, especially I love that you don’t overkill the colours in post-processing.
I just wish the photos were 16:9, I’m not a big fan of 3:2 for landscape.
I hear what you say, but I keep in mind the end use. I freely admit I am a bit of a dinosaur – I actually like getting my photos printed, and put them in albums! 3:2 gives an enlargement of 12″x8″ which fits nicely in the album. 16:9 means the image occupies less of the page, so has less impact. I do sometimes crop to a wider image, but I wish albums were bigger to make the most of it! I have some wonderful panoramic images, but they would be lost in an album. Unless I can persuade my wife to fill our walls with big enlargements, they are a bit wasted!
Just like my dad :) He still shoots on film.
I guess I tend to shoot 16:9 because I mostly view photos on PC/laptop and show the photos to our family friends on TV/tablet. And if I occasionally print, it’s 16:9.
Already excited for your next article.
Thanks Jay. With colours like these, you don’t need to overkill them. I hear what you’re saying about 16:9, but I’m a bit of a dinosaur, and most of my images end up in photo albums. 3:2 produces 12″x8″ prints, which fill the pages nicely. Anything with different proportions can start to get lost on the page. I do have some wonderful panoramas, but they just don’t work in an album, so until my wife agrees to covering our walls with huge enlargements, all I can do is look at them on a monitor!
Wow! Great article Nasim, I really enjoyed the photos and gear selection explanation.
Sorry, Alan. My mistake!
Thanks, glad you liked them. I do keep reading all the articles here and elsewhere about planning your shots, and visualising what you want before you get there – and I hope that one day I will have that luxury! Unfortunately many of my trips are to places I haven’t been before (with my wife, who is very tolerant, but not a photographer), and I mostly have to just grab what I can as it passes before the camera – and hope that instinct and luck produce something worthwhile. Maybe when I retire I will have time to do this photography stuff properly!
Nice article, but!
…hopefully you came back soon and “really” visit Chile. Our northern regions are mostly Peru and Bolivia regarding to how nature look (they didn’t belong to Chilean territory until Pacific War).
The real beauty of Chile starts in the 5th Region. In fact, the more you go south, the more beauty and nuances you see. That’s my advise.
This landscape is monotone.
We would love to visit the southern half of Chile, and hopefully one day we will (and ask your advice)! This trip though was based around some places my wife needed to visit for her work, so we based holiday around that.
Having said that, we do love desert scenery (including much of the SW USA)! I have seen the southern Andes on TV, and yes they look spectacular, and wild, but the northern Andes and Atacama look like something from another planet. The polished contours, the rainbow colours, and the wonderful salars (and the spectacularly clear air and light) make it a landscape photographers’ paradise.
I know much of this northern region is ‘new Chile’ – on our first trip we visited several of the abandoned ‘oficinas’ (nitrate mines) which were the root cause of the War of the Pacific. And those make for wonderful photos too!