Small sensor cameras have their detractors, but there are specific situations where shooting with a small sensor camera has some advantages. For example, my Nikon 1 gear is ideally suited to taking photographs of captive reptiles because of its light weight, portability, and the comparatively short minimum focusing distance of 1 Nikon lenses. In this article I’ll be discussing some of the things you can do to create some interesting images when using this type of equipment.
One of the most outstanding features of reptiles is the texture of their skin. For this reason some of the most arresting images of reptiles are often close ups. I think these types of pictures stimulate deeply rooted primal human fears of monsters when we view them. To capture these kinds of photographs we need to get as up close and personal as we can with our subjects.
Often when visiting zoos and other exhibits containing captive reptiles we are faced with some challenging photographic conditions. These include having to shoot through glass partitions or wire mesh. Many times the size of an exhibit area is quite small. This makes it difficult to acquire focus with a typical DSLR equipped with a telephoto lens and still eliminate obstructions in the foreground. In addition, many reptile exhibits are either poorly lit or are subject to high contrast lighting.
The first challenge we face is to eliminate distractions in the foreground. To accomplish this we need to press the hood of our lens right up against the glass partition or mesh so that our lens will focus past the wire obstruction or any dirt/glare on the glass.
The next critical factor is to frame our subject. Try to capture images without having to crop them at all if possible. This will give your images more details and allow for larger size prints. As you are planning your image pay attention to background elements, and position your subject against a neutral or muted background if possible. This will help your subject really pop in your frame. Using extension tubes can help you get in closer to your subject.
Don’t be afraid to frame in really tight on just the head of the reptile, or even just a portion of its head. Remember that full body images of a snake or lizard are common place. If you want to capture something different go in tight with your framing. This also helps to accentuate the texture of the skin of the reptile.
Change your angle of view in relation to the subject. Try different shooting heights and look for interesting angles or lighting accents. Shots taken while looking down on reptiles tend to show human superiority over them. If you want to add drama to your image position yourself at the same eye level as your subject. The more intimidating your subject – the more powerful being at the same eye level with them will be in your photo.
Use single point auto focus with your Nikon 1 camera, and place that single point on the most important part of your image – the eye of the reptile. You can position the AF single point by pressing on the ‘OK’ button on the back on your Nikon 1 camera body, then depressing the scroll wheel to move the AF point. To get the sharpest images possible, shoot at a maximum of f/5.6, thus avoiding the potential impact of diffraction. Centre-weighted metering often produces the best results.
I appreciate that some Nikon 1 owners are a bit intimidated when it comes to shooting in RAW. If you are only comfortable shooting in jpeg, then try to do some basic adjustments to highlights, shadows etc. to make the most of your images. If you’re worried about losing your original jpeg, then make a copy of it and save your original jpeg file. To illustrate this point, the following image is an out-of-camera jpeg with no adjustments at all.
Here is the exact same image with some simple adjustments done to the jpeg in CS6. You can use LightRoom or many other programs to do the same things. Adjusting highlights, shadows, contrast and sharpness can add a lot to your jpegs.
Here is the same image that was processed from the RAW file. I ran the file through DxO OpticsPro 10 with its automatic adjustments. Then, I added some lens softness adjustment, micro contrast, and PRIME noise reduction. A DNG file was exported into CS6 with adjustments made to highlights and shadows. Finally, Viveza 2 was used for slight adjustments to structure and contrast.
Every image will be different, so the processing description above is simply to illustrate how a few adjustments were done to enhance one specific image.
As far as choice of lenses to use with your Nikon 1 camera, it comes down to personal preference and practical considerations regarding the position of the subject reptile in relation to the glass partition or mesh/bars. For best results try to use long focal length lenses with comparatively short minimum focusing distances.
I’ve used my Nikon 1 V2’s with native 1 Nikon lenses as well as with my FT-1 adapter and some of my FX glass. Lenses to consider if you’re going the FT-1 adapter route include zoom lenses like the 55-200mm f/4-5.6, 55-300mm f/4.5-5.6, 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6, 70-200mm f/2.8 or 70-200mm f/4. If you also want some capability to shoot subjects that are closer to the front of an exhibit you can also include some fast primes like 50mm, 85mm and 105mm Micro lenses.
As far as 1 Nikon lenses go, I prefer to use the CX 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6 whenever possible as I love the focal length range, especially when I have my Vello extension tubes with me. This lens has comparatively short minimum focusing distance and also has very good corner to corner sharpness.
Extension tubes put extra distance between the lens and the sensor in your camera which has the effect of decreasing the minimum focusing distance of your lens. This enables you to fill more of your frame with your subject. The downside is that you lose some light and extension tubes can sometimes make auto-focusing slower.
I also like to have my 1 Nikon 10-30mm non-PD and 30-110mm zoom lenses in my camera bag as these lenses can help capture subjects that are closer to the glass partition or mesh. Given the relatively short minimum focusing distance of the 1 Nikon 10-30 lens I usually don’t bother taking any of my 1 Nikon primes with me.
Photographing captive reptiles with a small sensor camera like a Nikon 1 can be a very enjoyable pastime that can also lead to some very interesting images.
Technical Note:
All images were taken hand-held in available light with a Nikon 1 V2. All images were taken with either a 1 Nikon CX 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6 or a Nikkor FX 70-200 f/4 using an FT-1 adapter. Vello extension tubes were used on some of the close-up images taken with the 1 Nikon 70-300. Processing of all images (except Images 9 and 10) was done with DxO OpticsPro 10 as my RAW processor using PRIME noise reduction. A DNG file was exported into CS6 for some minor adjustments, with additional final minor adjustments done in Viveza 2 as needed. Image 9 is a straight-out-of-camera jpeg with in-camera noise suppression. Image 10 was adjusted using CS6.
Article and all images Copyright 2014, Thomas Stirr. All rights reserved. No use, reproduction or duplication including electronic is allowed without written consent.
brilliant shots, as always sir..! absolutely stunning.. and yes, it is the texture of their skin that sets them apart and draws in the viewer’s eyes right into the image. To be honest, i’ve never seen these many reptiles this close and whenever I come across the images of the lizards, I can only think of differently coloured godzilla(s).. (lol) .
And to say that these were shot hand-held, superb sharpness! About the last photo, was it meant to be taken just at the moment when the reptile closed its eyes, or was it more like an “accidental” shot..? It’s still perfect though.
Hi Anirudh,
Thanks very much for your kind words – always appreciated. The last image was of a lizard that was not in any kind of a cage or enclosure. It was resting on a branch in the display area that was bathed in sunlight. I waited until it appeared to be sleeping so I could get close enough to get that shot.
Tom
Hi Tom
Wonderful shots as always. Seeing your ‘dinosaur’ close-ups has inspired me to pop down to London Zoo and have go myself. I tried to get the Velo tubes in the UK without success. They are now back in stock at B&H so I have ordered them and they are presently winging their way over the ‘pond’. I hope to compare them with my close-up lenses to see which I prefer. I hope it is the tubes in a way since one set covers all lenses whereas different close-ups are required for a whole range of filter sizes.
It sounds as though the 70-300CX was well worth the wait for you Tom.
When do you choose between the 70-300CX and the 70-200f/4? Is it a conscious choice or just convenience?
One other question, why do you not note on the photos which ones were taken with the tubes?
Best wishes and please keep up the great work.
KSPGM
Hi KSPGM,
The images done with the V2/FT-1/FX 70-200 f/4 combination in this article are older images that I took in the summer. Since I got the CX 70-300 I haven’t used my FX 70-200 f/4 with my V2 cameras at all. I much prefer to only use the CX 70-300 since I can move the single point focus wherever I want which really helps from a composition standpoint. I also like the additional zoom range with the CX 70-300.
The software on the Photography Life web site automatically puts in the camera shooting data and it can’t detect the use of extension tubes so it could not add any information about extension tube use. When I’m ‘in the moment’ shooting I find that I am constantly taking the tubes on and off depending on the needs of each image I’m trying to capture. From memory the following images were taken with the Vello extension tubes: 1, 2, 5, 7, 13, 15 and 16.
You’ll find that the Vello extension tubes work quite well with the 30-1110 and the 70-300 lenses. They do fit a bit loose, especially on the 70-300 so you’ll need to make sure you support the camera/lens properly when you are using them. Other than that they work really well. If you combine both tubes you’ll find that you’ll lose about 2 stops of light as well.
Tom
Thanks Tom,
Thanks for the tip on using the tubes ( they may turn up today!). I never carry my 70-300CX attached on a strap. I always hold it by the barrel as it just feels too heavy to rely on the bayonet fit alone – so the Vello ‘looseness’ should not be too much of a problem for me.
I to have found my 70-200f/4 gathering dust since I bought my 70-300CX. I do not have any DX or FX gear anymore and just kept this lens until I had tested the 70-300. I am tempted to sell it as, like you, I prefer the extended range of the 70-300 over the 70-200 despite the loss of one stop at the upper end. The 70-300 is so crisp and sharp over the whole range, I do not detect significant quality difference between the two either. Is this your finding also Tom?
Best wishes
kelvin
Hi KSPGM,
Same feelings here. I think the CX 70-300 is a wonderful lens that adds so much additional capability to the Nikon 1 system. I will keep my FX 70-200 f/4 as I still have my D800 and other FX kit and for the odd time where I need the extra stop of light.
Tom
Thomas,
Are you hand holding these photos or were you using either a monopod or tripod in this article?
Hi Mike,
All images, including those where extension tubes were used, were taken hand-held. The VR on the 1 Nikon 70-300 lens and the Nikkor FX 70-200 f/4 lens are both very good indeed!
Tom
Hi Tomas
The photos are very good. What amazed me is the canadian consumer’s magazine “Protégez-vous” just rated the “Nikon 1 V3” sold at 1200$cdn with a score of only 57%, resulting as the worst choice among hybrids, and placing the Fujifilm X-AT1 with a fixed lens costing 490$cdn as the best with a rating of 70%. Do you think it is it because they are not processing the image with any softwares, and looking only at the jpegs coming out of the camera to make their rating ? By the way the V2 had a better rating at 61%, and the Fuji Finepix X-M1 at 68% 670$.
regards
Luc
Hi Luc,
Sometimes it is difficult to understand the reasoning behind ratings. Often evaluations are done based on published specifications alone and how a publication applies its weightings to various specifications can have a big impact on final scores. I am not familiar with the publication you noted so I have no idea how they base their evaluations and whether any hands-on and/or lab testing is actually done. I have heard/read that Fuji makes some excellent cameras and owners are very happy with them. Fuji is a brand that many folks should consider.
Since my business is already heavily invested in the Nikon 1 system from a practical standpoint I don’t pay much attention to reviews on competitive products like Fuji. Our Nikon 1 gear is a very good compliment to our Nikon FX equipment for client video work and we are very happy with the performance we are getting with it, as well as the flexibility that the FT-1 adapter provides for FX lens use with our Nikon 1 V2 bodies. As a result, last week we added a third Nikon 1 V2 to our business. If we were going to make any changes to our equipment it would be to transition into the Panasonic GH4 and away from our Nikon FX gear – but this will not happen unless we could do so from an economic standpoint that made sense. So far we haven’t been able to make the economics work for this transition.
At the end of the day it really comes down to the needs of a particular photographer/videographer and the clients they serve. Cameras, lenses and software are only a means to an end in terms of providing clients with the results they desire.
Tom
Fantastic captures! Thanks for sharing.
Hi Joe,
Glad you enjoyed viewing them.
Tom
Tom, those are some amazing shots! :-)
Glad you liked ’em Rick!
Tom
Your pics are class apart, i have taken lot of captive animal pics but yours are just awesome!
Thanks for your kind words Arun – I’m glad you enjoyed them!
Tom
Gorgeous as always. Your pictures have such a great clarity I can never seem to get. But then I only use the Nikon RAW developer still.
Hi animalpalace3,
Thanks for your positive words – always appreciated!
Tom
How weird that my name is suddenly changed to this?
Petra
Great captures Thomas — I always go for a full body shot and now I see that most of the character of the animal is is the headshot., thank you.
Hi Greg,
Thanks for you comment! Full body shots certainly have their place, so I’m not suggesting that anyone should stop taking them. Adding some tighter framing on some images can add a different perspective.
Tom
Awesome!
Thanks again for the wonderful pics & opening up our minds – to understand that real photographers can mold any tool to their good use.
Mike.
Glad you enjoyed the article Mike!