Last month, I spent two weeks on the frozen sea ice along the coast of Baffin Island, Canada, searching for female polar bears who had just emerged from their dens with their newborn cubs. Knowing that encounters would likely not be closer than 100 meters, I decided the new Nikkor Z 600/4.0 TC VR S would be the perfect lens for this project. Luckily, Nikon was able to provide me with one, and they gave me the new Nikkor Z 400/4.5 VR S lens to try out – the smallest and lightest 400mm prime in its class.
When I arrived at Nikon HQ to collect the lenses, a surprise awaited: a prototype of the new Nikon Z8 to test in the high Arctic. Needless to say, I was excited to try it out. This has been an eagerly-awaited addition to the Nikon mirrorless lineup, and all I knew were the many online rumors. (None as outrageous as my April Fools Z9 Field Report spoof, but still just rumors.)
This field report is about my initial impressions of the Z8 and my experiences in the field. I will also write about my experiences with the 600mm and the 400mm on my website, but I will do that in a separate article.
Baffin Island is the world’s fifth-largest island and part of the Canadian territory of Nunavut. It’s larger than all but two US states, but the population density is only 0.03/km2. Not surprisingly, the living conditions on Baffin are challenging, to say the least.
Canada is home to over 60% of the world’s polar bears, and Baffin can be considered polar bear central. It includes more subpopulations than any other place on Earth. Of the 19 subpopulations, 5 of them are within Baffin Island.
April is the time that polar bear mums and their newborn cubs emerge from their dens during a period of just four weeks. That creates a very small window of opportunity to find and photograph them. But this trip was not only about finding polar bears with cubs. The spectacular mountainous landscape of Baffin is littered with giant icebergs frozen in the sea ice, and it makes for great landscape photography.
Even though the concept behind the Z8 is different from the Z7 and the Z9, I will compare the three because it will be easier to understand what the Z8 is all about.
My first impression of the Z8 was that it felt like a more compact and lightweight version of my D850. I have always praised Nikon’s ergonomics; the Z8 does not disappoint in that regard. The grip feels great in my hand. I love my Z7, but I very much prefer the beefier grip on the Z8.
On the Z7, with my index finger on the shutter button, I can barely fit three fingers around the grip. On the Z8, there is a bit more space for those three fingers, which makes the camera feel more balanced in my hand. Nothing beats the Z9 in terms of balance and grip, but considering the Z8’s much more compact size, it feels really good. While shooting in extremely cold conditions, I realized this extra grip makes a big difference when handling your camera with gloves. The Z7 was more difficult to grab and operate with gloves.
On the Outside
But never mind the front of the camera; the back is way more important. I was happy to see that everything looked very familiar there. There is little difference with the Z7, just more space between the various buttons. That said, two of the buttons have different functions now. The image review button on the Z7 has moved to the opposite side on the Z8 – from the upper left to the lower right, the same as on the Z9. The button in the upper left corner is now called Fn3 (same spot as Fn4 on a Z9). This makes so much more sense to me.
Compared to the Z9, button placement is identical. The Z9 is a much larger camera, so it has an extra row of buttons below the LCD screen and an extra wheel, joystick, and AF-ON button for using the vertical grip.
Many of the buttons on the Z8 are customizable, which I find very useful. I have, for instance, moved the image review button to Fn1 on the front, where I can access it even easier and faster without moving my thumb away from the AF-ON button.
Luckily, the Z8 has the same eyepiece as the Z9, not the one from the Z7 – I have ripped a few of those trying to stuff the Z7 in my camera bag. The viewfinder housing seems a bit taller than the one on the Z9, but that might be an optical illusion.
The access door to the cards is a bit different. I have never liked the one on the Z9, as I find it difficult to slide the recessed button down and then toward you. Shooting in hot conditions with sweaty hands makes this even more challenging. I find the Z8 door much easier to open.
Once opened, there is space for two cards: one SD (UHS-II) and one CFExpress type B. I would have loved two CF slots, but alas.
The Z8 has a dual-axis articulating screen like its bigger brother, which I find especially useful when shooting vertically from ground level.
The size difference between the Z8 and the Z9 is significant. The Z8 is a lot smaller and lighter, mostly because of the integrated grip of the Z9. For wildlife photography and large telephoto lenses, I adore my Z9. It is super well-balanced, and the integrated grip is a necessity. However, when using medium telephoto lenses, and especially wide-angle lenses, it is much nicer to use a smaller body. The Z8 is easier to handhold for a long time, takes up less space in my camera bag, and has less weight to lug around.
I always travel with three bodies with lenses attached. Until now, I used two Nikon Z9s and a Z7. I will now replace the Z7 with the Z8. Even though the Z8 is larger than the Z7, I can still fit my standard wildlife kit in my Gura Gear Kiboko camera bag. In other words, one Z9 with the Nikkor Z 400mm f/2.8 TC VR S on one side, one Z9 with the Nikkor Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S, and now the Z8 with the Z 24-70mm f/4.0 S on the other.
The bag’s design gives me super easy access to the gear, and having the bodies and lenses assembled saves me precious time and dust bunnies. While the sensor shield works well on the Z8 and Z9, dust accumulated will eventually end up on the sensor.
The Battery Grip
Nikon has designed an optional battery grip for the Z8: the MB-N12. This means you can keep the body compact and lightweight or turn it into an almost Z9. This flexibility is great because I will use the Z8 as my primary landscape photography camera or my third wildlife photography camera with an attached Nikkor Z 24-70mm f/4.0. I don’t need the grip for landscape photography to enjoy a more compact and lightweight camera.
The grip design differs greatly from all the other Nikon grips I have used. Instead of having a small electrical connector, it now has a large battery-sized protrusion sticking out from the top. To use the grip, you must first take the EN-EL15c battery out of the Z8 and remove the door. You can store the door in a dedicated opening in the grip. You then insert the battery-shaped part into the battery chamber and use the screw to connect the grip to the body.
I am not too excited about this design for a couple of reasons. I hoped the grip would be like the one for the D850. On that body, you can keep the EN-EL15 battery in the camera when you add the grip. That grip can hold a powerful EN-EL18 battery, which, in combination with the EN-EL15, provides a ton of battery power. I have managed to shoot 12-hour night time-lapses with my D850 like that.
Meanwhile, the MB-N12 only holds two EN-EL15c batteries, which provide around 1.8x longer battery life than the single in-camera battery. The grip features a USB-C port for connecting to an external power source if you need more. A cool feature is that one of the batteries can be hot-swapped for on-the-fly battery switching. Also, batteries can be charged inside the grip even when not attached to the camera.
Adding the grip to the Z8 significantly increases the size of the camera. I could only barely close the zipper of my camera bag when I added the grip to my Z8 with a lens attached. Also, the ergonomics are quite different compared to the Z9’s vertical grip. On the Z9, your thumb is relatively close to all four buttons next to the multi-selector. Using the MB-N12 takes some finger gymnastics to operate those buttons while shooting verticals.
At some stage, my MB-N12 stopped working. I figured it was either because it was a prototype or too cold, so I removed it. The next day, I charged the batteries and tried again. That’s when I got an error message on the screen warning me that I should only use original Nikon batteries. I have a lot of third-party EN-EL15 clones because they’re cheaper, and this is the first time I’ve had this happen. After I swapped them for the real deal, the grip worked again. Not sure if this is simply a prototype glitch or if the final grip will only take the original batteries, but I wanted to mention it regardless.
In the Field
The two biggest challenges on this trip were finding the polar bears and dealing with the harsh conditions. Life in the high Arctic can be brutal for humans and camera gear, so I knew it would not be a walk in the park. Dressing for the cold is fairly straightforward, but it’s incredibly important to do it right.
For photographers, the hands are always the greatest challenge. It’s easy to keep your hands warm, but to photograph, you must take off your super warm mittens and operate the camera with liner gloves. Holding a camera at -30C is like holding a chunk of ice. Your hands get very cold very quickly, especially your shutter finger. I used special photographic mittens by The Heat Company that helped, and I added felt tips to the shutter buttons on the camera and the grip. This made them warmer to the touch, and easier to find while wearing gloves.
I also put LensCoat neoprene covers on all my lenses for added comfort and safety. At -30C, you don’t want any bare skin to touch the metal lens.
Overall, all the camera gear performed really well in the cold. We spent, on average, 9 hours outside each day, and I never had any issues. The Z8 performed flawlessly except for one little thing. Changing cards requires you to push the card in, so that the internal spring pushes it out again. On the coldest days, I noticed the cards came out very slowly or only a bit. I sometimes had to use my nails to pull them out. Again, I don’t know if this is simply a prototype issue.
On this trip, I used two Z9s and the Z8. The EN-EL18d battery in the Z9 is superb in extreme cold. A fully charged EN-EL18d lasted me a full day. The EN-EL15c is much more affected by the cold – not only while shooting but also when it was just sitting in the camera inside my bag. This was an extra reason to use the grip and have two batteries instead of one.
I should add that during the entire trip, I always kept my camera bag outside. Inside our tent, it got too warm or too humid, and I didn’t want to risk causing any condensation inside my gear. I only took the cards and batteries inside. The Z8 minimum operating temperature is rated -10C, but it can clearly handle a lot more cold than that. Note that the Sony ⍺7RV and the Canon R5 minimum operating temperature are rated at 0C.
On the Inside
The Z8 menu is the same as the Z9, so no surprises there. That said, there are some differences between the two cameras. Here are some things the Z8 offers that the Z9 does not:
- The ability to shoot 10-bit HEIF images
- A portrait impression balance and a skin softening settings
- Two USB C terminals, one of which is dedicated to communication (but no LAN or Synchro terminal)
- Vertical playback in vertical orientation
And here are some things that Z9 has that the Z8 does not:
- Continuous video recording time of 125 min. in in 8K/30p, vs 90 min. for the Z8
- Integrated vertical grip and longer battery life due to larger battery
- Built-in GPS (but the Z8 can do GPS through your phone)
- CFExpress card for second slot, rather than SD
If you’re like me, you will look at those differences and say: That’s it? Yep, that’s it. I may be unaware of one or two others, but I doubt they will be significant. Based on the specs alone, the Z8 is, therefore, literally a mini Z9. Smaller, lighter, cheaper, but just as powerful.
That sounds too good to be true, so I wondered how the Z8 would perform in the field.
I really enjoyed the Z8 for handheld shots with the Z 70-200mm f/2.8 VR S and the Z 400mm f/4.5 VR S lenses. Those lenses are almost the same size as one another and, coupled with the Z8, made for a very balanced setup. Although our primary focus was polar bears, we spent considerable time shooting distant landscapes and icebergs. For the image below, I asked our guide Cyle to climb the iceberg to add a sense of scale and adventure. Can you see him?
I wanted to stay quite a distance away to get a more pleasing perspective, and the 70-200mm was perfect for that. Instead of taking a single horizontal frame, I decided to zoom in to 165mm and shoot 12 vertical images to create this panorama.
On this trip, I saw a lot of bears. As we tried to stay 100m away from any bear, I shot most bear images with my Z9 and Z 600/4.0 TC VR S lens. However, every now and then, a bear decided to check us out or walk right by us – too close for the 600mm. For those dynamic moments, I always had the Z8 with the super lightweight 400mm f/4.5 prime close to me. It was easy to pick up with one hand, and easy to handhold while following the action. The image below is from one of those moments.
The Z8 has the same dual coating sensor as the Z9: 45.7 MP (stacked CMOS), protected with a sensor shield. The ISO sensitivity range is also identical: 64-25,600, expandable on both extremes. The dynamic range of the Z8 is very impressive. In high-contrast situations, like shooting an approaching skidoo in the snow, I would just meter for the highlights and make sure they don’t blow out, while ignoring the blacks – knowing that I can very easily recover those dark areas without introducing any noise.
Many cameras today are close to ISO invariant, which means that increasing ISO in-camera provides a similar level of image quality as brightening the photo in post-processing. The Nikon Z8 and Z9 are not fully ISO-invariant cameras. Instead, they have dual gain sensors that switch at ISO 500.
In other words, everything from ISO 64 through 400 could be accurately simulated on the Nikon Z8 by brightening ISO 64, and everything from ISO 500 onward could be accurately simulated by brightening ISO 500. If you want to keep things simple, avoid overexposure in the highlights, even if it means taking a darker photo and brightening it later (especially above ISO 500).
I have not specifically tested the high ISO performance of the Z8, but I have shot very usable images with my Z9 at ISO 25,600, so the Z8 will be no different. With an f/1.2 lens, the Z8 has an AF detection range from -7 EV to 19 EV, dropping to -9 EV using the Starlight View setting.
At the risk of getting repetitive, the Z8 has the same image-processing engine and autofocus capabilities as the Z9. The only difference I saw was the Dedicated Airplane subject detection setting, whatever that is. I don’t shoot airplanes, but I’m sure the plane spotters will be excited.
Of the wide range of AF modes to choose from, I typically use Pinpoint for landscape photography and very static wildlife, Dynamic Area S for things that are moving predictably, and 3D-tracking for serious action and/or when I want to keep my subject in a very specific spot in my frame.
The 3D-tracking worked perfectly on the skidoos, but polar bears being quite light against a bright background was sometimes tricky in sunny or heavily backlit conditions. If the one AF mode doesn’t give me the results I’m after, I quickly switch to another by pressing a customized button and rotating a dial. It takes less than a second. With so many AF modes, I recommend you try them all in various conditions to learn to pick the right one when it matters most.
The new Nikkor Z 600mm f/4.0 TC VR S with a built-in teleconverter is an amazing lens. Weighing only 3260 g (7 lb 3 oz), it is almost 600 g lighter than the F-mount version and even lighter than the AF-S VR 180-400mm f/4.0 TC. Coupled with the Z8, that makes it not-completely-insane to shoot handheld.
The image above was a fleeting moment – a female polar bear and her two spring cubs were walking up a mountain slope and briefly stopped to check us out. Looking at their body language, we decided to stay at a fair distance, especially considering the smallest cub looked underweight. I got this shot by shooting the Z8 with the 600mm handheld, as there was no time to set up my tripod. Autofocus was swift and accurate.
The only times I struggled to focus was when there were a lot of ice crystals in the air. The Z8 and the Z9 struggled to autofocus in those conditions, especially with the long telephoto lenses. This turned out to be non-camera specific – even my iPhone was unable to focus. It’s comparable to trying to autofocus in heavy snow or rain.
I almost forgot to mention the Pre-Release Burst function. When selected, the Z8 maintains an image buffer before pushing the shutter release. It records the buffer when the shutter button is pressed. This is extremely useful when waiting for a bird to take off or anything else that requires perfect timing, although the downside is that it is JPEG-only.
The image quality of the Nikon Z8 is superb. I have already been shooting with two Z9s for over a year now, and the images from the Z8 are identical. This is one of the reasons why I will replace my Z7 with the Z8.
My Z9s are my primary (wildlife) bodies, and I always travel with a third body because I prefer not to change lenses in the field – for dust and for speed reasons. The Z7 is a much slower camera, but the images also have a different look to them, and I obviously prefer to have similar-looking images from the same scene.
You will hear people call the Z8 a hybrid camera because it is a photographic powerhouse and a very serious video camera, capable of internal 8K raw video. Being a photographer, I didn’t shoot much video. Whenever something cool happened, I wanted to take photographs, not videos. I did, however, shoot various clips at various settings, and the results look really good. The high-quality codecs require color grading in video editing software which I have not done yet, but I shot a short test clip to see how the sensor would pick up all the subtle colors and hues after sunset.
My conclusion is perhaps a predictable one: The Nikon Z8 is a mini Z9. It is virtually the same as the Nikon flagship camera, only smaller, lighter, and cheaper. Surprisingly, the biggest differences are on the outside. On the inside, where it matters most, things are essentially the same. Even the maximum frame rate is exactly the same.
If you wanted a Z9 but couldn’t afford one or thought it was too big, the Z8 will be the perfect alternative. It’s well-balanced, as powerful as its bigger brother, yet in a smaller package. My only negatives are the design and batteries of the optional grip, and the fact that there is no space for two CFexpress cards. Other than that, it’s near perfect. The waiting list is going to be very long.
About the Author
Marsel van Oosten is a professional nature photographer and death metal connoisseur from The Netherlands. He is the world’s only photographer to have won the Grand Slam: the grand titles Wildlife Photographer of the Year, International Nature Photographer of the Year, and Travel Photographer of the Year. His latest book is called MOTHER – A Tribute to Mother Earth.
Marsel currently lives in South Africa with producer Daniella Sibbing. Together they run specialized nature photography tours for small groups of all experience levels to worldwide destinations.
A version of this article has also been posted here. An overview of Marsel’s work can be found on his website.
Completely agree about the size of the optional grip. The MB-N11 has made my slightly undersized Z6ii completely oversized. Why?
Wow! My favorite photographer now on PL, you guys rock.:) Thanks for the great review Marsel. I hope I will see more articles from you in the future. ;)
Marsel, thank you for the very informative review. I have enjoyed photography as a hobby for many years. I was looking for an upgrade from my D7500. After reading other reviews of the Z7ii and the Z8, I came across your review. I am now waiting for my Z8 to ship along with many others. Your pictures are amazing, but what I really enjoyed was how you wrote your review. I felt as if you were on the other side of a coffee table, giving me the real-life experiences of the camera’s capabilities.
Is it possible to make the difference in image quality visible on a web page? Or can we get a downloadlink for 2 raw files taken as Marsel described to compare them in C1/Lightroom?
Other question: Marsel can you give a rough date when your experience with the 400/4.5 will be described online?
You tested it also with a z7(ii?), that’s for a lot of people here also relevant. (For me it is -> a z8 to replace a z7 or a 400/4.5. Not both)
The difference in look and feel is not big enough to worry about. I merely noticed there was a difference, but it has very little value — too little to base your decision on.
As for the 400/4.5 — I hope to have a review ready for that lens and the 600/4.0 TC by the end of this month. I did not use the 400 on the Z7, only on the Z8.
The step from a Z7 to a Z8 is a big one, a massive upgrade.
The point that generates regret -on my part- and the loss of the possibility of cropping in 5:4, as since my D3x, D8xx, Z7… Because cropping afterwards does not bring the same concentration of the gaze…
I don’t understand what you mean. You can crop your image to any aspect ratio afterward.
Precisely, what I was saying is that it is not the same concentration of the mind as working on your 5:4 ratio (1:1, 16:9, or others…) directly in a sight, only later in its software.
In principle, I never reframe my views, it is for me a way of seriously living my photography. / Justement, ce que je disais c’est que ce n’est pas la même concentration de l’esprit que de travailler son ratio 5:4 (1:1, 16:9, ou autres…) directement dans une visée, que plus tard dans son logiciel.
En principe, je ne recadre jamais mes vues, c’est pour moi, une façon de vivre sérieusement ma photographie.
Thank you for sharing this professional and informative experience.
You’re welcome, Mathieu.
Marsel very nice field review. I miss shooting in the artic (Alaska espec with D850 and D5) and your photos bring indelible memories. Certainly the Z8 is a worthy instrument without a doubt. My Z9 will be my keeper however – as you said – love the grip and of course battery life. Weight has never really been an issue as I have owned the D2,3,4, and 5 – so I’m accustomed. It is interesting to me with nearly every new Nikon camera launch there are field reviews with beautiful accompanying photographs only to see in two or three years time a new iteration of the camera and likewise stunning field review images – AND all the advancements of the new iteration – AND the many who then posit the “shortcomings” with the previous version. I have clearly participated in this sequence of behavior (and expense) and annually vow to just be satisfied with what I have – we will see how long that lasts!
Thank you for the review! I had my NPS preorder submitted in the first 15 minutes (would have been the first minute but Nikon’s site was giving me issue, likely due to the number of others also trying to preorder). I can’t wait to add one of these to my kit and really get hands-on with it.
You’re welcome! Wow, that’s fast. You’ll love it!
Great report, Marsel! I’ve got my Z8 on order with NPS priority. Nice having the early report from the perspective of a nature photographer.
Thank you, Eric. Hope you’ll get yours soon!
Fantastic article Mr. Marsel. Thank you for the detailed analysis between the Z9 and Z8. I am now tempted to get the Z8!