With Nikon releasing its second-generation Z6 II and Z7 II mirrorless cameras, our readers might be wondering about how these cameras compare in terms of features and image quality. While these cameras are quite similar in many ways (even having identical control layouts and the exact weight), there are plenty of differences under the hood. If you are thinking of buying either the Z6 II or Z7 II, this article will help you understand the pros and cons of each.
Nikon Z6 II and Z7 II Specifications Comparison
Before I talk about image quality, let’s first discuss what these cameras are used for, and show their differences in terms of key specifications. While the Nikon Z6 II is targeted as a general-purpose mirrorless stills and video camera with its 24 MP sensor, 14 FPS continuous shooting speed, and 273 focus points, the Nikon Z7 II is a more specialized offering with a high-resolution 45.7 MP sensor. Both cameras offer hybrid autofocus systems, with on-sensor phase-detection and contrast-detection AF, capable of actively tracking subjects when recording high-quality 4K videos.
Ergonomically, there are practically no differences between the first and the second-generation Z6 and Z7 cameras. However, Nikon added quite a bit of horsepower in the second generation cameras with dual EXPEED 6 processors, in addition to significantly increasing camera buffer. A secondary SD UHS-II compatible memory card slot has been added, and now both cameras can be used with a real battery grip that features buttons and dials.
Let’s take a look at the specifications of the two cameras in more detail:
| Camera Feature | Nikon Z6 II | Nikon Z7 II |
|---|---|---|
| Sensor Resolution | 24.5 MP | 45.7 MP |
| Low-Pass Filter | Yes | No |
| Sensor Type | BSI CMOS | BSI CMOS |
| Base ISO | ISO 100 | ISO 64 |
| Native ISO Sensitivity | ISO 100-51,200 | ISO 64-25,600 |
| In-Body Image Stabilization | Yes, 5-axis | Yes, 5-axis |
| Sensor Size | 35.9 x 24.0mm | 35.9 x 23.9mm |
| Image Size | 6048 x 4024 | 8256 x 5504 |
| Image Processor | Dual EXPEED 6 | Dual EXPEED 6 |
| EVF Type / Resolution | QVGA / 3.6 Million Dots | QVGA / 3.6 Million Dots |
| EVF Coverage | 100% | 100% |
| EVF Magnification | 0.8x | 0.8x |
| Built-in Flash | No | No |
| Flash Sync Speed | 1/200s | 1/200s |
| Storage Media | 1x CFe / XQD + 1x SD UHS II | 1x CFe / XQD + 1x SD UHS II |
| Continuous Shooting Speed | 14 FPS | 10 FPS |
| Camera Buffer (12-bit Lossless) | 124 | 77 |
| Max Shutter Speed | 1/8000 | 1/8000 |
| Min Shutter Speed | Up to 900 sec | Up to 900 sec |
| Electronic Front-Curtain Shutter | Yes | Yes |
| Exposure Metering Sensor | TTL metering using camera image sensor | TTL metering using camera image sensor |
| Autofocus System | Hybrid PDAF | Hybrid PDAF |
| Focus Points | 273 | 493 |
| Low-Light Sensitivity | -4.5 to +19 EV | -3 to +17 EV |
| Focus Peaking / Peaking Colors / Levels | Yes / Red, Yellow, Blue, White / 3 | Yes / Red, Yellow, Blue, White / 3 |
| Video Maximum Resolution | 4K @ up to 60p, 1080p @ up to 120p | 4K @ up to 60p, 1080p @ up to 120p |
| 4K Video Crop | 1.0 (30p), 1.5x (60p) | 1.08x |
| HDMI Out / N-LOG | 4:2:2 10-bit HDMI Output / Yes | 4:2:2 10-bit HDMI Output / Yes |
| HLG / HDR Out | Yes / Yes | Yes / Yes |
| Zebra Stripes | Yes | Yes |
| Audio Recording | Yes | Yes |
| Articulating Touch LCD | Yes, Tilting | Yes, Tilting |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| LCD Size / Resolution | 3.2″ / 2.1 Million Dots | 3.2″ / 2.1 Million Dots |
| GPS / Wi-Fi / Bluetooth | No / Yes / Yes | No / Yes / Yes |
| Intervalometer + Timelapse Movie | Yes | Yes |
| Firmware Update via Snapbridge | Yes | Yes |
| Battery | EN-EL15c | EN-EL15c |
| Battery Life (CIPA) | 340 shots | 360 shots |
| Weather Sealed Body | Yes | Yes |
| USB Version | Type-C 3.1 | Type-C 3.1 |
| Weight (Camera Body Only) | 615g (21.7oz) | 615g (21.7oz) |
| Dimensions | 134 x 100.5 x 69.5mm (5.3 x 4.0 x 2.8″) | 134 x 100.5 x 69.5mm (5.3 x 4.0 x 2.8″) |
| MSRP | $1,999 (check price) | $2,999 (check price) |
As you can see, while both Z6 II and Z7 II offer very similar features, there are some differences that might make one camera more preferable over the other, depending on your needs. Are you primarily interested in the video features of these cameras? If so, the Z6 II is arguably a better choice than the Z7 II, since its 4K video is downsampled from the full width of the sensor at 1.0x crop. Sensor resolution is the main difference between the cameras, with the Z6 II featuring a 24 MP sensor, while the Z7 II has a much higher resolution 45 MP sensor. For some photographers, lower resolution images are preferable, since they take up less space and don’t require as much computing power to work with. Others, who primarily engage in landscape, architecture and product photography will prefer 45 MP in order to make larger prints.
Interestingly, Nikon decided to go with a slightly higher-end autofocus system on the Z7 II, which has a total of 493 focus points, while the Z6 II is limited to 273 focus points. However, these numbers don’t mean much in the real world, because the autofocus performance of the two cameras is very similar. In fact, when shooting in low-light situations, the autofocus system on the Z6 II has better AF detection range of -4.5 EV to +19 EV, while the Z7 II has -3 EV to +17 EV. In addition, the Z6 II has a faster continuous shooting rate of 14 FPS compared to 10 FPS on the Z7 II. Add a large buffer that can accommodate 124 RAW images (vs 77 on the Z7 II), and it appears that the Z6 II is better suited for fast action photography – that’s 8.9 seconds of continous shooting vs 7.7 before the buffer fills up.
In short, if you don’t need more than 24 MP of resolution and if you shoot lots of video content, the Z6 II is a better choice, especially considering that it is $1000 cheaper. However, if you do the type of work that could benefit from high-resolution images, then the Z7 II is the way to go.
Next, we will take a look at how these two cameras differ in high ISO performance, side-by-side.
Nikon Z6 II vs Nikon Z7 II High ISO Performance Comparison
Nikon did not update the sensor technology on its second-generation camera bodies, so we can expect the two to be identical in their performance to their predecessors. Let’s take a look at how the two differ at ISOs above 800. In order to compare 24 MP versus 45 MP side-by-side, I downsampled the Z7 images to match the Z6’s resolution. The Z6 is on the left, and the Z7 is on the right:
Although both cameras look great at ISO 800 and 1600, we can already start seeing differences in noise performance, with the Z6 looking a little cleaner.
At ISO 3200 and 6400, the Z6 clearly looks better than the Z7. This is especially noticeable in the red and pink swatches. Although the Z7 is still the sharper file at both ISOs, I am starting to prefer how the Z6 looks. But especially at ISO 3200, it is a bit of a toss-up:
The Z6 starts pulling away at ISO 12,800. Pay attention to the green, pink, red, and gray swatches. Although the Z7 still shows reasonable performance, and remains slightly sharper, the Z6 performs better overall at this ISO:
By ISO 25,600, it is clear that the Z6 is ahead in noise performance, and the extra noise in the Z7 has essentially eliminated the sharpness advantage. The better file here is definitely the Z6’s:
And at ISO 51,200, the Z6 not only wins in noise but also detail and sharpness, leaving the Z7 clearly behind:
Lastly, at ISO 102,400, the Z6 is far ahead of the Z7 in every way, including brightness. However, both images are pretty much unusable:
The takeaway here is that the Z6 is the better camera in noise performance at high ISOs, while the Z7 is better suited for lower ISOs.
Which Camera Should You Get?
Unless you really need the extra resolution of the Z7 II, the Nikon Z6 II is clearly a better choice for most photographers out there. It is significantly cheaper, has better autofocus and continuous shooting capabilities, a large buffer that fits more images (since files are smaller), and it performs better in low-light situations. Keep in mind that 24 MP is a sweet spot for most types of photography including portraiture, wedding, travel and event photography, so if you primarily shoot in these genres, go with the Z6 II and don’t look back. If you have an extra $1K laying around, put it towards an excellent Nikon Z prime like the Z 50mm f/1.8 S.
However, if you find 24 MP to be limiting for larger prints or client work, then the Z7 II has its place as well. It will give you a very clean image at ISO 64 with plenty of detail and dynamic range.
If you find this article useful, please consider checking out other comparisons of the second-generation Nikon mirrorless cameras:
Hi Nasim, have you seen Ricci talks new video? It appears Nikon has answered your prayers and you can now have a clear screen with no clutter, I know you had that on your most wanted list of changes for a while!
Mark, I saw someone mention that, and when I checked it out, it looked like one had to assign a button to clear the screen? If this is the case, this is beyond stupid. Nikon should just make the DISP button clear all the junk out, that’s the simple way to fix the issue.
Actually, you don’t need to assign it – my camera came with the button pre-assigned. It’s the ‘record’ button in photo mode that does the trick. You have to press it every now and then, to get the clutterless display, cause every time you perform some other action, like going in the menu and back, it will show information on the display again. I am new to this brand/mount/system and I am quite surprised this is only a feature just ‘now’, but lucky me – cause I was struggling with the clutter in my first day of use too!
Something else to consider is lens/sensor resolution combinations. I have not bought a mirrorless yet, but when I do, it will be the Z7 ii. The reason is that the 24mp sensor cannot always resolve the fine detail resolved by the highest end Nikon lenses, as I am just beginning to understand.
I currently own a D750 (or at least my daughter does, now) and a D850. I am a professional studio photographer, but also do a lot of scenic, nature and macro work, as well as candid and environmental portraits. I learned in the film era, as a photojournalist, and I do very little post-processing outside of my product photography marketing work, so the highest quality lenses and filters are important to me getting the shot right in camera.
About a year ago I was shooting a scene in an art studio using a Nikon 85mm 1.4G lens on the D750 (normally I shoot a Canon 5ds 45mp for corporate studio work, but this was on location, so I used my personal Nikon instead). My assistant at the time processed the image using Nikon Capture, and upon zooming in on the result details, noticed a strange horizontal stepping effect in the paintbrush bristles. Processing the RAW in Lightroom cleaned up the effect better, but not completely. At the time, I shared it with Nasim, and then with Nikon. Nikon wanted me to send in the camera, but I had just upgraded to the D850, and never bothered. I was only able to duplicate the effect twice more, in similar lens/studio strobe combinations. But the D750 was great otherwise, so I gave it to my daughter with a 35mm f2D lens.
Two days ago, I was reading an article comparing two Mark I and Mark II Canon lenses (I also shoot Canon) and he produced the exact same stepping effect in the hairs of a model with the higher-resolution Mark II lens, and his explanation was that these newer lenses are made for higher resolution sensors.
(You can read that article here: www.slrlounge.com/canon…omparison/ )
This was my Aha moment.
The 45mp D850 sensor, which I believe is shared by the Z7 ii, resolves such detail beautifully, even with an older high-end ultra sharp lens like the amazing Nikon 50mm f1.2. When you consider the other huge advantage in the Z series of both super sharp optics and the back focus lens being much closer to the sensor decreasing diffraction and noise, then both the upgrade to mirrorless AND the 45mp+ sensors seems inevitable to me. Which also saddens me, because making that switch is going to be, once again, very expensive. On the other hand, my current lens collection will still work just as well adapted onto the Z7 ii as the D850, while the addition of Z lenses will work even better.
If I’m getting something wrong, I welcome any input!
Hey Nasim! So im torn between the z6ii and z7ii. Im looking to do mainly landscape and astro photography. Will the z6ii be as good as the z7ii at night? Will pictures be noticeably more clear with the z7ii? also i wont be printing anything huge at all. I was leaning towards the z7ii bc of the bigger sensor/more mp but i could also go the other way with the z6ii and spend the extra $ on new glass! Please help!
Does anyone know if the depth of field preview above f/5.6 whilst zoomed in issue been resolved?
I have a Z6 I’m about to trade in to Nikon for the Z6 II. I know there is very little difference between the two generations, but the limited single memory card slot for XQD was a horrible design in gen 1. I’ve only shot about 1000 images on my Z6. Nikon is offering $1275 on the tradein, which pretty much pays for half the upgrade. I’m going to take advantage of the tradein value while the Z6 can pull a decent tradein amount.
Any idea how the new Z6 II might compete with the D500 as far as focus tracking moving subjects like birds in flight?
Nasim,
Fantastic web site – so helpful to enthusiast level photographers like me. I recently became a Basic Plus Member as I believe in supporting those that offer such valuable information (reviews and tutorials written so well that I learn so much).
I am considering both Nikon Z6 II and Z7 II (with the Z 24-70 f/4 S kit lens). I am interested in the S line of Z lenses with f/4, primarily. The native Z f/2.8 S line of trinity lenses is out of my price range as I am not a professional.
Hoping you can share your thoughts to help me select the most appropriate camera/lenses for my interests and level.
After much research, I have decided to upgrade to a Nikon Mirrorless Z system from my 2015 Nikon D5500 DX camera with 3 Nikon DX lenses (18-140 mm 3.5-5.6 kit lens, 35 mm 1.8, 55-300 mm 4.5-5.6).
I also have three older F-mount lenses I used with a mid-1970s Nikon FT2 film camera – Nikkor-Q Auto 3.5 135 mm, Vivitar 2.5 28mm auto wide angle, Bushnell Automatic 6.3 400 mm tele.
My primary interests are landscape, nature, and astro, then portrait and video to lesser amount.
Questions:
1. Which of the above six lenses are worth keeping because they could work well with the Z6 II or Z7II when using the FTZ Adapter ?
2. Would my existing Nikon DX 55-300 mm lens (when cropped with FTZ adapter in Z6 II / Z7 II wouldn’t this yield equivalent focal lengths of 72 – 450 mm ?) be a useful companion zoom to the Z 24-70 f/4 S zoom, while awaiting for Nikon to release (hopefully) a native Z 70-200 f/4 S lens ?
3. Is there a native Z wide angle zoom (14-30mm f/4 S) or Z wide angle prime (20mm f/1.8 S) you would recommend for me to add as a wide angle for landscapes/nature primarily to my “trinity”.
4. Should I pre-order Z6II / Z7 II now or wait until trustworthy sites like yours have received and field tested the Z6/Z7 II models – and given them a thumbs up ?
5. Will the 45MP resolution of the Z7 II make my images MUCH more clear/sharp/better dynamic range/more detail (than the Z6 II), and much better for prints up to 20×13, especially if I need to do some cropping in post processing ?
6. I have read your article on camera resolution, and it seems based on image area pixel sizes for Z6 II and Z7 II, for high quality prints at 300 ppi, the Z6 II would max out at about 20×13 inches print size, the Z7 II max out at 27×18 inches ? Are my print sizes here valid ? I want capability for detailed, sharp prints up to 20×13, and maybe a few prints larger than that.
7. Would the Z6 II suffice for 20X13 inch print size or would I need to get the Z7 II ?
Summary:
My current thinking is : Invest in the Nikon Z system. The Z lenses (S line) should be able to resolve detail in high resolution sensors far beyond 24 MP+ – so perhaps I can start with Z6 II at 24 MP and a trinity of Z f/4 S line lenses, and if I find after spending a lot of time with them that I believe I need to have a higher sensor resolution (after much effort and time/experimentation with Z6 II), I could sell Z6 II body and migrate to higher resolution model (Z7/Z8/Z9 ?) at a later date while still having the Z S line lenses that can handle resolving at those higher resolutions (36-45-60 MP).
In meantime, improve my skills/technique with Z6 II to try to get most detail/sharpness from Z6 II camera, using Z f/4 S line lenses and good filters.
Would love your thoughts on which of these two camera and native Z lenses are best for my level and interests ?
Is this a viable purchasing strategy for my level and interests and printing wants ?
Thanks
Hi Nasim, what a great website this is; many informative articles such as this!
I am trying to decide on whether to purchase the Z6ii or the Z7ii based on the types of photography I do, namely landscape, nature, and maybe some Astrophotography. My concerns:
1. Landscape photography is my favorite pursuit so sharpness and dynamic range is paramount. The Z6ii will have an AA filter. Is this a strong or mild filter? Z7ii does not have such a filter. Are these differences noticeable?
2. Wildlife photography is also very important important and I again am concerned about sharpness as I will be shooting with a Nikon 200-500 f/5.6 in the beginning. Again, should I consider 24mp or higher from the Z7ii?
3. I am thinking about doing some astrophotography and trying to decide between the two models.
4. Lastly, I plan on doing some videography regarding the natural environment. Which model would be better overall?
Any comments are greatly appreciated. Thank you Nasim.
Bill, looks like the Z6 II is a better fit for your needs. Don’t worry about sharpness differences – you will probably never be able to see them anyway. 24 MP is plenty for most photographers. Unless you are planning to make huge prints, I would not recommend to go with the 45 MP sensor.
Thank you so much Nasim for your reply. I did preorder the Z6 and was considering making the switch. Thanks for giving me clarity regarding my concerns.
Bill
Which camera would be best for both nature photography and for making prints (13 x 19) for display Also, how do adaptive lenses perform on the Z7/Z7ii? Does using the FTZ adapter reduce the image quality compared to using the “S” lenses? Would images using the FTZ adapter look better on the Z6 than the Z7 because of the pixel count? Thanks!
I would just go with the Z6 / Z6 II. The FTZ adapter does not reduce the quality of attached lenses, but it certainly does introduce another point of attachment, which could lead to potential decentering issues. The S lenses are on a whole new level compared to F mount glass, so go with the native lenses when possible.
Thanks for the article Nasim. I have a Nikon D750 right now and part of me doesn’t want to make a lateral move. I know the D6 II outperforms the D7 II in low light situations, but doesn’t IBIS make shooting in darker situations with lower ISO possible?
Thanks
Dan, yes, IBIS certainly helps in low-light situations. But the ability to focus in low-light is a bit different. Personally, I cannot see any serious differences in Z6 and Z7 focusing in low-light (to me they seem identical), but according to Nikon, the Z6 / Z6 II should be better. Don’t worry about this too much though. If you like your D750 and its resolution is sufficient for your needs, go for the Z6 II. Put that $1K towards Z lenses instead.