Photography Life

PL provides various digital photography news, reviews, articles, tips, tutorials and guides to photographers of all levels

  • Lens Reviews
  • Camera Reviews
  • Tutorials
  • Compare Cameras
  • Forum
    • Sign Up
    • Login
  • About
  • Search
Home → Cameras and Lenses

Nikon AF-P 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6E vs Tamron 70-300mm f/4.5-6.3

By Spencer Cox 15 Comments
Last Updated On July 18, 2023

One of the most popular types of telephoto lenses is the humble 70-300mm variable-aperture zoom. They’re small, light, and cheap – and many of them still manage good image quality. It’s anyone’s guess why Nikon has taken so long to introduce one to their Z system. Instead, photographers who want a lightweight telephoto have been adapting the F-mount Nikon AF-P 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6E for years. However, now that Tamron’s 70-300mm f/4.5-6.3 is also available with a native Nikon Z mount, I wanted to compare the two lenses in detail. Which one is better?

tamron-70-300-f4.5-6.3-product-image-size-on-camera
The Tamron 70-300mm f/4.5-6.3 on the original Nikon Z7

Table of Contents

  • Size and Weight
  • Build and Handling
  • Image Quality
    • Distortion
  • Vignetting
    • Lateral Chromatic Aberration
    • Sharpness
  • Value
  • Conclusion

Size and Weight

One of the best parts of these two lenses is how small and light they are. The Nikon 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6E is 680 grams (1.50 pounds), while the Tamron 70-300mm f/4.5-6.3 is even lighter at 545 grams (1.20 pounds).

On a mirrorless camera, the Tamron’s weight advantage is even better than that, since you don’t need to use Nikon’s FTZ adapter in order to mount it on a Nikon Z camera. With the FTZ II adapter weighing an additional 125 grams (0.28 pounds), using the Nikon 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6E entails carrying a bit more weight than the native Tamron. Sure, both are lightweight lenses, but there’s still more than half a pound difference between them.

As for size, the two lenses are very similar, but the difference obviously shifts in Tamron’s favor if you’re intending to use the Nikon lens on a mirrorless camera. Here’s a rough size comparison of the Nikon lens + FTZ II adapter versus the Tamron lens, to scale:

Nikon AF-P 70-300mm 4.5-5.6E vs Tamron 70-300mm 4.5-6.3 Size Comparison
A simulated size comparison between the two lenses (with the FTZ II adapter for Nikon)

In short, the Tamron 70-300mm f/4.5-6.3 wins the contest of size and weight if you’re comparing these two lenses for usage on the same (i.e. mirrorless) camera. Considering that 70-300mm variable-aperture lenses are popular for lightweight needs like travel and hiking, that’s a big plus in Tamron’s column.

Build and Handling

Neither of the two lenses I’m comparing today are considered high-end. That doesn’t make them bad lenses optically, but it does mean that they have some build quality and handling compromises.

One of the biggest compromises is that both lenses have externally zooming designs, where the lens barrel extends as you zoom in. Even some professional lenses do this, and it’s not a dealbreaker, but it does call for some extra caution when using these lenses in dusty or rainy environments.

Both lenses have primarily plastic exteriors, with a few key areas of metal (like the lens mounts). The plastic feels a bit nicer on the Nikon lens.

tamron-70-300-f4.5-6.3-product-image
The Tamron 70-300mm f/4.5-6.3

As for handling features, the Nikon lens comes out ahead, since it has a dedicated M-A switch and a VR switch. Meanwhile, the Tamron 70-300mm f/4.5-6.3 doesn’t have any buttons or switches at all. Both lenses have a zoom ring and a focus ring.

I prefer the Nikon lens’s handling, while I’d rate the build quality of both lenses about the same. That said, adding the FTZ adapter definitely makes the Nikon more annoying to use, especially if you are swapping the FTZ adapter between multiple F-mount lenses.

Nikon 70-300mm AF-P VR Image Samples (3)
NIKON D850 + 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6 @ 70mm, ISO 1600, 1/13, f/4.5
tamron-70-300-f4.5-6.3-iii-rxd-00015
NIKON Z 7 + TAMRON 70-300mm F/4.5-6.3 Di III RXD A047Z @ 276mm, ISO 200, 1/500, f/6.3

Image Quality

Which lens performs better optically between the Nikon AF-P 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6E and the Tamron 70-300mm f/4.5-6.3? In most categories, the two lenses are either tied, or the Nikon lens is the winner. But let’s take a closer look, because the differences may not be extensive enough to matter for you.

1. Distortion

Dedicated telephoto lenses usually don’t have much distortion, even zoom lenses like these. That said, the Tamron has a bit more than I’d like to see. Here are our full distortion measurements:

Nikon-70-300mm-f4.5-5.6E-VR-AF-P-Distortion-Performance-New

Tamron-70-300mm-f4.5-6.3-Di-III-RXD-Distortion-Performance-New

As you can see, the Nikon lens is much better controlled for distortion. The Tamron gets as high as 3.14% pincushion distortion at 200mm, which is a lot for a telephoto.

2. Vignetting

Next up is vignetting. Neither lens is terrible in this regard, but they still have noticeable vignetting:

Nikon-70-300mm-f4.5-5.6E-VR-AF-P-Vignetting-Performance-New

Tamron-70-300mm-f4.5-6.3-Di-III-RXD-Vignetting-Performance-New

Note that our tests for the Tamron lens include both close focus and infinity focus data, while we only measured infinity focus vignetting at the time of testing the Nikon lens.

To sum things up, the Nikon lens has less vignetting in almost every case, particularly wide open, where vignetting is the most important. The differences at 70mm, 100mm, 200mm, and 300mm are 0.54 stops, 0.46 stops, 0.30 stops, and 0.20 stops respectively. The differences aren’t massive, but they all favor the Nikon lens.

3. Lateral Chromatic Aberration

The Nikon AF-P 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6E and Tamron 70-300mm f/4.5-6.3 have very different chromatic aberration profiles, as you can see below:

Nikon-70-300mm-f4.5-5.6E-VR-AF-P-Chromatic-Aberration-Performance-New

Tamron-70-300mm-f4.5-6.3-Chromatic-Aberration-Performance

At 70mm, the Tamron lens has less chromatic aberration, although neither lens has enough to be of concern. The story is similar at 100mm, with even less CA on both lenses. At 200mm, the Tamron’s CA levels start to increase – it’s now higher than the Nikon, and may be just visible in real-world photos. Finally, at 300mm, the Tamron lens skyrockets in CA levels, while the Nikon lens remains very tame.

Overall, I’d rate the chromatic aberration performance as similar from 70mm to 200mm, but the Tamron lens is much worse at 300mm.

4. Sharpness

Now the moment you’ve been waiting for – sharpness! Which lens is sharper? Although both lenses have solid performance here, neither rises to the levels that we’ve seen from top-end telephoto lenses.

I’ll start with 70mm:

Nikon-AF-P-70-300mm-f4.5-5.6E-VR-MTF-Performance-70mm-New

Tamron-70-300mm-f4.5-6.3-MTF-Performance-70mm

Here, the story is pretty simple. The Nikon lens has better corners, while the Tamron lens is sharper in the center, and both are extremely similar in the midframes. As expected, the differences narrow at f/11 and f/16.

Now for 100mm:

Nikon-AF-P-70-300mm-f4.5-5.6E-VR-MTF-Performance-100mm-New

Tamron-70-300mm-f4.5-6.3-MTF-Performance-100mm

The situation is very similar at 100mm – in fact, more pronounced. The corners now strongly favor the Nikon lens, while the center strongly favors the Tamron lens. Midframe sharpness is a bit higher on the Tamron.

Now 200mm:

Nikon-AF-P-70-300mm-f4.5-5.6E-VR-MTF-Performance-200mm-New

Tamron-70-300mm-f4.5-6.3-MTF-Performance-200mm-New

The Nikon AF-P 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6E VR’s performance at 200mm is similar to its performance at 100mm. The Tamron, though, has undergone a character shift – losing some central sharpness but gaining some corner sharpness. The end result is that the two lenses have comparable center and corner performance at 200mm. However, midframe sharpness favors the Tamron.

Lastly, here’s 300mm:

Nikon-AF-P-70-300mm-f4.5-5.6E-VR-MTF-Performance-300mm-New

Tamron-70-300mm-f4.5-6.3-MTF-Performance-300mm

As with 200mm, both lenses are pretty similar to one another at 300mm. The Tamron lens has a slight edge in the center and midframes, while corner sharpness remains neck-and-neck.

Overall, I’d categorize the Nikon lens as more consistent across its focal lengths. The Tamron 70-300mm f/4.5-6.3 has a bit of a split personality. At the wider focal lengths, it is very sharp in the center but worse in the corners; at the longer focal lengths, it has fairly even sharpness across the frame. Both lenses are plenty sharp for most applications, but you should probably take these differences into account based on your personal requirements.

Value

This is a rare case when the Tamron lens is more expensive than the Nikon lens… or at least, that’s what it seems at first glance. The MSRP of the Nikon AF-P 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6E is $600, while the MSRP of the Tamron 70-300mm f/4.5-6.3 is $700.

However, that’s ignoring the price of the Nikon FTZ adapter that you’ll need in order to use the Nikon lens on a Z-series camera. It’s also true that the Tamron lens routinely goes on sale for $600. In practice, the two lenses are basically the same in terms of price and value.

You can check the current prices, and support my testing efforts at Photography Life, at the following B&H affiliate links:

  • Nikon Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 VR at B&H – Check prices and current sales
  • Tamron 70-300mm f/4.5-6.3 for Nikon Z at B&H – Check prices and current sales
Nikon 70-300mm AF-P VR Image Samples (8)
NIKON D850 + 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6 @ 92mm, ISO 64, 1/25, f/8.0
tamron-70-300-f4.5-6.3-iii-rxd-00019
NIKON Z 7 + TAMRON 70-300mm F/4.5-6.3 Di III RXD A047Z @ 300mm, ISO 64, 1/160, f/6.3

Conclusion

For full-frame Nikon Z shooters, I lean toward recommending the Tamron. It’s a bit worse optically, but not by much – and it’s significantly smaller and lighter than using the AF-P 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6E with the adapter. However, if you already have the Nikon lens + FTZ adapter, I don’t think it’s worth switching to the Tamron. You won’t gain anything optically, and you’ll lose plenty of money when selling your lens.

Another case where the Nikon lens wins is if you intend to use either of these lenses with a Nikon Z DX camera. Nikon hasn’t yet added in-body image stabilization to any of their Z DX cameras (hopefully that changes soon), and the Tamron lens doesn’t have built-in vibration reduction. So, the Nikon AF-P 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6E would make a lot more sense in that case.

Nikon 70-300mm AF-P VR Image Samples (12)
NIKON D850 + 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6 @ 100mm, ISO 64, 1/160, f/8.0
tamron-70-300-f4.5-6.3-iii-rxd-00020
NIKON Z 7 + TAMRON 70-300mm F/4.5-6.3 Di III RXD A047Z @ 207mm, ISO 64, 1/320, f/6.3

I hope this helps! Feel free to ask me anything about these two lenses in the comment section below, and I’ll do my best to answer.

Looking for even more exclusive content?

On Photography Life, you already get world-class articles with no advertising every day for free. As a Member, you'll get even more:

Silver ($5/mo)
  • Exclusive articles
  • Monthly Q&A chat
  • Early lens test results
  • "Creative Landscape Photography" eBook
Gold ($12/mo)
  • All that, PLUS:
  • Online workshops
  • Monthly photo critiques
  • Vote on our next lens reviews
 
Click Here to Join Today
 

Related Articles

  • Tamron 70-300mm f4.5-6.3 for Nikon Z
    Nikon Z Is Getting a 70-300mm Lens! (From Tamron)
  • Nikon 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6E ED VR AF-P
    Nikon 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6E VR AF-P Announcement
  • CX 70-300 Image 8
    Sample Bird Images Using 1 Nikon CX 70-300 Lens
  • tamron-70-300-f4.5-6.3-iii-rxd-00004
    Tamron 70-300mm f/4.5-6.3 Sample Images & RAWs
  • blue winged teal image 1
    Shooting Hand-Held Video with Nikon 1 CX 70-300mm
  • Nikon Z5 Image Sample #70
    Nikon Z 24-200mm f/4-6.3 vs Tamron 70-300mm f/4.5-6.3
Disclosures, Terms and Conditions and Support Options
Filed Under: Cameras and Lenses Tagged With: Choosing a Lens, Nikon Lens, Nikon Mirrorless, Tamron, Tamron Lens

About Spencer Cox

I'm Spencer Cox, a landscape photographer based in Colorado. I started writing for Photography Life a decade ago, and now I run the website in collaboration with Nasim. I've used nearly every digital camera system under the sun, but for my personal work, I love the slow-paced nature of large format film. You can see more at my personal website and my not-exactly-active Instagram page.

guest

guest

15 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Pascal Leclere
Pascal Leclere
June 12, 2024 12:46 pm

Both lenses on a DX camera, being z50 or the nikon lens on my d5300 would become 105-450mm if I’m correct.

I am thinking about buying the nikkor 70-300mm as I regret I bought the nikkor 18-300mm 3.5-6.3 vr lens although I read reviews it wasn’t too bad. Still, often I don’t manage to get good pictures with that lens, but I’m not sure whether I am the reason and I worry I will not have great pictures with that nikkor 70-300mm (fx) lens as maybe I am the one who can’t take good pictures. Thus, is the 70-300mm lens much better, and should I sell my 18-300mm and buy the 70-300mm for better pictures? I don’t want to waste again money. Or should I buy another camera? Thanks for advice.

0
Reply
Robert John
Robert John
Reply to  Pascal Leclere
August 1, 2024 5:13 am

Best try the lenses in a camera shop if you can.
I use the Nikon 18-140 and 70-300E on a D7500. They’re pretty comparable within their common range. I do like the 70-300 – I think it’s a distinct improvement on the old G version.
I bought both used for a total price of around £650, but that was before F-mount lenses became silly cheap. I’m happy with their price-performance ratio.

0
Reply
Driver3
Driver3
May 4, 2024 7:37 am

I like the stabilized viewfinder with the Nikon VR.

2
Reply
sirhawkeye64
sirhawkeye64
March 6, 2024 12:34 pm

ONe thing I’d point out is that the Tamron does not have any means of lens stabilization and depending on the use-case, this may be a make/break deal for someone. the Nikon does have built-in VR so while it does require the FTZ, it may be a better option for people who need stabilization as in-body stabilization on the camera side of things tends to lose effectiveness at longer focal lengths. I really wish Tamron would release a version of this lens with VC (their version of “VR”).

2
Reply
Andrzej
Andrzej
September 27, 2023 4:51 am

Hello, thanks for the great work and informative reviews.
I have a different question, what would give me better image quality, Z50-250 DX f4.5-6.3 on Z50 or this Tamron on Z6ii? I have both cameras so hence my dilemma. I would use the combo for travel purposes, not indoors. Thanks a lot.

0
Reply
Spookbok
Spookbok
July 11, 2023 10:54 am

AF performance between the two? I use my 70-300 DX as a light weight sports lens in good light and it has performed reasonably well. I considered upgrading to the FX version but the minor benefits didn’t justify the cost and weight increase. Does the Tamron acquire and hold focus sufficiently fast for dynamic sports action on the low end Nikon Z bodies? I expect on a Z8 or Z9 this would be a nonsensical question (cheap lens on expensive body).

0
Reply
Spencer Cox
Spencer Cox
Author
Reply to  Spookbok
July 18, 2023 12:51 pm

Yes, the Tamron focuses just fine, about the same as a native Nikon Z lens (maybe a hair less “sure”) – same goes for the 70-300mm AF-P. I didn’t notice any major differences between them in that department.

1
Reply
HMS
HMS
July 8, 2023 8:24 pm

Wow, awesome reviews, Spencer; thank you and please continue with this excellent format.
I love the 70-300mm focal range as it marries up nicely with the Z 24-120. I do own the Nikon AF/P versions – both the FX and DX versions with VR, so can easily use them on my Z7ii and Z50. As you noted however, the FTZ adapter is a real pain to use albeit a little more tolerable in the gen 2 version. While I do own the Z100-400, it is a beast to lug around. I am eagerly awaiting the Z 70-180mm Tamron and wondering how it will fare with a 2X TC; this might give me a relatively light weight 140-360mm which would also couple very nicely with the 24-120.

3
Reply
Pat
Pat
July 8, 2023 8:56 am

The article’s title doesn’t include any indication that your review is specific to mirrorless cameras, but should have, given the article’s content. That said, not having a mirrorless camera, I have no use for the Tamron and was just curious. I bought the Nikkor for those occasions when I want to pack lighter or not risk my premium lenses (beach, etc.), but just don’t like it in use; the images are surprisingly good.

0
Reply
Spencer Cox
Spencer Cox
Author
Reply to  Pat
July 18, 2023 12:58 pm

One of these lenses is only available for the Z mount, so I had to do the comparison on mirrorless. But our lab test results are comparable across both mirrorless and DSLR cameras, so you can extrapolate very easily. That said, if you only shoot with DSLRs, the winning lens in this comparison is pretty straightforward!

0
Reply
Marcin
Marcin
July 8, 2023 7:29 am

Please, correct me if I’m wrong but vibration reduction on the Nikon lens should work in tandem with the in-body stabilization in full-frame Nikon Z cameras. If that’s the case, such enhanced stabilization would be an addition advantage of the Nikkor lens over the Tamron model.

4
Reply
Spencer Cox
Spencer Cox
Author
Reply to  Marcin
July 18, 2023 12:56 pm

In theory yes, but in practice, they’re just about the same. Maybe 1/2-stop better for the Nikon lens.

1
Reply
Abhinav
Abhinav
July 7, 2023 7:35 pm

The VR is big bonus for Nikon as I have been consistently able to get in focus shots of birds on trees at 1/300second @300mm in sports mode. Switch off the VR and the shutter speed reaches 1/800 to 1/1000 for same category of photos. I am a DX user.

6
Reply
William
William
July 7, 2023 2:16 pm

How would you compare these lenses to the Tamron 100-400mm f/4.5-6.3 Di VC USD? And to make it less of an apples to oranges comparison due to their differences in focal lengths, size/weight, etc., as a hypothetical, if all were the same price or it was your birthday and for a gift you could have your pick of the three, which would you choose for primarily landscape (no sports or bif) and why?

0
Reply
Spencer Cox
Spencer Cox
Author
Reply to  William
July 7, 2023 2:28 pm

Both of these lenses are optically better (and much more portable) than the Tamron 100-400mm f/4.5-6.3 VC. I still enjoyed using that lens when I tested it, but if you can live without 400mm, I would skip that one.

Personally, I value light weight with my digital kit, and I’m not a fan of using the FTZ adapter if I can avoid it. I’d pick the Tamron 70-300mm f/4.5-6.3 as my answer to your question, for me personally. It’s close enough to the Nikon optically that I wouldn’t feel I’m missing anything for my work.

However, someone who shoots with a dual DSLR/mirrorless kit (or with a Z camera that lacks IBIS) would definitely be better off with the Nikon 70-300mm.

7
Reply

Learn

  • Beginner Photography
  • Landscape Photography
  • Wildlife Photography
  • Portraiture
  • Post-Processing
  • Advanced Tutorials
Photography Life on Patreon

Reviews

  • Camera Reviews
  • Lens Reviews
  • Other Gear Reviews
  • Best Cameras and Lenses

Photography Tutorials

Photography Basics
Landscape Photography
Wildlife Photography
Macro Photography
Composition & Creativity
Black & White Photography
Night Sky Photography
Portrait Photography
Street Photography
Photography Videos

Unique Gift Ideas

Best Gifts for Photographers

Subscribe via Email

If you like our content, you can subscribe to our newsletter to receive weekly email updates using the link below:

Subscribe to our newsletter

Site Menu

  • About Us
  • Beginner Photography
  • Lens Database
  • Lens Index
  • Photo Spots
  • Search
  • Forum

Reviews

  • Reviews Archive
  • Camera Reviews
  • Lens Reviews
  • Other Gear Reviews

More

  • Contact Us
  • Subscribe
  • Workshops
  • Support Us
  • Submit Content

Copyright © 2025 · Photography Life

You are going to send email to

Move Comment