Nikon 1 V1 vs V2

In this article, I will show feature differences between the Nikon 1 V1 and the newly announced Nikon 1 V2 mirrorless cameras. Judging by the J2 and V2 updates this year, it seems like Nikon will be refreshing the 1 line fairly often, so I am planning to provide feature comparisons like this to show what has changed between cameras after each announcement. As you may already know, the whole Nikon 1 line has a CX mount with a 2.7x crop factor and the J1/J2 cameras are targeted for photo hobbyists, while the V1/V2 cameras are targeted for more serious shooters. Hence, there is a significant difference in size, feature and performance between the two lines. Please keep in mind that this Nikon 1 V1 vs V2 comparison is purely based on specifications. A detailed comparison with image samples and ISO comparisons will be provided in the upcoming Nikon 1 V2 Review.

Looks like Nikon listened to many of the customer complaints about handling, layout and design of the V1 camera, so they came up with a completely different design this time around. The grip on the V2 resembles the Sony NEX series cameras. As I pointed out in my Sony NEX-5n review, I loved the way Sony designed its grip, so it is nice to see that Nikon borrowed the idea and improved the ergonomics. Another new addition is the dedicated PASM camera mode dial, which Nikon completely omitted on the V1. The rear of the camera also went through significant layout changes – now we have four function buttons on the left side of the LCD, similar to what Nikon DSLRs have. Aside from these ergonomic changes, the V2 comes with some new features and improvements. The sensor on the V2 has more resolution – 14.2 vs 10.1 on the V1. A built-in flash is now included. And despite the new form factor and the built-in flash, the V2 is also slightly lighter. Let’s take a look at how the two cameras stack up against each other in terms of specifications.

Nikon 1 V1 vs V2 Specification Comparison

Camera FeatureNikon 1 V1Nikon 1 V2
Sensor Resolution10.1 Million14.2 Million
Sensor TypeCMOSCMOS
Sensor Size13.2mmx8.8mm13.2mmx8.8mm
Sensor Pixel Size3.40µ2.86µ
Dust Reduction / Sensor CleaningYesYes
Image Size3,872 x 2,5924,608 x 3,072
Image ProcessorEXPEED 3EXPEED 3A
Viewfinder Type0.47″ 1.44m dot EVF0.47″ 1.44m dot EVF
Viewfinder Coverage100%100%
Built-in FlashNoYes
Flash Sync Speed1/60 (Electronic), 1/250 (Mechanical)1/60 (Electronic), 1/250 (Mechanical)
Storage Media1x SD1x SD
Top Continuous Shooting Speed5 frames per second 10, 30 or 60 fps using Electronic (Hi) shutter5 frames per second 10, 15, 30 or 60 fps using Electronic (Hi) shutter
Max Shutter SpeedElectronic Shutter: 1/16,000 sec, Mechanical Shutter: 1/4,000 secElectronic Shutter: 1/16,000 sec, Mechanical Shutter: 1/4,000 sec
Exposure MeteringTTL metering using image sensorTTL metering using image sensor
Base ISOISO 100ISO 160
Native ISO SensitivityISO 100-3,200ISO 160-6,400
Boosted ISO SensitivityISO 6,400N/A
Autofocus SystemHybrid autofocus (phase detection/contrast-detect AF)Hybrid autofocus (phase detection/contrast-detect AF)
Video CapabilityYesYes
Video Maximum Record Time20 min in 1080/60i and 1080/30p, 30 min in 720/60p20 min in 1080/60i and 1080/30p, 30 min in 720/60p
Video Maximum Resolution1920×1080 @ 30p, 60i1920×1080 @ 30p, 60i
Audio RecordingBuilt-in stereo microphone; sensitivity adjustable
Optional external ME-1 microphone
Built-in stereo microphone; sensitivity adjustable
Optional external ME-1 microphone
LCD Size3.0″ diagonal TFT-LCD3.0″ diagonal TFT-LCD
LCD Resolution921,000 dots921,000 dots
Built-in GPSNoNo
Wi-Fi SupportN/AWU-1B
BatteryEN-EL15 Lithium-ion BatteryEN-EL21 Lithium-ion Battery
Battery Life350 shots (CIPA)310 shots (CIPA)
Battery ChargerMH-25 Battery ChargerMH-28 Battery Charger
Weather Sealed BodyNoNo
USB Version2.02.0
Weight (Body Only)10.4oz. (294g)9.8oz. (278g)
Dimensions113 x 76 x 43.5mm107.8 x 81.6 x 45.9mm
MSRP Price$899.95 (as introduced, now $489)$799.95 (as introduced)

As you can see from the above comparison table, aside from the basics that I already covered on the top of the article, there is not much difference between the two cameras. What I find to be very interesting here, is that the V2 has a pixel pitch of 2.86µ. If the image quality of the V2 is as good as on the V1, then imagine what kind of a DSLR Nikon could potentially create. Putting some math into work, if we had a DSLR with this kind of pixel pitch, we would have a 105 MP full-frame sensor! So when someone talks about a 50 MP+ resolution on a 35mm sensor, this is more than doable, today.

Exit mobile version