Panasonic has just released the DC-G9 II, a highly-anticipated update to the beloved Panasonic G9 that Nicholas and I reviewed a few months ago. Five years since the original, the Panasonic G9 II brings some amazing updates to an already great camera. As a user of the original Panasonic G9, will I get one? Should micro four-thirds shooters be excited?
What’s New in the G9 II?
The Pansonic G9 II is not a small upgrade. In fact, it’s a completely different camera, both inside and out. The camera body is completely different than the original and is basically a Panasonic Lumix S5 II with a micro four-thirds sensor.
Speaking of the sensor, gone are the days of the ol’ classic 20MP micro four-thirds sensor. In the G9 II, you’ll find a 25 MP sensor similar to the one in the Panasonic GH6, with a refined dual-gain system to produce more dynamic range in a unique type of 16-bit Raw file. Also rather neat feature is the decrease in the base ISO from 200 to 100. I already am pretty happy with the sensor in my Panasonic G9, but these changes in the G9 II will make it even more appealing.
Continuing with some of the G9 II’s design changes, the combination mode dial on the left of the G9 has been replaced by two dials, with the standard PASM-style dial on the right and a separate mode selector on the left. What is most strange about this new design is that there is no more top LCD display, a feature that I’ve gotten so used to on my other cameras. It’s the one feature I would miss upon upgrading.
The biggest changes by far, though, are inside the camera. And in this regard, Panasonic answered the biggest wish amongst Panasonic users: the inclusion of a new hybrid phase-detect autofocus system! Although the original G9’s contrast-detect autofocus is pretty good for most subjects, it sometimes struggles with continuous autofocus and tracking. The newer phase-detect system along with the upgrade to 779 autofocus points will certainly result in serious improvements for those shooting fast action.
The introduction of the phase-detect autofocus system (along with the updated Panasonic Leica 100-400 f/4-6.3 II lens) makes the G9 II a more attractive camera for wildlife than the original G9, which sometimes is a frustrating camera for shooting action – and trust me, I love my G9. However, the G9 II still doesn’t look as good as the OM System OM-1 in that department. Unlike the G9 II, the OM-1 has a stacked sensor with more subject detection modes that should make it faster and more suited to erratic action like birds in flight.
Aside from the new autofocus system, the other main serious upgrade is video. The original Panasonic G9 is a pretty nice video camera with its latest firmware update, but the G9 II takes it to a whole new level. The video bitrates have been hugely upgraded to up to 600Mb/s at 4K versus the 150Mb/s for the original G9. On the the original G9, I noticed seriously degraded performance in some cases when shooting 4K, especially at the higher frame rates.
You’ve also got far more video resolution options to choose from, including up to 5760×4320 (a 6K anamorphic option with a 4×3 aspect ratio). ProRes 4:2:2 is now an option for 1080P, V-Log is included (this was a paid upgrade with the G9), and the recording time is now unlimited. Although I never found the 30-minute limit on the original a problem, the unlimited recording time will be useful for long-form interviews, lecture recordings, and event videographers who don’t want to worry about restarting the recording.
You can see the main differences between the two cameras at a glance with this chart:
| Camera Feature | Panasonic G9 | Panasonic G9 II |
|---|---|---|
| Announced | November 2017 | September 2023 |
| Camera Type | Mirrorless | Mirrorless |
| Sensor Type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Image Processor | Venus | Venus with L2 |
| Resolution | 20.3 MP | 25.2 MP |
| Pixel Dimensions | 5184×3888 | 5776×4336 |
| Sensor Dimensions | 17.3 x 13.0 mm (Micro Four Thirds) | 17.3 x 13.0 mm (Micro Four Thirds) |
| Sensor Pixel Size | 3.34µ | 3µ |
| Low Pass Filter | No | No |
| IBIS (In-Body Image Stabilization) | Yes | Yes |
| Base ISO | ISO 200 | ISO 100 |
| Max Native ISO | ISO 25,600 | ISO 25,600 |
| Extended ISOs | ISO 100-25,600 | ISO 50-25,600 |
| High-Resolution Sensor Shift | Yes | Yes |
| Focus Stack Bracketing | Yes | Yes |
| Pre-Shoot Burst Mode | Yes | Yes |
| Fastest Shutter Speed | 1/32000 | 1/32000 |
| Longest Shutter Speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
| Continuous Shooting (Mechanical Shutter) | 9 FPS | 10 FPS |
| Continuous Shooting (Electronic Shutter) | 60 FPS | 75 FPS |
| Notes for High FPS Shooting | Maximum framerate only with AFS | Maximum framerate only with AFS |
| Buffer Size (Raw) | 60 | 200 |
| Autofocus System | CDAF | Hybrid PDAF |
| Autofocus Points | 225 | 779 |
| Maximum Low-Light AF Sensitivity (Standardized to f/2, ISO 100) | -4 EV | -4 EV |
| Standard Flash Sync Speed | 1/250 | 1/250 |
| Curtain to Protect Sensor at Shutdown | No | No |
Video Features | ||
| Maximum Video Bit Depth (Internal) | 10 bits | 10 bits |
| Maximum Video Bit Depth (External) | 10 bits | 10 bits |
| Raw Video | No | No |
| 4K Maximum Framerate | 30 FPS | 120 FPS |
| 1080P Maximum Framerate | 180 FPS | 300 FPS |
| Additional Video Crop Factor | No | No |
| Chroma Subsampling | 4:2:2 | 4:2:2 |
| Video Recording Limit | 30 min | No limit |
Physical and Other Features | ||
| Card Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Slot 1 Type | SD (UHS-II) | SD (UHS-II) |
| Slot 2 Type | SD (UHS-II) | SD (UHS-II) |
| Rear LCD Size (Diagonal) | 3.0 in | 3.0 in |
| Rear LCD Resolution | 1.04 million dots | 1.84 million dots |
| Articulating LCD | Fully Articulating | Fully Articulating |
| Touchscreen | Yes | Yes |
| Viewfinder | EVF | EVF |
| Viewfinder Magnification | 0.83x (0.40x FF equiv.) | 0.80x (0.38x FF equiv.) |
| Viewfinder Resolution | 3.86 million dots | 3.86 million dots |
| Viewfinder Coverage | 100% | 100% |
| Voice Memo | No | No |
| Headphone Jack | Yes | Yes |
| Microphone Jack | Yes | Yes |
| Built-in Flash | No | No |
| GPS | No | No |
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| WiFi | Yes | Yes |
| USB Type | Micro USB | Type C 3.2 Gen 1 |
| Battery Type | DMW-BLF19 | DMW-BLK22 |
| Battery Life (Viewfinder) | 400 frames | 390 frames |
| Weather Sealed | Yes | Yes |
| Weight (Body Only w/ Battery + Card) | 579 g (1.28 lbs.) | 575 g (1.27 lbs.) |
| Dimensions (LxHxD) | 136.9 x 97.3 x 91.6 mm (5.4 x 3.8 x 3.6″) | 134.3 x 102.3 x 90.1 mm (5.3 x 4 x 3.5″) |
Price Comparison | ||
| MSRP, Body Only | $13001 (Check Current Price) | $1900 (Check Current Price) |
| 1However, note that the G9 is basically permanently on sale at $900. | ||
Conclusion and Thoughts
The Panasonic G9 II is an amazing upgrade to the original G9, to the point that it’s hardly the same class of camera. Hence the large difference in price.
So, who should get the G9 II? Let’s think about it. With all these new features, the G9 II is definitely not a budget camera, but rather, targets the OM System OM-1 in both features and price. (The OM-1 retails for $2200, but is on sale at the moment for $2000, so the two cameras are quite comparable.)
On one hand, for photographing fast action, the OM System OM-1 with its stacked sensor is probably still the best micro four-thirds camera. However, for videography, the G9 II surpasses the OM-1 thanks to the newer tools and better maximum video quality. In short, the G9 II occupies a similar niche as its predecessor as the strongest hybrid micro four-thirds camera.
Compared to the previous generation G9, the G9 II is clearly more advanced – so much more advanced that the roughly $1000 difference in their current prices isn’t a surprise. For the money, you’ll get dramatically better autofocus, higher-end video features, and other miscellaneous features like the lower base ISO, bigger buffer, and higher-resolution sensor. Meanwhile, the G9 still makes sense if you’re looking for a hybrid stills/video camera on a budget and don’t mind the more basic autofocus system.
Will I get this camera? It’s indeed tempting, and because I shoot a lot of video, the G9 II will indeed be my first choice if I decide to upgrade my micro four-thirds gear. On the other hand, since my existing G9 is still going strong and I am a bit more invested in the Nikon system, I will probably focus my efforts there for now. I also asked my fellow writer and G9 user, Nicholas Hess about the G9 II, and he said,
The OM1 sets a high bar for the Panasonic G9 II. The implementation of phase detect autofocus, boosted sensor resolution, impressive high resolution modes, video and price are convincing. How these technologies compare to the more seasoned OM system counterpart will need to be trialed with rigorous testing.
The 25mp sensor is a step up and quite attractive. However, how this effects ISO performance is an important detail. Many of us micro four thirds shooters are ok with lower yet useable image resolutions, but it’s really low light performance that is a struggle. Based on specs alone, the G9 II gives its competition, even the OM1 a run for its money. For me, it will really depend on how excellent the new PDAF system works, and how the camera performs at high ISO.
What do you think? Is the G9 II your dream camera? Let me know in the comments! And if you are thinking of buying this camera, consider using this B&H link to support Photography Life!
Unfortunately, I think Panasonic made the wrong choice in using the S5 body for the G9II. I have both the G9 and the S5. I like every aspect of the G9 body, controls, ergonomics and handling better. The phase-detect autofocus is the only thing missing for me in the G9. I got the S5 for it’s larger sensor and sensitivity for night photography. I was sorely disappointed when the S5 came out that Panasonic didn’t just put a full frame sensor in the G9 body. Now, I’m not sure that either the S5II or the G9II is worth upgrading to.
I’ve been a loyal Panasonic user through many generations of models for over 20 years, beginning in 2002 with the amazing Lumix DMC-FZ1 with tiny 2 megapixel, 1/3.2″ CCD sensor and marvelous fixed 35-420 internal-focusing zoom lens. That camera’s ergonomics were also terrible, but I loved that glass!
Well, I do love the G9 body so I think you have something going here. But the main thing I would miss for sure would be the top LCD.
Electronic shuttermode: the G9 has 20 FPS with AFC 60 FPS with AFS. The G9 60 FPS with AFC and 75 FPS with AFS
Yes, that is true! Thanks, I corrected it.
Why keep the DSLR-like bump though? It means you need a bigger camera bag apart from its inherent pointlessness. I know, that’s an issue with most mirrorless bodies.
Do you mean the one on the top? It’s possible that it makes more room for the screen. And there’s another reason…if the EVF is tucked away in a more square body then it’s a little uncomfortable to hold. I just tried by picking up a camera. If I have to move the camera too high up to look through the EVF, it’s not as nice as having it a bit higher.