Camera companies have really been fans of development announcements recently! Today, alongside the formal announcement of two Nikon Z macro lenses, Nikon also revealed a few more details about the upcoming 28mm and 40mm pancake primes that have been on the roadmap for a while.
Specifically, Nikon has announced that the 28mm lens will have an f/2.8 maximum aperture, and the 40mm will be an f/2 lens. Nikon also said that they are “scheduled for release within 2021,” for what it’s worth.
Beyond that, all we know is that both lenses should have a 52mm front filter thread, as you can see if you look closely at the images below. It also looks like the 28mm f/2.8 lens will be just a hair smaller and lighter than the 40mm f/2. Here they are:
Although it’s disappointing that this is merely a development announcement and it will probably be several months before the lenses are actually available, I am at least encouraged to see one thing: The 40mm prime is f/2 rather than f/2.8. This means it’s only 1/3 of a stop darker than the Z 50mm f/1.8, yet it looks to be about half the size. While this may come with an image quality penalty, I and many other photographers were expecting an f/2.8 lens (the usual maximum aperture of a pancake, if not f/4), so this is a welcome surprise.
In terms of the lens size, it’s a bit difficult to tell from the product images above, but Nikon has previously released this graphic with the relative sizes of their unannounced lenses. Though the 28mm and 40mm pancakes are shaded-in, it’s still clear that these are very small lenses compared to their peers. Only the 16-50mm f/3.5-6.3 DX and 24-50mm f/4-6.3 are about the same size:
There is no indication yet of how expensive the two pancake primes will be. However, given their narrower maximum apertures and the fact that they are not S-series lenses, they’ll most likely cost on the low end of things for Nikon Z glass. Considering that the Nikon Z 50mm f/1.8 S has a $600 MSRP but often goes on sale for $500, I expect these new lenses to be in the $300-400 range instead, and maybe even less. Nikon is clearly positioning them below the 50mm f/1.8.
Here’s Nikon’s full press release for the two lenses:
Nikon is developing the NIKKOR Z 28mm f/2.8 and NIKKOR Z 40mm f/2, two compact and lightweight prime lenses for the Nikon Z mount system
June 2, 2021
TOKYO – Nikon Corporation (Nikon) is pleased to announce development of the NIKKOR Z 28mm f/2.8 and NIKKOR Z 40mm f/2, two compact and lightweight prime lenses for full-frame (Nikon FX-format) mirrorless cameras for which the Nikon Z mount has been adopted. Both of these lenses are scheduled for release during 2021.
The NIKKOR Z 28mm f/2.8 is being developed as a wide-angle prime lens perfect for everyday snapshots, and the NIKKOR Z 40mm f/2 as a standard prime lens that will allow users to easily enjoy bokeh as part of their imaging expression. These two compact and lightweight prime lenses are designed for ease of use by a broad range of users, including those new to mirrorless cameras, and will be ideal for a wide variety of everyday scenes and situations.
Nikon will continue to pursue a new dimension in optical performance while meeting users’ needs, contributing to the development of imaging culture, with the hope of expanding possibilities for imaging expression.
*The appearance of the lenses may differ from the photos shown above.
I will take one with strawberry jam and the other with blueberry jam.
The Nikon Z 40mm F2 sounds ideal – if it would not cost more than max. 250 EUR.
So it basically means, 199-249 EUR max, especially with no WR, also Plastic Mount, as cost saver hereby.
For instance, Tamron 35/F2.8 is 199 EUR, and the Samyang FE 35/2.8 AF (which i own since Fall 2017) is also 199 EUR only.
So F2 is a bit faster, i do think, 249 EUR would being somehow realistic, even Nikon would announce this Lens for 299 EUR, perhaps at the Winter Season 2021. ;)
Taken the Size of the also shaded Nikon Z 24-105 S Line, it could being easily a variable F2.8-4 Zoom lens – might be the case, perhaps.
Because it’s that huge, the same Size like the Nikon Z 24-70/2.8 S Mount HighEnd Zoom.
Curious about the 24-105 lens as well. Of note, all S lenses appear to be fixed apertures, not variable (2.8-4)
I like stuff
These will make for great travel lenses . I already have the 35 & 50 1.8 , but will get the 40 F2 for my Z6II during my travels .
I’m tempted to get one of these, too. Although I’m thinking the 28mm plus 50mm macro combo looks good for those long hikes and traveling. I’m a bit divided right now.
Hi, was thinking the same but, for me, if this 40mm is good enough, it will be it for :
– landscapes with panoramic works (instead of the 28mm)
– + a Canon 250D Close-up lens for flowers (instead of dedicated macro lens)
Let’s hope it will be good enough ;)
Anyway, all quite exciting lenses to come.
Opps, I tried to vote positive but hit negative accidentally.
The Voightlander 40mm is my favorite normal lens. Wondering if Nikon took a cue from Voigtlander’s successful manual focus 28 f2.8 and 40 f2 pancakes? Neither are light weight but pair well with the d750.
It’s certainly possible. If so, I couldn’t complain, those are both great lenses!
Plastic mounts=expensive toys.
These mounts are designed to fail after a certain number of uses so I’ll pass.
Designed to fail? Hardly, and is it even confirmed yet that they have plastic mounts? If the price is right there would be great compact lenses and the 40 should be a great portrait lens on the z50.
If the mount material helps to make it cheaper and lighter I’m not too concerned.
Yes, plastic fails way faster then metal. Especially when it is literary THE POINT that holds entire lens mated to camera where even a millimetre of misalignment can lead to some really strange faults. And I know that they used plastics that are a bit harder to wear out but they DO WEAR out much faster then any metal and that is just the way things work on this planet so far.
Mounts are designed for a specific load – so a plastic mount is fine for a lightweight lens like 24-50 or the upcoming pancakes. However, even metal mounts sometime hold in plastics within the lens – this is to make the mount breaking off before the lens or the body are bend too much. Replacing a lens mount is cheaper than realigning a camera mount or recentering a lens barrel.
Lovely muffin lenses.
Sure, why not? :)