Photography Life

PL provides various digital photography news, reviews, articles, tips, tutorials and guides to photographers of all levels

  • Lens Reviews
  • Camera Reviews
  • Tutorials
  • Compare Cameras
  • Forum
    • Sign Up
    • Login
  • About
  • Search
Home → Miscellaneous

Bringing New Life to an Old Camera

By Libor Vaicenbacher 15 Comments
Last Updated On October 11, 2022

Maybe this has happened to you, too: You head out with your camera, ready to take some great photos, only to find that you left your memory card at home or forgot to charge your battery. (If this hasn’t happened to you, maybe you’re less distracted than I am.) In such a situation, you might be glad to have an old backup camera along with you, to bring back at least a few photos from the field.

One spring morning, I set out to photograph the Blue and Crested Tits around our cottage in the mountains. Everything was perfect: the birds were landing where I wanted, and the morning light was beautiful. However, I learned that my camera batteries were at zero. I had no choice but to reach for my son’s Nikon D90, mount it on my Nikon 200-500mm f/5.6, and take it for a test run. 

Although the light was nice, there wasn’t much of it. With my Nikon D500, I would have set ISO 3200, but I didn’t find the courage to set that on the D90. With this nearly 15-year-old camera, ISO 3200 and anything higher is certainly suitable for photographing the Loch Ness monster or a UFO, but not ideal for serious photography. 

Because I wanted to take home some usable photos, I chose a fairly conservative ISO 1600 instead. By today’s standards, this ISO sensitivity can be used even for landscape photography without much issue, but fifteen years ago with an APS-C camera, it was about the limit of usability. 

Camera sensors have made great progress in the past fifteen years, but editing software has also taken a giant leap. Almost every software from Lightroom/Photoshop to its many competitors have drastically improved their noise reduction over time. So I also wondered if, using my current software, I could make the photos at ISO 1600 pretty usable.

In order to create a reference point, I converted (in camera) the original RAW file to a JPEG. I leave the image below uncropped so that you can judge the image quality of this 12.3MP sensor from 2008, downsampled to web resolution. 

Eurasian Nuthatch_in-camera
In-camera RAW to JPG conversion. NIKON D90 @ 500mm, ISO 1600, 1/800, f/5.6

As you can see, the resulting photo certainly cannot be described as noise-free. However, if we don’t view it at 100% magnification, it is pretty usable. The sharpness and colors are not dazzling, but it should be considered that this is an unedited photo. Certainly with better post-processing, the image would be acceptable for online display, something like this:

Eurasian Nuthatch_edited
NIKON D90 + 200-500mm f/5.6 @ 500mm, ISO 1600, 1/800, f/5.6

However, the measure of a photographer’s work should not be an Instagram post, but a printed photograph. I wanted to see if I could get usable prints out of these images using my current photographic process and newer software.

First, I pre-edited the RAW file with DxO Pure Raw, to remove lens aberrations, reduce noise, and sharpen the image. (I’ve talked about the process before here.) I then did careful tweaking of color rendition and contrast in Capture One – although I’ll wait until a future article to dive into full detail.

Let’s take a look at the resulting photos instead. On the left (“before”) is the out-of-camera JPEG, and on the right is the version with modern tools:

Crested Tit_in-cameraCrested Tit_edited

Blue Tit_in-cameraBlue Tit_edited

I think those speak for themselves. Aside from the obvious resolution limit of 12.3 megapixels, I dare say that the photographs are perfectly suited to today’s requirements for exhibition prints.

In fact, that the photo of the Nuthatch – taken by my then five-year-old son – won the first place in the children’s category of the Czech Nature Photo competition! I think that proves it. (I also think I’m allowed a bit of bragging on his behalf :)

Even if it were necessary to print a low-resolution photograph at a larger sin, there are powerful tools today that can reliably extrapolate photographs by 2x, 4x, or even more. But that’s another story.

Blue tit_raw jpgBlue tit_edited

So, what is the point of my photographic contemplation today? No, I’m not exactly telling you to dig out long-forgotten old cameras from the depths of your cabinets. (Although, as I mentioned before, even that can come in handy sometimes as a backup.) A more practical takeaway from this article is that you should revisit some of your photos from the past and try to breathe new life into them with modern editing software.

If I’ve inspired you to do a little archaeological exploration into the depths of your archives, I’d be delighted. Maybe this will not only bring new life to your old files, but also dust off some forgotten memories. I’d love it if you’d write something about it in the comments below.

Looking for even more exclusive content?

On Photography Life, you already get world-class articles with no advertising every day for free. As a Member, you'll get even more:

Silver ($5/mo)
  • Exclusive articles
  • Monthly Q&A chat
  • Early lens test results
  • "Creative Landscape Photography" eBook
Gold ($12/mo)
  • All that, PLUS:
  • Online workshops
  • Monthly photo critiques
  • Vote on our next lens reviews
 
Click Here to Join Today
 

Related Articles

  • Nikon NEF Bit Depth Menu
    Recommended Camera Menu Settings for Landscape Photography
  • Photo Composed without Rule of Thirds
    How to Improve Your Camera Battery Life
  • Photography-Life-Logo-Thumbnail
    Photography Life Is Hiring!
  • Bag Review-7
    Best Outdoor Camera Bag
  • Orion Image Stack Crop
    High-Quality Astrophotography With Basic Camera Equipment
  • Fujifilm X-T20
    Mirrorless Camera Comparison
Disclosures, Terms and Conditions and Support Options
Filed Under: Miscellaneous Tagged With: Image Sharpness, Noise, Noise Reduction, Post-Processing, Wildlife Photography

About Libor Vaicenbacher

Libor works as a biology teacher, guide, photographer and photography course lecturer. His passion is birds. As an ornithologist, Libor has studied the avian diversity of the South American Andes. He fell in love with this part of the world and since then he likes to return there with his camera to popularize its nature with his photographs, talks and articles. You can see more of Libor's work on his Instagram page.

guest

guest

15 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Toby
Toby
October 22, 2022 4:36 pm

GIMP is professional software and because it is Open Source anyone can download and use it. It would be nice if this article was written with GIMP being used because the software provides opportunities for people to harness their skills because does not have a paywall.

0
Reply
Russ
Russ
October 16, 2022 5:07 pm

I have great regrets for selling my old Canon 600D a few years ago, but I suspect the need to keep more batteries charged and to carry another camera kit would stop me from taking it out with me, but I have known the despair of turning on my camera several times and finding that it was left on and is now completely flat. I now always carry a few extra batteries for this exact reason.

My phone takes some nice photos but using it while my expensive camera with a flat battery stays in the car is an awful feeling. It was a beautiful sunrise that morning as well. It was a painful lesson that I’ll never forget.

0
Reply
Libor Vaicenbacher
Libor Vaicenbacher
Author
Reply to  Russ
October 17, 2022 2:51 am

I am considering getting a second battery for my Z9 for this reason as well. Although I have already verified that I can shoot all day with it, it would add to my peace of mind and that counts too. Plus, I could keep my GPS on all day and shoot more videos.

0
Reply
Elaine Lansdown
Elaine Lansdown
October 11, 2022 7:50 am

Libor, did you consider not hiking your ISO up that high? Perhaps if you had tested the camera first to see what it could do, you might have been very surprised that you may not have needed such a high ISO. Maybe you did do that, and just didn’t say so. You might have gotten better more vibrant results with plain old auto ISO. I have an old D70, and to this day it takes incredible photos in most any light with all auto settings. And it has only 6 megapixels! I know that I am Miss Manual Shooter, but those old cameras were meant to be shot in auto, and even I would yield to that logic.

-5
Reply
Libor Vaicenbacher
Libor Vaicenbacher
Author
Reply to  Elaine Lansdown
October 12, 2022 2:47 am

I’ll start at the end, Elaine. I disagree that DSLR cameras, however old, were primarily designed to shoot on automatic. But of course you have to know their limitations and know how to use them. If I use an automatic, I leave the decision up to a device that has no idea what I’m shooting and what my intent is. You’re right that I could have used a lower ISO, but with birds as small and restless as tits, I would have run the risk of motion blur. When I shoot other species of songbirds, like South American Antpittas, I know I can go as low as 1/30s, but that’s not possible here.

4
Reply
Pete A
Pete A
Reply to  Libor Vaicenbacher
October 13, 2022 1:24 am

“I disagree that DSLR cameras, however old, were primarily designed to shoot on automatic.”

Nikon D70

Exposure metering: 1,005 segment color meter, 3D Color Matrix or center-weighted metering; spot metering.

Metering modes: 3D Color Matrix; Centre-weighted; Spot.

Configurable Auto-ISO.

Exposure modes: Digital Vari-Program (Auto, Portrait, Landscape, Close up, Sports, Night landscape, Night portrait); Programmed Auto [P] with flexible program; Shutter Priority Auto [S]; Aperture Priority Auto [A]; Manual [M].

Yep, obviously, it’s primarily designed to shoot in manual mode.

0
Reply
Mihai Zsigmond
Mihai Zsigmond
Reply to  Pete A
October 13, 2022 2:27 am

May I jump in this discussion about manual versus automatic, please?
When I first started photography 50 years ago, my camera (Pentacon Praktica with a 35mm Zeiss lens) had only mode: manual. Even the light meter was external and I was limited by the 36 shots available on a roll of film. and it took a few good minutes to prepare until I was able to take a shot.
Nowadays, I much appreciate some automation to take out from the burden of setting the camera and let me concentrate on the picture itself.
The point of using manual setting is correct if you just don’t take it as an inflexible rule.
A lot of work was done to develop these automatic or semi-automatic modes and if you their limitations, you can use them to your advantage. Especially with birds …

0
Reply
Libor Vaicenbacher
Libor Vaicenbacher
Author
Reply to  Mihai Zsigmond
October 13, 2022 4:09 am

You’re right, Mihai. A certain and appropriately applied degree of automation is a great help. I’m a bit sensitive to someone claiming to be a professional and therefore shooting exclusively on manual mode. Personally, I have my shutter speed and aperture set almost 100% manually. However, I leave the ISO, the most boring and least creative item in the exposure triangle, on automatic. However, in some conditions I work with full manual. For example, when there is a big difference in the brightness of the background and the subject, or when the lighting conditions are fairly constant. In a forest full of contrasts, on the other hand, I shoot with Auto ISO almost exclusively. A bird jumps from light to shadow and everything is different. I don’t have the mental capacity to deal with that.

0
Reply
Libor Vaicenbacher
Libor Vaicenbacher
Author
Reply to  Pete A
October 13, 2022 4:20 am

My favourite mode of all is Programmed Auto, marked P. When people in my courses show me that they shoot in this mode, I try to explain to them that the abbreviation P actually stands for Panic. And photography is, after all, the joy of creativity! There shouldn’t be a trace of panic in that, should there? Although, if I were to miss a single chance when photographing a really rare animal, I might be seized with panic bordering on hysteria :-)

0
Reply
Elaine Lansdown
Elaine Lansdown
Reply to  Libor Vaicenbacher
October 13, 2022 5:04 am

I never meant to set off a manual vs auto discussion with my post. I was simply responding to your need to add vibrancy to your photos in post. I take great joy in shooting manual, and I shoot manual exclusively. In this case, based on my results with my ancient D70, I thought that maybe the higher ISO could have been avoided. Libor then explained why he needed it, and I am fine with his answer. Regarding The Great Debate, speaking personally I see no point in owning a very expensive super camera and then turning it into a point and shoot. I truly find joy in shooting manually. And I love the increased creativity it gives.

2
Reply
Elaine Lansdown
Elaine Lansdown
Reply to  Pete A
October 13, 2022 6:32 am

Spot on, Pete! The manual settings on the D70 are all internal in the program settings, and placed across three menus so it is not easy to access them. There are no external manual buttons at all, except for the M on the PASM dial. To me this clearly means that this camera was intended to be mainly used in auto mode. Having never even seen a D90, I assume that the arrangement is similar to the D70, as it is only one generation later. I used the D70 for years. It was a great camera.

0
Reply
Rogério Peccioli
Rogério Peccioli
October 11, 2022 6:26 am

Not long ago I needed to use my Nikon D200 battle tank. It was stored and unused for a long time, but it saved a job.

0
Reply
Libor Vaicenbacher
Libor Vaicenbacher
Author
Reply to  Rogério Peccioli
October 12, 2022 2:51 am

A battle tank accurately describes the D200. I still have it myself and have taken many great photos with it.

0
Reply
Abhinav
Abhinav
October 11, 2022 5:16 am

Always want to do exactly that…..but alas, cannot manufacture time!!

0
Reply
Libor Vaicenbacher
Libor Vaicenbacher
Author
Reply to  Abhinav
October 12, 2022 2:54 am

Yes, time, that’s the biggest problem. Once I can’t hold a telephoto lens in my hand, maybe I’ll get to it :-)

0
Reply

Learn

  • Beginner Photography
  • Landscape Photography
  • Wildlife Photography
  • Portraiture
  • Post-Processing
  • Advanced Tutorials
Photography Life on Patreon

Reviews

  • Camera Reviews
  • Lens Reviews
  • Other Gear Reviews
  • Best Cameras and Lenses

Photography Tutorials

Photography Basics
Landscape Photography
Wildlife Photography
Macro Photography
Composition & Creativity
Black & White Photography
Night Sky Photography
Portrait Photography
Street Photography
Photography Videos

Unique Gift Ideas

Best Gifts for Photographers

Subscribe via Email

If you like our content, you can subscribe to our newsletter to receive weekly email updates using the link below:

Subscribe to our newsletter

Site Menu

  • About Us
  • Beginner Photography
  • Lens Database
  • Lens Index
  • Photo Spots
  • Search
  • Forum

Reviews

  • Reviews Archive
  • Camera Reviews
  • Lens Reviews
  • Other Gear Reviews

More

  • Contact Us
  • Subscribe
  • Workshops
  • Support Us
  • Submit Content

Copyright © 2025 · Photography Life

You are going to send email to

Move Comment