Photography Life

PL provides various digital photography news, reviews, articles, tips, tutorials and guides to photographers of all levels

  • Lens Reviews
  • Camera Reviews
  • Tutorials
  • Compare Cameras
  • Forum
    • Sign Up
    • Login
  • About
  • Search
Home → Miscellaneous

Is Medium Format Now Viable for Wildlife Photography?

By Libor Vaicenbacher 16 Comments
Published On May 23, 2024

It’s not often that a product can be described as a game-changer, no matter how much the term is overused in marketing. However, the introduction of the Fuji GF 500mm f/5.6 lens may qualify. With this lens, for the first time ever, medium format can be a platform for serious wildlife photography.

Although I’m excited about the possibilities that the GF 500mm f/5.6 might offer, it is not my intention today to gush over the new lens. Rather, I want to reflect on the pros and cons of medium format for wildlife photography as it stands today.

Fuji GFX 500mm_sample images_Michal Krause (11)
The Fuji GFX 100 II with the GF 500mm f/5.6 lens
Fuji GFX 500mm_sample images_Michal Krause (13)
GFX100 II + GF500mmF5.6 R LM OIS WR @ 500mm, ISO 2000, 1/250, f/8.0 © Michal Krause

Table of Contents

  • The State of Medium Format for Wildlife Photography
  • Image Quality and Crop Factor
  • Autofocus
  • Continuous Shooting
  • Image Stabilization
  • Handling
  • Wildlife Lenses
  • Conclusion

The State of Medium Format for Wildlife Photography

Most medium format cameras today are not geared toward wildlife photography in the slightest. They are generally much slower-paced cameras than anything on the full-frame or APS-C market. Even the cheapest crop-sensor cameras today at least have continuous autofocus! Yet some medium format cameras, like the $8200 Hasselblad 907X & 100C, do not.

Other wildlife-oriented features like high frame rates, subject recognition, and in-body image stabilization are also absent. Worst of all, very few medium format lenses are geared toward photographing distant subjects. This is a painful combination that makes it almost impossible to use medium format for wildlife photography, unless your subject is nearby and standing quite still.

Bison Photo Hasselblad 90V f2.5 Lens
Hasselblad CFV 100C/907X + XCD 90V @ 90mm, ISO 800, 1/400, f/2.5 © Spencer Cox

Then there’s the question of price. Even the rare telephoto lenses that do exist for medium format are prohibitively expensive for most mortals. For example, buy a lens like the Schneider 240mm LS Blue Ring f/4.5 AF, and your wallet will be $7300 lighter (plus an extra $2000 for the 2x teleconverter). Until now, the only reasonably-priced “wildlife lens” for medium format was the Pentax 400mm f/5.6 AF, but Pentax’s aging medium format DSLRs are quite unsuited to wildlife work.

Enter Fujifilm, stage right. Their recently announced GFX 100S II sells for $5000, which is less than a full-frame flagship like the Nikon Z9 or Sony a1. Yet it includes subject recognition, continuous autofocus, and 7 FPS shooting. Pair it with the $3500 GF 500mm f/5.6 that was just released, and it’s a truly viable option for wildlife photography.

Fuji GFX 500mm_sample images_Michal Krause (4)
GFX100 II + GF500mmF5.6 R LM OIS WR @ 500mm, ISO 2000, 1/1000, f/5.6 © Michal Krause

Image Quality and Crop Factor

Medium format cameras have some significant image quality advantages over full-frame and smaller sensors. At base ISO, they usually have better dynamic range, color depth, and resolution than full-frame sensors from the same generation. In recent years, even high ISO performance has favored medium format over full-frame.

However, one fact working against medium format sensors for wildlife photography is their crop factor. Due to the larger sensor, the crop factor of most medium digital format cameras is 0.79x, as you can see from the image below.

Sensor Size Comparison
Sensor size comparison

With a 0.79x crop-factor camera like the GFX 100S II, Fuji’s new 500mm f/5.6 is equivalent to a 400mm f/4.5 lens on full-frame. It is also compatible with Fuji’s 1.4x teleconverter, offering a 700mm f/8 lens (560mm f/6.3 full-frame equivalent).This isn’t bad by any stretch, but there is currently no way to achieve longer focal lengths if you need it.

The good news is that you can compensate for some of this by cropping the image, which isn’t hard on a 100-megapixel sensor. For example, cropping the GFX 100S II down to a full-frame area still offers 61 megapixels left over. This means that you can actually put more pixels on a distant subject with a 100-megapixel medium format sensor compared to a 45-megapixel full-frame sensor, given two lenses of the same focal length.

Fuji GFX 500mm_sample images_Michal Krause (7)
GFX100 II + GF500mmF5.6 R LM OIS WR @ 500mm, ISO 640, 1/1000, f/8.0 © Michal Krause

Everything seems to be in favor of the large sensor, right? Are there any clouds in the medium format sky? Well, the first cloud of doubt appears when you look at the file size. Uncompressed RAW files from the GFX 100S II are around 200MB, and compressed ones around 150MB. This places huge demands on the size and speed of memory cards, storage, and computer power.

Next, you need to honestly answer the question: “What does a huge 102MP medium format resolution get me?” Such a resolution and level of detail is obviously overkill for any digital-based display. Unless you’re making large exhibition prints or cropping to extreme levels, 102 megapixels is far more than most people will need.

And apart from the sensor itself, there are various other questions that arise when you consider medium format for wildlife photography. Below, I’ll go through the considerations of autofocus, continuous shooting, image stabilization, handling, and lens selection as they relate to Fuji’s current situation.

Fuji GFX 500mm_sample images_Michal Krause (5)
GFX100 II + GF500mmF5.6 R LM OIS WR @ 500mm, ISO 800, 1/250, f/8.0 © Michal Krause

Autofocus

Most medium format cameras cannot compete where autofocus is concerned. Fuji is the exception, with the GFX 100 II and GFX 100S II having automatic subject detection of people, birds, mammals, insects, aircraft, and various other subjects. These cameras also use a hybrid phase-detect/contrast-detect system that is based on the autofocus capabilities of their APS-C X-Series cameras. Those features are what allow us to take photos like the one below on medium format, arguably for the first time.

Fuji GFX 500mm_sample images_Michal Krause (12)
GFX100 II + GF500mmF5.6 R LM OIS WR @ 500mm, ISO 2500, 1/1000, f/8.0 © Michal Krause

My friend Michal Krause is the one who primarily tested the Fuji GF 500mm f/5.6, and you’ll see that most of the photos in this article are his. During my time with the lens (and GFX 100 II), my impression is that it focused very similarly to the Fuji X-H2. You can read my X-H2 impressions here, but I found that camera to be a quick focuser and good at tracking subjects.

In my experience with the medium format combination, when the bird was relatively close to the camera, the AF sometimes hesitated a little. On one occasion, it even seemed to freeze, and refused to respond to repeated presses of the AF-ON button. These are the kinds of things that the first firmware update will hopefully fix – I was testing a pre-production sample of the lens. We saw something similar with the 150-600mm X-Mount lens, which went on to be fixed.

Fuji GFX 500mm_sample images_Michal Krause (15)
GFX100 II + GF500mmF5.6 R LM OIS WR @ 500mm, ISO 1000, 1/2000, f/7.1 © Michal Krause

Michal sent me a lot of photos to choose for this article, and I won’t publish all 58 photos of the flying seagull that he gave me (one of them is shown below). But all the photos in that series were sharply in focus. So, with minor nitpicks, I believe it is fair to say that medium format is now capable of focusing on fast-moving action, even subjects like birds in flight.

Fuji GFX 500mm_sample images_Michal Krause (3)
GFX100 II + GF500mmF5.6 R LM OIS WR @ 500mm, ISO 800, 1/2000, f/8.0 © Michal Krause

Continuous Shooting

Even the fastest medium format cameras cannot compete with most full-frame cameras where continuous shooting is concerned – let alone similarly priced cameras like the Nikon Z9 or Canon EOS R3. The GFX 100S II can reach 7 FPS rather than something like 20+ FPS. That said, 7 FPS is hardly impossible to use for wildlife photography. Even a great camera like the Nikon D850 manages 7 fps (9 fps with the MB-D18). Most wildlife does not need 20 FPS to capture the right pose.

Interestingly, the maximum frame rate of the GFX 100 II with electronic shutter is only 5 fps. However, I don’t recommend using the electronic shutter anyway due to rolling shutter effects, which are more significant on such a large, high-resolution sensor. For this reason, full-frame will likely remain the leader in high-FPS capabilities for the foreseeable future.

At least the buffer is good – the aforementioned 58-image burst was taken on a UHS-II SD card and didn’t exhibit any slowdown. The Fuji GFX 100S II accepts dual UHS-II SD cards, while the more expensive GFX 100 II accepts one UHS-II SD and one CFExpress Type B.

Fuji GFX 500mm_sample images_Michal Krause (8)
GFX100 II + GF500mmF5.6 R LM OIS WR @ 500mm, ISO 1250, 1/1000, f/8.0 © Michal Krause

Image Stabilization

Ultra-high resolution sensors are unforgiving. To make the most of them, it is necessary to use either safe shutter speeds or effective image stabilization. Fuji claims that their in-body image stabilization system is capable of up to 8 stops of vibration reduction. My experience with the pre-production sample is that the limit of pixel-level sharpness with the 500mm f/5.6 lens is around 1/200 second handheld. That’s not particularly impressive, although for a 100-megapixel sensor, perhaps it isn’t surprising.

Fuji GFX 500mm_sample images_Michal Krause (2)
GFX100 II + GF500mmF5.6 R LM OIS WR @ 500mm, ISO 160, 1/250, f/9.0 © Michal Krause

Handling

When I first picked up the GFX 100 II with the new 500mm f/5.6, I was surprised at how light the whole kit is. The body itself, including the battery, is 1030 grams (2.27 pounds). That’s 310 g lighter than the Nikon Z9 – and the GFX 100S II is even lighter still, at 883 g (1.95 pounds). The lens isn’t too heavy either, weighing 1375 g (3.03 pounds). Nikon’s equivalent Z 400mm f/4.5 VR S weighs only a little less at 1160 g (2.56 pounds).

The result is that you can get a medium format system for wildlife photography that weighs less than the Nikon Z9 with the Nikon Z 400mm f/4.5 S. That’s not a bad result at all.

Fuji GFX 500mm_sample images_Michal Krause (6)
GFX100 II + GF500mmF5.6 R LM OIS WR @ 500mm, ISO 400, 1/250, f/8.0 © Michal Krause

Apart from the lightness, the other dominant impression was the feeling of holding something familiar in my hands. Fuji’s medium format cameras definitely borrow a lot of their DNA from the X-Series APS-C cameras that I’m familiar with. The controls are similar, including the clickable dials. Even the batteries are shared between the two systems. (Though this has the drawback of the medium format camera dying relatively fast; I would consider taking at least two, if not three, backup batteries for a full day of constant photography.)

Wildlife Lenses

No matter how capable a camera is, the real thing that matters for wildlife photography is the lens. Until now, this was lacking in Fuji’s medium format lineup – their longest option was the Fuji GF 250mm f/4, approximately a 200mm f/3.2 full-frame equivalent. The Fuji GF 500mm f/5.6 changes the situation.

Fujinon 500mm
Fuji GF 500mm f/5.6 R LM OIS WR

The Fuji GF 500mm f/5.6 is similar in many ways to the aforementioned Nikon Z 400mm f/4.5. Mounted on their own cameras, both offer virtually identical field of view and depth of field. Both lenses have the same 95mm filter thread diameter. Their physical dimensions differ only in millimeters, and the weight difference is pretty minimal.

Wildlife photographers often care about a lens’s minimum focusing distance, and the Fuji GF 500mm f/5.6 does well in that respect. The maximum magnification of 0.2x (1:5) allows for relatively small subjects to be captured in the frame. And the 100-megapixel sensor offers ample room for cropping after the fact, so it can even work for photographing larger insects.

Fuji GFX 500mm_sample images_Michal Krause (16)
GFX100 II + GF500mmF5.6 R LM OIS WR @ 500mm, ISO 1600, 1/250, f/10.0. Photo of dragonfly cropped to 38MP © Michal Krause

The GF 500mm f/5.6 lens has all the usual features you would expect from a lens of this type. In addition to the aperture ring, there’s a switch for the behavior of the four buttons on the front of the lens (AF-L, preset and AF-ON), an image stabilization switch, a focus limiter (full, 5m to infinity), and a SET button to save the focus plane in memory. Nothing strikes me as missing.

Other features worth highlighting are the Arca-Swiss compatible tripod foot, and the window in the lens hood that lets you adjust a polarizing filter without removing the hood. Most importantly, the lens is compatible with the GF 1.4X TC WR teleconverter. Combined with this, you get 700mm f/8 (540mm full-frame equivalent), which gives you a respectable reach.

Conclusion

At the beginning of this article, I asked whether medium format is suitable for wildlife photography. The answer is not quite straightforward. Mostly, it will depend on what you expect from your photos – and whether you are already immersed in a GFX system or just picking up a new system from scratch.

Which wildlife photographers benefit from medium format?

  • Photographers who want to achieve the higher image quality of medium format.
  • Photographers who already own a medium format camera, and the new telephoto lens will only extend its use to wildlife.
  • Those whose entire chain, from memory cards to powerful computers and large storage devices, can handle gigantic files.
  • Those for whom the price of equipment is not an issue.

Which wildlife photographers should stick with full-frame or smaller?

  • Those who find the resolution (generally 45 megapixels or less) enough for their display needs.
  • Those who demand a very high frame rate and the fastest autofocus on the market.
  • Traveling photographers, for whom weight and size are of the utmost importance.
  • Photographers who demand features unique to smaller sensors, such as auto-capture and pre-release burst.
  • Those who need more lens selection; there is no 400mm f/2.8, 800mm f/6.3, or many other such lenses for medium format.
  • Photographers on a tighter budget.
Fuji GFX 500mm_sample images_Michal Krause (14)
GFX100 II + GF500mmF5.6 R LM OIS WR @ 500mm, ISO 2500, 1/1000, f/8.0 © Michal Krause

At the end of the day, I still would not call medium format ideal for wildlife photography. But for the first time, I think we can safely call it viable. Fuji has done a good job preparing their cameras for the demanding situation of fast-moving wildlife, and now they have a lens that can truly match it. If we continue to see them introduce supertelephoto lenses and continually improve their cameras, medium format may one day match – or even overtake – full-frame as the system of choice for the most demanding wildlife work.

Looking for even more exclusive content?

On Photography Life, you already get world-class articles with no advertising every day for free. As a Member, you'll get even more:

Silver ($5/mo)
  • Exclusive articles
  • Monthly Q&A chat
  • Early lens test results
  • "Creative Landscape Photography" eBook
Gold ($12/mo)
  • All that, PLUS:
  • Online workshops
  • Monthly photo critiques
  • Vote on our next lens reviews
 
Click Here to Join Today
 

Related Articles

  • (null)
    A 500mm f/5.6 Lens on Fuji's Roadmap - Could Medium Format Be for Wildlife?
  • Spencer-Cox-2016-197-06-02-_SKY0803
    Wildlife Photography Without a Supertelephoto
  • Gentoo Penguin
    Wildlife Photography as a Career
  • GFX_Front_63mm _EVF
    Fuji GFX 50S Medium Format Camera Announcement
  • Francolin
    Wide Angle Wildlife Photography
  • Photo 3
    Reflections On Wildlife Photography
Disclosures, Terms and Conditions and Support Options
Filed Under: Miscellaneous Tagged With: Bird Photography, Birds in Flight, Fuji, Fuji GFX 100 II, Fuji GFX 100S II, Medium Format, Wildlife Photography

About Libor Vaicenbacher

Libor works as a biology teacher, guide, photographer and photography course lecturer. His passion is birds. As an ornithologist, Libor has studied the avian diversity of the South American Andes. He fell in love with this part of the world and since then he likes to return there with his camera to popularize its nature with his photographs, talks and articles. You can see more of Libor's work on his Instagram page.

guest

guest

16 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Vince
Vince
May 31, 2024 4:57 am

Well, im my opinion getting into the GFX system (also) for Wildlife only makes sense if you can fill the frame with the subject to make the most of the 100mpx. This is a challenge with the limited range zooms and this 400mm FF eq as well.

0
Reply
Jason Polak
Jason Polak
Admin
Reply to  Vince
June 1, 2024 5:43 am

That is absolutely true. The key is that you have to be more restrictive in wildlife. It’s not the kind of wildlife photography where you just go out and shoot opportunistically. It’s a more planned style, going to specific ecosystems where you can find this sort of situation. I can think of a few, maybe 10% of cases of all my willdife shooting where it would make sense. But if you can do it, it would be a very interesting style.

The other case is where you have GFX camera already and shoot other stuff like landscapes, and you want to get into wildlife without adding another system. Then it absolutely makes sense because you can still crop and get FF/APS-C level results due to the pixel density, and use the full range of the GFX sensor for your primary genre.

0
Reply
Lev
Lev
Reply to  Jason Polak
July 27, 2024 4:04 pm

Wouldn’t the GFX allow you to shoot a larger area knowing that you can crop without losing detail thus giving you more flexibility in composing the final shot with simple editing?

You can potentially have 2 or 3 possible images per picture taken.

I’m about to transition from a micro four thirds and trying to decide if a medium format makes sense, or stick with something like the Canon R5 and its wider array of zoom lenses.

The one thing that I liked about my old Olympus EM-1 was that I could shoot in RAW and set it to 16:9 ration which would show up on the viewfinder for easier composition while shooting but still have the full frame when editing in Photoshop. It was great to format the pictures to view them on a tv but not the best detailing for printing large images.

0
Reply
Dick de Ronden
Dick de Ronden
May 25, 2024 7:46 am

There seem to be ways to use Nikon Fullframe Lenses on the Fuji GFX systrem.
See the article here: fujilove.com/adapt…ifilm-gfx/

1
Reply
Robert John
Robert John
May 24, 2024 11:08 am

Lovely images. Are the delightful backgrounds down to the camera combo or the careful choices of the photographer?
But as your last bullet point indicates, one point of comparison (mine) is that my D500 and 300/f4 PF (efl 450mm) cost a modest £1,600 (both used, the former by necessity). And they fit into a very small bag.

0
Reply
Jason Polak
Jason Polak
Admin
Reply to  Robert John
May 24, 2024 11:12 am

The composition 100%. This sort of background can be done with pretty much any camera. The degree of background blur depends on the sensor size and aperture but basically the D500 you have can make these backgrounds easily with the right lens. The magnification of 500mm helps.

0
Reply
pieter Kers
pieter Kers
May 24, 2024 3:48 am

Like very much the photo with the ship and seagull; All the photos seem to breath technical quality even so small…
It is a real pity you cannot use GF-glass on a Nikon. Would buy the 20-35mm lens in a blink.
Basic problem i think with the GFX is the slow readout ( about 1/10th of a second) of the sensor. I am very glad Nikon made it so much faster on the z8/9.( 1/270s) That counts in wild life shooting especially as you often want to make silent photographs.

0
Reply
Kevin
Kevin
May 24, 2024 2:34 am

We currently have 4 main formats: MFT, APS-C, FF and a viable MF solution.

It would be interesting to have a “showdown” between these systems from a couple of wildlife photographers, comparing IQ, AF, usability, transportability and durability/weather resistance to shed some light on what might be the best for each of us but perhaps there are too many “variables”.

Some swear by the OM-1 with the 150-400mm f/4.5 TC 1.25 IS PRO Lens (scary price..), or is the better choice a Z8 with Nikon’s growing choice of long Z lenses, or something bigger as discussed here..

I suspect it comes down to price, lens choice & price, environmental durability and cropability, and that probably means, for many, a Z8 ;-)

0
Reply
Libor Vaicenbacher
Libor Vaicenbacher
Author
Reply to  Kevin
May 24, 2024 2:49 am

I had the same idea as you Kevin and wanted to photograph one subject in all four of the main formats you mention. Unfortunately, by the time I got my hands on a Fuji with the new 500mm lens, the bird pair I was documenting had disappeared to another part of the river. Still, you’ll be able to read and see the results from MFT, APS-C and FF soon.

0
Reply
Jason Polak
Jason Polak
Admin
Reply to  Kevin
May 24, 2024 4:34 am

For versatility, nothing will beat a FF camera with a high megapixel (45MP or higher) sensor. That’s especially true for birds in general. By “versatility”, I mean averaging over all types of wildlife, including all birds and other things. Medium format just doesn’t have lenses like the 400 f/2.8, 500 f/4, 600 f/4, 800 f/6.3, etc. And for those cases where you can fill the frame with FF and your lens of choice, you get noticeably better IQ that a micro four thirds sensor. The OM-1 combo is quite versatile though….but then you don’t have as many other lenses at your disposal like the 400 f/4.5 prime, which is much cheaper than the 150-400.

I think a comparison like you are mentioning can be done actually….after all, like you said, the main variables are cost, weight, AF performance, lens availability, and style of wildlife photography.

0
Reply
James
James
Reply to  Jason Polak
May 24, 2024 8:48 am

I will disagree with your specific example of the Nikon 400mm f/4.5, as the Panasonic 200mm f/2.8 is almost an identical size, weight, equivalent aperture and image quality.

The rest is correct though 😉. Full frame will definitely have superior image quality if both can shoot at base ISO. The exotic telephoto lenses aren’t there for m43. But the mid range tele primes like the Nikon 400mm f/4.5 and 600 f/6.3 have only recently come to FF to compete against the Panasonic 200mm and Olympus 300mm primes.

0
Reply
Jason Polak
Jason Polak
Admin
Reply to  James
May 24, 2024 11:13 am

Yes, the Panasonic 200mm f/2.8 is a CRAZY sharp lens. It’s a shame it is discontinued in manufacturing — at least that was the last announcement from Panasonic. But there are still many copies around and it’s a great lens.

0
Reply
Jeff
Jeff
May 23, 2024 10:21 pm

Your comment:
Which wildlife photographers should stick with full-frame or smaller?

Those who find the resolution (generally 45 megapixels or less) enough for their display needs.
Those who demand a very high frame rate and the fastest autofocus on the market.
Traveling photographers, for whom weight and size are of the utmost importance.
Photographers who demand features unique to smaller sensors, such as auto-capture and pre-release burst.
Those who need more lens selection; there is no 400mm f/2.8, 800mm f/6.3, or many other such lenses for medium format.
Photographers on a tighter budget.

Assuming you are OK with the size, weight and price, everything else on this list is just a matter of time. Imagine if Nikon came out with a medium format Z9. There would then be a very compelling argument. albeit expensive, for medium format for wildlife photography.

0
Reply
Libor Vaicenbacher
Libor Vaicenbacher
Author
Reply to  Jeff
May 24, 2024 12:57 am

I believe, Jeff, that medium format will soon catch up with the smaller formats wherever it lags behind today. Or rather, it will soon catch up to its current level, because the development of smaller formats is not going to stop either. But the most important question is whether such a large sensor size with such massive resolution is needed. It would be a waste to produce amazingly detailed images and then degrade them by displaying them on the web or even on social networks. For the small group of people who exhibit and print really large images, it definitely makes sense.

0
Reply
James
James
Reply to  Libor Vaicenbacher
May 24, 2024 8:54 am

I think the technology will theoretically exist for MF to catch up, but the market demand likely won’t drive it like it has with FF.

Speed is always easier on a smaller sensor, yet full frame, not APS-C or m43 is where the best high speed and high resolution wildlife cameras are. Even then, cameras like the OM-1 and X-H2S have a price advantage to their speed. MF is slower, more expensive, bigger, and the benefits for wildlife are effectively irrelevant. The difference in detail between an A7R5 and GFX100 is minimal, as is the dynamic range, given they use different sizes of the same sensor tech.

1
Reply
Spencer Cox
Spencer Cox
Admin
Reply to  Libor Vaicenbacher
May 24, 2024 11:46 pm

Full-frame is pretty entrenched as the system that gets the most R&D dollars these days, but theoretically, very little is stopping medium format from occupying that position one day. It’s always going to be larger and probably more expensive, but that comes with the territory.

A couple of remaining problems are rolling shutter when using the electronic shutter (hard to counteract with such a high-resolution sensor) and in-body image stabilization, which is tougher with larger sensors. I’m sure that progress will be made on both fronts over the coming years.

0
Reply

Learn

  • Beginner Photography
  • Landscape Photography
  • Wildlife Photography
  • Portraiture
  • Post-Processing
  • Advanced Tutorials
Photography Life on Patreon

Reviews

  • Camera Reviews
  • Lens Reviews
  • Other Gear Reviews
  • Best Cameras and Lenses

Photography Tutorials

Photography Basics
Landscape Photography
Wildlife Photography
Macro Photography
Composition & Creativity
Black & White Photography
Night Sky Photography
Portrait Photography
Street Photography
Photography Videos

Unique Gift Ideas

Best Gifts for Photographers

Subscribe via Email

If you like our content, you can subscribe to our newsletter to receive weekly email updates using the link below:

Subscribe to our newsletter

Site Menu

  • About Us
  • Beginner Photography
  • Lens Database
  • Lens Index
  • Photo Spots
  • Search
  • Forum

Reviews

  • Reviews Archive
  • Camera Reviews
  • Lens Reviews
  • Other Gear Reviews

More

  • Contact Us
  • Subscribe
  • Workshops
  • Support Us
  • Submit Content

Copyright © 2025 · Photography Life

You are going to send email to

Move Comment