Many cameras today, especially mirrorless cameras, let you pick between a mechanical and electronic shutter. Others – including a lot of DSLRs – have a third option called “electronic front curtain shutter” (EFCS) which is a blend between the other two types. Each shutter mechanism has several pros and cons, more than you might have realized. If you pick the wrong one, you could be harming your image quality.
Table of Contents
What Is a Mechanical Shutter?
Today, mechanical shutters are the default shutter mechanisms in many cameras for still photography. Many older cameras and even some new ones only allow you to take pictures with a mechanical shutter. However, as cameras are becoming more advanced, the mechanical shutter is slowly going away.
Mechanical shutters function using physical “shutter curtains”: two blades with a gap in between. When you take a photo, the blades slide rapidly in front of your camera sensor. Any light that hits the sensor between the blades will appear in your image.
You do not need to do anything special to enable the mechanical shutter on your camera. It is almost certainly enabled by default except on cameras like the Nikon Z8, the Nikon Z9, and the Sony A9 III, whcih do not even have mechanical shutters.
What Is an Electronic Shutter?
Electronic shutters are becoming more and more popular nowadays, but they are not present in some older cameras like DSLRs.
In general, electronic shutters work by reading data from your camera sensor line-by-line. A few cinema cameras have something called a “global shutter,” which reads the whole sensor simultaneously rather than line-by-line, but currently that technology is only present in a single consumer camera: the Sony A9 III.
To enable the electronic shutter, you will need to enter your camera menu. On some cameras, like the Sony A9, it is obvious how to change to the electronic shutter: Camera Settings 2 > Shutter Type > [Electronic Shut.]. However, other cameras hide this option under a “silent shooting” mode. For example, on the Nikon Z6, the only way to enable the electronic shutter is: Photo Shooting Menu > Silent Photography > On.
Again, not all cameras have an electronic shutter option, especially DSLRs.
What Is Electronic Front Curtain Shutter?
Lastly, electronic front curtain shutters are a blend between standard mechanical and electronic shutters. In this case, the first of the two “shutter curtains” is electronic, while the second is the traditional mechanical blade.
Enabling EFCS is easy on most cameras. For example, with the Sony A7 III, you simply go to: Shooting Menu 2 > e-Front Curtain Shut. > On. With the Nikon D810 and D850, go to: Custom Setting Menu > Shooting/display > Electronic front-curtain shutter > ON.
However, on certain cameras – specifically the Nikon D810 and D850 – turning on EFCS sometimes does not do anything. In order for it to work at all on the D810, you need to be in Mirror Up release mode; on the D850, you need to be in Mirror Up, Quiet, or Quiet Continuous release mode. Luckily, most cameras do not have this issue.
We talk about these limitations and more in our article on shutter shock.
Non-Image Quality Differences
Before diving into the factors that impact image quality, let’s take a look at some of the more general pros and cons of these three shutter types.
Fastest Shutter Speed
Which shutter mechanism lets you shoot at the fastest shutter speeds today? In general: Electronic, followed by Mechanical, followed by EFCS.
Electronic shutters on some cameras, such as the Sony A9, let you shoot at extreme shutter speeds like 1/32,000 second. However, not all cameras with electronic shutters will max out so high.
Mechanical shutters generally max out at 1/4000 or 1/8000 second depending on the camera. This is still quite fast – enough for typical needs.
Electronic front curtain shutters are usually the slowest of the group, often maxing out around 1/2000 second. Even on cameras that allow faster EFCS shooting, the manufacturer will often recommend against it due to potential uneven exposures. Although 1/2000 second is fast, it won’t always be enough in bright conditions.
Slowest Shutter Speed
Electronic shutter has the advantage when it comes to fastest shutter speed, but on some cameras, mechanical shutter has the advantage on the slowest shutter speed. The Panasonic G9 for example, cannot shoot longer than one second on its electronic-only shutter.
Other cameras like the Nikon Z8 and Nikon Z9 do not have this limitation. Therefore, when shooting long exposures such as night time landscapes, you should check your camera first before using electronic-only shutter.
Maximum Frame Rate
Another important point is that different types of shutter may have different maximum frame rates. If this applies to your camera, it’s usually the electronic shutter that can support the greatest number of frames per second. For example, the Canon R5 can shoot 12FPS in mechanical shutter mode, whereas it can shoot 20FPS in electronic shutter mode. That’s a huge difference if you need to capture really fast action such as fast-flying birds where the position of the wingtips is crucial for an ideal shot.
Flash Use
Mechanical shutters are generally ideal for use with a flash. On many cameras, you can’t even use the electronic shutter in combination with a flash at all. On the few cameras that do allow it (such as the Nikon 1 V3), it will max out at a slow sync speed (1/60 second in this case).
Flash with electronic front curtain shutter is better; most cameras let you use it without any different restrictions. However, with high-speed sync and external flashes, you’ll often see very visible banding in your images around 1/1000 second. So, with flash, I would stick to the mechanical shutter.
Silent Shooting
For situations when you need the quietest possible camera, you’ll want to go with the electronic shutter. This is no surprise since it has the fewest moving parts. It’s followed by EFCS, then mechanical shutter in terms of volume.
However, note that even the electronic shutter may not give you totally silent shooting since other components of the camera (especially aperture and focusing) also make sounds as you take photos. Even so, silent shutter can go a long way to not bothering people in quiet events, or not bothering wildlife with sensitive ears.
Other Differences
There are some more minor differences between the three shutter mechanisms, too:
- You will wear out your camera’s shutter curtains more quickly if you exclusively use the mechanical shutter.
- There are differences in response time with each type of shutter (the time between pressing the shutter button and when the camera starts taking the photo). In general, mechanical shutters have a slightly slower response time, although this is not true on every camera.
- At fast shutter speeds (1/2000 and beyond), electronic front-curtain shutter can result in uneven exposures.
- Electronic shutter can prevent you from using certain menu items on some cameras. For example, on the Sony A9, you cannot use long exposure noise reduction or Bulb mode with the electronic shutter. On the Nikon Z cameras, you cannot use long exposure noise reduction.
- On mirrorless cameras, the electronic shutter can eliminate viewfinder blackout (and live view blackout) from shot to shot. This can be useful for continuous shooting, making sure you never lose sight of the scene in front of you.
Next up, let’s take a look at image quality differences for each type of shutter.
Image Quality Tests
Shutter Vibration
The most well-known reason to use EFCS or the electronic shutter is to minimize vibrations – and therefore blurry photos – at certain shutter speeds. Specifically, in the 1/40 to 1/4 second range, you can end up with “shutter shock” that eliminates low-level detail in your images. This is most pronounced at longer focal lengths, and some cameras are worse in this regard than others. Here are three example photos taken on the Nikon Z7 (not a camera with particularly high levels of shutter shock). These are all 100% crops. In order, it goes mechanical shutter, EFCS, and electronic shutter. These are taken at 1/13 second. Click to see full size:
Quite clearly, the mechanical shutter image is not as sharp. The blur is not strong enough to ruin a photo, but it’s also not ideal. The other two images, by comparison, are perfectly sharp. Also, remember that these differences are more exaggerated on some cameras than others. If you often shoot around the 1/10-second mark, you’ll want to test for yourself to see how bad the problem can get.
Ranking:
- EFCS and electronic shutter (tie)
- Mechanical shutter
Rolling Shutter
Rolling shutter is very important any time you photograph a fast-moving object. Essentially, as your camera reads the scene line-by-line, anything moving quickly can be distorted with a “jello” effect.
In the photos below, I captured a regular ceiling fan on maximum speed, using a shutter speed of 1/2000 second. In order, the photos are mechanical shutter, EFCS, electronic shutter. Click to see full size:
As you can see, the first two images – mechanical shutter and EFCS – show practically no rolling shutter effects. The electronic shutter image, however, is going absolutely crazy.
Ranking:
- Mechanical shutter and EFCS (tie)
- Electronic shutter
Of course, this ranking only applies to cameras with signifcant rolling shutter. New cameras with stacked sensors like the Nikon Z9, Sony A1, or the OM SYSTEM OM-1 have very fast stacked shutters which make the rolling shutter effect almost nonexistent with the electronic shutter. Cameras like the Sony A9 III go even further: they use a global shutter and hence there is absolutely no rolling shutter. Of course, on certain cameras like the Nikon Z9 and Sony A9 III, there simply is no mechanical shutter to choose from!
Sunstar Flare
In certain cases (especially at fast shutter speeds), using the mechanical shutter can introduce a peculiar type of flare to bright objects in a scene. It is not really flare in the traditional sense, but instead a special kind of sunstar. If you have not heard the term “sunstar” before, it refers to the sharp edges of light seen in certain photos, like the one below:
Normally, sunstars are caused by aperture blades in your lens. But the shutter curtain can cause them as well, and things don’t look good when it does. I call this “sunstar flare” for lack of a better term:
Again, it’s the biggest problem at extremely fast shutter speeds. The image above is so extreme in large part because I’m shooting at 1/5000 second. However, until about 1/125 second (at least on my Nikon Z7), the effects can still be strong enough to be annoying. So, how can you minimize them?
Take a look at the following images, all captured at 1/2000 second and uncropped. Once again, the order is mechanical shutter, EFCS, electronic shutter:
That’s a pretty striking difference! The mechanical shutter has two distinct “sunstar flares,” while the EFCS has one (representing the exposure’s mechanical rear curtain). The electronic shutter does not have this issue at all.
Ranking:
- Electronic shutter
- EFCS
- Mechanical shutter
Flickering in Artificial Light
One of the other major effects of your shutter mechanism involves flickering/banding issues in artificial light. It’s most obvious in the following set of images. The order is still mechanical, EFCS, electronic shutter. Click to see full size:
As you can see, in this example, the only image to have noticeable banding issues is the third – taken with the electronic shutter. In general, that’s what you’ll see; mechanical and EFCS are not a problem in terms of banding. However, some specific cases with EFCS and artificial light can result in banding issues as well, especially when you are using fast shutter speeds like 1/2000 second. For example, take a look at the comparison below. Mechanical shutter is Before, EFCS is After. This is a moderate crop, roughly 1/5 the original area:
So, although EFCS is not nearly as bad as the electronic shutter under artificial light, it still is not ideal. Mechanical is the way to go any time you are shooting in such conditions.
Ranking:
- Mechanical shutter
- EFCS
- Electronic Shutter
Some cameras have a anti-banding or anti-flicker feature for electronic-only shutter use, which may be useful in case you must shoot with electronic shutter under artificial light.
Bokeh at Fast Shutter Speeds
One issue that grew in recognition recently in the photography world is the potential for EFCS images to have nervous bokeh at fast shutter speeds. It is certainly more visible in some cases than others, and I’d argue that even a worst-case scenario is not especially bad. Nevertheless, here are three crops demonstrating bokeh differences. Mechanical is first, followed by EFCS, then electronic. I took these at 1/2000 second to exaggerate any differences in bokeh that may appear. Click to see larger:
To my eye, the middle image – taken with the electronic front curtain shutter – indeed has the busiest bokeh, although not by much. The other two photos look similar to one another. For reference, here is the uncropped image (EFCS version):
This is a case where you might as well avoid EFCS for bokeh-critical shots at a fast shutter speed – but if you accidentally take some, you almost certainly will never notice.
Ranking:
- Mechanical shutter and electronic shutter (tie)
- EFCS
Noise Banding
A final problem that some photographers have mentioned regarding EFCS and the electronic shutter is the possibility of line-pattern noise in the shadows (i.e., the “banding” problem that was said to occur on the Nikon Z cameras, although that claim was arguably misleading.)
It’s said that extreme shadow recovery doesn’t look as good when using EFCS or the electronic shutter compared to the mechanical shutter. However, at least with the Nikon Z7, I was unable to reproduce this. Take a look at the following crops – again, mechanical, EFCS, and electronic:
To me, they all look equally good in terms of noise performance, line-pattern or otherwise. Keep in mind that these images have been recovered a whopping five stops in Lightroom, which is more than anyone would ever reasonably do. Here is the uncropped image for comparison:
Perhaps with certain cameras it is more pronounced than what I’ve shown here. You should always test for yourself in cases like this. However, based on what I see here, there are more important reasons than this to pick between the various types of shutter.
Ranking:
- Electronic shutter, EFCS, and mechanical shutter (tie)
Problems with Each Shutter Mechanism
Clearly, none of these shutter types is universally the best. So, I cannot recommend that you always use one rather than another; it depends on the photo.
Here are the downsides of each – so you know when to avoid each shutter mechanism (which is really what matters here):
Mechanical Shutter
Image quality factors:
- Can introduce sunstar flare when bright sources of light are in your frame
- Can introduce “shutter shock” vibrations at certain shutter speeds, especially around 1/10 second
Non-image quality factors:
- Does not always allow the fastest frame rate for high-FPS shooting
- Often maxes out at 1/4000 or 1/8000 second – not as fast as some electronic shutters
- Loudest of the three
Electronic Shutter
Image quality factors:
- Often adds extreme flickering/banding when shooting in artificial light
- Introduces rolling shutter issues on fast-moving subjects if you are using a camera with a non-stacked or non-global shutter
Non-image quality factors:
- Slower and older sensors with electronic shutter do not always allow flash – or, if it does, may max out at slow flash sync speeds like 1/60 second
Electronic Front Curtain Shutter (EFCS)
Image quality factors:
- Can add some flickering/banding when shooting in artificial light, though not as much as the regular electronic shutter
- Introduces half of a sunstar flare
- At fast shutter speeds, can introduce slightly nervous bokeh
- On some cameras, shooting at 1/2000 second or faster can lead to uneven exposure with certain lenses, according to Sony’s own information as well as online user reports
Non-image quality factors:
- Maxes out at 1/2000 second with some cameras
- Louder than electronic shutters
Recommendations
There is no single takeaway here about the best type of shutter to use for photography. However, below, I’ll try to pinpoint my recommendations for various needs. Note that the following summary assumes your camera can select any of these three shutter mechanisms:
For landscape photography, use the fully electronic shutter by default (not EFCS). However, if there is any significant artificial light in your shot, the mechanical shutter is your safest bet (although EFCS will probably be fine). In rare cases when something in your scene is moving quickly, like a bird in the sky you want to be sharp, switch to the mechanical shutter. Lastly, if you need to use specific options that the electronic shutter prevents (like long exposure noise reduction), you obviously should use a different shutter mechanism.
For portrait photography, use the mechanical shutter by default. The biggest issues with the mechanical shutter – sunstar flare and shutter shock – are not major problems in this genre, and you don’t need to worry about any flash-related restrictions. However, if you are shooting at a wide aperture in bright conditions (perhaps a beach photoshoot) and risking overexposure, there is a case to be made for the electronic shutter – assuming your camera allows extended shutter speeds like 1/16,000 or 1/32,000 second.
For sports, wildlife, and macro photography, use the mechanical shutter if you are shooting fast-moving subjects with a camera without a stacked or global sensor. That way, you avoid rolling shutter issues and eliminate banding in artificial light (and you can use a flash without issue). However, for certain subjects, you may wish to use the electronic shutter because it is quieter, and less likely to scare away a skittish subject.
For documentary photography, the electronic shutter will allow you to be as quiet as possible. However, if you are indoors or there is any significant artificial light in your photo, switch to the mechanical shutter instead.
For cityscape and architectural photography, use the mechanical shutter any time there is artificial light in your shot. If you are right at the shutter-shock speeds (1/10 second or so), consider bracketing shots – one with the mechanical shutter, and one with EFCS. Figure out later if the EFCS images have banding; if they don’t, feel free to use them.
Again, all of these recommendations change when you are using a camera with a stacked sensor or global shutter. If your camera has a fast enough electronic shutter, the only significant reason to use a mechanical shutter would be to avoid banding in artificial light, because the other disadvantages of the electronic shutter do not exist.
In general, the type of shutter that works with the widest possible range of conditions is the mechanical shutter (or the electronic shutter if your camera has a very fast stacked sensor or global shutter). But for natural light photos of a nonmoving subject, the electronic shutter is nearly always the way to go.
As for EFCS, it can be useful on cameras which don’t have an electronic shutter option, especially for minimizing shutter shock around 1/10 second shutter speed. Otherwise, if you have the all-electronic option, there aren’t many situations where EFCS is optimal for you anymore.
Conclusion
Hopefully, this article gave you a good understanding of the pros and cons of each shutter mechanism. As a landscape photographer, I previously had been shooting most of my photos with EFCS, but after doing these tests it’s clear there is a better method (given that my camera has a fully-electronic shutter option). Now, I’m going to use “silent mode” for almost all my landscape photography, except in rare cases where artificial light is in the shot. This way, I eliminate shutter shock while making the sun look as good as possible in every frame – plus allowing beyond 1/2000 second shutter speed in bright conditions.
If you have any questions about this article or suggestions as to when each shutter mechanism is ideal, let us know in the comments below!
Got official response from SONY, it is shared in article www.zsoltvarankaphotography.com/post/…mes-faster with my detailed further findings how exactly EFCS and also ‘shutter at power off’ function increase the pace of the shutter count growth of the A7IV (ILCE-7M4)
Thanks Spencer for your excellent Article! Actually, I hoped I get answer to my question: why my Sony A7M4 camera (firmware v1.11) counts every mechanical shutter actuation twice, while it counts normally any electronic shutter release?
Unfortunately, found no answer here, but after some testing I figured out myself:
seems, it is a firmware bug for A7M4 – when disable EFCS every shutter release has been counted twice, so your camera shutter count unexpectedly goes up in double pace!
This is clearly wrong way, since it is still one shutter actuation, and the two clicks come from the front and the rear curtain separate move, the same way as it work in DSLRs, where the same thing adds one number up to shutter count.
At the same time when activating EFCS or use the silent shutter then 1 click adds only one number to the shutter count, as expected.
For my curiosity I tested the situation in my A7M3, and it works correctly in all 3 setup modes, as expected! So, no double shutter count registration for the older camera, correctly.
After firmware update to v2.00 still have the same shutter counting issue with my A7M4, so I am going to inform SONY about the bug.
Major oversight – EFCS is default factory setting on many camera brands like Sony for a reason. I’ve been using Sony for more than 10 years and the bokeh & noise issues that only became the buzzword in recent years are garbage from pixel-peepers with nothing better to do with their lives. Nobody really cares or notices unless you go look for it like some @n@l clown. EFCS replaces mechanical shutter for most purposes except ultra high shutter speeds or where there is very strong but poor quality artificial light causing banding or flicker. Eg. Your portrait photography recommendation to use mechanical shutter is therefore wrong. It should be EFCS, since flash sync speeds are typically 1/200s to 1/400s (Sony A1) at most. EFCS works with flash/strobes, has no shutter shock vibration etc. HSS doesn’t count since it’s not that useful in real life pro/commercial photography. EFCS also has the lowest shutter release lag (as fast as electronics shutter), which is something you did not even address. Yes, there was actually a time when brands like the EOS 1 series always bragged about 50-60ms lag “only” for pro sports photography but only achievable with EFCS (before Sony matched/beat them with the A99 EFCS & later popularized A7/A9 series electronic shutter for pro use).
So, if EFCS is the default for Sony does it mean it is the best setting? Is this the reason why JPG image format is set, and not RAW or RAW+JPG?
Regarding the worse bokeh effect (busier and smaller bokeh balls) using EFCS is already mentioned by some youtubers, like Manny Ortiz, who might not be your favorite presenter, but his observations are valid, also well demonstrated in his video, so recommend to check out.
Actually, this article by Spencer is excellent, thanks a lot!
Excellent article that clearly explains and demonstrates a complicated subject that has many twists and turns. The one thing I think you need to add is some material on stacked sensors in the banding/flickering section. The Nikon Z9 does not even have a mechanical shutter because the readout from its stacked sensor is so fast that it prevents problems with banding/flickering under LED lights. Similarly, the Sony A1 and A9/II camera bodies have stacked sensors with very fast sensors. With any of these cameras, using fully electronic shutters under LED lights can be the default mode of operating. This gives one access to all the advantages of silent fully electronic shutters under LED lighting (which is on the way to becoming universal).
I am sure you know all this better than I. I think it is worth adding a couple of paragraphs to your fine article to include this information, maybe with images to demonstrate the point.
One difference between electronic and mechanical shuter which I believe you have not mentioned, is that on various camera models the electronic shutter will give you less dynamic range than the mechanical shutter (and presumably also less than EFCS).
Depending on what you shoot this might hurt your image quality.
It is interesting, really some people claims the silent shooting is giving less dynamic range. Wonder, which models you can mention? I shoot with many mirrorless models (Fuji X-T10, T-20, T-3, S-10, and Sony A7M3 and A7M4), and according to my own tests this statement is false. That’s why always use the electronic shutter, and turn on the mechanical only if need to use flash or led-light.
However, using EFCS results in troubles often, as mentioned by the article thoroughly. Seems, EFCS is a kind of early, not full version of using fully electronics shutter, like using a hybrid car engine before the fully electronic cars will be matured.
I’ve been shooting Nikons since 1974. I’m a techie for my day job, but avid travel photographer. This article is fantastic. I’ve never understood the EFCS ’til now. I’ve had a D850 for over 4 years. With my recent addition of a Z6ii, this was particularly interesting to me. I’m on Christmas vacation in South America, doing 90% outdoor landscapes in bright conditions. I chose to use Silent Mode just to save the 20,000+ cycles on the mechanical shutter. Now I understand that I’m doing the right thing! Bravo on the organization of your explanation and logical testing. I’m so happy to better understand the differences. I knew about banding and rolling shutter, but so much of what you said was new to me. I’m keeping a PDF of your arrival filed with my other tips and tricks, so I can refer back to it as needed. My mechanical shutter and I thank you!
As an avid Hobby Photographer , this information is so fundamental and also a game changer for me. I did a test this morning with seagulls flying the harbour and I felt so embarrassed, ignorant and relieved at the same time after reviewing the images. Over the past two years , I have been so discouraged with my wildlife photography and the R6 and I assumed it was the lens, my technique or other environmental factors. I was using EFCS for everything and I was only having a 10% successful keep rate. Most of the still bird images were very good. The images from this morning were taken in low light but almost 90% of them were in focus using the mechanical shutter. I will take the lessons that you provided while exploring landscape and macro photography as well, I actually felt like crying thinking about the pictures that I deleted..and the opportunities that I missed.
Great Report, congratulations.
I want to put the focus on an issue using mechanical or EFCS shutter.
Under all circumstances i have blurry fotos with the mechanical shutter, which does not appear under EFCS or ES conditions. Same problems have Sony and Nikon even with much more expensive cameras.
Anyone familiar with the shutter types on the GFX 50S Mark 2?.
For long-time photography the noise reduction doesn’t work if I use the electronic shutter on the Nikon z6?