Once upon a time, there was just Lightroom. But ever since Adobe moved to cloud- and subscription-based services, Lightroom has had two currently-maintained incarnations: Lightroom Classic and Lightroom (formerly known as Lightroom CC, where CC stands for ‘creative cloud’). Lightroom Classic is the desktop-only Lightroom that most photographers use, whereas Lightroom is a cross platform editing solution that stores your original Raws in Adobe’s cloud.
Yet, these programs are quite different from one another. Below, I’ll outline the differences between the two.
Table of Contents
1) The Naming Headache
For more years now, Adobe has offered both Lightroom Classic and Lightroom on the market. At first, the only difference was that Lightroom Classic was a standalone, perpetual-license product, while Lightroom was part of Adobe’s Creative Cloud subscription model. Over time, Adobe started adding some features to Lightroom that didn’t (and still don’t) exist in Lightroom 6 — things like the dehaze tool and local adjustments to the “whites” and “blacks” sliders.
Eventually, Adobe ceased offering a perpetual license. Now, whether you want to use the desktop-only Lightroom Classic or Lightroom, you need to subscribe to their monthly plan.
The interface on Lightroom Classic is exactly the same as the interface in the older, perpetual-license versions of Lightroom. On the other hand, the new Lightroom is a bit different. Although it has many of the editing tools of Lightroom Classic, its interface is simplified and less powerful. On the other hand, the cross-platform nature of Lightroom means that you can edit your photos on your desktop and then switch to your phone or tablet to continue your work.
So:
- Lightroom Classic: An upgrade everyone expected, with the same interface as prior versions of Lightroom, and some new features
- The new Lightroom: An cross-platform, cloud-based editor that has some, but not all of the features of Lightroom Classic
2) Comparing Features Between the New Lightroom Products
Feature | Lightroom Classic | Lightroom |
---|---|---|
Options upon import | Same as in prior Lightroom releases | Limited; only “Add to album” |
Organize with folders | Yes | No |
Organize with collections | Yes | Yes, but called albums |
Smart collections | Yes | No |
Rename photos | Yes | No |
Artificial intelligence keywording | No | Yes |
Face recognition | Yes | Yes |
Flags and stars | Yes | Yes |
Color labels | Yes | No |
“Basic” panel adjustments | Yes | Yes, in a different order than usual |
Clarity and dehaze adjustments | Yes | Yes |
Tone curve adjustments | Yes | Yes |
HSL panel adjustments | Yes | Yes |
Split toning adjustments | Yes | Yes |
Sharpening and noise reduction adjustments | Yes | Yes |
Lens corrections | Yes | Yes |
Camera calibration panel | Yes | No |
Adjustment history | Yes | No |
Soft proofing | Yes | No |
Compare, survey, and reference views | Yes | No |
Local adjustments (brush, gradient, radial tools) | Yes | Yes |
Healing tool | Yes | Yes |
Merge HDRs | Yes | Only in desktop |
Merge panoramas | Yes | Only in desktop |
Edit full-resolution images on mobile devices | No | Yes |
Edit on mobile devices at all | Yes, but only as smart previews; Lightroom mobile | Yes |
Map module and geotagging | Yes | No |
Tethered capture | Yes | No |
Printing module | Yes | No |
Book, web, and slideshow modules | Yes | No |
Images must be on Adobe’s cloud server | No | Yes, if you want to use Lightroom’s unique features |
Edits on one device instantly sync to others | Yes, but only smart previews and Lightroom mobile | Yes |
Plugin support | Yes | No |
Original photos backed up to the cloud | No | Yes |
Create snapshots | Yes | No |
Create virtual copies | Yes | No |
Create actual copies | Yes | No |
Sync settings | Yes | No |
Color and tonal adjustments on video | No | Yes |
Original files can be stored locally | Yes | Yes — click “Store a copy of all photos locally” |
Can be split into multiple catalogs | Yes | No |
Edit unlimited photos without extra cost | Yes | No — 1TB storage limit before price increase |
Greatest magnification to view photos | 11:1 | 2:1 |
Secondary screen | Yes | No |
Export file types | JPEG, TIFF, DNG, PSD, Original | JPEG, TIFF, DNG, PSD, Original |
Export color space | sRGB, Adobe RGB, ProPhoto | sRGB, Adobe RGB, ProPhoto |
Export with watermark | Yes | Yes |
Price | $19.99 per month with Photoshop and 1TB cloud storage | $9.99 per month with 1TB cloud storage |
Basically, Lightroom Classic really is “classic.” If there’s something you’ve been able to do in prior versions of Lightroom, you can do it in Lightroom Classic as well.
Lightroom is very streamlined and doesn’t offer as many advanced options. It lets you add photos to different albums, search via artificial intelligence keywords, and edit full-resolution photos on your phone. It also doesn’t have a huge learning curve; it should be pretty easy for most people to figure out what’s going on.
Even though Lightroom Classic has more advanced editing features, most of the good ones made their way to Lightroom as well. That includes things like local adjustments, for example, which are a must-have for advanced editing. Lightroom also has an artificial intelligence keyword search tool, which is an useful way to find a set of photos with the same subject. For example, consider this image, with a search for “cactus”:

3) Who should use Lightroom Classic?
Are you an advanced photographer? Have you used Lightroom before in the past? If so, Lightroom Classic is the obvious path for your work.
It simply has more features that an advanced photographer would need like printing and tethering. As nice as the artificial intelligence keyword search in Lightroom can be, most professionals will care more about things like plugins, multiple catalogs, fully-fledged develop features, and so on. Lightroom Classic fills the same market segment as all the prior versions of Lightroom did.
Target audience:
- Advanced or professional photographers who have used Lightroom in the past and appreciate its in-depth feature set.
- Photographers who edit a large number of photos, which would be too expensive to store in the cloud or too inconvenient with a slower internet connection
- Photographers who use third-party plugins
4) Who should use Lightroom?
Adobe markets a lot of the new features of Lightroom, but they don’t really say who the target audience is. However, I think that there is a clear target audience, and it’s not who you might expect.
In many ways, Lightroom can seem a bit slimmed-down. It doesn’t have as many features that photographers consider valuable, or even necessary for professional work. Yet, I would argue that one of the biggest benefits of Lightroom is that it doesn’t offer many of these advanced features. And that’s because Lightroom’s biggest target audience isn’t advanced photographers — it’s photographers who aren’t paid to take pictures, and value ease of use more than overall technical capability or features.
Lightroom has a very consumer-oriented design and feature set to make the learning curve as easy as possible, while still containing fairly advanced editing and organizational features.

Does that mean advanced photographers would never use Lightroom? Actually, there are some circumstances where I see Lightroom as holding a distinct advantage even for professionals.
For example, if you do a lot of social media marketing, you’ll want the ability to edit videos on the go (i.e., behind-the-scenes smartphone videos). Lightroom can do that, and Lightroom Classic can’t.
I can see YouTube creators and iPhoneographers relying on the relatively advanced post-processing abilities of Lightroom to post quick content in the field. That’s also true for editing your social-media-targeted photos on a desktop, then seeing the finalized edits immediately on your phone (and ready for instant export on the go).
In short, Lightroom is built for mobile creators, in addition to more casual photographers. If you’re an advanced photographer who doesn’t use your phone or tablet as an integral part of your brand and marketing strategy, I can’t think of many cases when Lightroom makes sense over Lightroom Classic.
Target audience:
- Casual, hobbyist photographers who want an easy-to-learn, yet surprisingly powerful, post-processing app for multiple-platform editing.
- Professionals with an active social media or YouTube presence who consistently create/share content on the go, especially with smartphones.
- Photographers who want to edit across multiple devices without worrying about file management
5) Pricing
The pricing for Lightroom Classic is $19.99/month with Adobe’s photography package, which also includes Photoshop. This package also now includes Lightroom.
If you don’t need Lightroom Classic and Photoshop, you can get just Lightroom and 1TB of cloud storage for $10/month. And, 1TB might not be enough for your uses, either. (Although I will emphasize that I don’t expect most professional photographers to host their entire library on Lightroom, even if they find it to be a valuable product — instead, my impression is that it’s meant for hosting content that you specifically plan to take, edit, or export on your phone.)
6) Conclusion
A lot of professionals will find Lightroom lacking in a few areas. No plugin support, virtual copies, history panel, or even color labels? On the other hand, since its inception, Lightroom has gotten more features that were once only in Lightroom Classic.
Still, the biggest target audience for Lightroom — casual photographers — neither needs nor wants most of those things. Photographers who do want them will prefer Lightroom Classic, instead. Even professional social media photographers who do use Lightroom are likely to use it in tandem with Lightroom Classic rather than on its own.
If I eventually shift toward doing a lot of social media marketing and mobile photo/video, Lightroom actually fills a void in the market. I’m not saying that I will subscribe to it — at least for now, I’m not planning to — but that it’s an entirely separate entity from what we’ve seen before, and photographers are only beginning to come up with creative ways to use it.
I can see why Adobe split Lightroom into two parts. Perhaps they should have adjusted their naming convention, but there’s a reason why both products exist. Although they still fill in different market segments, its possible that Lightroom will reach feature parity with Lightroom Classic, at which point Adobe could start offering a single product again.
If you have an Apple computer, is there any reason to pay a subscription for Lightroom CC when you can get RAW Power?
This article is really useful, I was choosing the appropriate version for my needs and this outlined and summarised the benefits of each and confirmed my view that Classic best suited my use. There are many reviews and opinions available, but this was the must succinct, by far. Thank you.
I have both on my computer…photos in both. Should I keep both or can I somehow merge them? If I merge them, which one should I use?
Whatever you do, keep LR 6 installed on your machine! I have a subscription and update LR 6 when updates available.
It appears they have dropped updates to new RAW files such as those with the extension RW2 from my new LX100 II camera.
Imagine my surprise to see “Preview not available.”
From my subscription I installed the latest LR CC or Classic or whatever (!) and it did import the new RAW formats not supported by LR 6.
Now I have a problem. LR 6 is an old soft shoe for me, but I need to use the new LR to process RAW from my camera.
I don’t plan to use Adobe for photos. I have a 2TB Google Photos subscription for $10/month. It was only 1 TB, but as a long-time user they doubled my storage? I use a wonderful plug-in from www.newpproducts.com/ to upload my photos. Seamless integration with LR.
Adobe, are you listening to your power users? No reason to abandon your loyal non-cloud LR users…
Hi
Great read.
To me the Lightroom Classic option would be preferable to me with 20GB storage.
I currently have a Standalone version but if I sign up the subscripition of LC Classic can I still not store my images and update locally ?
and if Adobe does pull Classic I’ll still have a local copy ? Am I correct on this ?
I may have to subscribe because if I plan to upgrade my camera to Nikon D500 my current version does not read teh NEF file and I am not a fan of converting to DNG to import.
Great article. I naively thought that Help/Updates… in Lightroom 6.14 would, well, update the software. Of course it doesn’t do that any more, since 6.14 is the tombstone version. My selection of Help/Updates… over the past year or so apparently did nothing but update Lightroom Classic CC in my version of Adobe Creative Cloud. When I finally got around to clicking the “Open” button adjacent Lightroom Classic CC, it indicated that my catalog required updating. That made me nervous. I’m glad that I found this article before clicking that update button. Like some other commenters here, I’m going to hold off updating for as long as possible. I suppose that an additional concern might be an unavoidable operating system update (e.g. to Windows 10) that somehow ‘breaks’ Lightroom 6.14, forcing me to upgrade.
An excellent clarification, Thank you. I have the Photography Plan (plus Illustrator) and previously used Lightroom Classic for sorting, viewing and selecting.
An excellent clarification, Thank you. I have the Photography Plan (plus Illustrator) and previously used Lightroom Classic for sorting, viewing and selecting.
However I now find that the updated version of Bridge (that comes with Photoshop) has such good preview and selection tools that I happily deleted Lightroom Classic and its cumbersome Catalogs. Camera Raw is so well-featured and versatile that my workflow now is Bridge > Camera Raw > Photoshop.
No need for Lightroom Classic (and I’m not an in-a-hurry social media photographer and so Photoshop CC is redundant for me),
Bottom line: Use Lightroom Classic if you are a pro or advanced amateur needing the range of features and control Classic offers.
Lightroom CC is a glorified phone app designed for faintly ambitious amateurs. Cloud storage of phone JPGs is huge at 1TB but meaningless for pros shooting RAW.
The ONLY advantage for a Pro using CC is the ability to sync images across platforms in different locations.
Well. I think we live in a new time of photography. The old classic workflow is in my eyes over. We live in times of Instagram, Snapchat & Co and think it was a smart desicion of Adobe to change the way we used to edit pictures. All the other brands will follow. We live in a time of taking as less gear as possible when we hit the road. Taking an IpadPro / WifiHD / and WifiCamera. is the perfect soloution for Travellers and adventurer’s. Photography is about taking pictures, not processing in a complex, time-cosuming way.
I mean it’s already amazing what you can do with an iphone&Lr, and Im pretty sure things get better down the road.
All I can say is:
Just think different. In the end of the day your photos are faster and easier online as ever before. And truth to be told, todays target of digital photography is simply put- the internet. Leave that old fashion way of edit your pictures behind, it’s allready dead.
Think forward. Stay hungry, stay foolish.
No thanks. The great thing about old-fashioned editing is that you don’t need an internet connection – when that goes down, if you have what you recommend, everything goes down with it.
Which is why I love my iPod Classic. And why my iPhone spends most of it’s life in sat in a drawer. Only take it out when I want to phone or text someone. I’ll take independence over connectivity.