Photography Life

PL provides various digital photography news, reviews, articles, tips, tutorials and guides to photographers of all levels

  • Lens Reviews
  • Camera Reviews
  • Tutorials
  • Compare Cameras
  • Forum
    • Sign Up
    • Login
  • About
  • Search
Home → Camera Gear Accessories

Hard or Soft Graduated ND Filters? It Depends on Your Lens

By Spencer Cox 20 Comments
Last Updated On August 2, 2023

One common question I see from photographers about lens filters is whether to get a hard or soft graduated neutral density filter. Which one is better? You’ve probably seen a lot of photographers recommend soft GNDs (if you can only choose one), since they’re more versatile when photographing uneven horizons. But that doesn’t capture the whole story. Instead, the optimal GND filter depends as much on your lens – wide vs telephoto – as the scene in front of you.

Table of Contents

  • Sample Photos
  • Focal Length Comparison
    • 20mm
    • 35mm
    • 50mm
    • 70mm
    • 100mm
    • 135mm
  • When Should You Use a Soft or Hard GND?
  • Conclusion

Sample Photos

The easiest way to demonstrate my point is to show you a few sample photos. All of these are gray field images with a two stop graduated neutral density filter. In every photo, the filter’s transition point is in the center of the image.

In terms of post-processing, I corrected vignetting and made minor adjustments to equalize brightness. Otherwise, these are straight out of camera RAW files:

14mm hard Grad ND
Hard GND, 14mm
14mm soft GND
Soft GND, 14mm
200mm hard GND
Hard GND, 200mm
200mm soft GND
Soft GND, 200mm

Do you notice anything interesting? When you’re zoomed in to 200mm, the soft GND has only the most minimal of gradients. What was once a specialty graduated filter is now acting as a watered-down standard ND filter! It provides little benefit aside from cutting out some light, which is usually more of a problem than a feature.

Note that I took all four photos above at the same aperture, f/11. But the appearance of the gradient also changes with aperture. Take a look at the two shots below, taken with exactly the same filter (2 stop hard grad) and focal length (70mm), only changing aperture:

f4 hard stop 70mm
Taken at f/4
f22 hard stop 70mm
Same everything, except taken at f/22

As you can see, the optimal graduated ND filter depends on far more than just the scene in front of you. Your focal length and aperture both have important effects as well.

Focal Length Comparison

In addition to the extremes of 14mm and 200mm, I thought it would be useful to show how soft and hard GNDs look at some of the most common focal lengths in between. This way, you have a better idea of when each graduated filter is more useful than the other. Note that all of these shots are taken at f/11:

20mm

20mm hard GND
Hard GND, 20mm
20mm soft GND
Soft GND, 20mm

35mm

35mm hard GND
Hard GND, 35mm
35mm soft Grad ND
Soft GND, 35mm

50mm

50mm hard GND
Hard GND, 50mm
50mm soft GND
Soft GND, 50mm

70mm

70mm hard GND
Hard GND, 70mm
70mm soft GND
Soft GND, 70mm

100mm

100mm hard GND
Hard GND, 100mm
100mm soft GND
Soft GND, 100mm

135mm

135mm hard GND
Hard GND, 135mm
135mm soft GND
Soft GND, 135mm

Note, of course, that a real-world scene will show these effects far more subtly. Even at the wider focal lengths, a hard GND is unlikely to have a noticeable line in the images, except for cases where the transition is over an empty area of sky.

When Should You Use a Soft or Hard GND?

If you’re shooting with an ultra-wide lens (anything wider than 20mm full-frame equivalent), a soft graduated neutral density filter is usually the way to go. Hard GNDs just transition too suddenly at such wide focal lengths, and they only work well for very flat horizons.

From 35mm to about 50mm, hard and soft GNDs both have a place. Something between the two would really be ideal; hard grads are a bit too harsh, and soft grads don’t have a massive effect. I would tend toward a soft GND when the horizon is broken by an obvious mountain, tree, or something similar. In most other cases, a hard GND will be preferable.

With telephoto lenses beyond 70mm, I really wouldn’t use a soft grad filter in most cases. They just don’t have enough of an effect at those focal lengths; it’s like not using a filter at all. Although hard GNDs are still fairly strong in the 70mm to 100mm range, real-world scenes will be much more accommodating than this torture-test of a gray field. For example, the photo below (taken at 100mm and f/5.6) is a good example of when a soft GND will have practically no effect, but a hard GND is quite valuable in equalizing the sky and foreground:

100mm Example Photo
100mm, f/5.6

Conclusion

Hopefully, this article gave you a better understanding of how to use filters more effectively, specifically graduated neutral density filters. The typical logic of “flat horizon = hard GND, broken horizon = soft GND” is not totally wrong, but it’s based on the assumption that you are using a wide angle lens. Once you get to about 50mm, and especially at 100mm and beyond, the equation changes. Suddenly, even for mountain landscapes and broken horizons, a hard graduated filter is the way to go.

So, if you’re tempted just to buy one type of GND and not the other, make sure you consider more than just the types of subjects you plan to shoot. Your expected focal length range is an equally important factor, if not more so.

Looking for even more exclusive content?

On Photography Life, you already get world-class articles with no advertising every day for free. As a Member, you'll get even more:

Silver ($5/mo)
  • Exclusive articles
  • Monthly Q&A chat
  • Early lens test results
  • "Creative Landscape Photography" eBook
Gold ($12/mo)
  • All that, PLUS:
  • Online workshops
  • Monthly photo critiques
  • Vote on our next lens reviews
 
Click Here to Join Today
 

Related Articles

  • WonderPana Front
    Lens Filters Explained - New Video Released
  • Filter Comparison
    Not All Lens Filters Are The Same
  • Wide-angle lens polarization
    Camera Lens Filters Explained
  • Landscape With Polarizing Filter Edited
    Are Polarizing, ND and UV Filters Useless?
  • Filters to Use or Not to Use
    Do Filters Affect the Resolution of Lenses?
  • Nikon 24mm Rear
    Things to Do After Buying a New Lens
Disclosures, Terms and Conditions and Support Options
Filed Under: Camera Gear Accessories Tagged With: Filter, Filters, Focal Length, Lens Filter

About Spencer Cox

I'm Spencer Cox, a landscape photographer based in Colorado. I started writing for Photography Life a decade ago, and now I run the website in collaboration with Nasim. I've used nearly every digital camera system under the sun, but for my personal work, I love the slow-paced nature of large format film. You can see more at my personal website and my not-exactly-active Instagram page.

guest

guest

20 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Sam
Sam
February 2, 2024 3:01 am

Thanks, just the info I was looking for!
I guess it would of course also have different impact if you are working with a aps-c sensor or your phase one 4X4 cm…

0
Reply
Edinburgh
Edinburgh
December 16, 2019 4:16 am

What an absolutely cracking article, thank you. It takes great skill to make what could be complex into easily understandable information. I’m still finding my way around the fascinating world of photography and this kind of article is incredibly helpful.

Will now start looking at medium grad filters. Excellent work.

0
Reply
Prashant Patel
Prashant Patel
December 5, 2019 7:06 am

Thanks Heaps. The best of its kind. I never found such info anywhere else on the Web. I have SW150 and 3 stop very hard grad which is too harsh for my Tamron 15-30 G2 so will get a 3 stop soft grad to complete the collection. Appreciate your help and time on this matter. Thanks from NZ.

1
Reply
Dave Steinberg
Dave Steinberg
August 27, 2019 12:06 am

Do the soft VS hard affects only apply to zoom lenses when comparing focal lengths? I can imagine when you zoom out in Teléphoto we are only looking through the center part of the lens so it makes sense. But it does not seem to apply to prime lenses, does it?

0
Reply
Spencer Cox
Spencer Cox
Author
Reply to  Dave Steinberg
August 27, 2019 12:59 am

It does apply to prime lenses just the same as zooms. What you’re doing with either a prime or a zoom is the same – essentially, including a larger or smaller portion of the filter in your photo. With a wide angle, you’re including a larger portion of the filter in your image, which means that the gradient appears smaller (and therefore sharper/harsher) by comparison.

0
Reply
Levente Csillag
Levente Csillag
Reply to  Dave Steinberg
March 6, 2020 8:03 pm

Hi. Im looking to buy gnd filter. I have an older model haida pro 100 series and want to buy filter for it. I have a canon 7d with kit lens, 18-55mm and the 75-300mm will be ok with a 100X100 filter size? Or should i get the cokin p series holder, coz i plan to buy a wide angle lens later on. Thx

0
Reply
Brian Breczinski
Brian Breczinski
May 13, 2019 12:55 pm

Very interesting, and not something I expected. I haven’t used GND filters much yet but now I have a much better idea of what I should try.

I wonder how it looks if you keep the same physical aperture at various focal lengths, rather than the f/stop aperture ratio? For example, if you compared the hard grad filter at 24mm f/2, 35/2.8, 50/4, 105/8. I’m expecting these to look very similar but maybe I’m wrong.

I bet the effect also changes with the placement of the filters, i.e. if you could position the GND closer or further from the lens (not possible with wide angles I know) or if different lens designs at the same focal length effectively change the filter position.

0
Reply
Keith Chamberlin
Keith Chamberlin
May 9, 2019 9:27 am

I’d be curious to know if shutter speed has an affect as well. Sensors do tend to bleed some light at slower speeds. May have to test it myself!

0
Reply
Jan Holler
Jan Holler
May 9, 2019 6:40 am

A very helpful article, Spencer, thank you very much. Would you elaborate why you’d use a physical filter rather than a software filter?
As the argument pro physical filters I see the possibility to acquire a wider dynamic range of the scenery than it would be possible without filter. An argument against physical filters is the general loss of light and thus higher ISO setting if keeping time and aperture.
But today’s cameras with their ISO invariance of about 4-5 stops allow you to expose for the highlights and then apply a digital ND filter(s) (lower sky, brighten foreground). You can later decide the exact position and the gradient and the falloff. This is a big pro for using digital filters. So what do you think?
In flash light or stage photography you sometimes can’t avoid disturbing exposure gradients. One face is bright, the next one not that much. But there is not really enough time to set up physical filters before each shot. So digital filters in post processing do a fine job. Couldn’t they generally replace the graduated ND filters?
Cheers! -jan

0
Reply
Mike Sharp
Mike Sharp
May 8, 2019 1:14 pm

In regards to using grads with crop sensors. Should I just apply the crop to my lens focal length and work with the equivalent focal length, or is it more involved than that.

Great info though.

0
Reply
Spencer Cox
Spencer Cox
Author
Reply to  Mike Sharp
May 8, 2019 8:52 pm

Yes, just apply your crop factor if you want to mimic the look of each photo – both to focal length and aperture. (I used 14-200mm at f/11 here, but with APS-C the equivalent is 9-130mm at f/7.1).

More important than exact values, though, is the general trend – and making sure that when you use a grad filter, its effect is neither too strong nor too weak. That’s usually easy enough to figure out in the field.

0
Reply
Justin Laidlaw
Justin Laidlaw
May 8, 2019 3:08 am

I’ve learned something new today, thank you for the lesson! :)

0
Reply
Spencer Cox
Spencer Cox
Author
Reply to  Justin Laidlaw
May 8, 2019 8:47 pm

Glad you found it useful, Justin!

0
Reply
Hans Ernst
Hans Ernst
May 8, 2019 1:09 am

Thanks a lot, Spencer,
I’ve never seen a better article regarding this topic.
You’re being most helpful again!

1
Reply
Spencer Cox
Spencer Cox
Author
Reply to  Hans Ernst
May 8, 2019 8:46 pm

You are quite welcome, Hans!

0
Reply

Learn

  • Beginner Photography
  • Landscape Photography
  • Wildlife Photography
  • Portraiture
  • Post-Processing
  • Advanced Tutorials
Photography Life on Patreon

Reviews

  • Camera Reviews
  • Lens Reviews
  • Other Gear Reviews
  • Best Cameras and Lenses

Photography Tutorials

Photography Basics
Landscape Photography
Wildlife Photography
Macro Photography
Composition & Creativity
Black & White Photography
Night Sky Photography
Portrait Photography
Street Photography
Photography Videos

Unique Gift Ideas

Best Gifts for Photographers

Subscribe via Email

If you like our content, you can subscribe to our newsletter to receive weekly email updates using the link below:

Subscribe to our newsletter

Site Menu

  • About Us
  • Beginner Photography
  • Lens Database
  • Lens Index
  • Photo Spots
  • Search
  • Forum

Reviews

  • Reviews Archive
  • Camera Reviews
  • Lens Reviews
  • Other Gear Reviews

More

  • Contact Us
  • Subscribe
  • Workshops
  • Support Us
  • Submit Content

Copyright © 2025 · Photography Life

You are going to send email to

Move Comment