If you want to take your photos to another level, camera equipment is a natural place to look. It’s a very tangible part of photography; we work with our gear constantly. In fact, new equipment often does help you capture certain photos more easily, or it improves the technical quality of the images you take. However, it’s easy to get swept away in this marketing message and forget that there are other, better ways to improve your photos — techniques that don’t require new equipment to put into practice, and tips that are applicable to every photographer.
Table of Contents
1) Learn Composition
Composition is all about getting your photos to say what you want them to say. It’s how you draw attention to your primary subject, making it as noteworthy as possible and excluding any unimportant details from your frame.
If you give Nikon’s cheapest DSLR to a professional photographer and force them to use automatic mode, they’ll still be able to capture fantastic photos. If you give a non-photographer the Nikon D5, even assuming that its settings are perfect, they probably won’t get anything that is nearly as good.
The reason should be obvious: The professional photographer knows how to get their point across. They can stand at a beautiful overlook and capture the essence of the scene; they can photograph someone’s wedding and paint a detailed story in a single frame.
If you want to do the same, most of it comes down to practice, along with ruthlessly critiquing your own work. Any time that there’s a problem with one of your photos — light, camera settings, composition, or something that’s harder to quantify — pay attention. What could you have done to avoid that mistake? Would the image be better if you had captured it at a different time of day, or from a different perspective? Be very tough on all your photos; even your best ones aren’t perfect.
It can be hard to critique your work harshly, even if you want to do so. But, if your goal is to learn the intricacies of light and composition, you need to be honest with yourself — what doesn’t work about a photo, even your good ones? When you’ve identified the negatives of a photo, that information will stick with you. Next time you’re in the field, you’ll correct those mistakes.
Photography is about constant self-improvement. After you look through your photos and find areas to work on, that should be your priority — be it light, color, composition, technical settings, or anything else. Gear should be the last thing on your mind.
I took this photo with the Nikon D7000, which was released in 2010 — in terms of digital cameras, practically a lifetime ago. Yet, viewers would never know; my composition is the only important part of the image. It’s what makes or breaks this shot.
2) Get to Know Your Gear
I tend to believe that you’ll often get better photos by using a single piece of camera equipment for a long time rather than constantly upgrading to the best new model. Why? Simple: As you get to know your equipment, it becomes easier and easier to coax out the photos that you want. If you’re a portrait photographer who understands all the intricacies of a decades-old manual flash and an old light-modifying kit, you’ll get better results than if someone handed you Nikon’s new $600 SB-5000 and top-of-the-line lighting accessories. Sure, you can learn how to use the new kit over time, but — short term — your photos from the “inferior” equipment will be better.
As I’ve switched around my camera kit over the years, this has been very true in my experience. When I upgraded from the Nikon D7000 to the D800e, it definitely took me some time to adjust. After using the D7000 for years, I intuitively understood everything about it — the button locations, the autofocus behavior, the metering system, and so on. No, the D800e wasn’t some alien camera, but it still me took several months before I really understood it to the same degree as I understood the D7000. If I had jumped to a different DSLR brand, or from the D7000 to a mirrorless camera, I’m sure it would have been an even longer process.
Rather than upgrading to the newest equipment, then, you’ll be surprised how much better your photos will be if you truly get to know the gear you already have. Even if you already have a pretty good understanding, there’s always room to improve. Can you set the camera with your eyes closed — or, more realistically, with your eye to the viewfinder? How quickly can you switch from manual mode to aperture-priority, then change your camera’s minimum shutter speed settings? The more you practice, the faster you’ll be.
From what I’ve seen, the most important part of your camera equipment is not the equipment at all. Instead, what matters is how familiar you are with your kit. If there’s something spectacular happening in front of you, and you’re about to take the perfect photo, your reaction time is what makes the difference — not whether you upgraded to the highest-resolution camera on the market.
Simply by practicing with your current kit, you’ll be able to solidify your skills in a way that wouldn’t be possible if you constantly upgraded. That’s not to say you should never get a new camera, but that it isn’t the only way to take higher-quality photos. By learning your current gear at the deepest possible level, you’ll make more progress than if you had “upgraded” to a marginally-better camera that you don’t yet know how to use.
I was on a helicopter with an open door when I took this photo, wearing thick gloves and trying to make sure that I didn’t turn into an icicle. Luckily, I knew how to use this camera without a second thought, or it would have been impossible to capture any good photos. If someone had handed me the newest Hasselblad camera before the flight, there’s no way I would have gotten as many good photos along the way. (A quick note: I used a D810 here rather than my typical D800e, since I had multiple cameras around my neck at the time. Luckily, the D810 works very similarly to the D800e, so there was no real learning curve.)
3) It’s Possible with Any Equipment
Whenever I feel the urge to buy a new piece of gear, there’s a simple question I like to ask myself: Does anyone use the equipment that I already have (or, perhaps, worse equipment) to take the types of photos that I want? Almost always, the answer is yes — and if the answer is yes, I don’t need to buy anything new.
If you’re disappointed that you still use a crop-sensor camera from six years ago, just search online; you’ll find people who use that camera to take spectacular images, no matter the genre. Are you a landscape photographer using the Nikon D7000? Google “Nikon D7000 landscape photos,” and you’ll surely be impressed by the results.
You’ll find that other photographers already have a lot of secrets figured out — which is great, because you can learn from them. Although new cameras may indeed provide tangible benefits, typically in terms of image quality or ease of use, you can capture great photos with any equipment. It is very rare that a photo you want to take will be impossible to capture, no matter the gear you have. (Exceptions include things like underwater photography that require very specific equipment in the first place, of course, but you’ll know if that applies to you.)
I took this photo with an entry-level DSLR that first went for sale in early 2011. New equipment is nice, but the best way to improve your photos has nothing to do with it.
4) Understand Visualization
The real secret to great photos isn’t really a “secret” at all — and it’s something you can do regardless of your gear.
Visualize everything; picture the final result in your head. Imagine the best possible photo of the scene in front of you, then do everything you can to make that photo a reality.
Visualization is the trick to taking successful photos, from landscapes to portraits. It is important regardless of the type of photography that you do.
Some photographers think of visualization as a very abstract tool that isn’t easy to implement in the real world, so I always like to provide an example of what I mean. Here’s a photo of the Eiffel Tower that I captured a few years ago:
Notice something interesting about this photo? It looks as though a spotlight on top of the Eiffel Tower is pointing straight up in the air, illuminating a cloud like a beacon over the city of Paris.
In fact, that’s not what’s happening (and this isn’t a Photoshop trick, either). Instead, this photo is a result of some very clever visualization that I did in the field, where I had a distinct goal in mind: I wanted to take a photo that looked almost exactly like this! So, how was it done?
If you’ve been to Paris, you may remember that there’s a large spotlight on top of the Eiffel Tower that turns on at night. It spins 360 degrees across the city, pointing mostly straight out, but tilted slightly upwards. Can you guess how I took this photo, now? I took advantage of the slight upward tilt of the spotlight. I waited for it to shine perfectly in my direction, and then I quickly took a photo when it did. An optical illusion makes it look like it’s pointing straight up!
It’s also worth mentioning that it took several tries to capture a believable illusion in this case, since the spotlight moves rather quickly. However, because I had visualized this exact result, I knew that I’d be able to capture a good photo in the end!
Your visualization efforts won’t always be this extreme; this is the clearest example I can think of from my own photography. However, visualization matters even for casual photos. Every time you look at a scene, think about the ideal photo, then work towards making it a reality. In almost every situation, you’ll be able to do something to make the image match your goal.
5) Conclusion
Even if your photos aren’t good enough, your gear probably is. There are countless ways to improve your images without purchasing new equipment, and this article only scratches the surface.
The essence is simple: Focus on improving your technique, and great photos will fall in line naturally. A new piece of equipment won’t improve your composition or lighting skills. Short term, before you really understand how to use it, you may even end up with worse results!
Right now, people are out there capturing the photos you want using exactly the equipment you already have, if not something significantly worse. If you want to be like them, buying more gear won’t help.
I’m not trying to disparage new equipment — I love it, too. New cameras and lenses make certain photos easier to capture, and they can improve the resolution and detail of the images that you take.
However, if your photos are lacking, gear isn’t the solution. In order to improve the true quality of a photograph, you need to focus on things like light, subject, and composition. These aren’t factors your equipment can fix; you’re the only one who has that power.
Great article but posting examples shot with 2000$+ lenses doesn’t really help making a point.
Spencer – great article. This reminds me of my experience with golf. I had a set of hand me down clubs that I had acquired when I first started playing golf. After a few years, I reached a plateau in my golf game and I blamed these old clubs. “If only I had a new set of irons – my game would vastly improve” I told myself. One day I was on the driving range with a friend who is a very good golfer. I told him “I think my clubs are crap and they are bringing my game down.” He said “let me see” and picked up this old 3 wood and smacked a 200 yard line drive shot – straight and beautiful. It wasn’t the clubs- it was me. I need to remind myself that when my photos are growing stale – it’s not the camera… it’s me. Terrific article – terrific lesson. Thanks
Hi Peter, I also use the same lens 24-120 and find more than sufficient taking portraits and landscaping.
All I do is get a little closet to my subject and find a vantage point for great sharp shots.
I held back in purchasing other lens, maybe in the near as I may need it.
After 50 years of photography, having bought and then sold many lenses, I go on my local photo trips with 1camera and 1 lens: a Nikon D700 with a Nikon 24-120mm f/4 lens. Lens shade and a polarizer filter in my pocket. I leave the other 4 lenses home. I do mainly landscape photography and find the 24-120 is perfect.
Since I do photo work for web sites and newspapers, I dumped RAW got JPEG several years ago and have never looked back. Using JPEG makes doing hdri and pano shooting a pleasure.
Great article Spencer !
I switched from Nikon D3200 to OMD EM5 because it is lightweight and lens prices and options are affordable. Lately I developed a case of GAS but more for legacy lenses which are so much more challenging with its manual focus when current ones are almost always AF. It’s fun composing with legacy lens as I really need to pause and focus my thoughts before taking the shot.
Changing and adding equipment did not improve my photography but taking more shots helps. And with my EM5 I am always more than willing to step out with only one lens (mostly legacy these days) and challenge myself to get the most out of it.
Thanks photographylife for enriching our beloved hobby.
I’m learning my D750 and boy it’s a switch from my a6000, particularly point #4 (well and yes, it’s new to me). I wonder how much of it’s that I had the a6000 first, but it seems to me the EVF is a wonderful tool to help with #4, because it’s WYSIWYG – adjust exposure compensation up and down, and boom, I can see the results right there. Chimping is taking some getting used to after being able to do image review right there in the EVF.
Another nice article Spencer, I enjoyed it! I’m looking forward to finishing the Landscape book from you and Nasim.
Dear Elizabeth and dear Spencer,
I share your thoughts. I think training and questioning about the photographic approach is a good starting point against our compulsive behaviors in photographic equipment and our need to be reassured against the fear of failure.
In a society that shares billions of images every day on social networks, where everyone tries to exist and to mark his own originality, technological offer is a very tempting and monetized shortcut … but which does not protect us by Against our own frustrations.
Educating the eye requires will, effort, patience and imagination. Some of the properties that characterize today’s image production are volumes, process speed, and digitization. To go against these phenomena and decide to produce less and better, to take “his” time in the process of creation and sometimes to print his images to share them in flesh and blood, is like deciding Watching water flow and no longer wanting to freeze it, because in any case, it will always slip between our fingers.
I am intimately persuaded that the transition from image to photography is the result of a deep inner approach that vaccinates us against narcissism.
Manuel, thanks for adding your thoughts! There are so many images shared that it really is impossible to stand out to everyone, but you can still stand out to some, and hopefully brighten those peoples’ lives a little :)
Great article Spencer! I agree with all your points wholeheartedly, and especially “Get to Know Your Gear.” I also think that if you have money burning a hole in your pocket, it would be better spent on education than on gear. An investment in a workshop, a class, or a critique session once a year is a great investment towards improving your photography.
Thank you, Elizabeth, very true! New gear is great, but education (or, for nature/travel photographers, a trip to an interesting location), is often a better use of money.
Hi Spencer,
Thanks for the reminder. I guess no one is immune to gear acquisition syndrome. I remember a post by Thomas Stirr on skills acquisition syndrome to replace GAS which treads on similar lines. Love the images that supported the post as well. Shoutout from the Philippines.
Oggie
Thank you, Oggie! Skills Acquisition Syndrome is a good name for things. Glad you liked the photos!
It is worth watching the 1st episode of the documentary “The Century of the self” (available for free on several legit sites) :
Episode One: Happiness Machines
The story of the relationship between Sigmund Freud and his American nephew, Edward Bernays. Bernays invented the public relations profession in the 1920s and was the first person to take Freud’s ideas to manipulate the masses. He showed American corporations how they could make people want things they didn’t need by systematically linking mass-produced goods to their unconscious desires.
Bernays was one of the main architects of the modern techniques of mass-consumer persuasion, using every trick in the book, from celebrity endorsement and outrageous PR stunts, to eroticizing the motorcar. His most notorious coup was breaking the taboo on women smoking by persuading them that cigarettes were a symbol of independence and freedom. But Bernays was convinced that this was more than just a way of selling consumer goods. It was a new political idea of how to control the masses. By satisfying the inner irrational desires that his uncle had identified, people could be made happy and thus docile.
Stefano, people have certainly taken those concepts to even more extremes over the years! Camera manufacturers aren’t an exception. This type of manipulation reaches too far for there to be, in my opinion, any hope of containing or curtailing it over the near future. What we can do is educate ourselves to see through the outer layer of emotional advertising/propaganda and compare products or services from the most objective possible perspective. It isn’t always possible, but it’s something to strive for.
Spencer,
some photography sites (not this one) write up about really expensive gear, and when they test lenses or cameras, those reviewer take really poor images, that a decent photographer with a point and shoot could come up with something more interesting.
I got too much gear myself, but the past year I worked more than usual, and for me it is important to have redundancy, backup camera option.
While bokeh is somehow an aspect, I can not think of images photographers I like, like W. Eugene Smith, Don McCullin, William Klein, Alex Webb, Paolo Pellegrin and so on where bokeh was a determinant aspect.
Vison, content, composition are really what makes a photo stand out.
I even think that the attention span to look at a photo is a few seconds for many. The onion ring do not matter.
In any case I started shooting some film recently, TMax 400. It is fun. But a modern DSLR or mirrorless has so much more definition and resolution than 35mm film. Yet those old images are still powerful.
Photography sites have to get ads to provide information, so it is a new circle.
I just wonder how could Nikon and Canon decades ago could survive selling less gear, cameras lasted a longer time etc etc.
And lately cameras and lenses are getting a lot more expensive.