Like many couples, my wife and I talked about going to Greece for many years. Fortunately for us the stars aligned this fall and we were able to go on a bus tour/island hopping holiday. While this type of holiday is not ideal from a photography standpoint it did allow us to cram a lot of sightseeing into a relatively short time frame. Greece is a very diverse and interesting country and I thought Photography Life readers may like to see some selected images.
While I anticipated that my shooting time at Greece’s historic sites would be limited, I did not fully understand how compressed it would be when on a bus tour. Most days I was lucky to even get two hours of total shooting time. Luckily the guides on our tour used radio headsets so I could listen to the information provided as I discretely moved away from the tour group and took some photographs. Otherwise I would have been limited to 15-45 minutes of unencumbered shooting time at most of the archeological sites
As photographers we all have our own shooting style and lens preferences. I have always found that zoom lenses are the workhorses of my trips. It was no different on this holiday. What was different for me was deciding to leave my Nikon D800 and FX lenses at home and opting to use a small, lightweight camera/lens system instead.
There are many great, lighter weight camera options available today from a range of manufacturers such as Sony, Olympus, Fuji, and Panasonic to name a few. Since I am already committed to the Nikon 1 system for my video business, I took my V2 and a selection of six 1 Nikon lenses to Greece.
All of the antiquity sites in Greece have roped off sections restricting where visitors can go. Some of these public areas can be quite narrow and crowded so the flexibility of using zoom lenses to frame shots was ideal. This was also the case in many of the island towns like Fira, Oia, and Mykonos where the streets can be very narrow and often crowded.
Having a wide angle zoom lens in my bag (efov 18-35mm) was very useful when trying to accentuate the size and grandeur of many ancient sites like the theatre at Delphi.
Or shooting large structures like the Temple of Olympian Zeus. It allowed me to get up as close as possible to the structure, thus eliminating people from the image. I was not concerned with the severe lens distortion created by this type of shooting situation as it is easily corrected with software.
When using these types of wide angle lenses it is important to remember to frame your original images to allow for perspective adjustments in post. Otherwise you may be disappointed when parts of the subjects in your photos end up being cropped off when you adjust perspective.
I used a standard-range zoom lens (efov 27-81mm) and a long telephoto zoom lens (efov 81-297mm) extensively during my trip. Having shot with them under a variety of lighting conditions in the past I knew that they were practical, flexible lenses. The VR on these lenses is also very good which allows them to be shot successfully hand-held at fairly slow shutter speeds if needed. This came in handy when shooting inside the museums at the various archeological sites. Photography is limited to certain areas of the museums and your tour guides will advise you accordingly.
In general, taking photographs inside monasteries is restricted and often forbidden. There are exceptions, so be sure to ask.
If you go to Greece taking a zoom lens with 300mm reach on the long end can be very helpful indoors when taking images of statues from a distance, or when trying to quickly frame the many exhibit samples on display.
Lenses of this focal length are also very useful if you like to capture the detail on buildings in the various archeological sites in Greece.
We had the opportunity to visit a couple of the monasteries at Meteora and snap a few quick photos. I would have loved to spend three or four days in this area rather than just a couple of hours. It is simply spectacular.
For those of you who are James Bond movie fans, here is a shot of the Monastery of the Holy Trinity where the 1981 Roger Moore film “For Your Eyes Only” was filmed.
The Meteora monasteries afford visitors plenty of image opportunities…
I had some time during my trip to do some walking tours in Mykonos town on the island of Mykonos, Nafplio on the southern mainland of Greece, and in Fira on Santorini. Time permitting I am hoping to put together a follow up article on these photo walks. In the meantime here are a few images taken in Nafplio.
A couple of images taken on the island of Mykonos…
And, a few taken on the island of Santorini…
When you walk through towns in Greece you will find numerous stray dogs and cats. Most of them sleeping under the warm sun. Some of them, especially the cats, can get aggressive quite quickly and unexpectedly so they are best left alone.
It was interesting to note that there were very few people using DSLRs. After two weeks visiting some of the most popular archeological sites on the mainland and two of the most visited islands I don’t think I saw more than a dozen people a day using large, DSLR gear. Even fewer people were trying to use tripods. Most people were shooting with compact cameras or their phones, and many with mirror-less cameras.
I noticed many people struggling in the bright sunlight trying to frame their shots using the display on the back of their cameras/phones and some mirror-less cameras. Using a camera like the Nikon 1 V2 which has a viewfinder was extremely helpful and allowed me to frame shots exactly as I wanted.
Although I took three prime lenses with me I did not anticipate using them very much, other than to address specific shooting situations.
I found the fast wide angle prime I took was useful for some landscape shots during inclement weather so I could easily shield the lens and camera from the rain.
It was also helpful in some of the museums when I was trying to capture wider displays of carvings, in the beehive Tomb of Agamemnon, and at Akrotiri.
There was one evening when this lens was invaluable capturing video of members of our tour group learning some traditional Greek dances…and breaking a few plates. Being able to get good depth of field when shooting at f/2.8 at 1/60th shutter speed with a small sensor camera enabled me to keep my ISO at a reasonable level.
My ‘normal’ prime stayed in my bag for most of the trip but did come in handy for my wife and me to capture some images of each other when we volunteered to take part in some Greek cooking demonstrations.
Taking a fast 85mm prime can be helpful, especially when doing street photography. The following shot was taken with the 1 Nikon 32mm f/1.2 lens. I am hoping to do a hands-on review of this lens in the near future.
When in Greece you will very likely be shooting in strong, bright sunlight which can challenge the dynamic range of many cameras, especially those with small sensors. This is further heightened on the islands since many houses and public buildings have white-washed exteriors. Using a polarizing filter is recommended. You’ll notice some clipped highlights in the following image:
Shooting in RAW helps when using a camera with limited dynamic range, and adjusting metering and exposure settings can help minimize highlight clipping to some extent. Having said that, using cameras with smaller sized sensors like the Nikon 1 V2 do have some inherent shortcomings that just are what they are.
Low light performance and image sharpness can also be a challenge when using small sensor cameras as the small pixel size can cause diffraction to be noticeable above f/5.6 and for noise to appear at fairly low ISOs. These issues can be at least partially addressed in post. Here is an image taken during a late night walk in the town of Olympia. It was taken hand-held at f/1.2, 1/50th ISO-6400. I wouldn’t normally take an image like this with a small sensor camera, but I wanted to push the limits of my Nikon 1 V2 to see what would happen. When you’re traveling you often have to deal with less-than-ideal lighting.
Here is another hand-held image taken at ISO-6400:
The objective in showing these images is not to extol the virtues of any specific software, but rather reinforce the idea that when buying a camera that has a small sensor, it is important to consider how the software you own can help mitigate some image quality issues. This also holds true for lens sharpness. Here is an image taken at Meteora:
The next image is a 100% crop:
When you consider that this image was taken with the 1 Nikon 30-100 kit zoom lens that sells in the $250-$280 range I think the post processing results shown in the cropped image are quite respectable.
For those of you who are interested in the camera gear that I used to take all of the photographs during my trip to Greece here is my equipment list:
Nikon 1 V2 body
- 1 Nikon 10mm f/2.8 (efov 27mm)
- 1 Nikon 18.5mm f/1.8 (efov 50mm)
- 1 Nikon 32mm f/1.2 (efov 86mm)
- 1 Nikon 6.7-13 f/3.5-5.6 (efov 18-35mm)
- 1 Nikon 10-30mm f/3.5-5.6 (efov 27-81mm)
- 1 Nikon 30-110mm f/3.8-5.6 (efov 81-297mm)
The total weight of this gear was about 2.4 lbs. (1,075 grams). I must admit that I was very conflicted about leaving my D800 and selection of FX lenses at home for our trip to Greece, but I just didn’t have the luxury of carrying all that size and weight around with me. As the picture below demonstrates, there is a significant size (and corresponding weight) difference between FX and CX systems.
Based on my experiences in Greece I would have no hesitation using my Nikon 1 system exclusively for my future travel photography needs.
If you are currently shooting with a DSLR and you want to a lighter weight option for travel photography you may find that some of the smaller sensor cameras available today are more than adequate to meet your needs.
Article and all images Copyright 2014, Thomas Stirr. All rights reserved. No use, reproduction or duplication including electronic is allowed without written consent.
Hmm… strange-looking pictures, most of them… Most landscapes have a strong HDR-y look to them… quite, hmm… shall I say “surprising”?
Also … are you on facebook? Would love a link on that to follow you.
Hi Prakash,
You caught me right in the middle of trying to determine and finalize my social media strategy. I’m not on Facebook at this point. I’m hoping to have all of this figured out by the end of the year.
Tom
Thomas, there are some wonderful photographers on Google+ so please consider that social site that too. Thanks!
Thanks for the tip Joni!
Thomas … Besides Greece (and New Zealand), if you have put up images for any other country / holiday destination, I’d love to see those. Would appreciate some links to them. Seriously love your images & plan to use them as a reference point if i ever get to visit those places :)
Hi Prakash,
I haven’t had the time to produce any other articles covering other countries at this point. I did recently post an article containing some images taken at Letchworth State Park.
Tom
Sir, a question about DxO and DNG. I notice when exporting JPG or TIFF files that DxO gives me a resolution option for the “ppi” count (I normally use 300). However, if I choose DNG than the resolution option is Greyed out, and lists only 72 ppi. It would therefore seem to me that the DNG file would be lower resolution that the original NEF file. Is this correct, or am I missing something?
Thanks,
WEJ
Hi William,
Good question to which I have no explanation as I am not a software guru. I can tell you that when I open up the DNG file in CS6 for additional processing that the resolution is at 300 and I haven’t had any issues with printing enlargements with files where I used DNG as part of my process.
Tom
Jean-Daniel,
Numerology aside, I agree that the man behind the camera is the main influence on the image making process.
But, being old enough to have cut out pieces of cardboard and having manipulated them at the end of a wire handle between the enlarging lens and the paper in the easel to dodge certain parts of the negative image and having cut holes in cardboards to do the opposite, I can tell you that the post process is of great importance as well. If not I would just content myself with the largest fine jpg.
I can also live with the fact that not everyone wants to share every detail of their workflow. I am most indebted to people like Tom for taking the time to share both images and experiences.
Christian.
Christian,
I’ve been there before, too, so we belong to the same planet. What questions me — and I’m not finding fault with anybody, just saying what I feel — is the relentless asking for knowledge and competence… People pay for their gear, and it looks like they find it “normal” to get advice and teaching for free. What is normal is to pay for it. All the more that, as you say, we are already indebted to Tom…
Hi Christian,
Please see my post 147).
Tom
Well, well, well,
Ansel Adams died 30 years ago (1984), Henri Cartier-Bresson 10 years ago (2004), René Burri only yesterday (2014) — it looks as though number 4 is prevailing —, and their work is overwhelming with stunning and iconic photographs! Great pictures do not depend on the gear or the software, and work won’t be better shot with Canon, Nikon or Leica, or post precessed in Lightroom or DxO Optics Pro… Everything depends on the person behind the camera…
I only want to say that I perfectly understand Thomas Stirr who declines explaining his way of post processing, and who is content with showing what can be done with such or such gear. That is rewarding and challenging enough…
JD
Hi Jean-Daniel and Christian,
My reticence to share details of how I process an image has nothing to do with me being secretive.
Tom
Hi Thomas, I think you should consider an article about how you process your images. A video would be great showing how you start on one image and take it to finish.
I too would love to get a peek at your workflow :)
Hi Prakash,
The basic workflow is DxO OpticsPro 9, then exporting a DNG file into CS6, with final adjustments in Nik Suite.
Tom
Hi Tom,
I usually export from DxO 9 as a tif. Can you let us know what is the advantage of exporting as a dng. I have not tried it yet and would like your comments on using a dng in PShop.
Your answers have made this thread a real gold mine of information.
Thanks again.
Christian.
Hi Christian,
Nasim wrote a great article on this subject:
photographylife.com/dng-vs-raw
Tom
Hi Joni,
Based on past experience that is not something that I will be doing again here at Photography Life. Post processing is a very personal matter and I learned that articles of that nature unfortunately can raise the hackles of some people if the writer of such articles does not follow their perceived ‘right way’ of doing something. Also, some folks perceive others that write such articles as trying to position themselves as an ‘expert’ in this topic, which I certainly am not.
My basic process is DxO OpticsPro 9, then exporting a DNG file into CS6, with additional final adjustments in Nik Suite.
Tom
Thomas, I am so sorry that you had a bad past experience with articles about image processing. Thank you so much for all the information you have given to all of us reading your articles and enjoying your masterful photographs.
Hi Joni,
Life simply is what it is… :-) I’ve found that there is no purpose served in fretting about the past…best to simply learn from it and move on.
If you refer to my posting 147) there is a link to my previous article that may be helpful for you.
All of the team members here at Photography Life do our best to create articles that (hopefully) will be of interest and value to our readers. Thanks again for your ongoing readership and positive comments. Both are greatly appreciated!
Tom
Hi Thomas … absolutely loved your images. Your compositions were stunning … the images were crisp & yet soft (oxymoron)??
I use LR 5.6 for processing … Would you rate DXO Optics pro 9 a better RAW converter. Some for’s/against’s would help.
Hope to visit Greece someday. I’m bookmarking this page as references :)
Warm Ragrds.
Hi Prakash,
Unfortunately I can’t comment on, or compare DxO OpticsPro 9 with Lightroom since I have never used Lightroom.
Tom
Hi Christian,
I’ve used the 18.5mm f/1.8 quite a bit for video and results have been very good…similar to the 50mm f/1.8 G FX. The lens is pretty sharp and focuses quickly. I wish I could give you more insights but I usually use my primes (CX and FX) for video, not stills.
Since I am now using DxO OpticsPro 9 for all of my RAW processing I shoot my Nikon 1 V2 up to ISO-1600 and don’t even think about it. The PRIME noise reduction does a great job on the files.
Tom
I agree Tom, DxO Optics Pro 9 does a good job.
I’m looking forward to pushing this baby to ASA 800-1600 on the V3. Hope the noise is as under control as on the V2.
Thanks again.
Christian.
Hi Christian,
Since DxOMark rates the low light performance of the V2 and V3 at very similar levels I suspect that you will find the noise very close indeed.
Tom
Hello Thomas,
I just picked up a 18.5mm f1.8. Still in the box…
I see it in your line up but you haven’t posted any images taken with it. Have you used it at all and if so can you share your impressions ?
I bought it because I wanted that near 3 stop advantage over my other 1 Nikkor which are f3.5 max and going over ASA 400 doesn’t sound like a great idea with this sensor size.
I’m hoping to achieve the same sharpness as with the Fx 50mm f1.8. What is your experience with it ?
Broke the bank with the pre-order of the 70-300mm so just couldn’t afford a 32mm f1.2.
Thanks Thomas !
Christian.