Winter is often regarded as the doldrums for nature and wildlife photographers here in Michigan. Despite the unusually warm weather this year, opportunities for outdoor photography have been quite limited, often resulting in gloomy two-hour long outings in the wild yielding little more than a few images of withered brown leaves, and maybe a squirrel or two.
Fortunately, if the weather conditions are just right, it is possible to capture fascinating photographs of ice crystals. Not the tiny, feathery hoar-frost crystals one commonly finds growing on blades of grass, but larger crystals that sometimes form on the surface of motionless ponds.
Ice is considered a mineral within the hexagonal crystal family, which contains two crystal systems: hexagonal and trigonal. The prismatic, six-sided crystals of clear quartz commonly seen in rock and mineral shops are hexagonal system minerals. (Trigonal system minerals are less common; however, you will see some photos of it momentarily – a three-sided pyramid of ice.)
Unlike frost crystals that tend to grow upward and outward from an anchor point (dendritic crystals), the crystals formed on pond water grow laterally across the water’s surface. These structures are best seen when the ice is very thin, around 2-3 millimeters thick. Once the ice gets thicker, the surface loses definition and becomes featureless, just like the ice cubes in your freezer.
I took the following photographs of beautifully exotic and ephemeral ice crystal structures over two consecutive days at a local pond.
Let’s start with some photos of trigonal ice crystals appearing as pyramids. Shooting obliquely across the ice surface into the light, and helped by the low 25° sun angle at this time of year, I was able to accentuate the three-dimensional aspects of the ice structures. The overcast sky turned the ice into silvery, monochromatic sheets which separated the tiny pyramids from the background.
The complexity in these pyramidal structures is impressive. Bear in mind the pyramid apices are only a few millimeters in height.
The bright white circles are bubbles of methane gas trapped under the ice; the light brown-yellow tones are underwater leaves and reeds.
In the image above, we see an exquisitely formed pyramid on the right, with an incipient pyramid on the left. The chevrons cause wonderfully complex interactions of light and shadow.
Here is a crop of the large pyramid – note the gas bubble trapped at the pyramid’s apex:
Later, a brief interval of blue sky brought some color, adding striking contrast to the pyramid shapes.
Crystals with a hexagonal form were rarer than the pyramids you see above. Of course, I didn’t expect to see any “quartz crystal-like” prismatic forms; instead, what appeared on the lake were essentially “hexagonal plates.”
The large hexagonal plate in the upper center of this photo is the best example I came across. Bounded by four pyramids, it shows a depressed center. I wonder what it would have looked like had it continued crystallizing until all six sides met? This is a fascinating structure, and quite large – probably six by six inches. Cropping into different sections of this picture could yield an additional four or five separate photographs.
It’s hard to tell whether the two following images show trigonal structures, or incipient or modified hexagonal structures. Nonetheless, they make for very photogenic compositions.
A few more trigonal structures…
The next two images show the effect of changing my shooting position – resulting in two completely different compositions!
Finally, to close this long treatise, here are a few abstract compositions.
Observations on equipment and technique:
I used a Panasonic G9 with the Lumix 100-300mm II f/4.0-5.6 lens and a Panasonic G95 with the Lumix 45-175mm f/4.0-5.6 lens; hand-held; dual IBIS on.
The G9 was in Manual mode, center-weighted metering, auto ISO (maximum at 6400), f/7.1 or f/8.0, shutter speed 1/800-1/1250. ISO ranged from 200-3200.
The G95 was in Aperture Priority mode, multi-segment metering, auto ISO (maximum at 6400), f/8.0, and shutter speed at 1/400 (minimum setting linked to the ISO limit). ISO ranged from 200-1000.
Shooting obliquely across the pond surface at maximum 300mm telephoto and with subjects at 20-30 yards distance, the depth of field was shallow, even at f/8.0. I placed the AF box on the mid-point of the subject and trusted that the depth of field generated would be sufficient to cover the main area of interest.
Photos were cropped, lightly adjusted for tone and contrast with Radiant Photo. Then noise removal and minor sharpening were applied with Topaz Sharpen AI.
Outdoor photography during the long winter months always presents a challenge to enthusiasts searching for inspiration. I hope that my ice crystal photographs will help others in finding unconventional subjects to banish the dreary doldrums until spring arrives!
About Carl F. Brink
A career in gemology, geology, and metallurgical engineering enabled Carl to develop his photography skills documenting various geological exposures and outcrops. He excelled at macro and photomicrography of rock and mineral specimens.
His image-making efforts over the years in his photographic niche were rewarded by selection for industry-related publications; he has a number of magazine cover photos to his credit.
Presently residing in Michigan, he now concentrates his photography on the nature and wildlife opportunities so abundant in the state. You can contact him here.
Thank you for the beautiful photographs. I was most interested to learn that you used telephoto lenses to capture these. I have done similar ice crystal photographs but always used wide angle lenses which, of course, required getting very close to the ice. Perhaps the next time I’ll try it your way!
Hi David, I was trying to find birds with the telephoto…accidentally noticed the geometric shapes out on the ice in the middle of the pond! Once I started looking, I found them everywhere. Finding and selecting suitable compositions was difficult. The telephoto lens gives me “pseudo-macro” framing at the long end! Glad you liked the pics!
Very nice photos – thank you. You may be interested in reading about Wilson Bentley better known as “Snowflake Bentley”. He was known for photographing snowflakes in the late 1800’s here in Vermont. Again, thanks for sharing you photos.
Thanks for the comment. I will check out Mr. Bentley’s photos.
Interesting! I happened to come across something very similar in my backyard (flic.kr/p/QyK8DT), but never thought of actively looking for these structures. Photography has no limits.
I found more just a few weeks ago…arguably better pics than the ones I posted. Like you say, photography has no limits! Thanks for the comment!
Amazing photos! Number 15 looks like an airport in the frozen arctic.
The abstract nature of these structures is wonderful. Thanks for the comment.
I’m glad you enjoyed the pics!
These are very cool! Some of my favorite photos are ice structures, but I’ve never gone out with the specific purpose of photographing them. Clearly that needs to change!
I’m glad you enjoyed the pics!
Thank you for these beautiful photos! For me, the beauty of nature is in the big structures (night sky, landscapes) and in the tiny small things, such as plant or lichen or fungi parts under the macro lens. I never before tried ice crystal photos – you inspired me! Thank you.
I’m happy I inspired you!