The Nikon ZF looks like an amazing camera...I'm shocked it's only 2K. Are you thinking of getting it?
Most probably. It looks like it's a kind of retro Z6 III with Z8 AF... so the perfect camera to me.
No, but it does make me want to see what they have planned for a Z6iii (same thing, different form factor?) or a Z7iii.
I'd really like a Z8 with the IBIS improvements and pixel shift, but that probably is going to have to wait for a Z8ii, so another couple years out.
Yes,but, would like to read Spencer's review first 😊 I already have z fc and Nikon D7200
Waiting for the mirrorless D500.
Yes - as soon as they bring a silver edition. 😉
It's stupid, I know, but to be honest I would buy mostly out of nostalgia anyway...
No, I don't get along with the ergonomics of such cameras. I have owned a Fuji X-T1; didn't get along with it. Sold it and much later tried an X-T30; same story, didn't get along with the ergonomic. These are beatiful cameras but just not for me.
I also believe that Nikon made a mistake by investing resources in the Zf. There is a Zfc which would work just fine for over 99% of the Zf buyers. I own a Z50 which has the same sensor as the Zfc and it produces fantastic images. I don't get the point why there is a need for a fullframe version of the Zfc. I print up to A3+ and can't tell the difference between a D850 image and a Z50 image in this size.
___________________________________________
Pascal Hibon
Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/phibon/
Website: https://pascalhibon.net/
Bought it.
Challenging wheels, buttons, dials combination. But very satisfied with IQ, autofocus, ISO performance and handling. The latter was not foreseen.
24MP is fine. Had a Z7ii, which made me obsessively take care of perfect focus. With the Zf I feel relieved. Autofocus is reliable. I do much more "focus" on composition or the interaction with the person I shoot.
Zf's ergonomics are not working well for me. I am still hanging on to my Df though...