It’s starting to rain outside, the days are getting shorter, and my holiday time is irreversibly over. Most of us are probably skimping on our remaining vacation days for the end of the year. What a situation! There are distant lands, exotic animals, and adventure awaiting – but no time to photograph them.
There are two solutions to this situation. One is quite radical, which is to say goodbye to work and just go where your heart takes you. The other, which I’m going to offer you today, won’t leave behind burnt bridges, thousands of dollars, or a failed marriage.
Instead of traveling to far-flung locations in search of unusual wildlife, you can search for them closer to home, sometimes literally in your backyard. How is that possible?
Forget the zoo for now. Today, I’ll introduce you two species that I photographed in Prague, but which originally belong to a completely different continent. A real exotic at home, as I promised.
The first is the Mandarin duck, which is mostly at home in Japan and China. But the growing population – first established from birds that escaped from captivity – has spread itself thousands of kilometers from its original home. The ducks have even begun to breed in Europe, and thus I went to photograph them in the 700-year-old Stromovka Park in the center of the Czech metropolis.
The second exotic bird I will introduce you today is the Carolina duck. Yes, the one that swims in ponds in the United States, from Washington, DC to Central Park in New York. Maybe it’s not an exotic bird if you live in the USA, but for me, it’s as far-flung as a bird from Africa. The Carolina duck arrived here for similar reasons as the Mandarin duck, and now it makes its home throughout parts of Europe.
The ecologist half of me says that they don’t belong in our wilderness, even though they aren’t as much of a problem as many other non-native animals. For now, though, let’s look at them not through the eyes of an ecologist, but a photographer. And these eyes say that they are beautiful birds that are a joy to photograph.
I always like the eye-level photograph of a bird, especially like this, when they’re floating on the water. Top-down photos tend to be deletable. Alas, the lake where I found these species in Stromovka has such steep banks that it is difficult to reach water level. So, I must act like a duck and jump in the water.
A wise saying goes something like this: to live with the wolves, you have to howl together with them. And so, to photograph ducks, you have to swim together with them – or at least walk into the water with wading pants.
One morning, I visited the ducks in their natural (to me unnatural) water environment. Although I had just gotten my Nikon Z9, I chose to leave it at home and dive into the water with my D500, for fear of dunking the camera underwater.
I would only attempt a photoshoot like this with a tripod and a gimbal head. My concern with a ball head is that I would accidentally loosen it too much, causing the camera to plop into the water with the grace of a loon.
When I finally got down to the duck’s level (physically, not mentally, I hope), the only thing left was to wait – and to enlist the help of a nice lady walking by who was feeding the ducks. The rest was easy and fun. I stood in the water, while some of the most colorful ducks of two different continents swam around me.
My final trick was to try to photograph both species of duck in the same picture. After all, why not? The scene would never have occurred in an untouched planet, but that tells a story in and of itself. Two colorful birds from different continents meeting up to eat some food in a pond in Europe. It seems they are as cosmopolitan as any of us.
Admit it: Even a photo shoot near your house can be quite an adventure with a touch of the exotic.
Great shots, Libor, and wonderful article. I have shot the same two ducks at The Pond of Central Park with the same gear. I love my 200-500, but the auto focus is painfully slow compared to a modern 70-200. I’ve found it is better to get closer to that “lady feeding the ducks.” I also got the 90° viewfinder for the D850 so I can look down and out and magnify. In NYC we call those Wood Ducks, and Mandarins. 😁
Hi Scott, you are right that the 70-200 is much faster. But it’s not exactly a fair comparison. After all, that lens is in a different price range and also the motor has less work to do because of the overall smaller elements inside the lens. The downside of a short telephoto lens can be that you get things in the frame that you don’t want there. 200mm is almost a wide angle lens.
An angled viewfinder can be quite handy near water. Do you wade, too? We also call them Mandarins here in the Czech Republic, just like the fruit. After all, the males look pretty tasty.
Brilliant photos. Thanks.
Thank you, Gary.
Excellent images, unexpected from D500 with normal level 200-500 lens. The details of the bird, sharpness, composing, lighting with proper exposure, everything is perfect. The risk you have taken by going in to water is marvelous.
Thank you Gera for your kind comment. The combination of the D500 and Nikon 200-500 f/5.6 is so good, that I’m going to make some coffee and write something about it. Thanks for the inspiration.
Yes, you are right, that is the wonderful combination with certain limitations. I am also using the same.Sir what is your openion on going for Nikkor 500 mm 5.6 pf with same D500 instead of 200-500. Will there be any improvement?
The 500mm f/5.6 PF is an amazing lens. The main advantage is its light weight and everything associated with it. The optical quality is better compared to the 200-500mm, especially at the edges of the frame (is that such a critical part of the frame for our purposes?). What is definitely better is the AF speed.
What’s really different is the price!
But that’s photography life for you.
Sorry. Sour grapes ‘cos I can’t afford one. I do agree on AF speed – my 300/f4D is better than my 200-500.
Lovely photos. Almost makes me want to buy some waders.
Thank you Libor, sorry for my late response.
Marvellous pictures ! Thank you for sharing :-)
With great pleasure. Glad you like it.
The photos are marvellous, these birds are very beautiful and colourful. Am I out of line to ask if these are all males? Is the sexual dimorphism in these species as strong as in mallards?
I am also more than happy to notice, that the Mandarin duck can also have a bad hair day, that I am not the only one (the first photo).
To be honest, while I am more than aware of some invasive species crawling into Europe (like the grey squirrels or the Asian ladybeetle) I am a little surprised to learn about invasive ducks. Do these species cause any issues in local ecosystems? Are they stronger or more aggressive and push out the local birds?
I appreciate your article, Libor. It has inspired me to keep my eyes wide open for such discoveries. Most of the time, what you can encounter in a city park in Europe is a mallard, a mute swan, a common coot, a pigeon and a sparrow (or some gulls if there is a big water nearby). These are hardly exotic birds.
P.S. Let’s just hope that the Canadian goose will not follow the steps of the Carolina duck and will leave us alone – the aggression in that bird! :)
Hi Marcin, good point. The females are really extremely different from the beautifully colored males. The role of males in caring for the young is woefully small.
These ducks, as far as I know are not a problem yet, but for example the Egyptian goose is already really problematic in some places.
Amen about the Canada geese. Where I live those critters love grass athletic fields and shit all over them.