Equivalent Focal Length and Field of View

When it comes to focal lengths, it seems that many photographers get very confused by “equivalent focal length” and “field of view” jargon that is often used to describe lens attributes on different camera sensors. To help fully understand these terms, I decided to write a quick article, explaining what they truly mean in very simple terms.

1) True Focal Length

What is the true focal length of a lens? This one is extremely important to understand. Focal length is an optical attribute of a lens, which has nothing to do with the camera or the type of sensor it uses. The true focal length of a lens is typically what manufacturer says it is on the lens. For example, the Nikon 50mm f/1.4G lens (below) has a true focal length of 50mm, irrespective of what camera you use it on.

Nikon 50mm f/1.4G AF-S

2) Field of View

The “field of view” (which is sometimes wrongfully called “angle of view”, as explained below) is simply what your lens together with the camera can see and capture from left to right, to top to bottom. If you are shooting with a DSLR camera, the field of view is typically what you see inside the viewfinder. Some DSLR cameras, have less than 100% viewfinder coverage, which means that what you see inside the viewfinder is actually less in size than what the final image will be. For example, if you shoot with the Nikon D90 DSLR that has 96% viewfinder coverage, what you see inside the viewfinder is going to be about 4% less than what the camera actually captures. Hence, the actual field of view is always what the camera captures, not necessarily what you see inside the viewfinder.

Here is an example of differences in field of view between 70 and 400mm:
70mm-400mm FoV

The top-left 70mm image looks almost “wide”, while the 400mm image shows a much greater magnification with a much narrower field of view.

3) Angle of View

Lens manufacturers often publish the term “angle of view” or “maximum angle of view” in lens specifications, because they define what the lens is capable of seeing in degrees. For example, the Nikon 24mm f/1.4G lens has a maximum angle of view of 84°, while Nikon 300mm f/2.8G telephoto lens has a maximum angle of view of only 8°10′ when used on film or full-frame cameras. Take a look at the following illustration:

Nikon 300mm vs 24mm AoV

As you can see, 84 degrees is very wide when compared to 8 degrees. That’s why you can fit a lot of the scene when shooting with a 24mm lens, while a 300mm lens allows you to capture a narrower, but much more magnified portion of the scene.

The main difference between the angle of view and field of view, is that the former is an attribute of the lens, while the latter is the result of both the lens and the camera. For example, the above angle of view of 84° for the 24mm f/1.4G is only for a full-frame camera. Once mounted on a camera with a cropped/APS-C sensor, the field of view, or what you see through the camera actually gets narrower to 61°. Nikon publishes two different numbers for angle of view for lenses – “Maximum Angle of View (DX-format)” and “Maximum Angle of View (FX-format)”. In reality, the actual physical characteristic of the lens (what it sees) does not change. As explained below, the size of the sensor simply crops part of the frame, which results in a narrower “field of view”.

4) Equivalent Focal Length

Let’s now move on to the term “equivalent focal length”, which like I stated in the beginning, is a term that many photographers misunderstand. The word “equivalent” is typically in relation to 35mm film. You see, back in the 35mm film days, the focal length of the lens was always whatever the lens said on the label. With the invention of digital SLRs, the camera sensor (the device that captures images) is often much smaller than the 35mm film, primarily because of high cost. This reduction in size of the sensor results in cutting of the image corners, the process that photographers call “cropping”. The interesting thing, is that the image is actually not cut by the sensor or the camera – parts of the image are simply ignored. Take a look at the following illustration (red arrows represent light entering the camera):

FX and DX camera

As you can see from the above illustrations, the 35mm film/sensor cameras capture a large area of the lens, while the smaller sensors (also known as “cropped sensors”) capture mostly the center. Note how the light enters the camera chamber in exactly the same way in both illustrations, but the smaller sensor is only able to capture a certain portion of it, while the rest of the light falls outside of the sensor. The term “cropped sensor” can be confusing, since “cropping” an image is often associated with cutting it. Once again, in this case, there is no cutting – the light rays from the edges of the lens just overshoot and do not make it to the sensor.

Manufacturers knew about this “overshooting” process when they designed smaller sensors, so they started producing lenses specifically designed for cropped sensor cameras to make them cheaper. Nikon calls them “DX”, while Canon calls them “EF-S”. Basically, the lens itself passes through a smaller image circle and by the time it gets to the sensor, not much of the circle is actually wasted. Think of it as the right part of the above illustration, except the circle is much smaller. Obviously, lenses like these do not function as they should on full-frame/35mm cameras – only half of the scene will actually make it to the sensor. Nikon full-frame cameras are programmed to recognize DX lenses and will automatically decrease the image resolution, while the Canon EF-S lenses will not function on full-frame cameras at all.

How do two cameras with different sensor sizes have the same image resolution? For example, both full-frame Nikon D700 and cropped sensor Nikon D300s have 12.1 Megapixels while having different size sensors. This is because the Nikon D300s camera has much smaller pixels (and hence, higher pixel density) compared to Nikon D700 – that’s how 12.1 million pixels are able to fit on a smaller sensor. What this essentially means, is that the smaller sensors with smaller pixels enlarge the center area of the lens more in this case. If a lens is not of very high quality and is not able to resolve fine details, the images might appear less sharp on cropped sensors.

Let’s now get back to the term “equivalent focal length”. I’m sure you have seen manufacturers claim something like “The 28-300mm lens has a field of view equivalent to a focal length of 42-450mm in 35mm format”, which is a correct way of saying it. Others may say something like “the lens focal length is equivalent to 42-450mm on DX sensor”, which is an incorrect way of saying it. As I have shown above, in relation to the camera sensor, the focal length of the lens never changes – only the field of view does. Saying something like “my 28-300mm lens on my Nikon D90 is like a 42-450mm lens” is incorrect for this reason.

Where do these larger numbers such as 42-450mm come from? Let’s now look into the crop factor and how these “equivalent” numbers are actually computed.

5) The Crop Factor

By now you understand what “equivalent focal length” truly stands for and how the smaller sensors ignore the larger circle area. Let’s now talk about the crop factor – the term that manufacturers and photographers often use to describe camera sensors and to calculate the “equivalent focal length”. You might have heard people say something like “Nikon D90 camera has a 1.5x crop factor” or “Canon 60D has a 1.6x crop factor”. The term “crop factor” came up after smaller sensors were invented to make it easier for people to understand how much narrower the field of view gets when a lens is used on a camera with a small sensor. Manufacturers had to somehow explain how an image on a smaller sensor camera looks enlarged or “zoomed in” compared to 35mm film.

If you take the sensor area of a full-frame sensor or 35mm film and compare it to a cropped sensor, you will be surprised to see that the former is at least twice larger than the latter. For example, the Nikon full-frame cameras approximately have a sensor size of 36mm x 24mm which gives us a surface area of 864. Cropped-sensor cameras like the Nikon D90, on the other hand, have an approximate sensor size of 24mm x 16mm, which is around 384 in surface area – a whopping 2.3 times smaller compared to Nikon D3s! But when it comes to focal lengths, you do not use the surface area of the lens. The crop ratio is computed by taking the diagonal of the full-frame sensor, divided by the diagonal of the cropped sensor.

Now you will have to remember some math. Remember how to compute the diagonal? Here is the formula in case you forgot it: √(X² + Y²). The full frame camera has a diagonal of 43.26 (square root of 1296+576), while the cropped sensor cameras have an approximate diagonal of 28.84 (square root of 576 + 256). If you take 43.26 and divide it by 28.84, you get 1.5 – the ratio of the full-frame sensor diagonal to the cropped sensor diagonal (these numbers are rounded – the actual ratio is a little bit higher, around 1.52).

What do you do with this ratio? You multiply it to get the “equivalent focal length”. For example, the Nikon 24mm f/1.4G lens has an field of view equivalent to approximately 36mm when mounted on a cropped sensor camera like Nikon D90. What this means, is that if you took a 24mm lens and mounted it on a cropped sensor camera, then took a 36mm lens and mounted it on a full-frame camera, you would get about the same view. If you put it the other way, to have the same field of view as the 24mm mounted on a full-frame camera, you would need a 16mm lens on a cropped sensor camera. For example, if you were standing from one spot and could fit a house in your frame using a 24mm lens on a full-frame/35mm camera, to be able to fit that same house on a cropped sensor camera, you would need to have a much wider lens with a focal length of 16mm.

Hope this clears up the true definition of the above terms for those who do not understand them well. If you have any questions or comments, please post them in the comments section below.


  1. November 15, 2010 at 11:50 pm

    Thank you for this excellent post! One thing I was wondering a while ago was how to compare binoculars with camera lenses. The binocs always advertise “6x magnification” or something like that. What I found was that a 50mm lens is supposed to be pretty much what the eye sees, so is effectively 1x. Every additional 50mm is an additional magnification. I wanted a pair that would do better than my Nikon 18-200 on my D300. I figured that a 200mm lens on a DX sensor gives an effective angle equivalent to 300mm focal length on 35mm, so should be the same as a 6x pair of binoculars.

    I never actually had someone who understood both validate my thought – can you say whether that conversion makes sense?

    After reading your post, I realize I should have just looked at the angles (since I think both lenses and binocs publish those).


    • November 17, 2010 at 7:35 pm

      Ben, you are most welcome!

      Yes, you are right about 50mm – it is considered to be a standard/normal focal length. The “x” magnification is computed by taking the long focal length and dividing it by the short focal length. For example, the Nikon 28-300mm is a 10.7x zoom lens (300mm / 28mm = 10.7). The Nikon 18-200mm is an 11.1x zoom lens :)

      Let me know if you have any questions.

    • 1.2) jebey
      January 24, 2013 at 5:54 pm

      Sir Nasim, you are so generous of knowledge. your article is so great, it will go a long way to many people all over the world needing to understand focal length, angle of view and camera sensor.

      Many thanks to you. Wish you a happy life.

      – jebey

      • 1.2.1) John
        May 22, 2013 at 3:02 am

        Sir Nasim, I have 50mm 1.8g on D7000 (crop sensor) body, now I attach wide converter 0.7 on my lens so in my calculation it turns out I have a field of view of 52.5mm which means I get nearly a full frame sensor field of view on 50mm lens. If my calculation is correct do I still get same quality photo on full frame DSLR?

        This is my calculation:

        50mm (lens)
        1.5 (Crop Sensor)
        0.7 (wide converter)

        50×1.5=75mm, 75×0.7=52.5mm


  2. 2) Del-Uks
    November 16, 2010 at 5:08 pm

    Any word on the “lens breathing” issue with some zoom lens (like the Nikkor 70-200 VRII) ?

    • November 17, 2010 at 7:39 pm

      Del-Uks, I knew somebody would have asked this question! :) The lens breathing characteristic has to do with focal length shifts due to the optical design of the lens to accomplish two things a) to have a shorter maximum near focus range and b) to not move external lens elements while focusing. It is just a different way the lens focuses, which is why the focal length is accurate at infinity.

  3. 3) sekhar
    November 18, 2010 at 6:34 am

    Hi Nasim, excellent info. can you pls. clarify as to why 85mm is called a portrait lens(mounted on FX) ? What would i do wrong in terms of image quality if i do the same with a 50mm lens? I have seen a lot of beautiful images on your website with 50mm… but it seems several photographers are pretty strict about using 85mm for portraits? thanks.

    • November 18, 2010 at 3:31 pm

      Sekhar, the 85mm is called a portrait lens, because that’s what it is intended to be – for shooting portraits. It renders the background (bokeh) better than any other Nikon lens and the really large aperture of f/1.4 allows to isolate subjects, while keeping them sharp in the foreground. The Nikon 50mm is also superb, but it is certainly inferior in terms of wide open performance + rendering of bokeh.

      I personally like both lenses and consider the 50mm f/1.4G to be a great value, given its price and performance.

      • 3.1.1) sekhar
        November 18, 2010 at 4:16 pm

        Nasim, Yes, only after coming across your articles, i could make up my mind and purchased a 50mm f/1.4G for my d90. No doubt I see clear-cut difference from other lenses with smaller apertures. I guess, I will have to try the 85mm myself and see the difference, but it is too pricey !

        • Profile photo of Nasim Mansurov Nasim Mansurov
          December 7, 2010 at 2:19 pm

          Sekhar, don’t worry about the 85mm and enjoy your 50mm instead! :)

  4. 4) Coby
    November 23, 2010 at 9:08 am

    Nice article.
    I always wondered if the focal length mentioned on an EF-S lens is the real focal lenght or already the equivalent focal length? I guess it’s the real focal length,but I’m still not fully sure.

    • December 7, 2010 at 2:21 pm

      Thank you Coby! The focal lengths on lenses are the real focal lengths, not equivalent ones. So if you are looking at the Canon 18-55mm lens, for example, the equivalent “field of view” is going to be that of a 29-88mm lens.

      Hope this helps!

  5. 5) Francis
    December 22, 2010 at 2:14 pm

    Hi Nasim,

    Can you help me understand how the image is magnified in a DX versus a FX?
    I understand that the DX only captures part of the image capable by the FX, but why the enlargement of the subjects?

    If I have a photo on my desk, and I just cut around the outside perimeter of the photo to make it smaller in size, the subjects within my photo (ex: flowers) do not change in size, so how does this happen in the camera of a DX sensor? Something simple I am missing here I am sure bit I just cant see it yet.

    Does the DX camera electroniaclly strech the image out to fill up a 35mm sensor size equivalent after the phot is taken? Is that how the magnification happens? If so, how do you not lose resolution by doing this (like photoshop cropping)?

    Hope I was clear in what I am asking :)

    Thanks, hope to hear back!

    • January 6, 2011 at 5:52 pm

      Francis, an image is not magnified in DX versus FX – it just gets cropped. Think of it this way – an image is cropped and then because there are more pixels on DX, you get a similar resolution as FX. Because of this, the pixel size on DX sensor is much smaller than on FX, which is why you also get less dynamic range.

      There is no real enlargement happening here – all it is is physical (not software) cropping. That’s why the term “crop factor” is used. Have you had a chance to thoroughly read the article? Take a look at the last image – it will be easier to understand the concept.

      In terms of your question about a photo on your desk, think of it this way. If you were to cut the outside perimeter of the photo, the image does not appear larger because you are keeping the same distance between yourself and the photo before and after you cut it. Now what happens if you move closer to the photo after you cut it? The image will appear larger right? Cameras don’t work the same way, because you don’t change the distance between yourself and the subject, but rather increase the number of pixels to effectively blow up the image in size :)

      Hope this helps!

      • 5.1.1) Francis
        February 7, 2011 at 12:31 am

        Thanks Nasim for taking the time to respond, it did help!

        • Andy Brown
          January 5, 2013 at 5:45 pm

          Can I just add—try and think of the image being shrunk by the “lens”onto the 1.5/6 factored sensor to fit it “whole” then we get given the whole sensors worth as our image.

          It’s pretty confusing, I [from my old film days] still have the 35mm eye but have to stop and recalibrate.

          The best thing ever would be someone brings out a 17-80 1.4 zoom, all the angles are covered.

  6. 6) Eli from Norway
    December 25, 2010 at 3:32 pm

    After reading this, I’m not sure about purchasing 50mm 1.4G to my D300, should I go for the 35mm 1.8G instead? If the pics doesn’t get as good as if I had for example D3x/D3s I mean. Something about “cropped making the images less sharp” made me think… Is the sensor too small in my D300 to get the most out of 50mm 1.4G?
    I’m a student and therefore it’s a big deal to me financially, I want to be positively sure before I get the glass.

    Sorry about my bad english. ;)

    • January 6, 2011 at 9:27 pm

      Eli, if you have budget issues, then definitely go for the 35mm f/1.8G instead of 50mm f/1.4G.

      • 6.1.1) Jay
        January 3, 2013 at 12:29 pm

        Hi Nasim,

        I have the same question as to what I want to buy for my D7000. My cousins bought 50mm f/1.8. You mentioned it in one of your articles that the 50mm f/1.8 does not really work well with some DX camera.

        Do I really have to go for the large aperture (50mm f/1.4) or get the 35mm f/1.8? I want to have great pictures in low-light, disco light setting.

        Thank you very much. And more power to you!

  7. 7) Balaji
    December 27, 2010 at 8:36 pm

    Hi Nasim,

    Detailed good explanation in simple terms! kudos :) I am a beginner and going to make my first dslr purchase in a week. Decided the camera (D90)! Lens wise, I did read your other threads and found 50mm f1.8 and 35mm f1.8 to be very useful to buy (eventually will buy either one of them). I also read the kit lens pros and cons.

    My question here is, d90 body costs SG $1180 (free – 18GB card) and D90 kit (with 18-105mm) costs SG $1480 (free – 8gb card, 1 Tripod, cleaning kit, nikon bag, nikon travel bag). Is USD $230 worth for the kit lens with freebies or should i have to just buy the body with one of my preferred prime lens. I mostly would like to take portraits, landscape in my point&shoot.

    Balaji M

    • January 6, 2011 at 9:28 pm

      Balaji, I would get the kit lens together with a prime lens.

  8. 8) JordanL
    March 12, 2011 at 11:11 am

    Hi, I found your article very informative and clear; however, I do have one question. I just bought a D700, my first fx camera and have been using it with my old dx lenses. I am currently looking for an fx lens to shoot with but the whole crop factor thing has me confused. My question is this, the focal length of an fx lens on an fx sensor the same as a dx lens on a dx sensor? So if I like my 24-85mm dx on my D100, would I get the same with 24-85mm fx on the D700?

  9. April 3, 2011 at 11:59 pm

    What an useful explanantion about focal lens, picture angle and crop factor. Have to say thanks..

  10. 10) Sunarto Djuardi
    May 29, 2011 at 7:02 am

    Dear Nasim

    I am a beginner and just bought D300s and found great of the explanation.

    I have 2 questions regarding ” If a lens is not of very high quality and is not able to resolve fine details, the images might appear less sharp on cropped sensors ”

    ie :
    1. Might the image of ( D300s+ Nikon 24-70 ) be less sharp than (D-700 + Nikon 24-70) ?
    2. is that ( D300s + FX lense ) more sharp than ( D300s + DX lenses ) ?

    Appreciate if you could advise since I am considering to invest more to FX lenses ( 14-24 and/or 24-70 and/or 70-200 ).
    I just bought Nikon DX 18-200 mm and Tokina 11-16 mm/f2.8 as starting point).

    Tks n Rgds

    Tks n Rgds

  11. 11) Kostas
    August 11, 2011 at 5:45 am


    First of all congratulations for the well-designed website and the information it contains. I find it very helpful.
    I’m about to buy the nikon d5100. However my “problem” is to what type of prime lens should i get. Either the 50mm 1.4G or the 35mm 1.8G. In terms of budget there’s no issue. I’m between of these two lenses as I intend to take photos mostly at home, people portraits (close-ups and some distance), family photos as well as street photos.
    I do not intend to change lenses frequently so I’d also consider sth to keep it for a long time before I upgrade to another category.
    I’d appreciate it to have your advise on this and under these types of photo wwhich lens would add the maximum of value according to the use i plan to do.

    Thanks & regards

  12. 12) Peter
    August 22, 2011 at 8:28 pm

    Hello Nasim,

    I would like to congratulate you on a well informed article.

    Very simple in explanation and easy to follow.

    All the best with your website.

    Thank you & regards,


  13. 13) anupam
    November 18, 2011 at 12:26 pm

    im an amateur photographer . i wanted to ask you something, i decided to get a nikkor 50mm 1.8 G, and i bought it the other day. i use nikon D7000 which has a cropped censor, and that 50mm lens should give me 75mm on cropped censor but it is still giving me 50mm on my nikon d7000, why so? is there any defect? hope you will soon answer my question

    • 13.1) Matiasgh
      February 29, 2012 at 11:10 am

      As I notice you did either not read or not understand this great article. 50mm is always 50mm, it gives the “equivalent perspective” of an 75mm on full-frame, but it is still 50mm. The working distance, if for example you were to take portraits, has to be further away because there is less sensor to make a wider picture, and that is why some people claim the “mm” difference. Just concentrate on the angle of view and remember to understand what “equivalent” means.

  14. 14) nile
    November 18, 2011 at 12:27 pm

    im an amateur photographer . i wanted to ask you something, i decided to get a nikkor 50mm 1.8 G, and i bought it the other day. i use nikon D7000 which has a cropped censor, and that 50mm lens should give me 75mm on cropped censor but it is still giving me 50mm on my nikon d7000, why so? is there any defect? hope you will soon answer my question

  15. 15) sosu
    March 6, 2012 at 5:05 pm

    Just came across you site while searching to understand about the lens.I recently bought a Nikon D3100 and planning to but extra lens to capture some family pictures at parties. Should I go with 35mm or 50mm or 85 mm lens? Which lens would have the ideal focal length to cover indoor events without losing the picture quality?

    Thank you for your effort in writing this article.

  16. March 21, 2012 at 12:30 pm

    Hi, Nasim,

    First of all, congrats on the excellent explanation.

    I just want to clarify one doubt. Suppose I’m 10m far from my subject and I take a picture with a 50mm lens mounted on 35mm sensor camera.

    To acquire the same image with an APS-C sensor (let’s say 1.5 crop factor), I’d have to use the same 50mm lens, and take the picture 15m away from the subject.

    That is taking a picture with a 75mm on 35mm is not the same as a picture with a 50mm on 1.5 crop factor APS-C camera on the same distance.

    Am I correct?

    Thanks in advance.

  17. April 27, 2012 at 1:37 am

    Hi Nasim,

    Above article is seriously a great help of understanding between the “real” and “equivalent” focal lengths depending on the format of the sensor in camera. And I believe I’ve got it cleared of course due to your explanation. I appreciate that…

    But what I’ve understood, the fact is that photographers have made the “focal length” of lenses more friendly to relate with full-frame cameras to call it the “real focal length” and when you put these lenses on cropped-sensor camera the term “equivalent focal length” is derived. But “focal length” is actually an element of a lens, irrespective of the camera it is used on. (just like you stated in your article above)…

    Just to let you know that I am also waiting for an opinion of yours on another article… please reply if you got time….

    Thank you for your content on line… seriously since the day, I have found your website, I didn’t need to keep hunting around….

  18. 18) Alex
    April 29, 2012 at 3:06 pm


    Tanks for this great article and the even greater site. there’s still a thing though which i don’t understand.
    Since I’m planning on buying the d7000 i wonder about the 100% viewfinder and the crop factor. Ok, the crop factor determines the actual angle of view on the final picture. But what do I see in the view finder with an 50mm lens, for example??? The angle of view of the final picture will show an equivalent of 75mm. Will the viewfinder show the same 75mm or will it show 50mm???

    thanks in advance

  19. 19) Wasanths P Dissanayake
    July 2, 2012 at 2:46 am

    Hi Nasim
    Very good article ,easily inderstand,the best web page I ever read.please continue to serve people to become good photographers.congratulatipn

  20. 20) Marvin Melendrez
    September 13, 2012 at 10:15 am

    Hi Nasim

    This is a very good article and I have learn many things from your site. I have one question only is a 12-24 mm wide zoom lens will perform better also on a dx lens like d90? Im going to use it for landscapes.

    Thank you and more power…

  21. 21) Tony
    February 3, 2013 at 8:54 pm


    Is your diagram showing the 35mm and cropped sensor incorrect? More specifically, with the lens focused at infinity, shouldn’t parallel light rays entering the camera intersect or converge at the image plane, i.e. the sensor? The diagram shows them converging in the middle of the camera.


  22. 22) Tim
    April 10, 2013 at 9:37 am

    This is one of the best, easy to read explanations of the crop factor.

    I use this general rule for handholding without lens stablization.
    50mm lens = 1/50 or faster shutter 200mm lens = 1/200 or faster shutter.

    With the crop factor figured in, the rule would still be the same because the lens is not becoming longer, just cropping, correct?

    • 22.1) Steve
      June 27, 2013 at 10:14 am

      Using a 200mm lens on a camera with a 1.5 crop factor suggests a min shutter speed of 1/300th

  23. 23) gianni
    May 3, 2013 at 11:25 am

    MAny thanks for the article but there’s still a question i havent been able to solve yet:

    Taking a photo with a 300mm lens on a 35mm is said to be equivalent, in FOV terms, to a photo taken with a 200 mm lens on a APS-C camera (crop factor 1.5).

    What i would like to understand is if that equivalence exists in terms of IQ aswell.

    Saying otherwise, giving the same shot conditions (aperture, exposure, lights conditions, object distance etc) and quality of lenses used, the level of details captured with a 300mm on a 35mm shoud be”exactly” the same of those captured with a 200mm on a APS-C (if cameras have same resolution too, saying 24MP) ???
    or the equivalence is only in terms of FOV (field of view captured by sensors) and not also in terms of IQ (image quality)???

    many thanks!


    • 23.1) Brian
      June 27, 2013 at 12:49 pm

      The image area taken with a 200mm is on an APS-C is relatively the same at that of a 300mm on a full frame sensor. If you want to see the image size of the 200mm on a full frame sensor, but on a cropped sensor then all you have to do is increase the distance from the camera to the subject. This will give you the same FOV as a 200mm on a full frame sensor.

      The FOV will now be the same, but the DOF will be different due to the increased distance. Just adjust the f:stop to compensate…if this is a problem.

  24. 24) Twinkle Paul
    October 1, 2013 at 1:07 am

    Thanks for this excellent post. It answered lot of my doubts. But I still have a question. A lot of people commented elsewhere that the Nikon 35mm 1.8G DX lens would have an equivalent focal length of 50mm on a DX camera (like the D5100 or D90) and, the Nikon 50mm 1.8G which is an FX lens would have an equivalent focal length of 50mm on an FX camera and 75mm on a DX camera. Why the 35mm DX lens does not have an equivalent focal length of 35mm on a DX camera?

    • 24.1) Soufiane
      January 14, 2015 at 9:06 pm

      This is actually a good question and would love to see it answered. Anyone to bring some light on this?

  25. 25) Chris
    November 18, 2013 at 10:52 am

    With all this being said in this article. Should DX lenses only be used on DX cameras?

  26. 26) James
    February 9, 2014 at 7:05 am

    This article provides a nice clarification on crop factor. But, I think some of your statements about angle of view may be misleading.

    Just as focal length does not change, neither does the angle of view. Only the field of view does, due to the crop factor.

    It is crucial to distinguish “angle of view” and “field of view”. Angle of view refers to the number of degrees projected by the lens as a cone back to the sensor. This angle does not change, regardless of crop factor. The field of view is the area within the projected circle captured by the sensor. Your diagram shows this well: the circles are the same (since the angle remains the same), but the rectangle of the sensors are different sizes.

    In your second to last paragraph, however, you write: “For example, the Nikon 24mm f/1.4G lens has an angle of view equivalent to approximately 36mm when mounted on a cropped sensor camera like Nikon D90. What this means, is that if you took a 24mm lens and mounted it on a cropped sensor camera, then took a 36mm lens and mounted it on a full-frame camera, you would get about the same view.”

    No, the *angle of view* remains the same 84° of a 24mm lens. Yes, you do get “the same view” in terms of *field of view*, but there remains a critical difference: the amount of visual distortion. Since 24mm “squeezes” 84° of the scene onto the sensor, there is more distortion than when a 36mm “squeezes” 62° onto the sensor.

    For example, the portrait lens length of 85mm (full-frame) is preferred because it renders faces as we see them. A 24mm lens gives us big noses. With a 50mm or a 58mm lens on a DX (AP-C) camera, the sensor captures a *field of view* similar to the 85mm (full-frame), but the angle of view remains that of a 50mm. Hence, a 50mm on a DX is still not quite optimal.

    There is a good demonstration of this at the following link: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nG1pN5Vic8E

    Thanks for a great website.


    • February 9, 2014 at 4:50 pm

      James, you are absolutely correct! I take the blame for using the two interchangeably, because I thought it would make sense for beginners when they see the same terms used by Nikon, for example. I modified the article and added a separate paragraph on “angle of view” and its difference relative to “field of view”. Unfortunately, Nikon uses both terms interchangeably all the time – see their technical data for every lens, where they define “maximum angle of view” differently for each format. In reality, the angle of view should be a single number and field of view relative to format should be defined separately. I think they did this to avoid additional questions, but that certainly creates confusion. Please see the updated article – I hope it now makes more sense and is correct per your comment.

      • 26.1.1) James
        February 12, 2014 at 8:05 am

        Looks good. Your corrections read well in the sense that I meant.

        My eyes were opened to this issue when I saw the video link that I posted. I, too, have noticed that the camera manufacturers are quite sloppy in their wording. It reveals (unfortunately) how much they set a premium on a simple message. I am sure that their lens developers know the difference.

        At least the term “crop factor” is correctly chosen, since that is the real difference between FX & DX.

        Thanks again for a great site.

        Cheers, James

  27. 27) prateek
    April 15, 2014 at 11:13 pm

    I want to ask that i want to buy a new lense for my D5100 and im looking forward to 50mm or 35 mm , but im confused in it.And im also buying a 55-200 mm nikon or 70-300mm sigma. so plss suggest me which one i should take .. 35 mm or50mm .1.8g
    And second lens.55-20mm vs 70-300 sigma

  28. 28) mrtkmk
    June 3, 2014 at 8:15 am

    Excellent article on a tricky topic for beginners!

  29. 29) Abhirup Bhadra
    September 14, 2014 at 10:22 pm

    Dear Nasim

    Thanks a lot for such an informative post , I was pretty confused on buying a lens of fixed focal length , I realise the difference now after going through this article. I am using a Nikon D5200 with a 18 – 55 and planning to buy a 35 mm prime. I mainly focus on Street photography and Pictorial photography . I hope I will be getting better crisp images with the new 35 mm prime on my cropped sensor camera. Thanks a lot again , will be waiting for your new articles……


Comment Policy: Although our team at Photography Life encourages all readers to actively participate in discussions, we reserve the right to delete / modify any content that does not comply with our Code of Conduct, or do not meet the high editorial standards of the published material.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *