It’s been almost three years since Nikon announced the Z mirrorless system in August of 2018. The initial Z6 and Z7 were accompanied by three lenses (24-70mm f/4, 35mm f/1.8, and 50mm f/1.8) as well as a roadmap which promised 20 more by the end of 2021. That’s about where we are today.
To put things into perspective, here’s the first roadmap announced alongside the early Z-series cameras, with a total of 23 lenses (eleven of which had no identifying information other than a placeholder):
This plan shuffled around a bit (the 70-200mm f/2.8 and 20mm f/1.8 shipping later than planned; the 24mm f/1.8 shipping earlier) but Nikon largely stuck to the script. So far, 20 Nikon Z lenses plus two teleconverters are shipping already, and it looks like Nikon will indeed hit the 23 lens mark by the end of 2021.
Here’s how the most current Nikon Z roadmap looks:
Although the roadmap has changed in appearance since the original version, it’s been about the same for roughly a year at this point. Occasionally, Nikon will release a new development announcement (like for the 18-140mm f/3.5-6.3 DX) and add it to the roadmap. But Nikon hasn’t added a large batch of lenses to the list for a while, and that means we’re filling in the roadmap faster than it’s expanding.
In the image above, Nikon labels the following nine lenses as “to be announced”:
- 85mm S-line lens
- 400mm S-line lens
- 600mm S-line lens
- 28mm compact lens
- 40mm compact lens
- 24-105mm S-line lens
- 100-400mm S-line lens
- 200-600mm lens
- 18-140mm DX lens
But even that’s a bit of a stretch. Three of those lenses have already received a development announcement (the 28mm f/2.8, 40mm f/2, and 18-140mm f/3.5-6.3 DX), and one is practically shipping already – the 28mm f/2.8 in its “SE” (special edition) form when bought with the Nikon Zfc camera.
This leaves six lenses that are completely unannounced: an 85mm (presumably f/1.2), 400mm (presumably f/2.8), 600mm (presumably f/4), 24-105mm, 100-400mm, and 200-600mm. Unless Nikon starts pre-announcing a lot of new lenses, the roadmap in its current form will be essentially complete by the end of the year.
Where do we go from there? Nikon has historically liked to keep its cards close to its chest. When the Z series was originally announced, many photographers were surprised to see a roadmap published alongside at all. It’s quite possible that Nikon will stop maintaining the roadmap now that we’re near the end. It may not be updated at all, or we may only see some development announcements added here and there.
The alternative is that Nikon will take the end of the first-generation roadmap as motivation to create a new version with many more new lenses, just like they did when initially announcing the Z system. Although this probably isn’t as likely to happen, it’s what I think many Nikon faithful are hoping for. One of the most consistently popular articles on Photography Life these past few years has been our analysis of the Nikon Z roadmap. The roadmap is clearly generating interest and anticipation among Nikon shooters – and probably grabbing the attention of some non-Nikon photographers who are considering jumping to the system.
If Nikon does choose to announce another roadmap, these are the lenses I’m hearing requested the most in emails and our comments section (with rough focal lengths and maximum apertures):
- 70-200mm f/4
- 70-300mm f/4-6.3
- 14mm f/1.8
- 35mm f/1.2
- 135mm f/1.8
- 200mm f/4 macro
- 300mm f/2.8
- 24mm or wider tilt-shift lens
- Any fisheye lens
- Any PF telephoto lens
- 10-24mm DX
- Any DX prime lenses
- Fast DX zoom lenses
The Z system is getting to the point that the basic lens needs are nearly covered. What’s left is for Nikon to fill out some of the few remaining gaps (especially on the telephoto end) and then start working on niche lenses that will attract more specialized photographers to these cameras.
Nikon may not be planning to maintain a detailed roadmap forever, and while I hope they do, the real key hasn’t changed. If Nikon can keep producing high-quality mirrorless lenses at a fast enough pace, the Z system will continue to get more advanced and competitive over time.
Yes I’d be interested in a 35mm with superb optics whether f/1.2 or 1.4. The current Z35/1.8 is good but not great. However before I invest in more Z glass Nikon has to catch up AF wise. If it cannot I’m thinking of moving (gasp!) to S or C.
I’m more looking forward to see third party joining the battle.
Sigma dg dn series! Particularly 35 1.4 art, 85 1.4 art and 100-400 C (Poor me, I can’t afford a $3000 Z 100-400mm now) :P
What about good lenses for video that are also great for photography? Where are the 18-35 f2.8 or 20mm or 24mm f1.4 (or lower) lenses?
As a high school sports photographer I am looking forward to the Z 100-400mm. For afternoon games I start out with a D500 & 70-300 AF-P and when the lighting conditions change I switch to 70-200 f2.8 w/ 1.4 tc. Once all sunlight is gone I drop the 1.4 tc. When the 100-400 is released I will start using it with a Z 6ii during team practices to prepare for a change to mirrorless someday.
Seems like a good plan.
A little OT but I’m curious what kind of ISO/shutter speeds you are able to maintain for outdoor night games? I shoot my daughters soccer team a lot and find even a 2.8 lens is extremely marginal for night games.
Nikon could of kept the F mount, its disappointing that after all those years they’ve done the dirty on Nikon users. I’ve gone elsewhere now.
Tony, I initially thought the same, until I realized that the FTZ adapter permitted use of newer F mount lenses on the Z mount bodies. As a landscape and product photographer with an emphasis on image sharpness and detail rendition, I am pleased to see that most if not all of the new Z (S) optics have tested sharper than their F mount counterparts. Thanks!
Agree with Tony. So much invested in F mount lenses and if you want to switch to mirrorless you have to use an adapter. I am not interested in mounting my 600mm f4 on an adapter.
Is the Z Mount Adapter not a viable option for F Mount lenses on the Nikon Mirrorless camera?
They would have been completely DOA if they didn’t introduce a new mount. Totally noncompetitive.
Where did you go? Do they have an F mount?
Who did you switch to, Canon who also changed mounts? Maybe Sony, who again, changed mounts? Fuji, wait they did too.
Damn Nikon for keeping the same mount for 60 years; longer than anyone else.
Waiting on the announcement of the 24-105. I’m looking for a travel lens to maybe replace my 24-120 f4G as I slowly downsize overall quantity, weight and size of my travel gear. I suspect it will probably be an f4.
Ja, da warte ich auch drauf. Aufgrund der Darstellung in der Nikon Roadmap könnte das durchaus ein 2,8-4 sein. Bin mal gespannt.
Yes, me too, having been a long time user of the F Mount 28-105 lens for travel, I am awaiting the announcement of this lens, which seems to be a long time in coming, I too expect it to be F4, but would be happy to pay a premium price for an F.2.8.
Check out the 24-200; it’s really a great option for travel.
For those who, like me, like to hike assiduously in the mountains, I expect a lot to know what this Z100-400s will be, with its “compactness” and with what opening (constant or not) ??
I specify that I use a lot and for a long time the AF-s 70-200 / f4 on the D8xx, then on the Z7 (with a relative happiness since the passage in Z) …
I can not help but think of the outputs of a very good 24-105 (f / 4.0?) Followed by a very honorable 100-400 (f / 4-5.6?)!
This could “help out” some photographers (landscape addicts) of my kind!
I expect it to be a little bigger than the Z 70-200, going by the roadmap silhouettes.
Bigger, yes, but maybe not as heavy as the massive silhouette apparently suggests?
This is what makes me fantasize, to go between 100 and 400mm in my mountains … between 2800 and 3000m altitude ;-)
I wondered if the Z 24-70s f / 2.8 + TC 1.4x or 2x might do the trick for HD photography on Z7, but … I can’t believe it.
www.cameralabs.com/nikon…-review/2/
Oups! Z 70-200s, of course
Just check other manufacturers’ 100-400 lenses. About the same can be expected from Nikon too. A little bit bigger and heavier than the 70-200.
No way it will be constant aperture unless it’s F5.6 all the way.
Fast Dx Zoom lenses and primes, and then a perfect combo with Z50 or ZFc
I’d love to see a Z version of the 105mm 1.4 E Lens that I’m currently using via FTZ adapter. It works fine, but I can only imagine a native Z Mount version would be quicker when it comes to AF.
Likewise. The one aspect that I would like to see improved in my 105mm f/1.4E is faster autofocus. Having less CA like the 85mm f/1.8 S would also be welcomed.
Yet if I am made to choose between a 105mm f/1.4 S and a 135mm f/1.8 S, I would choose the 135mm f/1.8 as this this would make a good match with the 85mm f/1.8S which I use a lot.
For me the 105E works great on my Z7 with the adapter. But sure quicker would be better. A great Z85/1.2 is a bigger hole
The Z-mount lenses I am waiting for:
• 70-200mm f/4 or 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6
– should be a bit lighter and more compact than the F-mount versions
– should have better optics than the F-mount
• 135mm f/1.8
– make it as good or better than the 85mm f/1.8 S but at 135mm
– otherwise, my Zeiss 135mmm f2 will soldier on
• 19mm or wider tilt-shift lens
– the F-mount version is stellar and a favorite but if a Z-mount version could be made even better, then I will get this as well.
Well, to be honest the 70-200 f/4 F mount is a superb lens. Extremely sharp with a very good and fast AF. There is not much you may want to have improved in it. It was sharper than the 70-200 f/2.8 not to mention the well controlled breathing. So while I understand the need for a Z-mount “version” of it I do not understand your comment about the “better optics”
I look at my 24-70mm f/2.8 S and compare it with the F-mount 24-70mm f/2.8E and f/2.8G … and have no problem seeing how the Z-mount can have better optics. My 24-70mm f/2.8 S is also better than my pair of 24-70mm f/4 S.
The same applies with the 70-200mm f/2.8 S vs the 70-200mm f/2.8E and f/2.8G. I would think these were so obvious that I do not understand why you do not understand my expectation of a better optics for a 70-200mm f/4 S.
My F-mount 70-200mm f/2.8 and f4 are both very sharp. If your 70-200mm f/2.8 is not as sharp as your 70-200mm f/4, you can get this fixed. The 70-200mm f/2.8G is slightly better than the 70-200mm f/4G. The 70-200mm f/2.8E is substantially even better than the 70-200mm f/4G. This is my experience. The comparison in this website shows the same:
photographylife.com/revie…m-f4g-vr/3
photographylife.com/revie…8e-fl-vr/4
So I think its perfectly reasonable to expect that a Z-mount 70-200mm f4 S can have better optics than its F-mount counterpart.
and didn’t Nasim judge the F-Mount 70-200mm F/4 as having “resolving power less than 36 MP” (article: Why Nikon Should Not Make DSLRs Over 36 MP) so I would certainly expect an S version to fix that problem for the Z7 ii sized sensors..