Two of Nikon’s highest-end cameras are the Nikon Z7 and the Nikon D850. Even though the Z7 has been superseded by the Nikon Z7 II, the original Z7 is still an excellent camera and is now selling at very competitive prices, both new and used. So, let’s take a look at how the Z7 compares to the Nikon D850.
(First, though, if you’re after a comparison between the D850 and the newer Z7 II, you can read that here instead: Nikon Z7 II vs Nikon D850.)
Nikon Z7 and D850 Specifications Comparison
Let’s start by comparing specifications. As you can see below, both the D850 and Z7 have some impressive specifications, with many similarities overall. Where there are differences, though, the Z7 generally comes out a bit ahead:
|Camera Feature||Nikon Z7||Nikon D850|
|Sensor Resolution||45.7 MP||45.7 MP|
|Sensor Type||BSI CMOS||BSI CMOS|
|Mount||Nikon Z||Nikon F|
|Sensor Pixel Size||4.35µ||4.35µ|
|Image Size||8,256 x 5,504||8,256 x 5,504|
|In-Body Image Stabilization||Yes||No|
|Image Processor||EXPEED 6||EXPEED 5|
|Buffer: RAW 14-bit Lossless Compressed||19||51|
|Native ISO Sensitivity||ISO 64-25,600||ISO 64-25,600|
|Boosted ISO Sensitivity||ISO 32, ISO 51,200-102,400||ISO 32, ISO 51,200-102,400|
|Dust Reduction / Sensor Cleaning||Yes||Yes|
|Viewfinder Type||Electronic Viewfinder / EVF||Pentaprism / OVF|
|Viewfinder Coverage and Magnification||100%, 0.8x||100%, 0.75x|
|Storage Media||1x XQD (or CF Express)||1x QXD (or CF Express), 1x SD (up to UHS-II)|
|Continuous Shooting Speed||9 FPS (12-bit RAW), 8 FPS (14-bit RAW)||7.0 FPS, 9.0 FPS with MB-D18|
|Max Shutter Speed||1/8000 to 30 sec||1/8000 to 30 sec|
|AE Bracketing Range||Up to 9 frames, up to 3 EV difference||Up to 9 frames, up to 3 EV difference|
|Flash Sync Speed||1/200||1/250|
|Shutter Durability||200,000 cycles||200,000 cycles|
|Exposure Metering Sensor||TTL exposure metering using main image sensor||181,000-pixel RGB sensor|
|Number of AF Points||493 AF points||153 AF points, 99 cross-type|
|AF Detection Range||-2 to +19 EV (-4 to +19 EV with low-light AF)||-4 to +20 EV|
|Video Maximum Resolution||3,840 x 2,160 (4K) up to 30p, 1920 x 1080 (FHD) up to 120p||3,840 x 2,160 (4K) up to 30p, 1920 x 1080 (FHD) up to 120p|
|HDMI Output||4:2:2 10-Bit||4:2:2 8-Bit|
|Audio Recording||Built-in stereo microphone|
External stereo microphone (optional)
|Built-in stereo microphone|
External stereo microphone (optional)
|LCD Size and Type||3.2″ Tilting Touchscreen LCD||3.2″ Tilting Touchscreen LCD|
|LCD Resolution||2,100,000 dots||2,359,000 dots|
|Battery Life||330 shots (CIPA)||1840 shots (CIPA)|
|Weather Sealed Body||Yes||Yes|
|USB Version||3.1 (Type C)||3.0 (Type A)|
|Weight (with Battery and Card)||675 g (1.49 lbs)||1005 g (2.22 lbs)|
|Dimensions||134 x 100.5 x 67.5 mm (5.3 x 4.0 x 2.7″)||146.0 x 124.0 x 78.5mm (5.7 x 4.9 x 3.1″)|
|MSRP Price||$3,399.95 (as introduced; check price)||$3,299.95 (as introduced; check price)|
Clearly, the Nikon D850 and Z7 have plenty of similarities. In fact, aside from the expected differences between a DSLR and a mirrorless camera, the two cameras are remarkably alike. The Z7 has a smaller, lighter form factor and an electronic viewfinder, while the D850 has a better battery life and an optical viewfinder. Another key difference between the two cameras is storage media – Nikon decided to go with a single XQD memory card slot on the Z7 instead of two memory card slots that we see on the Nikon D850. For video shooters, the Nikon Z7 is a superior option, thanks to 4:2:2 10-bit recording with N-Log, which is absent on the D850.
Along with that, the Nikon Z7 has in-body image stabilization (IBIS) that can compensate up to 5 stops, the first time we’ve seen such a thing in a Nikon camera, and that’s a big deal. Considering that it works with adapted F-mount lenses, you now have image stabilization on any lens you own, going back decades. This is a big deal for both photography and video work. Also, the Nikon Z7 has 9 FPS shooting built-in, while the D850 requires a separate grip (adding to the weight and price) to get the same.
It is also worth stating the obvious: These cameras have different form factors, and they won’t handle in the same way. Aside from the smaller size of the Z7, which leads to a shorter grip, there are many differences in the control arrangements of these two cameras. A big one is that the Z7 has a mode dial with three custom setting options, while the D850 has a button to change PASM modes, as well as menu banks for custom settings. Some of the cameras’ buttons are in entirely different places, too, mainly to accommodate the Z7’s change to right-hand dominant controls.
My opinion is that the Z7 layout takes the best of Nikon’s consumer and professional DSLR controls and puts them in a single camera. It not only has the joystick and AF-ON button of the D850, but also the custom settings of Nikon’s less expensive DSLRs that many people prefer. The Z7 could still use one or two more custom function buttons, but overall, the handling is about as good as it gets. The D850 also has excellent handling, but it’s significantly larger and bulkier side-by-side.
In terms of autofocus, our tests found that the Nikon Z7 was a bit behind for tracking moving subjects compared to the D850, although the Z7’s eye-AF makes it excellent for photographing subjects like portraits and your pets. Between the two, full-time wildlife photographers will likely prefer the D850 (which also has a larger buffer than the Z7).
High ISO Comparison
To see if there is any image quality difference between the Z7 and D850, let’s take a look at a high ISO comparison. All of the images below are 100% crops from a RAW image. The Nikon Z7 is on the left, and the Nikon D850 is on the right.
Let’s start with base ISO 64:
As expected, it is nearly impossible to tell the difference in image quality between the two cameras. Both produce extremely clean images. The same is true for all low ISO levels all the way to ISO 1600, as you can see from the image crops below.
Here is ISO 100:
At ISO 1600, I see just a hint more color noise on the Z7. Again, Z7 on the left, D850 on the right:
This becomes more evident when ISO is pushed to 3200:
And even more so at ISO 6400:
At ISO 12,800 both cameras produce plenty of noise, and I wouldn’t want to use either, but the D850 is still ahead:
ISO 25,600 continues this trend:
At extremely high ISOs like 51,200, both cameras are unusable, even though the D850 retains its slight advantage:
Lastly, ISO 102400 looks awful. The D850 looks slightly less awful of the two, but these photos are both going in the trash:
From the above tests we can conclude that the Nikon Z7 does have slightly weaker overall performance compared to the Nikon D850, most likely caused by the addition of phase detection pixels on the Z7’s sensor.
Does this make the Nikon Z7 inferior to the Nikon D850 in terms of image quality? If you are going to shoot at ISO 25,600 and pixel-peep your images at 100% view, then maybe you will notice an advantage to the D850. In the real world, the differences between the cameras are too small to matter.
Which Camera Should You Get?
As the specifications comparisons showed, the Nikon Z7 is ahead of the D850 in some interesting new ways, such as the addition of IBIS, but the two cameras are quite close overall. Indeed, I’d say they are positioned more side-by-side on the market rather than one ahead of the other.
So, the question for many photographers will come down to price. Even though the Nikon D850 is an older camera, these days it tends to sell for more than the Z7. We’ve seen the Z7 go as low as $2300, while the D850 as low as $2500. (Check current Z7 price here, and current D850 price here.)
It is also true that many photographers will want to consider the Nikon Z7 II instead, which you can read more about in our review. The Z7 II adds features like a bigger buffer and dual memory card slots compared to the Z7, which chips away at some of the D850’s advantages.
Overall, though, you can’t go wrong either way. The Nikon D850 is one of the best cameras ever made and is a proven workhorse for any type of photography. The Nikon Z7 is more geared toward travel and landscape photography thanks to its light weight and features like IBIS.
You can read more about both cameras in our full Nikon Z7 review and Nikon D850 review.
Between the two, I ended up choosing the Z7 for my own photography mainly because of size and the excellent new Z lenses. But I know just as many photographers who chose the D850 instead, and they don’t regret it. Nikon has managed to make two excellent high-resolution cameras, so pick whichever one seems right for you, and don’t look back!
Yeah, the battery life on these new mirrorless cameras is definitely something an adopter has to take into consideration. If you will do ONLY stills then 700+ shots is possible. On my older DSLR I don’t even turn it to OFF, just let it go into standby mode.
So here’s my thing, I have no doubt the D850 is one of the best DSLR cameras ever made. That being said there is so much noise in the raw files I find them unusable. Shooting Jpeg fine* produces tac sharp almost noise free images. I accidentally shot 1/50th f5.6 at 16,000 iso and the noise looked like 1600 raw. I do get the benefits of raw but do not think they outweigh the processing IQ of the JPEGS on the D850.
There is a lot of talk about the autofocus limitations of the Z7 vs the D850, but little discussion of the lag of the EVF vs the mirror. If one is trying to photograph small and quick subjects, warblers, hummingbirds, ect., the D850 is much better because you are viewing real time vs a video feed. I have both the D850 and the Z7. The Z7 is good for portraits, landscapes, and things that don’t move much, but then again so is the D850. I have seen too many photographers miss shots trying to use a mirrorless camera. In fact, during the migration here in Texas, no one is using the mirrorless or at least not with success.
I’d enjoy the evf for manual lens usability, but I can’t get past the huge battery life difference: 300-odd shots is quote a limiting factor for my overseas camping-based roadtrips where recharge opportunities are
The CIPA rating of 300 or so shots is super conservative. With normal use, I normally get about 750-800 shots on a single battery charge if I’m shooting stills.
Very useful, thankyou. When I bought my D850 I was worried that Nikon wouldn’t keep up in the emerging mirrorless market. Now I feel reassured and pleasantly surprised that my next model won’t mean my lenses will become obsolete. I can’t see myself dropping the D850 any time soon, so being able to swap lenses between mirrorless and SLR is going to keep me with Nikon.
Nothing is future proof. Ask Kodak
funniest comment ever considering that at the time the comment was made Kodaks business was booming again and fast forward to today they are even making new film emulsions because of the high demand for film.
Having a Panasonic Lumix G9 and a Nikon D850, I have found that the lighter and smaller G9 has been a pleasant suprise. Th picture quality of the G9 is incredible and I can’t find any difference between the two cameras. When I travel, I have always taken the G9 and lenses with me, everything goes into a small camera bag and I get great pictures, macro and landscape, and the prints at A3 are amazing. This is why I will most likely sell the 850 and purchase the Z7, I’m getting use to the handy size camera and compact lenses. As already mentioned, picture quality has been fantastic. The Z7 will give me high picture quality, choice to use my old Nikkor lenses as well as the new Z7 lenses, and as with the G9, I can carry both the G9 and Z7 with me on my travels, easy as that. I have loved my big Nikon cameras, but time to move to mirrorless, as that is the way forward now. Have fun everyone.
Strange you would give up the G9 for the Z7 when you can’t find any differences now between it and the D850.
With regard to battery life and the EVF of Mirrorless cameras compared to DSLR’s; battery life with the Mirrorless camera is going to be affected by the Need to power the EVF. One of the things I like about my D850 is the ability to use the optical viewfinder to see a very clear image, while framing/composing, without need to use more battery power. On the other hand, I have also been using a Fuji X-T3 and really like having the EVF with extensive and customizable info, including full time level and histogram display while shooting. It does eat power, though, even with the eye sensor that turns the EVF off when your eye is not against the eyepiece. For the most part, for landscapes and most static work, I use my D850 very much like a Mirrorless by setting up using the OVF then switching to Liveview perfecting focus, setting and checking exposure and using the live histogram, and actual shooting. Seems like the best of both worlds.
i have both the D850 and Z7..honestly,,im not sure about the z7 yet..I love the the focus on it for landscapes. I love the lighter weight compared to the 850. But, not crazy about the 24-70 lens and when you put the F-mount lenses on it, there is not much difference in weight. I love the ability to program all custom functions in one setting, similar to canon. I hate the menu banks and extended menu banks. Thats just insane to me..Oh,,and putting the tripod mounting plate on the z7 prevents the adapter from being removed and vice versa..I have a new velbon pano head and when the mounting plate is attached to the FTZ adapter, that adapter interferes with the removal of the adapter. So you cant switch easily from the 24-70 Z mount lens to a F-mount lens with the adapter. I love the remote shutter plug..thats easy but does come loose easily also on the z7..I cant figure out how to keep my the electronic viewfinder from shutting off so quickly, but if you dont then it uses up battery life quickly…..
The terrible battery life is the main reason that I will keep the trusty D800 for another year (or two) I will wait for the Z8. I don’t mind the adaptor, can deal with the crapy buffer, and other misses, but $3500 and carry 3 to 4 batts is out of the question for me. As a Nikon guy of 39 years, I’m very disappointed with the new small body. I had wished for a D850 with mirrorless with a better sensor. I think Nikon screwed up a chance to become the undisputed king.