Photography Life

PL provides various digital photography news, reviews, articles, tips, tutorials and guides to photographers of all levels

  • Lens Reviews
  • Camera Reviews
  • Tutorials
  • Compare Cameras
  • Forum
    • Sign Up
    • Login
  • About
  • Search
Home → Comparison

Nikon D850 vs Canon 5D Mark IV

By Nasim Mansurov 64 Comments
Last Updated On May 11, 2023

With the release of the Nikon D850, one might be wondering how the Canon 5D Mark IV would compare to it side-by-side in terms of specifications, since both compete directly with one another. The Canon 5D Mark IV was announced almost exactly a year earlier in August of 2016, so it is a fairly recent release that will most likely not be updated for at least several more years. Now please keep in mind that such camera comparisons do not take into account lenses, accessories and other systems differences, so I ask that our readers take such comparisons with a grain of salt. It would be foolish to change systems every time a better camera comes out, because manufacturers like Nikon and Canon are known to leapfrog each other every few years!

Nikon D850 vs Canon 5D Mark IV

Let’s take a look at the specifications of both cameras in more detail. Additional commentary on the data is provided below.

Nikon D850 vs Canon 5D Mark IV Specification Comparison

Camera FeatureNikon D850Canon 5D Mark IV
Sensor Resolution45.7 MP30.4 MP
Sensor TypeBSI CMOSCMOS
Sensor Size35.9×23.9mm36.0×24.0mm
Low-Pass FilterNoYes
Sensor Pixel Size4.35µ5.36µ
Image Size8,256 x 5,5046,720 x 4,480
Image ProcessorEXPEED 5DIGIC 6+
Buffer: RAW 14-bit Lossless Compressed5121
Native ISO SensitivityISO 64-25,600ISO 100-32,000
Boosted ISO SensitivityISO 32, ISO 51,200-102,400ISO 50, ISO 51,200-102,400
Dust Reduction / Sensor CleaningYesYes
Viewfinder TypePentaprismPentaprism
Viewfinder Coverage and Magnification100%, 0.75x100%, 0.71x
Built-in FlashNoNo
Storage Media1x QXD, 1x SD (UHS-II)1x CF, 1x SD (UHS-I)
Continuous Shooting Speed7.0 fps, 9.0 fps with MB-D187.0 fps
Max Shutter Speed1/8000 to 30 sec1/8000 to 30 sec
AE Bracketing Range±3 EV±3 EV
Flash Sync Speed1/2501/200
Shutter Durability200,000 cycles150,000 cycles
Exposure Metering Sensor181,000-pixel RGB sensor150,000-pixel RGB+IR metering sensor
Number of AF Points153 AF points, 99 cross-type61 AF points, 41 cross-type
AF Detection Range-4 to +20 EV-3 to +18 EV
Auto AF Fine-TuneYesNo
Focus PeakingYesNo
Focus StackingYesNo
Video Maximum Resolution3,840 x 2,160 (4K) @ up to 30 fps4,096 x 2,160 (4K) @ up to 30 fps
Video Crop Factor1.0x1.74x
Audio RecordingBuilt-in stereo microphone
External stereo microphone (optional)
Built-in stereo microphone
External stereo microphone (optional)
Headphone JackYesYes
LCD Size and Type3.2″ Tilting Touchscreen LCD3.2″ Touchscreen LCD
Dual Pixel AFNoYes
Dual Pixel RAWNoYes
LCD Resolution2,359,000 dots1,620,000 dots
Built-in GPSNoYes
Wi-FiYesYes
BluetoothYesNo
Battery Life1840 shots (CIPA)900 shots (CIPA)
Button IlluminationYesNo
Weather Sealed BodyYesYes
USB Version3.03.0
Weight (Body Only)915g800g
Dimensions146.0 x 124.0 x 78.5mm150.7 x 116.4 x 75.9mm
MSRP Price$3,299 (as introduced)$3,499 (as introduced)

Obviously the two cameras are made to serve different purposes. The Nikon D850 has a high-resolution 45.7 MP sensor that competes more with the Canon 5DS R (50.6 MP), rather than the Canon 5D Mark IV, which only has a 30.4 MP sensor. Nikon D850 has a superior back-illuminated (BSI) CMOS sensor and at ISO 64, it is known to yield exceptional dynamic range – something Canon typically struggles with. Without a low-pass filter, the D850 yields very sharp and detailed images, making it an ideal choice for landscape, macro and wildlife photography. In comparison, the Canon 5D Mark IV looks more like a general-purpose camera that is primarily aimed at portrait photographers.

Aside from that, there are very few areas where the Canon 5D Mark IV can hold its ground against the Nikon D810. Nikon has done a phenomenal job with the D850 and it really shows when one looks at a chart like this, since it highlights where Nikon was aiming with the announcement. Clearly, Nikon’s goal was to make sure that the Canon 5D Mark IV stays out of the competition, and as you can see from the chart, Nikon beats Canon pretty much on every major spec. It has a larger viewfinder, much better storage media options, an option to increase continuous shooting rate by 2 fps to get to a total of 9 fps, better flash sync speed, better shutter durability, better AF system, larger AF detection range, 4K video without any cropping, a tilting LCD screen, a far superior battery life and a lower price point.

Where the Canon 5D Mark IV comes out is its Dual Pixel AF system, which takes advantage of the phase detection pixels on the sensor when shooting in live view mode, allowing the camera to focus quickly and accurately on subjects. I wish Nikon implemented something similar, because its contrast-only live view focusing is extremely slow in comparison. Another feature Nikon has been consistently missing is GPS. Canon has done a great job by integrating a GPS chip into the 5D Mark IV and I really wish Nikon did it on the D850, since it is such a needed feature for travel and landscape photography. Lastly, the Canon 5D Mark IV is noticeably lighter (with roughly about 115 gram difference) and it is physically smaller in comparison to the Nikon D850.

Looking for even more exclusive content?

On Photography Life, you already get world-class articles with no advertising every day for free. As a Member, you'll get even more:

Silver ($5/mo)
  • Exclusive articles
  • Monthly Q&A chat
  • Early lens test results
  • "Creative Landscape Photography" eBook
Gold ($12/mo)
  • All that, PLUS:
  • Online workshops
  • Monthly photo critiques
  • Vote on our next lens reviews
 
Click Here to Join Today
 
Disclosures, Terms and Conditions and Support Options
Tagged With: Canon, Canon 5D Mark IV, Nikon, Nikon D850

About Nasim Mansurov

Nasim Mansurov is the author and founder of Photography Life, based out of Denver, Colorado. He is recognized as one of the leading educators in the photography industry, conducting workshops, producing educational videos and frequently writing content for Photography Life. You can follow him on Instagram and Facebook. Read more about Nasim here.

guest

guest

64 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Ahmad Dan-Hamidu
Ahmad Dan-Hamidu
September 30, 2023 11:13 pm

Until I read this detailed comparison, my take was that any photographer who wanted the very best that a camera could possibly offer, would need to have BOTH of these cameras during photoscapades (because of the few things that the Canon has which the Nikon lacks, and obviously for the many things that the Nikon has which the Canon lacks). This is the only way to have one’s cake and eat it.

Now however, I’m beginning to think that the Nikon is better off enough for the discerning camera connoisseur to want to take a pass on having the Canon in the toolbag.

What do you all think (let me know in your comments). By the way, I’m a novice still trying to learn the ropes and take my Samsung Galaxy Note 10+ camera cluster to its limits before going for one or both of these cameras.

-1
Reply
Ahmad Dan-Hamidu
Ahmad Dan-Hamidu
January 4, 2023 1:50 am

It really is hard to choose considering the awesome comparisons made in this post and other similar posts on these two cameras that I’ve read. Based on the above, I would have to get the D850 as it seems a clear winner. And since the 5D had a few features I just can’t ignore, I will do the wise thing that @Davic C (commenter) did, “have both cameras” by getting the 5D afterwards. Having both gives you the best of both while covering up for each one’s deficiencies.

0
Reply
David C
David C
January 20, 2021 2:55 am

I have both of these cameras. I bought the Nikon and my company bought thw canon… I use my own gear because the garbage ergo and button layout of the Canon.

2
Reply
tom
tom
June 8, 2019 1:08 am

Jay Maisel uses a 12Mp D3s and the 28-300 zoom.

www.peachpit.com/artic…8;seqNum=2

He sells his prints for $2,500

So much for tech specs and gear comparisons

1
Reply
Harry Joseph
Harry Joseph
December 29, 2018 12:19 am

Nikon has consistently beat Canon when it comes to cameras since the D200. I’m wondering when canon is going to wake up. Things like a “rate” button are mind boggling. The Dynamic range of the Nikon cameras is the dagger in the heart of Canon. With that said, I have too much invested in Canon gear. This includes lenses and Flash units. Another thing is i’m not getting any younger. I can only look with envy and sometimes disappointment, something i have been doing since the early 2000’s. Sure there was a surge with the 5D classic and also the 5D II which introduced video but overall Nikon has been kicking Canon’s butt for the longest sorry to say. One good thing I have to say about Canon is their ‘L’ series lenses and the way they render the final image in that they come out on top.

3
Reply
David C
David C
Reply to  Harry Joseph
January 20, 2021 2:57 am

Also when will Canon put the power switch on the right aide of the camera like Nikon and all other camera makers. Not to mention all the rest of the bad ergo that Canon clings to.

1
Reply
Paul Mann
Paul Mann
December 24, 2017 9:18 am

I have seen the Canon 5D mark IV priced at $2599. Who wants to spend $2800 for a Nikon 70-200mm f/2.8E lens?
How much time are you spending in Lightroom with Nikon vs Canon? I have spent many many hours trying to get the
pink out of Nikon skin tones while trying to avoid green. If I don’t have to do that with Canon, then I want Canon.
I don’t need 45 MP. It just takes forever to move from one image to the next in full-screen mode in Lightroom.

1
Reply
David C
David C
Reply to  Paul Mann
January 20, 2021 2:58 am

Funny I hate canon color science for the weird red skin tones.

2
Reply
Japan only
Japan only
October 28, 2017 4:34 pm

I would never buy a Made in Thailand junk, and don’t give me that story about their Japan management and QC at the factory overseeing the production.

It will never be the same as if they are made in Japan.

Quality and working ethic of a Thailand low wage worker cannot match the Japan worker. Give some respect to the buyers shelling out $4K for the camera and make it in Japan. Not to mention the plasticky lenses crap made in china like the 105mm 1.4 costing $1,5K, and sensor made by sony. What a joke! Nikon is a mess.

I have the D700, that’s made like it should be, but I guess I will be going for the Canon as my next camera. And Nikon, make some decent 135mm prime lens, we all had it enough with the sluggish outdated 135 dc to match the Lord of the rings 135 f/2 Canon has.

0
Reply
Ransford Abakah-Arthur
Ransford Abakah-Arthur
October 26, 2017 5:49 pm

Am a new new photographer with less than 500$ camera budget. I need help on the type of camera to buy

0
Reply
Matt
Matt
October 15, 2017 10:24 am

The need for big heavy DSLR’s are diminishing day by day. Only pure enthusiasts are now in to it. Smartphone technology is the next thing Corporate giants are interested to invest. Their R&D has come up with amazing quality camera phones. Even though I hate Apple to the core for its marketing tactics and pricinng, it still amazes me how an iphone 8 plus or iphone X can shoot 4k videos @60fps and even top class DSLR’ models has not reached to that point regardless the huge price difference

-3
Reply
Ron Day
Ron Day
Reply to  Matt
May 29, 2020 9:29 am

While it’s nice to be able to take movies, that’s not why most of us buy these type cameras.

0
Reply
David C
David C
Reply to  Matt
January 20, 2021 2:59 am

Pros will keep buying real cameras to take photographs and you can use your phone to take snapshots.

2
Reply
AM
AM
October 5, 2017 8:21 am

No doubt, Nikon and Canon are good for one another: without this ongoing competition, we would not see the innovation come so fast and furiously. They are in the business of selling camera equipment and the technology changes motivate people to replace products sooner than they really should.

Any camera review should start with the photographer’s goals. If your current equipment is meeting your needs, don’t get caught up in the flavours of today. You can broke trying to keep up with the constant innovation. Spend more time on assessing what your needs are, and concentrate on learning what the existing camera body can do. No amount of technology is going to compensate for lousy composition skills.

And remember, while the new body might look great hanging around your neck, in the end, it’s the images that matter. As a pro-sports photographer once told me on a golf course: “there are a lot of very expensive cameras out there, taking a lot of poorly composed pictures.”

6
Reply

Learn

  • Beginner Photography
  • Landscape Photography
  • Wildlife Photography
  • Portraiture
  • Post-Processing
  • Advanced Tutorials
Photography Life on Patreon

Reviews

  • Camera Reviews
  • Lens Reviews
  • Other Gear Reviews
  • Best Cameras and Lenses

Photography Tutorials

Photography Basics
Landscape Photography
Wildlife Photography
Macro Photography
Composition & Creativity
Black & White Photography
Night Sky Photography
Portrait Photography
Street Photography
Photography Videos

Unique Gift Ideas

Best Gifts for Photographers

Subscribe via Email

If you like our content, you can subscribe to our newsletter to receive weekly email updates using the link below:

Subscribe to our newsletter

Site Menu

  • About Us
  • Beginner Photography
  • Lens Database
  • Lens Index
  • Photo Spots
  • Search
  • Forum

Reviews

  • Reviews Archive
  • Camera Reviews
  • Lens Reviews
  • Other Gear Reviews

More

  • Contact Us
  • Subscribe
  • Workshops
  • Support Us
  • Submit Content

Copyright © 2025 · Photography Life

You are going to send email to

Move Comment