Copyright Nasim Mansurov
If you are into sports and wildlife photography, you might be wondering which camera is the best for these two genres today. Without a doubt, action photography can be challenging even for the most expensive cameras on the market, since it has very specific requirements. Action cameras need fast autofocus systems, fast continuous shooting speeds, minimum blackout, large camera buffers, extensive weather sealing, solid build quality, and the intelligence to be able to identify and stay locked onto a subject. In this article, we decided to compile a list of top cameras we recommend for sports and wildlife photography needs. It is important to note that every single tool in the list below has been tested extensively by our team members, so we only provide recommendations based on our real-world experience.
Copyright John Lawson
If you are wondering which camera features are important in an action camera, here is a quick list that we put together, based on its importance (from most important to least):
- Lens Selection – while this is not a camera feature, it is perhaps the most important factor when considering a sports and wildlife camera. What good is a camera, if you can only mount a very limited number of telephoto and super-telephoto lenses on it? The first factor you should always consider is the overall strength of the camera system, which heavily depends on the availability of high-quality lenses.
- Fast, Responsive and Customizable Autofocus (AF) System – you will need a camera with an advanced phase-detection autofocus system that is reliable for fast-action photography. The autofocus system needs to be fast and accurate, capable of producing consistently good results in different environments. Here is a breakdown of the most important autofocus features:
- Phase-Detection AF / Hybrid AF System
- AF Speed
- AF Reliability
- Low-light AF Performance
- Subject Recognition and Tracking
- Range of AF Focus Modes (Single, Dynamic, Group, etc)
- AF Mode Customization (Tracking Speed, Tracking Sensitivity, etc)
- Wide AF Point Coverage
- Face / Eye Detection
- Continuous Shooting Speed – when it comes to photographing sports and wildlife, the more frames-per-second (FPS), the better.
- Camera Buffer – fast FPS alone is not enough if the camera cannot shoot continuously for more than a few seconds before its buffer runs out. The camera also has to have a large enough buffer size.
- Fast Memory Card Storage – the camera buffer heavily depends on how fast the memory card storage is. In fact, if the memory card storage is fast enough, the camera buffer does not have to be very large. Basically, the faster the storage, the faster the images are transfferred to the memory card.
- Sensor Size – being able to shoot clean, noise-free images in low-light situations can be critical when doing wildlife photography. A full-frame camera is going to have much better high ISO performance than a camera with a smaller sensor. At the same time, a smaller sensor with similar resolution is going to provide better reach due to cropping (see crop factor), so one has to evalulate sensor size low-light performance vs reach.
- Sensor Resolution (Megapixels) – while some photographers prefer low-resolution cameras for cleaner images, others like the ability to crop images agressively when using high-resolution cameras.
- Ergonomics – when shooting fast action, ergonomics are extremely important. You need to be able to quickly switch between different focus modes without lifting your eyes off the viewfinder. You must be able to access the most critical settings such as camera mode, ISO, exposure compensation and metering mode when conditions change. You need to be comfortable with button placement, and you should be able to quickly evaluate the quality of the captured image. The camera and lens need to balance in your hands and when used on a tripod.
- Build Quality and Weather Sealing – sports and wildlife photographers have to be able to shoot in all kinds of challenging conditions, so weather sealing in both the camera and the lens is extremely important. When shooting in a busy sports arena or shooting from a moving vehicle, bumping and dropping accidents tend to happen from time to time, and one needs to be able to rely on the build quality of their gear to keep on shooting.
- Battery Life – sports and wildlife photography depletes battery faster than any other type of photography, since the camera is always busy actively tracking subjects, taking many images and constantly accessing and storing captured images. The longer the battery lasts in the field, the better.
- Size and Weight – generally, a high-end DSLR camera with a super-telephoto lens is going to be large and heavy. While smaller sensor systems are going to be lighter and smaller in comparison, they are not going to yield the same level of performance in comparison. You will need to evaluate each system based on your needs and budget. Keep in mind that the camera and lens combination have to be practical in the field.
There are other camera features and factors to consider, but the above are the most important ones to keep in mind.
Copyright Nasim Mansurov
Although DSLR cameras have been dominating action photography for many years now, the advancements in mirrorless camera technology (especially in autofocus capabilities) are quickly changing the camera landscape. If just a few years back I would not dare to recommend any mirrorless camera for photographing fast action, the situation is changing in favor of mirrorless technology every year. Once manufacturers address all autofocus, battery life, and native mount lens selection concerns, mirrorless cameras will eventually replace DSLRs as the most favored options for shooting sports and wildlife in the future.
Keep in mind that the sensor size is going to dictate the size of the overall system, its weight, as well as its overall cost. While top-of-the-line full-frame cameras offer the best autofocus systems and image quality, they are quite large, heavy, and very expensive. For this reason, those who are starting out in sports and wildlife photography might want to first consider APS-C sensor options, which are provided in this article.
When it comes to camera brands and systems, there are plenty to choose from from a variety of camera manufacturers, including Canon, Nikon, Sony, Fujifilm, and many others. The below list is sorted by our order of preference, although every camera we present is more than capable of producing great results.
Table of Contents
Canon EOS-1D X Mark III
If your system of choice is Canon, the latest EOS 1D X Mark III is an absolute marvel for any kind of action photography, including sports and wildlife. Canon engineers put their best efforts into making it the most feature-rich and complete DSLR camera on the market today, and it really shows. With its advanced 20.1 MP CMOS sensor that produces low-noise images even at extremely high ISO levels, 191-point advanced autofocus system, superb Dual Pixel CMOS AF and 5.5K video shooting capabilities, the Canon 1D X Mark III shines as both advanced stills and video camera.
Copyright Dvir Barkay
Canon’s new autofocus system is what makes the 1D X Mark III stand out from the competition. In addition to the advanced phase-detection autofocus system that features Face Detection, Head Detection, and Deep Learning for advanced subject recognition and tracking, Canon also incorporated its Dual Pixel CMOS AF into the camera that takes autofocus performance to the next level when using Live View. This brings many of the benefits of modern mirrorless systems in terms of autofocus features. At 16 FPS, the 1D X Mark III is also the fastest camera on the market when it comes to continuous shooting speed – and it can shoot at such insane speeds with full-time AI Servo AF. Switching to Live View, it extends the shooting speed to 20 FPS, also with continuous autofocus and tracking capabilities. And it can do all that without ever running out of the camera buffer, even when shooting RAW + JPEG images.
Copyright Dvir Barkay
The EOS-1D X Mark III is the first Canon camera to feature the HEIF image option, which can store HDR information in the image and offers much better bit depth compared to the JPEG format.
And let’s not forget about Canon’s excellent line-up of super-telephoto lenses – from 70-200mm f/2.8L IS III USM and 200-400mm f/4L IS USM Extender 1.4x all the way to the exotic 300mm f/2.8, 400mm f/2.8, 500mm f/4, 600mm f/4 and 800mm f/5.6 primes. Canon really knocked its latest EF 400mm f/2.8L IS III USM and EF 600mm f/4L IS III USM lenses out of the park, making them significantly lighter compared to their Nikon counterparts (the 400mm is almost a kilo lighter in comparison, which is very impressive).
As explained in my Nikon D6 vs Canon 1D X Mark III article, the Canon 1D X Mark III stands out almost in every way when compared to the Nikon D6, making it our top contender for the best sports and wildlife camera on the market today.
Nikon D6
The Nikon D6 is another advanced and feature-rich DSLR camera on the market today, making it another top pick for sports and wildlife photography. Sporting a low-noise 20.8 MP CMOS sensor, Nikon’s most advanced Multi-CAM 37K autofocus system, a fast EXPEED 6 processor, 14 FPS continuous shooting speed, a huge buffer, and dual CFexpress memory card slots, the Nikon D6 is a monster of a camera. The autofocus system features a total of 105 all cross-type focus points that deliver fast and accurate focusing, which is extremely important when shooting fast action.
Copyright Robert Andersen
As Nikon’s “best of the best”, the D6 has superb ergonomics, excellent build quality, and extreme weather sealing to make it suitable for any shooting environment. Nikon also has an extensive list of exotic super-telephoto lenses Nikon 70-200mm f/2.8E FL ED VR, 120-300mm f/2.8E FL ED SR VR, 180-400mm f/4E TC1.4 FL ED VR, 300mm f/2.8G VR II, 400mm f/2.8E FL ED VR, 500mm f/4E FL ED VR, 600mm f/4 E FL ED VR and 800mm f/5.6E FL ED VR. For those who want lighter lenses, the Nikon 300mm f/4E PF ED VR, as well as the 500mm f/5.6E PF ED VR are also unique and superb alternatives. Lastly, Nikon maintains an excellent trio of 1.4x, 1.7x and 2x teleconverter options, providing plenty of focal length options for those who need better reach.
Copyright John Lawson
For those on a tighter budget, Nikon’s previous-generation top-of-the-line DSLRs like D4, D4S, and D5 are also excellent choices for sports and wildlife photography. In my earlier days of photography, I used to own and love the Nikon D3s, which I used heavily for photographing action and wildlife. I also had quite a bit of field experience shooting with both Nikon D4 and D4s, which are simply phenomenal cameras. Today, you can find these cameras for a real bargain in the used market, some of which are in excellent condition.
Copyright Nasim Mansurov
Nikon’s top-of-the-line cameras are obviously not for everyone, but for those who can afford these cameras, they are worth every penny.
Sony A9 II
If you were to pick the best mirrorless camera for action photography today, the Sony A9 II would certainly take the top spot. The highlights of this camera include Sony’s best 24.2 MP BSI stacked CMOS sensor with phenomenal readout speed that allows up to 20 FPS continuous shooting, advanced 693-point phase detection AF with Real-time Eye Autofocus capabilities, 5-axis in-body image stabilization, 3.69-million dot OLED electronic viewinder (EVF) and dual UHS-II SD memory card slots.
Copyright Nasim Mansurov
Being a mirrorless camera, the Sony A9 II has a few advantages over Canon’s and Nikon’s top DSLRs. First of all, at just 678 grams, it is a much lighter camera when compared to the Canon 1D X Mark III or Nikon D6 (even with an optional battery grip attached, it is still 300 grams lighter). Second, its autofocus system offers a much wider coverage compared to DSLRs, which allows the Sony A9 II to continue tracking subjects even when they are close to the borders of the frame. Third, the fast readout speed of the image sensor allows the A9 II to be able to shoot without major blackouts, which makes it easier to shoot fast-moving subjects. Obviously, being a mirrorless camera, the Sony A9 II has many pros and cons when compared to a DSLR. If you are wondering about their differences, see my DSLR vs Mirrorless Camera article for more information.
Copyright Nasim Mansurov
Lastly, Sony managed to make its FE 400mm f/2.8 GM OSS and FE 600mm f/4 GM OSS lenses as light as Canon’s newest super-telephoto primes, which is a very impressive achievement. Lens selection is obviously a big deal for sports and wildlife photography, and that’s where Sony is a bit behind at the moment – it has no 300mm f/2.8 / f/4, 500mm f/4, 800mm f/5.6, or high-end zoom lenses like 200-400mm f/4. Another negative is the poor ergonomics and menu system of all Sony mirrorless cameras. If you are used to Nikon and Canon ergonomics, switching to a Sony might be a rather painful experience.
If you are on a tight budget, the original Sony A9 is also an excellent choice, and it can be purchased at a bargain. Another great option for photographing action is the Sony A7 III.
Nikon D850
Those who want a more modern DSLR with better cropping options than the D6 have another excellent choice – the Nikon D850. This camera features a high-quality 45 MP BSI CMOS sensor capable of class-leading high ISO performance and dynamic range, Multi-CAM 20K 153-point AF system, 7 FPS continuous shooting speed, a reasonably large buffer, 4K video shooting, excellent battery life, superb ergonomics and full weather-sealing.
Copyright John Lawson
Nikon threw everything in its arsenal at the D850, and it really shows. The D850 is a DX and FX camera combined in one. Switch to DX mode, and you get a 19.4 MP camera with unlimited buffer capacity. And if you use a high-power battery in a grip, you can increase the shooting speed to 9 FPS – almost the same speed as what the Nikon D500 offers.
Copyright John Lawson
At $3K, the D850 is not a cheap camera, but it is one heck of a tool for practically any photography needs, including fast action. If it falls out of your budget, the Nikon D780 is another great full-frame option at a much lower price. See our Nikon D780 review for more information.
Nikon D780
If the D850 is out of your budget, the Nikon has another great full-frame option – the D780. Sporting a modern 24.5 MP BSI CMOS sensor, EXPEED 6 image processor, Advanced Multi-CAM 3500FX II autofocus system with 51-focus points, 7 FPS continuous shooting speed (12 FPS in live view), a large buffer and a lightweight but fully weather-sealed body, the D780 has a lot to offer for its $2300 MSRP. Nikon incorporated some of its features from the mirrorless Z-series cameras into the D780, making it a “hybrid” DSLR.
Copyright Spencer Cox
Although its autofocus system is older and inferior to the one on the D850, Nikon improved the AF algorithm, which makes it quite solid for shooting fast action, even in low-light situations. Those who like shooting videos will be pleased with the 4K video recording capabilities – the D780 does it without any extra cropping involved (full sensor width, oversampled). It has dual UHS-II compatible SD memory card slots, so it is a good idea to use fast cards in order to clear the buffer faster. As expected from a DSLR, the D780 has amazing battery life – you can get up to 2260 shots (CIPA) on a single charge! There is a lot to say about this camera, so if you want to find out more, check out our detailed Nikon D780 review.
Copyright Spencer Cox
Canon EOS R6
The Canon EOS R6 is another mirrorless camera on our list of recommended tools for action photography and for a good reason. It is phenomenal, all thanks to Canon’s superb Dual Pixel CMOS AF II autofocus system that is capable of tracking people and wildlife’s eyes with great precision. Add the ability to shoot up to 12 FPS (20 FPS with electronic shutter), high-resolution EVF, low-noise 20.1 MP full-frame image sensor, 4K video shooting up to 60p, and a weather-sealed body, and you got one heck of a mirrorless camera for photographing fast action.
The Canon EOS R6 has excellent ergonomics and a properly organized menu system, making it easy to operate the camera in the field. It is small and lightweight, and when coupled with Canon’s newest 600mm f/11 and 800mm f/11 super-telephoto primes, it can offer amazing reach in a very compact package. While Canon has not yet announced any super-telephoto lenses for the RF mount, all existing EF super-telephoto lenses can be used with the different EF to RF mount adapters.
Nikon D500
Although the Nikon D500 was announced way back in 2016 and has not received a refresh, it has remained as a formidable choice for sports and wildlife photography. While it might not have the same level of low-light performance as the full-frame cameras I talked about so far (being an APS-C / DX camera), it has Nikon’s incredible and proven Multi-CAM 20K 153-point autofocus system, fast 10 FPS continuous shooting speed, large camera buffer, superb battery life, and full weather-sealed construction, making it one of the best APS-C action cameras on the market.
Copyright Nasim Mansurov
The Nikon D500 is a robust and very practical camera in the field, especially when paired with Nikon’s top super-telephoto lenses. My favorite lens selections for the Nikon D500 are the 200-500mm f/5.6E ED VR, 300mm f/4E PF ED VR, and 500mm f/5.6E PF ED VR lenses. These lenses are very small, lightweight, and extremely versatile, allowing one to easily hand-hold gear in the field. And being a DSLR, you don’t have to worry about running out of the camera battery when observing wildlife at a distance.
Copyright John Lawson
While many photographers have been wondering why the Nikon D500 has not been updated in so many years, I feel like the D500 has already pushed many of the boundaries of current sensor and DSLR technology. At around $1500 retail and less than $1K in the used market, the D500 still offers quite a bit of value, even today.
Canon EOS 7D Mark II
If you already own Canon lenses, the 7D Mark II is another superb tool for sports and wildlife photography. Similar to the Nikon D500, the 7D Mark II also features an APS-C CMOS sensor with 20.2 MP resolution, 10 FPS continuous shooting rate, excellent battery life and weather sealing. It has a 65-point all cross-type phase-detection autofocus system, dual DIGIC 6 image processors and Dual Pixel CMOS AF technology, providing fast and accurate autofocus performance, even in low-light situations.
Copyright Nasim Mansurov
Having used the 7D Mark II in the past, I found it to be a very capable camera for photographing fast action. Its autofocus system is very fast and reliable, especially when the camera is coupled with Canon’s excellent line-up of super-telephoto lenses. The biggest downside of the 7D Mark II is its age – it was announced way back in 2014, and Canon never bothered updating it ever since.
Copyright Nasim Mansurov
Unlike the D500 that has 1x UHS-II compatible SD and 1x CFexpress / XQD memory card slots, the 7D Mark II has the older UHS-I SD and CompactFlash slots, which makes it a bit dated in terms of camera technology in comparison. It also has a much smaller camera buffer – only 31 RAW images (roughly 3 seconds) before the camera slows down to a crawl. The Nikon D500 has a practically unlimited buffer, making it a more versatile choice for continuous shooting. If you are wondering about the differences between these cameras, see my Nikon D500 vs 7D Mark II article for more information.
Best Budget Camera for Sports and Wildlife Photography
If you are not ready to spend thousands of dollars on a medium format or a full-frame system, you might want to consider a few budget-friendly options with smaller sensors that offer a bit less resolution. Many photographers who do wildlife photography as a hobby might want to consider these:
- Canon EOS 90D
- Fujifilm X-T3 / X-T4
- Nikon D7500
- Sony A6000-series
What camera do you shoot sports and wildlife with and why? Please share in the comments section below!
It would be my opinion that looking past the m43 format for this comparison is a miss, especially relative to budget. The format offers many pluses and tracking that often shows up the big brothers. There are two main manufactures, yet all the lenses are swappable, so if there is a miss, it may be covered by the other. Another two bonuses – lighter to carry and lighter on the pocket book. Main two consumer zooms support FOV up to 800mm and most shooting these lenses do so handheld due to the very good IBIS systems, especially in the top tier cameras. So, my vote, for consideration here is the Olympus OM-D E-M1 mark III, released in 2020, with a price of only $1557. (No affiliation with Olympus – and I have a host of top tier Nikon gear I have been shooting with for nearly two decades – not switching, just building a compact travel kit – having just ordered this camera and a couple of f/2.8 zooms to get learning the platform after many many hours of research.) I know as a practical matter most crop- and full-frame sensor shooters don’t use tripods as they should for the focal lengths they shoot – but I am seeing far better results in the handsfree images from this platform due to lens and body stabilization for wildlife and sports. I think the platform is an affordable option and one that very acceptable results can be produced with.
I should be clear on key Olympus lenses, the 40-150 f/2.8 is a pro lens (FOV = 80-300) and they have the 300mm f/4 pro lens (FOV = 600) along with 1.4x and 2.0 x teleconverters. I’m not easily impressed, but have been very surprised at what I see people getting WITH TCs from the pro lenses and even the consumer zooms, especially if people use a tripod. More clarity with TCs than I see from most cropped- or full-frame shooters. I have a very defined approach to TCs, so I usually get very usable results, even from the 2.0 – but my shot discipline is very different than most. I will be exploring this immediately with my kit, once B&H gets it here.
+1 for M43 format. Several good bodies and good lenses which are easily hand-held. Though I do use my Nikon D500 with either a Sigma 500mm or 150-600mm for wildlife when travelling by car. In this case I take the D810 with a wide-angle lens for landscapes.
I understand the use of a high pixel FF – used D8xx series until Z7 – but looking forward to testing out the 80mp RAW file on a tripod feature of this Olympus camera – it looks very promising for most of those scenes you want in more detail.
WileEC, I agree that M43 is a great system. However, with Panasonic not wanting to integrate phase-detect AF into its cameras and a very unknown future for Olympus, I cannot recommend this system at this point to our readers. If one already owns M43 and likes it, they should continue using it. But I personally wouldn’t invest my time and money into a system that seems to be phasing out. Without much new development on behalf of Olympus and Panasonic’s continued focus on very specialized M43 gear (mainly video), I wouldn’t put it on the list of top cameras to buy.
This is very unfortunate, because I actually like M43 a lot. It is too bad to see any camera manufacturer suffer. Considering how much innovation Olympus engineers brought into the camera industry (including many of the mirrorless camera innovations), it is a pretty tragic situation for all of us.
I watched the same thing happen to Nikon 1 a few years back. Although Nikon 1 was a great little system and many (including myself) loved its potential for extreme reach, Nikon slowly killed it off. When I was telling our readers not to get into the system, many were convinced that Nikon 1 will live on, except we all know what actually happened. When a product is discontinued and killed off like that, you can’t really continue using it. No new lenses, no updates, no accessories and the resale value tanks very quickly.
I feel the same about the M43 system now. With Olympus selling off its entire camera division, production facilities moved and very little innovation taking place, I really don’t see the point of buying into it. Panasonic has already moved to full-frame, and I just don’t see it spending a lot of money towards further development of M43, especially when the global demand for cameras has only been shrinking.
Is M43 dead? Not yet, but I think it is a matter of time (although the alliance is certainly dead). Everything now depends on the direction Panasonic is going to take. If Panasonic wants to keep it going, we will be seeing more cameras and lenses in the future. But if Panasonic slows it down or kills it off, then it is a done game. Personally, I don’t see a bright future for M43, not when smartphones are getting into the same territory…
I understand what you are saying – and have a host of Nikon 1 gear to underscore it. That said, people have been speaking the death of m43 for a decade. Olympus is continuing to innovate. Time will tell if they keep producing lenses and cameras. I’m investing in a new setup as I type, as I think they will be around long enough for me to get my use from the system and from the hours and hours, I’m certain they deserve a seat at the table in this discussion, for outdoor sports and for wildlife, especially in good light with the longer reach that is possible with the zooms and TCs.
I own and think the D500 is great for some wildlife, but always choose D5 first – without question, on many fronts. The extra FOV from cropped sensor isn’t worth the IQ hit with most lenses. D500 on the 600 f/4 should be marriage made in heaven – it’s not, but it works great on the 200-500, which I’m guessing that lens was designed for the D500.
For high school lacrosse I use D500 with 70-200 2.8 and wild life D500 with 300 or 500 PF. I am now practicing wild life with Z6 and Z70-200 S + TC-2X.
Hard to argue with the recommendations here; the 1DX mk3 and Sony A9ii are in a league of their own with the D6 not far behind – while the R6, D850 and D500 are outstanding options at slightly more affordable prices.
My only question is Besides the slightly better high ISO performance of the R6, why would you pick it over the R5?
And btw that picture with the R6 and 800 f:11 lens is the best I have seen to date. Up to now I had written that lens off but clearly, with the right technique it can deliver.
Frederic, the R5 looks great on paper, but ever since encountering issues with lockups, I am going to wait and see if it is an early batch issue or some other more serious flaw with the camera. I will be getting a sample from a different batch once they become available again, but for now, I can’t recommend it. Haven’t experienced any issues with the R6, that one seems to be solid.
As for lenses, the 600mm f/11 and 800mm f/11 are both phenomenal lenses in good light. I am actually quite shocked to see how well they perform. The R6 tracks wildlife better than any other mirrorless camera I have used so far, especially for little birds. It just grabs on to the bird’s eyes and holds AF precisely, which is incredible.
Thank you, highly appreciated additional information! I hadn’t realized the R5 had lock-up issues – I shoot Nikon but I am a Canon-nostalgic as I shot canon for 25 years and only switched 5+ years ago… muscle memory is only just switching to Nikon reflexes now and I still screw lenses on the “wrong” way half the time :-) Looking forward to your detailed reviews.
R5 and lock ups, that was new to me as well. I did some research and so far many users who experienced this problem solved it by using different cards. In some instances this did not solve the problem. I am sure however that Canon will resolve this matter. I remember the Fuji X-H1 used to have this problem as well and nobody complains of that anymore. I personally use an X-H1 and have never experienced any major issues. If I had the finances together (am still saving up for it), I would buy the R5 in a heartbeat.
I do wildlife photography and shoot with the Nikon D500. I upgraded to this specifically as I wanted to stay with crop sensor as it gave my telephoto lenses that ‘extra reach’ so to speak. I pair mine with a Tamron G2 150-600mm.
Great combination but only downside is the minimum f6.3 when fully extended. Hope to be able to afford an f4 500mm lens, to add to my arsenal in the future!
I do know that whenever I visit reserves and hides etc, the D500 seems to be a very popular choice amongst wildlife photographers!
Debbie, the D500 is indeed an excellent camera, hard to beat for sports and wildlife needs!
Really some fantastic photographs in this article which I enjoyed a lot.
For sports I use the Nikon D500 with the old 70-200 mm f/2.8, but have also used my Z6 for sports and have no problems using it with an adapted 50 mm f/1.8 if I’m close enough. Was surprised with the very good hit rate of the Z6.
For bird photography I use the Nikon V3 with Nikon 1 70-300 mm which gives a reach of 810 mm.
Anders, too bad Nikon killed off Nikon 1. It was such a small and versatile system. Hoping the future Z-series cameras will offer better AF capabilities.
The noise handling and IQ of the Nikon 1 series wasn’t very good. I have a lot of that gear collecting dust. Shot a few things with the V1 on the back of a 600 – a bear just coming out from winter hibernation. Reporting images, not quality.
Excellent article, thank you. However!
Although you mention the X-T3/4 as a best “budget” option, I’m not sure they can be described as “budget” cameras. Either cost more than the Nikon D500. 2 years ago I switched from a Nikon D500 setup for wildlife to Fuji X, largely because I switched out to mirrorless for other genres and gone lightweight by comparison to dSLR’s. In terms of FPS I found my Fuji X equal to the Nikon and especially with the electronic shutter. The Fuji lens equals my Nikon 80-400mm AFS G and Sigma 150-600mm C in terms of IQ, although before numerous AF upgrades the Fuji could not equal the D500 in terms of focus acquisition. I do accept that in terms of weight for wildlife there’s no weight saving between the two.
That leaves EVF v OVF and now that Nikon have brought out the Z range that comparison fades. So, I’m surprised you didn’t give Fuji a special mention as in previous reviews by your Elizabeth the Fuji features highly.
« cost more than the Nikon D500 » + « the Fuji could not equal the D500 in terms of focus « you have your answer 😉
Richard, I have seen some great pricing on the X-T3, especially used. I personally own the X-system, as well as the GF and I have always been a huge fan. The main reason for mentioning Fuji X at the end is because it is not as complete of a system as the others I have mentioned. Fuji needs to add more lenses to the line-up, specifically for sports and wildlife needs. I would love to see small and lightweight 300mm, 400mm and longer primes. Imagine a Nikon 500mm f/5.6E PF-like lens, except smaller and lighter! That would be a game-changer. Another area to improve would be animal eye AF, which is likely to happen in the next iteration of the X-series cameras. Keep in mind that this article is very specific to two genres. For all other genres, the Fuji X is great, and the GF reigns supreme for landscape, studio and architecture needs.
Hi Nasim, long time. Thank you very much for offering realistic suggestions of gears meant for sports & wildlife photography.
I would like to add, the old serviceable gears also perform great if taken care of properly. Especially I would like to single out Canon 7D original and Nikon D300. Many users are still shooting with those DSLRs happily without complaints.
Therefore, I would suggest, if the current camera is giving flawless service, there’s no need to replace it. Rather saving money for additional appropriate lenses is a wise choice.
Best regards.
Quazi, I fully agree with you. Plenty of older gear that does really well, especially for those on tight budgets. The D300 goes for almost nothing these days. I miss that camera. I used to own it for many years…
Excellent review ( I own the D6 and love it, I had the the D4s and D3, all great cameras for what I do)
Thank you for your feedback Jack. The D6 is the king, and for a good reason! I heard the same from a number of my friends who shoot with that camera.
XT3 with 100-400 is very capable for me as I approach 80 and I have learn to enjoy wildlife environmental photography vs fill the frame with a given wildlife subject.
Thank you for sharing! Fuji has done great with the X-system for sure. I would love to see more AF refinements in the next iteration, specifically with animal eye AF.
Hi Nasim. Thank you for this great article, in which I found a lot of practical information! As a hobby-photographer I use Nikon D7500 and I find it great. Considering Nikon D500 for the future :)