If you are into landscape photography, you might be wondering which camera on the market today is the best. With so many great cameras out there, it is hard to pick a winner. We decided to put together a detailed guide that shows the top cameras we recommend for your landscape photography needs. It is important to note that every single tool in the list below has been tested extensively by our team members, so we only provide recommendations based on our real-world experience.
While most digital cameras can work great for landscape photography, some are going to be better than others based on such metrics as total megapixels, dynamic range, in-camera features, and lens selection.
Landscape photographers often desire cameras that have as many megapixels as possible, as wide of dynamic range as possible, great battery life, in-camera features such as focus stacking, as well as the ability to withstand tough weather conditions. Often times, high ISO performance, high frame rates, deep buffers and fast autofocus systems are of little use for landscape photographers.
At the same time, other features such as in-body image stabilization (IBIS) can be quite helpful, especially when cameras are able to take advantage of sensor movements in order to track stars or to create high-resolution images using pixel shift technology. The ability to capture more dynamic range when shooting at higher ISOs, as well as the ability to focus easily in low-light conditions can also be vital for those who shoot the night sky. So if you are into astrophotography, you might need to evaluate such criteria separately when picking a particular camera or camera system.
Lastly, it is important to point out that a good camera for landscape photography requires a solid selection of high-performance lenses. A landscape photographer should be able to pick lenses based on their particular needs and their budget.
Although many photographers continue to rely on DSLR cameras that have a proven track record for landscape photography needs, some are shifting towards mirrorless systems. Both certainly have their advantages and disadvantages, and depending on your needs, you might want to evaluate each to see what works better for you.
Keep in mind that the sensor size is going to dictate the size of the overall system, its weight, as well as its overall cost. While medium format digital cameras offer the best overall image quality for landscape photographers, they are often large, heavy, and very expensive. For these and other reasons, most enthusiast and professional landscape photographers often choose full-frame DSLR and mirrorless cameras for their needs. Still, even full-frame cameras can end up being too heavy and expensive for many hobbyists, which leaves APS-C and smaller sensor systems as the best choices. In this article, we will first go over our top camera picks for landscape photography, then go over some of the budget options.
As of early 2021, there are many mirrorless cameras available from a variety of different manufacturers, including Panasonic, Olympus, Fujifilm, Hasselblad, Sony, Nikon, Canon, and Leica. Most of these cameras are capable of exceptional image quality, thanks to their high-resolution image sensors, wide dynamic range, and superb built-in features, making them all perfectly suitable for landscape photography. Let’s take a closer look at the cameras we picked from different manufacturers. The below list is sorted by our order of preference, although every camera we present is more than capable of yielding exceptional images.
Best Cameras for Landscape Photography in 2020
Fujifilm GFX 100
Our top pick is the amazing Fujifilm GFX 100, the only medium format camera that we decided to include in our top cameras for landscape photography. The Fujifilm GFX 100 is a superb choice for landscape photography for many reasons. First, it has an ultra-high resolution 102 MP sensor that produces images with stunning detail and excellent dynamic range. Second, it has a wide selection of exceptionally good lenses suitable for landscape photography, as well as all kinds of useful accessories and bellows from both Fujifilm and third-party manufacturers. Third, if you shoot hand-held, it comes with a very effective in-body image stabilization (IBIS). And lastly, Fujifilm provided plenty of in-camera tools in the GFX 100 specifically for landscape photography needs such as easy to use focus stacking, bracketing, focus peaking and on-screen histograms to assist photographers in yielding optimal exposure.
Its cheaper and lighter sibling, the GFX 50S is also an excellent camera if you are on a budget. While it might have less resolution, it is a solid tool with great ergonomics and build quality, capable of producing beautiful images.
See our detailed review of the Fujifilm GFX 100 and GFX 50S for more information about this camera.
Nikon D850
Although mirrorless cameras have been gaining quite a bit of traction lately for a number of reasons (see mirrorless vs DSLR), they still have some catching up to do with DSLRs when it comes to things like battery life and lens selection. For landscape photography needs, in particular, none of the camera manufacturers have made tilt/shift lenses yet, so one has to either use adapters with them or resort to bellows systems to be able to tilt the plane of focus. Nikon has a wide array of tilt/shift lenses available today and although they are quite expensive, they are among the many lenses available for the system, giving lots of different options for landscape photographers.
After testing out the Nikon D850, our team at PL agreed that it is the most complete DSLR on the market today. Thanks to its phenomenal 45 MP sensor with the capability to go down as low as ISO 64 and yield class-leading dynamic range performance, proven Nikon ergonomics and easy to use menu system, rich lens selection, excellent in-camera features, great weather sealing, and amazing battery life, the Nikon D850 is our top recommendation among all full-frame cameras on the market today for landscape photography needs.
For more information, see our in-depth Nikon D850 review.
Another Nikon DSLR that we highly recommend is the older D810, which is another phenomenal camera for landscape photography needs. We did not include it in this list because of the D850 that replaced it. Personally, I decided to keep shooting with my Nikon D810 even after the D850 release, because it was such a phenomenal camera. I later sold it off in favor of the Nikon Z7, which I talk about below.
Sony A7R IV
While the first few iterations of the Sony A7R suffered from a number of issues, Sony really came around and addressed most of the concerns with the release of the A7R IV. Thanks to its superb 61 MP BSI CMOS sensor, great battery life, and a rich lens selection, the Sony A7R IV is our top pick among full-frame mirrorless cameras on the market today. Sony has also done an amazing job with its lens releases, giving plenty of options from ultra-wide-angle to super-telephotos for landscape photographers. Sony’s willingness to open up the E mount and work with third-party lens manufacturers resulted in the addition of many lens options in a relatively short amount of time.
If you are on a tighter budget, its predecessor, the Sony A7R III is also an excellent choice that we can highly recommend for landscape photography needs.
Our biggest criticism of the Sony mirrorless cameras in general lies with the ergonomics and poorly organized menu system, which can make it painful for photographers to use these cameras in the field.
Canon EOS R5
Seeing Canon go from one of the least desirable to one of the top mirrorless camera options for landscape photography has been pretty incredible. While the original EOS R was a very odd camera with some quirks and issues (as detailed in our Canon EOS R review), Canon decided to address all the issues and release the ultimate Canon mirrorless camera for landscape photography needs in the shape of the EOS R5. Featuring a 45 MP sensor with a high-resolution optical low-pass filter, the EOS R5 demonstrates excellent image quality and wide dynamic range, making it a very desirable camera for landscape photography needs.
In addition to excellent ergonomics and easy to understand menu system, the Canon EOS R5 has a tough magnesium alloy construction, superb weather sealing, and dual memory card slots (1x CFexpress and 1x SD UHS-II). Despite its high-resolution sensor, the EOS R5 is able to shoot up to 12 FPS using its mechanical shutter and up to 20 FPS when using the electronic shutter. Similar to Nikon Z, the Canon RF lens options have grown tremendously since the launch of the original RF mount (although Canon focused more on professional-grade zoom and prime lenses). And for those who like to shoot video, the EOS R5 is the only consumer-grade digital camera on the market today that is capable of shooting 8K videos.
For those on a budget, Canon’s EOS R6 is another great mirrorless option for landscape photography. Although with its 20.1 MP sensor it has much less resolution compared to the EOS R5, many of its features are very similar to those of the R5. As detailed in my Canon EOS R5 vs R6 article, it has the same ergonomics/build quality, 5-axis IBIS, autofocus system, and continuous shooting speed. All this makes the EOS R6 a great general-purpose camera. So unless you are planning to make very large prints, the EOS R6 is going to be a great alternative to the EOS R5, and it will save you quite a bit of money.
Nikon Z7 / Z7 II
The Nikon Z7 and Z7 II are strong contenders in our list of best cameras for landscape photography needs thanks to their excellent overall performance. The Z7 and Z7 II mirror the Nikon D850 sensor and its ISO / dynamic range capabilities, come with very effective in-body image stabilization (IBIS), and pack everything (and more) the D850 has to offer in terms of in-camera features designed for landscape photography, all in a smaller and lighter package. While lens selection remains a challenge, Nikon was able to roll out its holy trinity in the form of the Nikon Z 14-24mm f/2.8 S, Z 24-70mm f/2.8 S, and Z 70-200mm f/2.8 S in a relatively short period of time. And for those who enjoy doing astrophotography, the new Z 20mm f/1.8 S is also an excellent budget-friendly choice. In short, Nikon’s new Z lens line-up is simply amazing when compared to its F-mount counterparts.
Although the original Z7 featured a single XQD / CFexpress memory card slot, Nikon added a UHS-II compatible SD memory card slot to the Z7 II. As explained in my Nikon Z7 vs Z7 II article, there were a few other important refinements delivered with the Z7 II, including dual EXPEED 6 processors, a much larger memory buffer and the ability to use a real battery grip with controls. Still, we do want Nikon to pay more attention to firmware updates, so we created our detailed wishlist of camera features we would like to see on Nikon Z-series cameras in the future. Even though Nikon has been able to address some of them, we hope to see more continuous improvements and innovations in these cameras.
For more information about the Nikon Z7, see our Nikon Z7 review (the Z7 II review will be published as soon as we have access to the camera). For more information about Nikon Z lenses, please see Everything You Need to Know About Nikon Z Lenses.
For those on a tighter budget, the Nikon Z6 and Z6 II are also favorable choices for landscape photography. While these cameras have 24 MP sensors with low-pass filters, as long as you are not planning to make huge prints, they are still excellent cameras for most photographers out there. You can find out more about the Z6 in our Nikon Z6 review, while a comparison between this camera and its second-generation version can be found in our Z6 vs Z6 II article.
Another option that is even cheaper than the Z6 II is the full-frame Nikon Z5 (see our Nikon Z5 review). Although it has a slightly older 24 MP CMOS sensor, its dynamic range performance, as well as all the in-camera features are still excellent for landscape photography needs.
Panasonic S1R
Panasonic’s first high-resolution full-frame mirrorless camera is full of great features, making it a very strong contender for landscape photography needs. Sporting an excellent 47.3 MP image sensor, in-body image stabilization, 9 FPS continuous shooting speed, dual memory cards (1x CFexpress / XQD and 1x SD UHS-II), pixel-shift technology and excellent dynamic range, the Panasonic S1R is one of the most feature-rich mirrorless cameras on the market today. The high-resolution pixel-shift mode is capable of delivering images up to 186.9 MP, providing amazing level of detail when shooting landscapes (although this feature does have its limitations, as detailed in our Panasonic S1R review).
Copyright Spencer Cox
Another strength of the Panasonic S1R is lens selection. With Leica, Panasonic, and Sigma being part of the “L-mount alliance”, there are plenty of great lens options available for the L-mount – from ultra-premium Leica glass to budget-friendly options from Sigma. Panasonic’s own zoom and prime lenses are also excellent and highly recommended for landscape photography needs.
Copyright Spencer Cox
The biggest drawback of the S1R is its size, weight, and price. It is as big as a high-end DSLR camera, weighs over a kilo, and retails for $3700, making it the third most expensive camera on this list after the Fuji GFX100 and the Canon EOS R5.
Pentax K-1 / K-1 II
Another well-rounded DSLR in our list is the Pentax K-1, which rightfully earns its spot, thanks to its 36 MP CMOS sensor with 5-axis IBIS that is capable of taking high-resolution images with pixel-shift technology. With pixel-shift, the Pentax K-1 is able to yield highly detailed, noise-free images up to 42 MP. While 42 MP might not sound like a lot when we have 45 and 50 MP cameras on this list, it actually yields more pixel-level details compared to other cameras. In addition, the ability to move the image sensor also allows the Pentax K-1 to capture moving stars with its “AstroTracer” feature, making the K-1 arguably the best camera on the list for astrophotography needs. The Pentax K-1 comes with a great set of in-camera features for landscape photography, including built-in GPS and Compass which automatically get written into every captured image, which can be helpful for tracking the movement and position of the camera.
Pentax replaced the original K-1 with the K-1 II in early 2018, which provides even more features such as hand-held pixel-shift mode, superior AF tracking algorithm, and other improvements to its pixel shift feature. All this makes it worthwhile to upgrade to the latest version.
Best Budget Camera for Landscape Photography
If you are not ready to spend thousands of dollars on a medium format or a full-frame system, you might want to consider a few budget-friendly options with smaller sensors that offer a bit less resolution. Many photographers who do landscape photography as a hobby might want to consider these cameras, which we have had a good experience with:
- Fujifilm X-T3 / X-T4 – Our top picks among APS-C cameras are the X-T3 and X-T4, both of which offer great image quality with a relatively small footprint.
- Nikon D7500 – Nikon’s enthusiast-grade DSLR with an APS-C sensor offers a wide dynamic range and a solid selection of Nikkor lenses
- Nikon D5600 – Another great choice for those on a lower budget is the Nikon D5600, which is capable of amazing image quality, even when coupled with kit lenses
- Canon EOS 80D – A strong 24 MP camera from Canon that can be coupled with an extensive list of Canon EF and EF-S lenses to deliver stunning results
- Canon EOS T7i – Sporting a similar 24 MP sensor as the 80D, the T7i is another great camera from Canon
- Sony A6000-series – Sony’s A6000-series cameras are all very good mirrorless options for landscape photography needs
What camera do you shoot landscapes with and why? Please let us know in the comments section below!
Photography Life is, by far, the best written, most informative, photo site on the internet. I continue to be impressed with your contributors. You can see by your comment sections that you have an audience of photographers at all levels hooked.
I have a D850 with an older, 24-70 F/2.8 G ED and 70-200 F/2.8 G VR. Also a sturdy, Gitzo, carbon fiber tripod. Image quality has been excellent. I didn’t add a true wide angle because I just couldn’t justify the expense. I have every piece of equipment I need. What I don’t have at age 70 is the willingness to lug it up and down the mountain trails in the Pacific Northwest. This kit is limited to car trips and short hikes. I added a Z6 with the 24-70 F/4 S kit lens and the 85 F/1.8 prime. I have the 20 mm F/1.8 on order. Image quality is pretty good. I lose a little detail with the 24 Mpixel Z6, but I rarely print anything more than 16 X 20 inches and the detail is more than good enough. Wish I had a way to lighten the tripod but so far I have not found anything lighter that stands up to the Columbia Gorge winds. I couldn’t convinve myself that the Z7 was worth the premium price as long as I have the D850 but in a year or two, a second generation Nikon mirrorless could be on the wish list.
The Z 7 II is already available and is the second generation of Nikon ML ;)
And the higher resolution is not only for big prints but for better details and the cropping of small parts of an image. It often happens to me that I didn’t see as much details as these high resolution sensors do. And soon there was a small animal or flower in the picture I should have seen to take a dedicated photograph of it.
I often enjoy to watch some frames more carefully for details than I was doing while in the actual process of framing and finding the best perspective, and and and… So, I could complain of not being careful enough when framing – but where to complain? Or I could enjoy all the nice little surprises I can look at afterwards with as much time as I need, not being pushed by schedules or changes of light or waiting for the wind to calm down.
Also, the Z lenses do deliver more detail than most of Nikon’s old F-lenses. Sure, the lens selection is huge and enough high quality lenses form 3rd party developers are available. But some of them are rather big and heavy (says me, the fan of Sigma Art lenses :D)
Nasim, Your list doesn’t include any of the micro four thirds cameras, which are quite useful for landscape photography. I have full frame (Sony A 7III), Crop sensor (Fuji X-T3), and micro 4/3 (Panasonic G-9), all with full complement of lenses . . . but being sorta old (78) . . . I find that the pleasure of carrying the lightweight Panasonic and Olympus lenses, makes my landscape picture taking a lot more fun and far less fatiguing.
They say that four thirds is dead, but in the meantime, four thirds cameras do take mighty good pictures – even of landscapes.
Julian, just a quick note, with the death of Olympus, and Panasonic heading towards specialized use of M43 (mostly video-centric), I am not sure I can recommend M43 to any of our readers in the future.
Those who already own M43 and love the gear will obviously continue to use it, but the future of M43 does not look good at all. That’s very sad, given how incredible some of the M43 cameras have been. I have always been a big fan of the OM-D series cameras. Too bad Olympus couldn’t survive the shrinking camera market. I hope Panasonic continues developing M43 cameras for photography.
Olympus is dead – long live Olympus.
I am with Julian, though a few decades younger. I think the death of Olympus has been exaggerated and I bought 3 new MFT lenses in the last month (incl a macro and astro lens). I have Nikon DSLR FF (D810) and APS-C (D500) systems – I love them – but it is the MFT system I pick up for everyday use. I would use the Nikon systems when I take a long trip by car and will consider the D850 replacement rumoured to be announced this year.
Nasim, I fully agree to your reasoning. Currently no one really knows what will become with the brand Olympus and JIP also might find themselves in the situation of decreasing camera sales. If there’s no one “burning for photography” in JIP’s management, the future of Olympus or Zuiko or whatever the brand’s name will be, is unpredictable.
But of course, more photo sites refusing to support the brand with recommendations (for obvious reasons) will not help them to stay alive.
“While medium format digital cameras offer the best overall image quality for landscape photographers…”
Nothing could be further from the truth.
Medium format film cameras and large format cameras offer the best overall image quality for landscape photographers.
I shoot with a Nikon D800E plus a Nikon D850. Why I still shoot with the D800E is because I bought it when it was fairly new (on the market) and it hasn’t degraded since then, if you get my point. Meaning that it isn’t a worse camera now, compare to as how it was when it came out on the market in the first place.
I bought my Nikon D850 only a few moth’s ago and the reason for this is because I want to have an back-up camera and also because I wanted an upgrade to my D800E.
However, I think that these two camerabodies is going to follow me until either they stop function or I do, because I came to the conclution that the limitations in my photography skills is not to be found in my equipment but elsewhere, if you know what I mean 😉.
You have some really lovely landscapes here, Nasim! Well shot and nicely postprocessed.
I would just like to suggest as an alternative for people who like landscapes but maybe aren’t ready to go Z7 level, but still want mirrorless full-frame, that the Nikon Z5 is a very nice and capable camera. Pair it with some Z glass and it would also be a very nice and more affordable landscape tool.
Thank you Jason! I forgot about the Nikon Z5 – it is an excellent camera for landscapes indeed. Will update the article to include the Z5, thanks for the reminder!
And if you do, be sure to also include the Panasonic S5.
I have a used D610 with used 24-85 and 70-200/f4 and a new 18-35. The great thing about the combination of advancing tech and other people’s GAS is that there are great choices in the used market. I don’t think you need the latest or costliest gear to take landscapes at 100 ISO on a tripod and print to A2. Wildlife is however a different matter – then a D6 and 400/f2.8 (with 1.4 TC as necessary) is to be envied.
What would be nice is a landscape camera with 16:9 format. I do waste a lot of pixels cropping to that.
This sital always produce quality. Thanks.
The Fuji systems are really class and their commitment to continue to support previous generation cameras and lenses shows their commitment to the brand and customers. I would love the GFX50R as the 100 is just to much $$. Currently my XT4’s serve as all in one bodies. From Landscape to Wildlife to the odd small function shoot and go and do anything with it cameras. Since changing from a big DSLR system with long and heavy lenses, I have enjoyed photography again as an everyday event. Mostly so, with Landscapes. Reminds me of my days with my first own bought MInolta XG1 film camera is 1980. Slow down, enjoy the process as much as the pictures..
Now Laowa has a new Tilt lens for Nikon Z mount: 15mm f/4.5 Zero-D Shift
Nasim, is there a reason why the team of two only tested digital cameras? Why did you not include film cameras (35 mm, medium format, large format), which are also widely used in landscape photography?
Martin, I don’t think there are many 35mm film shooters doing landscapes anymore. As for medium and large format film, there are so many choices out there that it would be impractical to do a comparison between them…
Wow… I can’t believe I am actually reading this.
There aren’t many 35mm shooters doing landscapes?
“So many choices”, as if there aren’t so many choices among digital cameras to make it practical to do a comparison between them?
Honestly, this is embarrassing, Nasim.
Martin, I have shot landscapes for many years now and not once did I come across someone who was doing landscapes with 35mm film. Those who shoot landscapes with 35mm film probably do it for fun, because digital has practically fully taken over – it makes much more sense to shoot 35mm digital than 35mm film nowadays. This is why I wouldn’t even bother with 35mm film, as aside from a couple of people here and there, there would be no audience for such material.
As for medium and large format film, the choices are far larger compared to digital. With digital, I only need to worry about the most current generation of cameras from a handful of manufacturers, whereas film cameras date back so many years – any of them are still great. Throw different format sizes on top of that and we are dealing with a practically unlimited choice of film backs and view cameras. 120, 4×5, 5×7, 6×7, 8×10 and everything in between. If I were to only pick cameras that are available to buy brand new today, then the choice is too small and highly dependent where you buy from.
Lastly, how would I be able to compare and rank film cameras? The point I am trying to make is, there is no practical way to compare film cameras. And nobody, including Photography Life is willing to put out the time and resources to do such assessments. Even the most popular sites and magazines with much bigger budgets would not want to do something like this, because they know that the amount of time they spent doing such an assessment would not justify the end result. I know this might be disappointing to hear, but that’s the reality.
Hey Nasim, you should do your homework! You would need a 200MP digital camera to equal what 35mm film can produce, and that is just the pixle’s. If we start talking resolution, and sharpness, your going to need a 100 years for digital to catch up with film. FILM is still King.
I shoot landscapes with 35mm film all the time, and I doubt any of your digital pic’s compare. They don’t even make scanners that can can scan film at what its capable of, which is why you make prints from negatives, and not from the digital scan of your prints.
People mostly shoot digital because they don’t have the knowledge to shoot film, which you have proven nicely lol.
He said “FILM” shooters… I think you missed that very important distinction.
My bad Martin, I did not read all the way back up to your original point. Just what you posted just above this comment…. I see now YOU were speaking about film shooters.
Looks like your believing the advertisers, and marketers and, believe digital is better than film, so you will keep buying what’s newest. Hate to break it to you, but no digital format compares to film. Do your homework, and research it from us pro’s and, you will see I am right.