Photography Life

PL provides various digital photography news, reviews, articles, tips, tutorials and guides to photographers of all levels

  • Reviews
  • Learn
  • About Us
  • Forum
  • Search
Home → Cameras and Lenses

So, Your Autofocus Isn’t Good Enough for Wildlife Photography?

By Spencer Cox 103 Comments
Published On December 19, 2022

Partly as an experiment – and partly because I no longer have a copy of the Nikon Z9 – I recently took a lot of wildlife photos with my trusty Nikon Z7 for our upcoming Nikon Z 800mm f/6.3 review. The Z7 isn’t widely known as a camera for fast wildlife photography, and that’s an understatement.

In particular, the Nikon Z7’s autofocus system has major limitations with subject recognition and tracking. Even though the camera’s AF speed and accuracy are actually impressive, the Z7 is pretty bad for following fast-moving subjects.

Or is it? Well, yes. Put the Z7 next to the Z9 (or next to a Canon EOS R5 or Sony A1) and it won’t be a pleasant comparison. Even against a lot of cheaper options, the Z7’s autofocus will usually be the weaker one. I’m not trying to say otherwise with this article.

But “bad” is relative. I finished my recent wildlife photography trip with some newfound respect for what the Z7’s autofocus system can do, even for fast subjects like birds in flight. Once I got the focusing system dialed in (basically just using Wide Area Large and AF-C) sharp photos were the norm.

Sharp Sandhill Crane Nikon Z7 800mm f6.3 VR S PF
NIKON Z 7 + NIKKOR Z 800mm f/6.3 VR S @ 800mm, ISO 2800, 1/3200, f/6.3
Sharp Crop of Sandhill Crane
Crop of the prior photo

You might think that I’m a few years late with this news; we already reviewed the Z7 ages ago. But I’m not writing this article about the Z7 specifically. Instead, I have a more general observation today: Your camera is capable of better autofocus than you think.

In other words, if the Nikon Z7 can focus on birds in flight, so can almost any camera. Newer and better focusing systems will always exist, but that’s no reason to feel disheartened by the gear you already have. If you work with your AF system rather than writing it off, you might be shocked at its capabilities.

Here’s one example that shocked me, with a small, fast subject against a chaotic background at ISO 9,000:

Snow Goose in front of Distant Tree Nikon Z 800mm f6.3 VR S Lens
NIKON Z 7 + NIKKOR Z 800mm f/6.3 VR S @ 800mm, ISO 9000, 1/3200, f/6.3
Snow Goose Sharp Crop
Crop of the prior image

Another example, this time in an environment with hardly any light (note the ISO of 25,600 and the 1/125 shutter speed):

Low Light Coyote Photo Nikon Z 800mm f6.3
NIKON Z 7 + NIKKOR Z 800mm f/6.3 VR S @ 800mm, ISO 25,600, 1/125, f/6.3

Crop of Coyote Photo Low Light

All of these photos are with an f/6.3 lens. I’m not feeding the AF system a lot of light here. (Hence the noise in these 100% crops – which haven’t gone through any special sharpening or noise reduction software.) Doesn’t seem to matter.

Sandhill Crane Flying Quickly
NIKON Z 7 + NIKKOR Z 800mm f/6.3 VR S @ 800mm, ISO 4000, 1/3200, f/6.3

Crop of Fast Sandhill Crane

What about a bird flying directly toward me at high speed? Not a problem.

Bird Flying Toward Me Autofocus
NIKON Z 7 + NIKKOR Z 800mm f/6.3 VR S @ 800mm, ISO 100, 1/3200, f/6.3

Bird Flying Toward Me Crop

Here’s a case with some tiny, distant subjects (and a lot of stuff in the background for the AF system to lock onto):

Tiny Distant Subjects Sharp Autofocus Wildlife
NIKON Z 7 + NIKKOR Z 800mm f/6.3 VR S @ 800mm, ISO 900, 1/2500, f/11.0
Tiny Distant Subjects Sharp Autofocus Wildlife Crop
Extreme crop of the prior image

And probably the biggest challenge of all, when something in the foreground was blocking the subject. The Z7’s lowly autofocus system still tracked the bird with no problem.

Snow Goose Behind Out of Focus Plant
NIKON Z 7 + NIKKOR Z 800mm f/6.3 VR S @ 800mm, ISO 280, 1/3200, f/6.3

Snow Goose With Out Of Focus Foreground Crop

Thinking back on it, I could say something very similar about the focus system of entry-level DSLRs like Nikon’s cheapest D3400 or D3500. No, they don’t have high-end autofocus. Compared to something like a Nikon D500, it’s nowhere close to a fair fight. But if you master the AF system and understand its limits, you can still get sharp photos of almost any subject.

Focusing with the D3400
NIKON D3400 + 70-300mm f/4.5-6.3 @ 300mm, ISO 1000, 1/1000, f/6.3
Focusing-with-the-D3400-Crop-brightened
(Cropped and brightened a bit)

There are faster birds than the one in the photo above, but this still a bird in flight taken with the Nikon D3400… a camera with 11 autofocus points, one cross-type. It’s only state-of-the-art if you live in the 1990s. Yet the duck’s head is properly focused.

I didn’t do anything special to get the sharp photos you’re seeing in this article. I’m sure that experienced wildlife photographers would have managed a higher keeper rate than I did. But with over a 50% sharpness rate (depending on how extreme I crop it), I can hardly complain.

This isn’t my way of saying that the Nikon Z7 is secretly amazing for wildlife photography. It’s not; most cameras today would have done a better job. But that’s the point. Even though the the Z7 is famously near the bottom of the AF heap, it was still viable for a week of fast-paced wildlife photography.

If that’s all there is to “bad autofocus” in a modern camera, it’s a good time to be a photographer. Whatever gear you have, don’t feel limited by its performance – just go out and shoot! Something better will always exist, but that doesn’t make your current camera any less capable. A bit of effort and practice should be enough for it to shine.

Three Cranes Nikon Z7 and 800mm f6.3 Lens
NIKON Z 7 + NIKKOR Z 800mm f/6.3 VR S @ 800mm, ISO 1800, 1/3200, f/6.3

Related Articles

  • Spencer-Cox-2016-197-06-02-_SKY0803
    Wildlife Photography Without a Supertelephoto
  • Gentoo Penguin
    Wildlife Photography as a Career
  • Nikon D6_Z7II_Z9
    The Best Nikon Cameras for Wildlife Photography (2023)
  • Francolin
    Wide Angle Wildlife Photography
  • Photo 3
    Reflections On Wildlife Photography
  • Allen's Hummingbird
    Best Focal Length to Get Into Wildlife Photography
Disclosures, Terms and Conditions and Support Options
Filed Under: Cameras and Lenses Tagged With: Autofocus, Autofocus Issues, Bird Photography, Birds in Flight, Wildlife Photography

About Spencer Cox

I'm Spencer Cox, a macro and landscape photographer based in Denver. My photos have been displayed in galleries worldwide, including the Smithsonian Museum of Natural History and exhibitions in London, Malta, Siena, and Beijing. These days I'm active on Instagram and YouTube.

guest

guest

103 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Toni Vidas
Toni Vidas
January 17, 2023 2:58 am

Sometimes when photographing a seagull for example you have too much sky and you can switch to APS-C format to put only the bird in scene! My question is what is better: to shoot directly in APS-C format with 19.5 MP or to crop later in Photoshop to 19.5 MP?

0
Reply
Conchscooter
Conchscooter
December 30, 2022 9:06 am

Thank you for this. It’s my long held belief and to have someone of your caliber state it so unequivocally helps. Now I can continue struggling with composition!

0
Reply
Spencer Cox
Spencer Cox
Author
Reply to  Conchscooter
December 31, 2022 11:51 pm

Struggling with composition is the best part of being a photographer! I hope you keep it up in ’23.

0
Reply
Georgina
Georgina
December 28, 2022 4:17 pm

Great article. We are pretty danged lucky these days whatever modern gear we use. I have an old photographer friend who was photographing birds in the 1950s with a maximum 180mm lens, manual focus, manual wind on, max 30 something shots to a roll and a car battery powered flash!

3
Reply
Spencer Cox
Spencer Cox
Author
Reply to  Georgina
December 29, 2022 11:37 pm

No kidding! That’s quite a setup. It really puts into perspective how much improvement there’s been since then.

0
Reply
Fred
Fred
December 24, 2022 2:29 am

Thank you for your article Spencer. I bought a Z7ii last year, and I sold my other Sony and Nikon bodies. My wildlife experience with my Z7ii is far better than with the D750 or Alpha 77ii that I used for years. I never had a D500, D850, Z9, R5 etc. and I know that their AF system are top notch, but I know that Z6/Z7 AF system are very good. I heard or read so bad reviews and user feedbacks concerning Z bodies AF, that I bought my Z7ii with the fear of losing my money. Finally, I succeed into the photos I want to take. Hit ratio of 80% I think. No issue for flying birds, even kingfishers or bee-eaters, I mean no issue with the equipment, of course it depends on the situation and environment parameters.
Maybe those who struggle with their Z7 don’t know yet all advantages and drawbacks of their ML body, or they have another body like D850 and have some habits they expected to find in the Z. The conclusion is that everyone has to find the equipment that fits his/her needs and way of working, and perform with it, while keeping the pleasure of photography. I have it every day using my Z7ii.

5
Reply
Spencer Cox
Spencer Cox
Author
Reply to  Fred
December 26, 2022 1:15 pm

Fred, that’s great. I would need more practice before those hit rates are within range for me, but it shows that it’s possible. You do need different habits with the Z7 / Z7 II compared to the typical DSLR.

0
Reply
Till
Till
December 23, 2022 8:54 am

Great article Spencer!

I´ve been shooting kitesurfers with a Nikon D5100 years ago and today with a Nikon Z6 with a Tamron 70-200 f2.8 – yes there are more powerful options these days (Would love to have the Nikon Z 70-200 2.8). But it is as you say – as you know what to do you can get a bunch of crispy sharp pictures. The only thing I hate is the slideshow in the viewfinder of the Z6.

I think the last time I shot with the Z6 kitesurfers I had a hitrate around 75% which I found pretty impressive!

-2
Reply
Spencer Cox
Spencer Cox
Author
Reply to  Till
December 23, 2022 12:00 pm

That’s awesome! Sounds like you’ve practiced a lot to get to that 75% hit rate. Results like that are hardly impossible, even though it requires some effort.

0
Reply
Till
Till
Reply to  Spencer Cox
December 26, 2022 2:09 am

Honestly I thought I had much less hits. Thanks to the slideshow in the viewfinder. But it is good to know, that the Z6 still does its work even though you can’t see it!

It’s been a pleasant surprise when I looked through the footage on my computer!

Well I just tried out every single autofocus option 😂

I ended in the same you used: wide large and af-c

0
Reply
Bil
Bil
December 23, 2022 6:44 am

I have a D500 for wildlife, and Z6 for “other stuff”. What I have noticed is when I do take the Z6 outside for birds, the “wide area” works about as well as the “group focus” on the D500; meaning it focuses on the closest thing to you, in the “box”.

And the D500 is the premier wildlife DSLR.

Also, there is a hobby paradox that I consider: The more I do something, the more challenging it needs to be to keep me interested. So what sense does it make for me to upgrade to the newer better autofocusing systems, if doing photography just becomes easier? I will lose interest (unless as others may experience, the bar gets higher and we find other ways to challenge ourselves.)

1
Reply
Spencer Cox
Spencer Cox
Author
Reply to  Bil
December 23, 2022 11:59 am

That is a really interesting paradox you mention. It’s very true that the purpose of photography isn’t just to create pretty images, or else we could all sit at home and plug words into an AI processor. The challenge is an important part.

But like you mentioned in a different comment, good equipment can just reveal more subtle challenges at play, even as it makes other tasks easier. Sometimes, I would rather my camera gets out of the way so I can focus on the challenge of composition. Other times, I want the whole process to be a difficult but contemplative endeavor, and that’s when I bring out my large format film gear :)

1
Reply
David Powell
David Powell
December 22, 2022 6:42 pm

I’d like to take better pictures, but I feel that “better” subjects would do more for me than better kit, so next years pocket money will be going on travel. In the circumstances it’s very gratifying to read the views you express here – it does help with the chronic GAS…
It was a great idea to include an example using entry level kit, something that is overlooked far too often.
And I really liked your closing shot of the cranes. Well spotted Sir!

3
Reply
Spencer Cox
Spencer Cox
Author
Reply to  David Powell
December 23, 2022 11:54 am

Thank you, David! And I’m glad you liked that photo. You’re absolutely right that travel and experiences are more important than gear almost all the time.

0
Reply
Ron Sundar
Ron Sundar
December 22, 2022 2:13 pm

Will the Z7 II perform better than the Z7?

0
Reply
Bil
Bil
Reply to  Ron Sundar
December 23, 2022 6:47 am

From my research, no. Both the 6ii and the 7ii still have the “slower” processor even though there are two. To get the tracking performance of the Z9 and/or Canon R5, a faster processor is needed. An extra processor does help in other areas such as low light focusing, buffer speed, etc

0
Reply
Spencer Cox
Spencer Cox
Author
Reply to  Ron Sundar
December 23, 2022 11:54 am

AF tracking performance is somewhat better on the Z7 II compared to the prior generation, in my experience. Not by a drastic amount, though.

0
Reply
Jeff
Jeff
December 22, 2022 11:30 am

Good write up photography has become so simple and post production you can save pictures that shouldn’t be. A person would go broke trying to keep up with the yearly upgrades. Use what you got and make it work. People should shoot old manual cameras using 50 asa to get a sharp image. Being married to a tripod. Great photos taken that way is a whole different level then today

1
Reply
Spencer Cox
Spencer Cox
Author
Reply to  Jeff
December 23, 2022 11:52 am

I agree with you there!

0
Reply
Alvaro
Alvaro
Reply to  Jeff
January 5, 2023 8:52 am

I feel so spoiled learning photography through five years of film cameras and then buying an entry-level modern full frame camera. The possibilities are endless! And I’m so glad I learned proper technique before, now I can make the most out of them.

0
Reply
Gerben
Gerben
December 22, 2022 5:58 am

What is your opinion of a Z50 with a Nikon 70-200 2,8 AF-S type ll (which will be 100-300 on the Z50) for indoor sports and outdoor wildlife? I’m looking for an easy/cheap way out for volleyball and birds…..

0
Reply
Spencer Cox
Spencer Cox
Author
Reply to  Gerben
December 23, 2022 11:51 am

I would pick the D500 DSLR instead of the Z50, which will be a better focuser overall. If you buy used, it will be pretty cheap.

1
Reply

Learn

  • Beginner Photography
  • Landscape Photography
  • Wildlife Photography
  • Portraiture
  • Post-Processing
  • Advanced Tutorials

Reviews

  • Camera Reviews
  • Lens Reviews
  • Other Gear Reviews
  • Best Cameras and Lenses

Photography Tutorials

Photography Basics
Landscape Photography
Wildlife Photography
Macro Photography
Composition & Creativity
Black & White Photography
Night Sky Photography
Portrait Photography
Street Photography
Photography Videos

Unique Gift Ideas

Best Gifts for Photographers

Subscribe via Email

If you like our content, you can subscribe to our newsletter to receive weekly email updates using the link below:

Subscribe to our newsletter

Site Menu

  • About Us
  • Beginner Photography
  • Lens Database
  • Lens Index
  • Photo Spots
  • Search
  • Forum

Reviews

  • Reviews Archive
  • Camera Reviews
  • Lens Reviews
  • Other Gear Reviews

More

  • Contact Us
  • Subscribe
  • Workshops
  • Support Us
  • Submit Content

Copyright © 2023 · Photography Life

You are going to send email to

Move Comment