It seems that once you’ve bought into a camera mount, you’re stuck there unless you switch systems. But, in the dark realm of photography, there’s a way to cross the mysterious border between lens mounts. That’s adapting lenses – in other words, taking a lens from one system and mounting it to another.
Table of Contents
Adapting Lenses: What Is It?
Normally, you can’t simply slap the same lens onto different systems. Even if the lens physically mounts onto the other system (which is rare – as in the case of a Nikon F lens on a Pentax K camera), it will be about as functional as a rock. Each mount has its own physical specifications and electronic communications protocols that can be as different as English and Hindi.
But, like language translation, it’s sometimes possible to bridge these barriers. Physical adapters can allow the lens of one system to be mounted on the camera of another – not always (or even usually) with full features, but possible nonetheless.
Namely, there is a possibility of adapting a lens as long as the flange distance is short enough on the receiving camera (shorter than on the lens’s original system). This is why you can adapt most DSLR lenses to most mirrorless systems, but generally not the other way around.
Historically, many adapters have been created. There are Canon EF to Nikon Z adapters, Pentax K to Micro Four Thirds adapters, and others. DSLR shooters sometimes use Nikon glass on Canon cameras (though not the other way around), while mirrorless shooters sometimes use Sony E glass on Nikon Z cameras (though again, the other way around is impossible).
Many adapters are purely mechanical. They allow the lens to physically attach to the new system, but that’s where the relationship ends. They don’t transfer any electronic signals to and from the lens. On the other side of the spectrum, some adapters allow full communication. With those, features including autofocus, automatic aperture, EXIF data, and lens vibration reduction can be used. Using these adapters feels a lot like using a native lens.
Why Would You Adapt?
The best reason to adapt lenses is for fun. It allows you to try far more lenses than would normally be possible on your camera system, including classic lenses from older times for a different look. And adapting lenses slightly goes against the intended use of the product, so it has the feeling of rebellion! Getting a good photo with an adapted lens – especially a lens that doesn’t have any native alternatives – makes you feel a real sense of accomplishment.
One lens I’ve had fun adapting is the Tamron 500mm f/8 55BB lens. It’s a mirror lens introduced in the 1980s, and it’s incredibly small for a 500mm lens. It has a unique character and can produce imagery that is markedly different than a modern lens – not to mention that it’s as small as some modern 50mm lenses and costs only $200! Although it’s manual focus only, I enjoy using it for these unique qualities that don’t exist in any of Panasonic’s native lenses.
If you shoot with a mirrorless system, you can give new life to older, manual-focus lenses originally made for SLRs and DSLRs. Manual focusing is very easy on mirrorless cameras, even handheld, thanks to features like focus peaking and magnification directly in the viewfinder. Many mirrorless cameras also have in-body image stabilization, allowing you to shoot in low light conditions with these lenses more easily. Frankly, old lenses with an adapter can be even more practical today than when they were first made!
Adapting also makes trying new types of photography a little cheaper. Older lenses may not be as fancy as the newer, computer-designed lenses, but they cost much less than the modern stuff. So if you want to try a new focal length but you’re not sure you’ll like it, you might like to pick up a cheap manual-focus lens in that focal length without first committing to a modern lens.
There are other reasons to adapt, too. Both Nikon and Canon have created official adapters for adapting their DSLR lenses to their mirrorless systems that work with many (though not all) of their DSLR lenses. Thus, if you’re switching to mirrorless, you don’t have to get rid of your DSLR lenses if you like them. This can also lead to some great values if you’re on a budget, like what Libor described in his article on buying used Nikon DSLR lenses, especially supertelephotos.
Finally, some camera systems may not have exactly the lenses you need, so adapting may be the only way to get the features you need on your current system. For example, I used to use a Tamron 150-600mm G2 lens on my Micro Four Thirds Panasonic G9 camera. At the time, no other lens had a 600mm native focal length for Micro Four Thirds, and I found this combination great for video.
Why Should You NOT Adapt?
Sadly, adapting lenses can also be a disappointment. For one thing, adapting does not always work as well as using a native lens. Autofocus in particular is often buggy with adapted lenses, even with the more expensive and advanced autofocus adapters. Other features like in-body image stabilization tend to work better with native lenses (you might get 5 stops of stabilization rather than 3 or 4, for example). And there is more room for odd errors like the aperture not stopping down properly, or EXIF data being recorded incorrectly.
For example, I once tried adapting the Nikon 50mm f/1.8G to my Panasonic G9 using the Viltrox adapter for Micro Four Thirds. It does work decently, but not nearly as well as it works on the Nikon Z6 or Nikon D500. Namely, the focusing was a lot more finicky, not always locking exactly onto my subject even though the camera said it was in focus.
You have to remember that adapters are kludges designed by third parties. They can open up a lot of opportunities for lenses that you never would have used otherwise. But they don’t promise perfect functionality even in the best case.
One exception to this rule is the first-party adapters that Canon and Nikon developed, allowing you to use their DSLR lenses on their mirrorless systems. With these adapters, autofocus and most other functions work exactly as intended. But they’re the exception to the rule. In general, I find that adapting lenses gives you the best value when the lens in question is already manual focus only.
What about image quality? This is a common question that people have when adapting lenses. The fact is, lenses are designed for specific sensors these days. Particularly with wide-angle lenses, there can be issues with sharpness and color shifts in the far corners of the image.
Spencer found this when testing the Sony FE 14mm f/1.8 GM on the Nikon Z8, which revealed that the corners of this Sony lens are just not as sharp when shot on Nikon cameras (though the center was equally sharp). You can see that in the following crops from the same portion of the frame:
Finally, another reason to avoid adapting is that you have to deal with adapters themselves. It’s another thing to worry about, both in terms of mechanical failures and issues like weatherproofing. For example, once an adapter got stuck on my camera and I had to dismantle it to take it off!
So, adapting is not all roses. I tend to look at adapting this way: It’s worth it if there’s a specific look you want, or if you want to experiment with a cheap, older manual-focus classic. It’s also worth it if you’re trying to use Canon or Nikon DSLR lenses on their own mirrorless cameras, using the official adapter. But it’s not worth it if you want to use the latest and greatest lenses from one system on another – generally, what you gain is not worth what you lose.
Does the Adapter You Want Exist?
The remaining question is, does an adapter exist for your system? As there are hundreds, I can’t list them all, but here are some popular ones to get you started:
Type | Brand | Control | Price |
---|---|---|---|
Nikon F lens to Nikon Z camera | Nikon | Full Electronic | $249.95 at B&H |
Nikon F lens to Sony E camera | Metabones | Full Electronic | $99 at B&H |
Nikon F lens to Sony E camera | FotodioX | Manual Only | $21.7 at B&H |
Nikon F lens to Canon RF camera | Novoflex | Aperture Ring Only | $261 at B&H |
Nikon F lens to Canon EF camera | FotodioX | Manual Only | $36.6 at B&H |
Nikon F lens to Micro 4/3rds camera | Metabones | Manual Only | $99 at B&H |
Nikon F lens to Leica L camera | Metabones | Aperture Ring Only | $139 at B&H |
Canon EF lens to Micro 4/3rds camera | FotodioX | Full Electronic | $134.95 at B&H |
Canon EF lens to Canon R camera | Canon | Full Electronic | $129 at B&H |
Canon EF lens to Leica L camera | Canon | Manual Only | $59.95 at B&H |
Sony E lens to Nikon Z camera | Megadap | Full Electronic | $249.95 at B&H |
Leica L lens to Sony E camera | Vello | Manual Only | $32.50 at B&H |
Pentax K lens to Micro 4/3rds camera | FotodioX | Manual Only | $24.95 at B&H |
Pentax K lens to Sony E camera | FotodioX | Manual Only | $19.39 at B&H |
Conclusion
For most of my photography, I just use lenses made for the camera I’m using. And yet, adapting lenses is fun and sometimes can give great results. It’s not for everyone and can sometimes have problems, but when you get it to work, you can experiment with even more lenses and potentially add something new to your photography repertoire.
Adapting works especially well for older lenses onto mirrorless cameras. They often gain a new life with features like manual-focus aids in the viewfinder and in-body image stabilization. Since manual-only adapters usually are not that expensive, it might be worth a try if you have some lenses from another system lying around.
Do you adapt lenses or want to try? Any favorites? If so, let me know in the comments!
Hi.
Great article showing pros and cons of lens adapting!
While adapters for most possible combination of major lens and camera makers exist already, I want to introduce our service of making rare and special adapters.
We don’t work with glass or electronics, so can make only dumb adapters.
But we take special orders and can make adapters for rare old lenses or filters.
If you need something like this, and we don’t have at rafcamera.com yet, please feel free to contact us at [email protected]
Thank you.
Hmm, that is an interesting service! Didn’t know about you guys.
Very interesting article Jason which came at the time I tried adapting my Zuico OM lenses from the Olympus OM2 onto my Canon EOS R6 II using the K&F adapter. Very first trials with the 85mm f2 are promising and I like the colours. As you mentioned there are a lot of learnings with the challenge of shooting in full manual. Will try the 35 and 50mm soon.
Surprised that you don’t mention Fringer adapters, which are also available from B&H, as well as from Fringer directly. They allow full electronic communication and autofocus for most Nikon F and Canon EF lenses on Fujifilm cameras and are very popular with many Fujifilm wildlife photographers. They also make an adapter to use Canon EF lenses on Nikon Z bodies.
I’ll update the article shortly!
Thanks for your interesting article. Being a photographer on a budget I’ve adapted several lenses to my Sony A6000, these have included M42, Pentax PK & Canon EF. the most outrageous was a vintage Tamron 200-500 with M42 mount. Weighing in at almost 3kg I was always in fear of damaging my lens mount so finally cut up an old crutch to make a “rifle stock” to make the whole thing stable. The big plus for me was that using adapted lenses forced me into Manual operation of the camera – it was a great way to learn the mysteries of “M” mode.
Cool. The Tamron 200-500 was a beast indeed!
Great information Jason. My only experience adapting is Nikon F lenses to Canon EF DSLRs. Through the lens exposure setting using the optical viewfinder doesn’t work properly using stop down settings. With live view it usually works well. But it’s best to use a separate hand held or accessory mount light meter. Then it’s perfect. My favourite is the Samyang 14mm f2.8 mk2 in Nikon F mount. Works perfectly like a native Nikkor on my Nikon F. I use it with a chipped Fotodiox adapter on my Canon 5D 4 DSLR where it indicates focus perfectly. Exposure by light meter reading. In fact the Samyang 14 Nikon F mount works better on Canon DSLRs using a chipped adapter than the same Samyang lens designed for Canon DSLRs which is a dumb lens with no focus indicaton
Thanks, Graham! That actually makes sense. I remember that Canon versions of those third party lenses often weren’t chipped, whereas the Nikon ones were!
Thanks Jason, an interesting topic which induces a lot of thinking about sensor technology!
Thank you for your encouragement, Massimo!
It takes me back to the M42 mount, then Tamron’s T‑mount and Adaptall (1973).
The 55BB lens is actually an adaptall lens! Actually, I used TWO adapters for it: Adaptall to Pentax K, which is the “required” adapter and the Pentax-K to micro four thirds adapter. And of course M42 is a very popular one also.
Thank you for this review. As, we don’t have any 28mm f/1,4-1,8 and 105mm f/1,4-1,8 in the Nikon Z lineup, I adapt a Sony 28mm f/2 with the Megadap EtZ and the Canon 100mm f/2 with a Fringer adapter to my Z system. Everything works well. Ps: i like the size/weight of f/2 lenses.
Another fun avenue is playing with FotodioX’s TLT Rokr adapters. I have just started using one that enable Nikon F to Nikon Z but which adds moderate shift and tilt capacities. Yes you are limited to manual usage and no EXIF. And full shift hits the boundaries of the len’s image circle. Even so I am using wide Zeiss glass in ways not possible before.
That is true! Tilt-shift adapters are very cool.
I shoot a Nikon Z5 and fell in love with the rendering of the older Nikon lenses, specifically the Nikkor-O 35mm f/2 and the Nikkor-P 105mm f/2.5. There’s just something a little more magical about that less-than-perfect, made-for-film look.
I use an adapter and the 105 especially, has become an integral part of my most used kit!
I have and enjoy the AI versions of those lenses on a Nikon Zf. They make a great pair.