Now no one’s ever going to accuse me of being a motorhead any more than they could accuse me of being a gearhead. Cars don’t provoke a tachycardic enthusiasm from me in the same way as other subjects do. But there happened to be a car show at a summer festival nearby yesterday so I ambled along with my camera to see the display. I was certainly tempted by the beautiful lines, form and colour of classic car anatomy.
Perhaps in keeping with my relative ambivalence I only took one lens with me, mounted to my E-M5 (no bag or accessories or even a lens cap; just the camera and lens). The Panasonic 20mm F/1.7 pancake is not the best or worst lens on the planet but it does allow for a light and compact set-up to walk around with (in contrast to the few visitors sweating profusely with their DSLRs and backpacks in the humid afternoon heat!). It also focuses pretty close and quickly.
Having one prime lens, of course, also forces one to think more about compositional options. The 40mm equivalent field of view did make some of my framing choices a little tight, as you can see here, but it also helped me exclude unwanted elements, such as the hordes of people wandering around. It was not easy to isolate a car from the one next to it but with a tighter field of view the cars could fill the frame and bring the viewer closer to them.
No one will accuse me of finding particularly original compositions either but I did try looking for more interesting angles and spaces to shoot from. Sometimes it’s enough to just focus on the details and features rather than the entire vehicle, and such features were often more interesting to me than the car as a whole.
Forgetting to bring my polarising filter led to some vigorous head-banging against a few bonnets but once I regained consciousness I realised that the reflections in the windows and metal panels actually gave me some appealing results.
A polariser would certainly have helped me see into the interiors through the windows but all that would have given me were images of the interior. Luckily on some cars the windows had been rolled down.
And speaking of reflections, it’s always an easier way of taking a selfie :)
Cars mean engines and mechanics, of course, and there was ample opportunity to capture the internal organs, albeit while suffering the deafening roar of their revving.
All of these images were shot using the flip-out LCD to frame and the touchscreen to lock the AF point and shoot. I shot in Aperture Priority at a variety of apertures and between ISOs of 100 and 200. The camera chose the shutter speed, of course. As many of these were classic and muscle cars I processed the images in Lightroom to emphasise the shape and form of their anatomies, pushing the contrast, black and white points, and clarity sliders to deepen the blacks and accentuate the lines. I’m sure someone will someday write an article about tailoring one’s post-processing to the subject but alas it won’t be me. I just did what I felt worked for these images.
For certain shots, I found that black and white was appropriate to the subject, either because it was an older car or because it enhanced the classic appearance. Or simply because colour added nothing to the overall image.
Anyway, I hope you enjoyed at least some of these. T’is the season for summer fetes and festivals so do get out and have a look. There will always be something to shoot and make a study out of. Try to pack light, perhaps using just one small lens or a compact camera so that you don’t become consumed by the image making endeavour and actually enjoy the experience of whatever it is that you are shooting. It will also allow you to hold an ice-cream in your other hand. That’s obviously way more important than the photography.
More images from this car show can be seen here.
Regards,
Sharif.
Nice shots, technically perfect, but I don’t like the colour rendering, like they were old postcards, or a spin off from Instagram.
Thank you again for this lovely gallery!
Every time I see your work, I’m tempted to change my DSLR for a MILC. I currently own a D7100 and my new target is a Fuji XT-2 (I love Fuji lenses…they have built some lenses that no one else has, Eg. 16 f/1.4, 56 f/1.2). I always have concerns about MILC’s AF….but lately MILC are getting better and better regarding AF, especially continuous AF. What are your thoughts about the olympus? Are you satisfied?
Regards
Tomas
Hi Tomas, I’m pleased you liked the pics :)
I think your concerns are very valid as MILC AF speeds are not up to that of DSLRs yet, although they are getting better. Many mirrorless cameras, including my Olympus, still use contrast detect AF rather than phase detection, so while they are great for still subjects, they can struggle with moving objects. This has never been a terrible handicap for me personally as I have always worked around it but I would love to have full PDAF in my camera. I think Sony and Fuji MILCs already use PDAF so they are probably a better choice for sports and movement. Other than that I am still very satisfied with my 4 year old Olympus technology, which I will happily be taking with me on my next trip to Eastern Europe tomorrow :)
Warm Regards,
Sharif.
Sharif, thank you for the feedback!
As you say, MILC AF is quite good for still subjects and I’m realizing that 95% of my shots were taken using AF-S. For my shooting style might be interesting to leap forward and grab one of those :D
Good luck on your trip!
Kind regards,
Tomas
Hey, you should desaturate the background in the corvette shot. That would make the black car all but disappear.
Hello Henrik, thank you for stopping by and for your suggestion. I’m not sure that desaturating the background would actually make that car less apparent, just less colourful. But I take a look at it.
Sorry for the late reply. Enjoying a momentous day here in the UK :)
Some great pictures, I love some of the angles you’ve taken, and the way you focused on certain features such as a cushion, steering wheel, and reflections. My favourite is your first picture of the blue car and how the rest is black and white. I go to lots of fetes taking pictures of cars but have ran out of ideas, I hope you don’t mind me stealing some of your ideas. I don’t know how you take pictures so low to the ground and still compose the picture well.
Simon.
Thank you Simon, I appreciate that. Feel free to steal ideas, that’s how we learn! :)
I composed all of these using the flip-out LCD screen on the camera, so it was easy for me to crouch/kneel low while holding the camera even lower towards the ground, using the screen as a frame to compose and then hitting the touchscreen with a finger to focus on a spot and take the photo. I find that most of my composing and shooting is done this way with the LCD screen rather than using a traditional viewfinder as it allows much more variety and flexibility in one’s compositions.
Cheers :)
Oh, for the want of a polarizing filter! Flare…nice self portraits…group photos contained in the reflectance. Whereas, I couldn’t find Waldoo…I found AW all too often. I did appreciate the 100% reflected image 12b. A discussion/tutorial on how to minimize the unwanted when shooting shiny reflective subjects outdoors would benefit most…if not all. I’m sorry for my negative perspective…but I know you’re a better photographer than by what is represented here.
Nah….I’m really not :) And if for no other reason than I like these images, hence their presentation here. I am sorry you didn’t enjoy them but you’re entitled to your view and I respect that – no apology necessary at all :)
As stated in the text, I found the shiny reflections rather appealing and that the flare added a coruscating vibrance to the metallic sheen. And having left my teleportation powers at home that day there was little I could do to magic all the other folks away :)
I have written before about the virtues of showing other people at a location and I was more than happy to capture the reflections of a few here, even if I was in them myself (probably because I was the one taking the photo?).
Thus the tutorial you seek will have to emanate from the wisdom of someone else :)
Thank you very much for stopping by :)
wonderful work and subject material. I like the suggestion of simplicity, i.e. one camera and one lens. Amazing pictures w/o Polarizing filter. I think the affect is more charming when there is natural light reflection.
I wonder how these same pictures will look w/o too much post processing in JPEG format?
Thank you very much urodoc!
In answer to your question, not as good (at least not to me!) without the processing accentuating their form (which was my intention). I wanted the vehicles to look as vvid and as muscular as possible and I think the original RAW files belied their full potential :)
Cheers :)
Thanks for this article. These shows are usually annual events so, for future reference, could you say where this was located please?
I think the name of the place was Oak Hill in London. I was just passing through the area when I saw the poster and decided to stop by so I’m not entirely sure.
Cheers.
Great shots. I also ran into a street auto show in Albany NY and had a fun time shooting. You’re right about one thing, at these shows the cars
are close together that it’s difficult getting lone shots. Enjoyed the presentation.
Thank you JoeR :)
Love the shots and the processing. As a teenager in the early 70’s that is all we dreamed of owning. I was fortunate enough to own a few before starting a family but my favorite car was a 1969 Cadillac Convertible that looked like it rolled out of the showroom.
Thanks Joe. My fave was always the corvette (not the one here, but the 70s version and also the ’83 wheel base.)
The pics look over processed to me, but if you did it on purpose than I would consider it a style!
I did it on purpose so consider it a style!
“The pics look over processed to me…”
I agree. Not my cup of tea.
Cool! Thanks for stopping by!