My wife and I just returned from a whirlwind photography tour/vacation travelling by car through some of the most intriguing parts of the United States. We were on the road for 26 days with 19 of them focused on capturing images along our route. In all we covered 10,187 kilometres (6,330 miles).
The purpose of our tour was to replicate a typical, sightseeing automotive tour that many travelers would do and enjoy, as well as do field work for some upcoming photography e-books that I’m developing. Given our very tight schedule we created images on a ‘catch as catch can’ basis.
We made no attempt to focus our photography time during the ‘magic hour’ in the mornings or late afternoons. Nor did we make any repeat visits to any of the photography locations in an attempt to wait for ideal photography conditions. Most days we were on the road by 9AM and off by 6PM.
While the weather threatened us on many days we did have some luck getting breaks when we needed them. We also escaped a torrential downpour in Sioux Falls South Dakota which caused flooding in the city the day we departed.
A week or so later a tornado touched down in a neighboring town not too far from our accommodations in Utah.
In many instances our image captures were limited to single attempts, then we moved on to the next part of our adventure. This was especially true of roadside images.
We also kept our hiking to various locations to a modest level, usually no more than a couple of kilometers in total to reach and return from any given site.
It would be impossible to provide readers with a comprehensive selection of images in one article, so this posting provides a just few highlights. You will note in the EXIF data that I shot my Nikon 1 gear at f/8 quite a bit. Given the extremely tight time frames we had at many venues I did this purposely to try to ensure sufficient depth-of-field throughout a wide range of compositions, risking some diffraction as a result.
As noted earlier, our trip was also designed to do field work for some photography-related e-books that I am currently working on and which I am planning to publish early in the new year. I’ll keep you apprised in future articles on how these e-book projects are progressing.
Our photography tour focused mainly on Utah, with some secondary emphasis on South Dakota, Colorado and Wyoming.
No matter how much planning one does, and how much time one spends on the road there will always be locations that have been missed or overlooked. Much of our photography tour focused on visiting national and state parks, as well as some other popular locations such as Mount Rushmore and the Crazy Horse Memorial. In most cases we only spent 2 to 3 hours at any given park, which took all the discipline we could muster. Most of the parks were certainly worthy of multiple day explorations, but we pressed on and followed our original plan.
I’ve added some basic location information after the EXIF data on each photograph to give you an idea of the location of each image.
I captured all of the images during our photography tour using a pair of Nikon 1 J5s and a Nikon 1 V2. I took three Nikon 1 lenses with me, including the 6.7-13mm f/3.5-5.6, 10-100mm f/4-5.6, and CX 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6. The 10-100mm f/4-5.6 was the workhorse lens of the tour.
Other than some ‘smooth water” images created at Sioux Falls South Dakota with the help of a Benro monopod and a variable neutral density filter, all of the images were taken hand held in available light. All photographs were created from RAW files using my standard process of DxO OpticsPro11, CS6 and Nik Suite. When composing images using the rear panel of my J5s I had to really concentrate on using a very light shutter motion and on controlling my breathing to try to ensure I’d get the desired captures.
I used single point AF for all of the images captured during the tour and most often used matrix metering. When faced with difficult lighting I did switch on occasion to center-weighted metering and also used spot metering a few times. As is my common practice I very rarely use any exposure compensation when shooting with Nikon 1 gear. I doubt that I took even three or four dozen images during the entire tour using any kind of exposure compensation. Surprisingly I did not create nearly as many images as I first anticipated. I haven’t done a final count yet, but I estimate that I took no more than about 4,000 images during the entire trip which is probably half of what I was expecting.
Some of this is due to the fact that I saw very few birds along our route or at the various locations at which we stopped.
I never thought that I would ever say this, let alone state it in an article here at Photography Life, but after using my J5s intensively for this tour I must admit that I now find it rather strange and awkward to use an EVF to compose landscape images. It is amazing to what we can become accustomed.
Article and images are Copyright 2016 Thomas Stirr. All rights reserved. No use, adaptation, or reproduction of any kind including electronic is allowed without written consent. Photography Life is the only approved user of this article. If you see it reproduced anywhere else it is an unauthorized and illegal use.
Hi Tom,
I am a keen follower of your work, and I will say this – you were a big reason why I bought into the Nikon 1 system A year ago, I was looking for a more compact alternative to carry with me on treks, and I finally converged on the Nikon 1 J5 after researching on the internet, and your articles and YouTube videos were a big part of convincing me that the system was viable, in spite of concerns about the small sensor size etc.
In the year since I have had the J5, I have used it a reasonable amount, and have accumulated a few observations that may be useful to the larger community. The link is at:
purpwaltz.wordpress.com/2017/…ld-report/
Hope this provides some useful info to the current and future Nikon 1 community.
Thank you once again for your stellar and inspiring work!
Mahesh
Hi Mahesh,
Thank you for your supportive comment about my work – much appreciated! I’m glad you hear that the Nikon 1 J5 is meeting your needs and that you are enjoying the camera! A small sensor system like Nikon 1 is not for everyone of course since it is not the best choice for low light work. For those of us that primarily shoot in good lighting the Nikon 1 J5 is an excellent, small camera.
Tom
Ah ..lovely pics Tom. Recently received my V2 . Am mainly using it with a Ft1 adaptor with 70-300 FX lens. Am in two minds on spending on the 70-300 CX .
Hi Sanath,
Glad you enjoyed the pics! Many folks use the Nikon 1 V2 with an FT-1 adapter and the FX 70-300 and enjoy the combination.
Tom
Thomas,
Brilliant stuff. The Mesa Verde shots, in particular, are outstanding.
I’ve been thinking of getting out more to visit and photograph the national parks. This is just the inspiration I needed.
Regards,
Talha
Thanks Talha – I’m glad you enjoyed them and provided you with a bit of inspiration!
Tom
Hi Thomas,
Excellent imaged as usual! I am sure your ebooks will be awesome for “normal” vacationers.
For better or worse, I will never be that guy. Since I was about 16, I can rarely sleep past 4:30. I am happy to go right then, then come back and get my wife / fellow travelers at a more normal hour. Just the way I am built. I like it, LOL.
Hi sceptical1…
We are all different to be sure! I am also usually an early riser. On the trip I was often working on my computer cataloguing images etc. early in the morning so I wouldn’t forget where they were taken…advancing age you know!
Thanks for the positive comment about the images…much appreciated! When we originally conceived the e-books we defined our target audience, then constructed our trip to replicate the experience that ‘normal’ vacationers have.
2017 should be a very busy year – we have a minimum of 5 e-books planned!
Tom
Great series Thomas! I too use Nikon CX, DX and FX systems and really enjoy my V2 much of the time. I too find the 6.7-13mm lens to be a great landscape lens (very sharp) and find it, as well as the 70-300CX on my camera most of the time. I wonder why you used the 10-100 so much, when you were in the same range as the 6.7-13…. convenience?
Keep your great articles coming on PL!
Cheers for now, a fellow Canadian….. David A. Hamments
Hi David,
Thanks for the positive comment and sharing your perspectives on some of your gear!
As you suggested, much of my use of the 10-100mm f/4-5.6 was convenience. I drove throughout the trip with my 10-100mm f/4-5.6 mounted to one of my J5s and positioned nose down in my coffee cup holder so I could grab it quickly. I took a number of images without even getting out of the car. Quite often I simply saw something of interest, stopped the car and grabbed the camera in my coffee cup holder, then shot from the window or jumped outside for a moment to get my shot(s)…then moved on.
This may sound a bit strange but I ‘trained’ a bit in advance of our trip in order that I could better anticipate image opportunities while driving and also shoot more effectively from the car window. During my ‘training sessions’ I determined that the 10-100 f/4-5.6 was the Nikon 1 lens best suited for this approach.
At some of the national parks where we had longer stops planned like at Bryce and Zion, I would take my camera bag with me so I could experiment a bit more with a range of focal lengths. The 10-100 f/4-5.6 was the least sharp of the three Nikon 1 lenses I took on the trip but it provided a very practical focal length range which was an acceptable trade-off to me.
Tom
Delightful series of shots, showing yet again how good the Nikon 1 system is in the right hands! Add to that the excellent weather, fantastic sceneries, unusual animals, and some to me totally unknown places!
Thanks for the positive comment Tord – I’m glad you enjoyed the images!
Tom
Hi Tom,
Truly lovely images, and given you were working under the same restrictions as ‘normal’ sight-seers, great results!
I was looking through and noticing how many were taken with the Nikon J5, and then saw you comment towards the end:
“I never thought that I would ever say this, let alone state it in an article here at Photography Life, but after using my J5s intensively for this tour I must admit that I now find it rather strange and awkward to use an EVF to compose landscape images. It is amazing to what we can become accustomed.”
I have a Nikon V1 that I use with a variety of Nikon 1 lenses, and except for the 70-300, tend to use it with the rear screen most of the time, especially when taking photos of people – it is easier to engage with them with the camera away from one’s face. So it is interesting to note your comment about landscape usage without an EVF, maybe it is easier to see the bigger picture, and see how one is picking out the details?
Hi Dave,
Thanks for the supportive comment – much appreciated!
I find that the only time that I feel the need to use one of my V2s that have an EVF is when I’m photographing birds or other subjects in motion. Even when I was at Mount Rushmore and Devil’s Tower I mounted my CX 70-300 on one of my J5s in order to capture more detail with some static images.
As far as using my J5s for landscape photography I am finding them so much easier to use in terms of changing the physical position of the camera and thus the perspective of the image. It would be the same as using a flip-screen or articulated screen on any camera I suppose but since the rear screens on my V2s are fixed I find that I much prefer using the J5s. I find that it is much quicker to do my ‘circle check’ when composing an image from the rear screen than when using an EVF.
For as much as I love my Nikon 1 V2s I pretty much now only use them for bird/action still photography, but they are still the only cameras I use for my client video work.
Tom
So many excellent images. Thanks for sharing.
Thanks Anders!
Tom
Thanks for posting these wonderful images, Tom. I especially like them because they represent the vast majority of my photographic efforts; i.e. the “on the go” travel shots taken in whatever conditions exist at the time. And because you’re shooting with the small sensor Nikon 1 system — I recently acquired a M4/3 body (Oly E-M5) and one of those “no-good” all-in-one 14-150mm zooms (28-300mm equivalent). I’ve been impressed with the images I’ve been getting, so much to the point that I’m considering ditching my Nikon DSLR and its collection of lenses and using the proceeds to buy some quality glass for the Oly body.
Thanks for the positive comment Jim – much appreciated! Our respective choices of gear are dependent on our individual needs and it would appear that your M4/3 gear is doing a great job for you! I sold all of my Nikon full frame gear about 16 months ago and I haven’t regretted that decision at all. Each of us needs to find what fits our needs best and go with it!
Tom
Hi Jim,
I shoot Olympus and Nikon. For my needs, it is very difficult to ditch Nikon (shoot some very fast moving dogs and, increasingly, horses) but I shoot with the Olympus gear most of the time. Lighter / smaller generally makes for a better experience for me. The image quality is fine – don’t let the pixel peeper crowd deter you. I highly recommend Olympus and their professional lenses are as good as it gets. You really can’t go wrong with any of them! Enjoy!
I live in Colorado, in the Denver area. I’ve travelled to and through Utah and to the parks…Arches, Canyonlands, Monument Valley, the Escalantes, Bryce, Zion. And up to Wyoming to the Tetons and Yellowstone. Always moving. A couple of weeks ago, I spent a long weekend in the Moab area and then up to the Tetons. The main take-away from that 4-day trip was that in order to get “unique” photos, I will need to spend at least 4 days in each location. The view-point pull-offs are crowded and everyone there is essentially taking the same photos. I learned that I need to spend time to hike away from the madding crowds. Also, every place is different. The color is the same everywhere in Arches and Canyonlands. I need to be aware of this and plan my photo making for times of day when the light works best for the environment. I learned that time is my enemy when on “rushed” photo drive-abouts and that to be successful and come away with more than one or two images that make me proud, I need to find a way to beat time…or accept that I can’t and spend more of it wherever I go. You seem to have done that pretty well. Thanx for sharing!
Hi Peter,
Thanks for the comment and sharing your perspectives – always appreciated!
Tom